How Trump's deportation push created 1 million MORE undocumented people
Donald Trump campaigned on launching 'the largest domestic deportation operation in American history,' promising to target the 'invasion' of 'unvetted illegal alien migrants' he claimed were stampeding across the U.S.-Mexico border.
In her first briefing, White House press secretary deemed any immigrant who was in the United States without legal permission a 'criminal.'
But the administration's own actions have turned more than 1 million immigrants who entered the country legally into the 'criminals' the White House has denounced.
The administration effectively 'de-legalized' tens of thousands of immigrants who were granted humanitarian protections to live and work in the United States, and thousands of people with pending immigration cases are being ordered to court each week only to have those cases dismissed, with federal agents waiting to arrest them on the other side of the courtroom doors.
Those reversals have radically expanded a pool of 'undocumented' people to add to Trump's deportation numbers.
'The Trump administration is actively creating a larger class of undocumented people by literally de-legalizing them and taking away their work authorization early, a cruel slap in the face to hundreds of thousands of people who followed the exact processes the U.S. government required of them,' according to Karen Tumlin, director of immigrant advocacy groups the Justice Action Center.
'Let me be very clear: this is another threat to all of us who believe in due process and the rule of law,' she said in a statement. 'This is another callous action to sow chaos and fear in communities throughout the country, and we will not stand for it.'
In February, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced the administration was ending temporary legal status — or TPS — for Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela.
Congress created the TPS program in 1990 to provide temporary immigration protections for people fleeing war, natural disasters and 'extraordinary and temporary' conditions in their home countries. Beneficiaries are allowed to apply for renewable work permits and protections against deportation.
Last month, the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to cancel TPS for roughly 350,000 Venezuelans who fled President Nicolas Maduro's regime.
In a separate ruling, the Supreme Court paved the way for the administration to revoke TPS for another 532,000 immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela.
Taken together, the rulings gave the administration permission to begin stripping legal status for nearly 900,000 people, making them vulnerable to deportation.
Advocacy group Haitian Bridge Alliance said the move is 'punishment' for following the law, and is 'tearing those lives apart, forcing families into chaos and pushing vulnerable people to self-deport,' according to director Guerline Jozef.
In filings to the Supreme Court, the Trump administration argued that continuingTPS for those nations is a national security issue that is 'straining police stations, city shelters and aid services in local communities that had reached a breaking point.'
Immigrants' advocacy groups argued the government explicitly relied on 'false, negative' stereotypes — including the president's claims that foreign prisons were emptying out jails to send criminals to the United States — to justify the end of the temporary protected status.
Noem's statements 'conflated Venezuelan [temporary protected status] holders with 'dirt bags,' gang members, and dangerous criminals,' they wrote to the Supreme Court.
A federal judge overseeing one of the challenges to the Trump's administration's move said efforts to broadly cancel protections is 'predicated on negative stereotypes casting class-wide aspersions on their character' and 'smacks of racism predicated on generalized false stereotypes.'
In a dissent, Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson warned that the court ignored the 'devastating consequences of allowing the government to precipitously upend the lives and livelihoods' of thousands of people while their legal claims are still pending.
In January, Leavitt labeled anyone arrested for living in the country without legal permission a 'criminal.'
'I know the last administration didn't see it that way, so it's a big culture shift in our nation to view someone who breaks our immigration laws as a criminal, but that's exactly what they are,' she said.
Days later, tens of thousands of immigrants who were granted legal entry into the United States through the Biden administration's CBP One app were told to leave the country.
More than 300,000 people seeking asylum in the United States abruptly had their appointments canceled, stranding them on the other side of the southern border.
In one lawsuit targeting the Trump administration's upending of the asylum process, plaintiff Maria Doe — who says she was fleeing cartel violence after testifying against police collaborators — had her appointment canceled the day of Trump's inauguration.
'Asylum is a crucial lifeline for people fleeing violence, including our clients, who are stranded in Mexico with nowhere to turn,' said Rebecca Cassler, senior litigation attorney at the American Immigration Council. 'The administration's policy to end asylum access at ports of entry is blatantly unlawful.'
Meanwhile, thousands of people who are following immigration law — including international students with visas to study in the United States and immigrants showing up for their court-ordered Immigration and Customs Enforcement check-ins, immigration court hearings and U.S. Customs and Immigration Services appointments — have become easy targets for arrests.
The administration is also restricting entry to any travelers or immigrants from more than a dozen countries, effectively shutting the door to any immigrants seeking even temporary visas.
That list of countries includes the nations previously granted TPS.
'Note the hypocrisy,' said Kelli Stump, president of the American Immigration Lawyers Association.
'The same countries this administration claims are safe enough for deportations by ending grants of temporary protected status and humanitarian parole are now deemed too dangerous for entry,' she said. 'This is part of an invisible wall against immigration that harms our nation and erodes America's core values.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
34 minutes ago
- The Hill
Netanyahu praises Trump Iran strikes: ‘Peace through strength'
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu thanked President Trump on Saturday for directing U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. 'President Trump and I often say, 'Peace through strength.' First comes strength, then comes peace. And tonight, President Trump and the United States acted with a lot of strength,' Netanyahu said in a video on the social platform X. 'President Trump, I thank you. The people of Israel thank you. The forces of civilization thank you. God bless America. God bless Israel. And may God bless our unshakable Alliance our unbreakable faith,' he continued. Trump announced on Saturday evening that the U.S. had bombed three Iranian nuclear sites and said, 'NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!' Netanyahu congratulated Trump for making the 'bold decision to target Iran's nuclear facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United States,' saying it 'will change history.' Netanyahu touted the efforts Israel has made in its strikes against Iran, adding, 'but in tonight's action against Iran's nuclear facilities, America has been truly unsurpassed.' 'It has done what no other country on Earth could do. History will record: President Trump acted to deny the world's most dangerous regime, the world's most dangerous weapons,' the Israeli leader said. 'His leadership today has created a pivot of history that can help lead the Middle East and beyond to a future of prosperity and peace,' he continued, referring to Trump. The announcement of U.S. action against Iran came two days after the White House said Trump would decide whether to get involved in the conflict between Iran and Israel 'in the next two weeks' to give a window for negotiations. White House sources indicated the U.S. had given Israel a heads up before it struck the Iranian sites and that Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke after the strikes. It marked a significant entrance by the U.S. into a conflict that Israel and Iran had been in for more than a week. It also indicated a shift by Trump, who said he was seeking a diplomatic solution with Iran and sent U.S. officials to make a deal with Tehran on its nuclear program.


Newsweek
38 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump's SNAP Benefit Cut Plans Suffer Blow
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A plan by Republicans to shift a portion of federal food stamp costs to state governments suffered a major setback after the Senate parliamentarian found it would violate chamber rules. Why It Matters The blocked provision was an attempt to reduce federal spending on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), affecting more than 40 million low-income Americans who rely on food aid. The shift would have transferred major SNAP costs to the states, requiring them to pay at least 5 percent—and potentially more—of benefit costs, which analysts warned could result in significant cuts to nutrition support. The parliamentarian's decision places additional pressure on the bill's champions to find alternative means to fund tax cuts without imperiling food assistance, Medicaid, or other federal support programs. What To Know The provision, a cornerstone of Republican efforts to offset the costs of President Donald Trump's multitrillion-dollar tax and spending legislation, has been ruled inadmissible under Senate rules, sending GOP leaders scrambling to revise the mega bill. The ruling, issued by Senate parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough, came as the package prepared for a vote. While her opinions are advisory, they are rarely ignored in lawmaking practice. Republican lawmakers are now searching for new savings as they continue to advance Trump's legislative priorities despite the setback. Activists with the Poor People's Campaign protest against spending reductions across Medicaid, food stamps and federal aid in President Donald Trump's spending and tax bill being worked on by Senate Republicans this week, outside the... Activists with the Poor People's Campaign protest against spending reductions across Medicaid, food stamps and federal aid in President Donald Trump's spending and tax bill being worked on by Senate Republicans this week, outside the Supreme Court in Washington D.C. on Monday, June 2, 2025. More J. Scott Applewhite/AP Photo Parliamentarian Ruling and Byrd Rule Compliance MacDonough declared the SNAP cost-sharing plan noncompliant with the chamber's budget reconciliation rules, specifically the Byrd Rule, which bars certain policy measures from being attached to budget bills. The proposal would have shifted billions of dollars in SNAP costs from the federal government to the states, creating a new fiscal obligation for state governments and threatening coverage for millions. House Passes Bill with GOP SNAP Cuts The House passed the broader tax and spending package along party lines in May 2025, including a provision to require states to fund at least 5 percent of SNAP benefits and more for high error rates. The House-passed measure's SNAP provision was projected to save about $128 billion. Republican leaders had hoped these savings would help offset the bill's $4.5 trillion in tax cuts and new spending. Other Key Provisions Beyond SNAP, the package includes an extension and expansion of individual and business tax cuts, new work requirements for Medicaid recipients, cuts to federal health and nutrition programs, increased military and border security funding, and the elimination of taxes on tips for service workers. GOP Paths Forward Republican leaders, including Senate Agriculture Committee Chair John Boozman of Arkansas, said they were exploring options to keep the legislation on track while still delivering savings elsewhere. Options range from modifying the disputed SNAP provision to removing it entirely or risking a procedural vote requiring 60 votes—an unlikely scenario in the current Senate. Impact on SNAP Recipients The plan would have expanded work requirements to older adults (up to age 65), a component that remains in the bill for now. Democrats and anti-hunger advocates warned of significant harm to those in need, with more than 3 million individuals projected to lose food stamp access based on Congressional Budget Office estimates. Additional Rulings Expected The Senate parliamentarian is also expected to rule on other elements in the bill, including limits on immigrant eligibility for nutrition aid and changes to federal agencies, with further decisions likely to shape the final legislation. What People Are Saying Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar, the top Democrat on the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee, said: "We will keep fighting to protect families in need," opposing shifts in SNAP costs to states, which she said would result in significant benefit cuts. Arkansas Senator John Boozman, chair of the Senate Agriculture Committee, said Republicans are "exploring options" to comply with Senate rules, while supporting those reliant on SNAP. What Happens Next Senate Republicans are expected to revise the bill to comply with the parliamentarian's rulings or drop the contested SNAP provisions. Further decisions from the adviser on other elements of the megabill are anticipated before any final Senate vote. This article contains reporting from The Associated Press.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Iran's foreign minister brands Donald Trump a 'lawless bully' as Keir Starmer holds Cobra meeting
Iran's foreign minister has slammed Donald Trump as a 'lawless bully' after the United States launched strikes on the state's nuclear facilities. Three sites were attacked in Iran overnight, which President Trump claimed had been 'completely and fully obliterated'. It followed days of speculation over whether the US would take action amid an escalating situation between Israel and Iran. READ MORE: Donald Trump confirms US airstrikes against Iranian nuclear facilities READ MORE: Jet2 issues travel warning to UK tourists flying to popular European holiday destination In the UK, Sir Keir Starmer is due to chair a Cobra meeting on Sunday afternoon following the US strikes. The government has said the UK had no involvement in last night's strikes, but was aware of Mr Trump's decision. Speaking at a press conference this morning (June 22), Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi described the Trump administration as 'warmongering', while he warned that diplomacy was not currently possible. "Silence in the face of such blatant aggression will plunge the world into an unprecedented level of danger and chaos," he said. "Humanity has come too far as a species to allow a lawless bully to take us back to the law of the jungle." The Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran confirmed attacks took place on its Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz sites, but it insisted its nuclear programme will not be stopped. Mr Araghchi insisted that while the 'door to diplomacy' should always be open, 'this is not the case right now'. He added: "The warmongering, lawless administration in Washington is solely and fully responsible for the dangerous consequences and far reaching implications of its act of aggression." Mr Araghchi said 'there is no red line' that the US has not crossed, adding: "The most dangerous one was what happened only last night when they crossed a very big red line by attacking nuclear facilities only." Satellite images taken on Sunday show damage to the mountainside at the underground site at Fordo. The images, by Planet Labs PBC, show the once-brown mountain now has parts turned grey and its contours appear slightly different than in previous images, suggesting a blast threw up debris around the site. That suggests the use of specialised American bunker-buster bombs on the facility. Light grey smoke also hung in the air. Iran and the UN nuclear watchdog said there were no immediate signs of radioactive contamination at the three locations following the strikes. Join the Manchester Evening News WhatsApp group HERE It is not clear whether the US will continue attacking Iran alongside its ally Israel, which has been engaged in a nine-day war with Iran. Mr Trump acted without congressional authorisation, and he warned there will be additional strikes if Tehran retaliates against US forces. 'There will either be peace or there will be tragedy for Iran,' he said. UK prime minister Sir Keir Starmer said: "Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat. "The situation in the Middle East remains volatile and stability in the region is a priority. We call on Iran to return to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution to end this crisis."