
When, and when not, to tip
T.Z.
/ Brookline
Tipping isn't required for takeout items, although if your order is elaborate, or if you are a regular customer, it's a good practice to leave change or a spare dollar for coffee or 10 percent of the bill for food.
The proliferation of payment machines with preset tip amounts that can go ridiculously high, especially on small items such as coffee (suggesting a $5 tip on a $10 tab, for example), is vile and extortionate. Good on you for pushing back. I'd urge you to go whole-hog—because, really, life is too short to half-hog it — and pay in cash rather than using the machines at all. If you wanted to go double-hog, to extend a metaphor I already regret, you could stop frequenting places that push obnoxiously high tips and write to the management about why. Under no circumstances should you take your irritation out on the counter staff, but you know that.
Advertisement
If your friend is so suggestible and so easily embarrassed that she is ashamed to be in the company of one who would correct a machine, you've probably had other bumpy patches in your relationship. Good luck working through this one.
Advertisement
I'm sure you're familiar with the virtual introduction, where you say to a friend, 'Can you introduce me to So-and-So?' Recently, I asked a friend for a virtual introduction — and that friend thrust me into So-and-So's mailbox without contacting him first and giving him the chance to opt out. It just seems so rude, though I'm sure my friend does not mean it that way. Is there anything I can do as the 'thrustee' to help So-and-So understand that he can certainly say no thanks?
K.L.
/ Bellingham
Darling, you are worrying too much. You seem like a very nice person whom anyone would like to be introduced to. Yes, the pre-intro check-in is a nice courtesy, but it's possible your friend — who, after all, is the one who knows So-and-So — also knew that So-and-So would be just as eager to meet you and didn't have to ask. When contacting So-and-So you can simply add, 'If you have no time to meet, I thoroughly understand, so please don't be embarrassed to say no.'
Be specific about your desire for a check-in when asking for a virtual introduction, too, and give your friend some context for the request, so he can represent you accurately. 'Can you ask Such-and-Such [because you've already met So-and-So] if it would be all right to introduce me to her? I'm a fan of her work on telomeres and would love to show her my aglet collection' — something like that.
Advertisement
And then don't worry. I hate to add yet another bit of etiquette jargon to the mix, but if the check-in on the virtual intro doesn't happen and So-and-So doesn't want to meet you, he will probably ghost. (Do you feel as if you're in a
Seinfeld
episode yet? Welcome to my world.)
Miss Conduct is Robin Abrahams, a writer with a PhD in psychology.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
04-06-2025
- USA Today
Saints rank among the NFL's lowest spenders in undrafted free agency
Saints rank among the NFL's lowest spenders in undrafted free agency For years the New Orleans Saints were seen as an attractive team for undrafted free agents, giving long-shot rookies better odds of making the team than other outfits around the league. It goes back to the early days of the Sean Payton-and-Drew Brees era, when the Saints consistently found diamonds in the rough like running back Pierre Thomas and wide receiver Lance Moore. More recently, the Saints have found Pro Bowl-level talents after the draft like special teams ace J.T. Gray and returns specialist Rashid Shaheed (who has become a dynamite receiver in his own right). But 2025's rookie free agent class doesn't have as much momentum behind them. For one thing, it's one of the smaller classes around the league, with just 11 players. That's tied with four other teams to rank 23rd in the NFL, half the size of the Jacksonville Jaguars' 22-man class. Four more teams each signed 20 or more rookie free agents this spring. For another thing, based on the latest reporting, the Saints guaranteed just $904,000 between those 11 players. Six teams gave out at least $2 million in guarantees, each, while 14 teams got to at least $1 million. The Saints, at best, rank around the league's middle class. Guarantees are a useful yardstick because that's how teams outbid each other to recruit rookies after the draft. If a player was guaranteed a big portion of his contract, the team clearly expects him to win a roster spot, and they had to fight out competitors to get him. Which means other teams weren't banging on the door to get a word in with many of the Saints' rookie free agents. Former South Carolina guard Torriccelli Simpkins III received the highest guarantees on the team, at $259,000, but just two other players broke the $100,000 threshold -- Kansas State tackle Easton Kilty ($240,000) and Delaware running back Marcus Yarns ($120,000). The details aren't in on Hunter Dekkers' contract, but seeing as he only signed after trying out at rookie minicamp, we're guessing the Saints didn't guarantee him much money. Why did this change? When did the Saints go from a powerhouse in undrafted free agency to a team that's fallen behind? The main culprit would be a lack of opportunities in New Orleans. If all things are equal, young pros would rather go somewhere they have a real shot at competing for a roster spot than coming to the Saints, where they would be stuck behind older veterans on the defensive line like Cameron Jordan, Nathan Shepherd, and Davon Godchaux. It's a similar story at other positions. Young guys want to go where they can play, and the Saints don't have as many of those opportunities as other teams. Still, guys beat the odds all the time. Once the pads come on and practice intensity ramps up at training camp, we'll start to find out which of these rookies has a real shot at making the team. Maybe someone surprises us. But for now, it's probably best to keep expectations muted.
Yahoo
04-06-2025
- Yahoo
Fawn rescued after getting trapped in metal fence
Firefighters rescued a fawn that got stuck in a metal fence in Southampton. Hampshire and Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Service said a crew helped the young deer whose hip had got stuck in the fence in Vermont Close at about 16:00 BST on 26 May. A force spokesperson said the "fawn was on the fence about which way to go" but was quickly freed after a crew used a hydraulic spreader to bend the metal. The fawn's mother was waiting nearby and the spokesperson said she had "deer-ly missed [it]" while stuck. You can follow BBC Hampshire & Isle of Wight on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram. Hampshire and Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Service
Yahoo
04-06-2025
- Yahoo
BBC rejects incorrect White House claims on Gaza coverage
The BBC has rejected incorrect White House criticism of its Gaza coverage, describing a claim it had taken down a story as "completely wrong". At Tuesday's White House briefing President Trump's press secretary Karoline Leavitt accused the BBC of taking "the word of Hamas" when reporting on the number of people killed in a shooting near an aid distribution site on Sunday. She also claimed, wrongly, that the BBC had retracted a story. "The claim the BBC took down a story after reviewing footage is completely wrong. We did not remove any story and we stand by our journalism," the BBC said in a statement. The corporation added that its coverage was updated with new figures throughout the day, which is "totally normal practice on any fast-moving news story". The numbers were "always clearly attributed, from the first figure of 15 from medics, through the 31 killed from the Hamas-run health ministry to the final Red Cross statement of 'at least 21' at their field hospital," the statement said. There are conflicting reports on what happened near an aid distribution centre in Rafah on Sunday. Civilian witnesses, NGOs, and health officials said people were shot at while waiting for food at an aid distribution point. But the Israeli military said the reports were false, and denied that its troops fired at civilians near or within the site. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a US-and Israel backed group which now runs the aid distribution, said the reports were "outright fabrications". Israel does not allow international news organisations, including the BBC, into Gaza, making verifying what is happening in the territory difficult. On Tuesday, there was a similar incident when local officials said Israeli forces fired at civilians as they attempted to collect aid, killing at least 27 people. The IDF said its troops fired shots after identifying suspects who moved towards them "deviating from the designated access routes". Referring to the incident on Sunday, Karoline Leavitt said the BBC kept changing the number of casualties in the story's headline and accused the corporation of eventually removing the story from its website. In its statement the BBC explained that a separate report from BBC Verify on Monday found that "a viral video posted on social media was not linked to the aid distribution centre it claimed to show". But the video did not run on BBC news channels and did not inform its reporting. "Conflating these two stories is simply misleading. "It is vital to bring people the truth about what is happening in Gaza. International journalists are not currently allowed into Gaza and we would welcome the support of the White House in our call for immediate access," the statement adds. Israel launched a military campaign in Gaza in response to Hamas' cross-border attack on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage. At least 54,470 people have been killed in Gaza since then, including 4,201 since Israel resumed its offensive on 18 March, according to the territory's Hamas-run health ministry.