
MPs to reintroduce bill in name of girl, 9, who died in pollution-linked death
Dubbed 'Ella's Law,' the proposed legislation is named after Ella Adoo-Kissi-Debrah, who lived 82ft from the busy South Circular Road in Lewisham and suffered the fatal asthma attack in February 2013.
She became the first person to have air pollution listed as a cause of death following a landmark inquest in 2020.
Sian Berry, Green MP for Brighton Pavilion will present the bill to the House of Commons with a speech on Tuesday July 1, with the aim of making clean air a human right under UK law.
If passed, the bill would require the Government to achieve clean air throughout England by January 1 2030, setting out a pathway to bring the country in line with World Health Organisation air pollution guidelines.
She has so far been backed by cross-party Labour, Liberal Democrat, SNP and Independent MPs but hopes that more will support the bill and it will be picked up by the Government in the next King's Speech.
Ella's mother Rosamund Adoo Kissi-Debrah has long campaigned for the Government to introduce stricter air pollution limits since her daughter died.
In 2022, a similar version of Ella's law was steered through the House of Lords by Green Party peer Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb.
Sian Berry and Rosumund Adoo Kissi-Deborah on the on the boundary of the South Circular Road in London (Green Party/PA)
It was later sponsored by Caroline Lucas MP in the Commons until Parliament was dissolved for the 2024 general election.
Ms Berry said: 'Deaths like Ella's, and the millions of lives blighted by preventable diseases caused by air pollution, can be a thing of the past if Governments start taking the right action now.
'Rosamund's campaign is gaining momentum and communities across the country are raising air pollution as a key problem in their local area, so it is great to have representatives from all parties joining together to press for a legal right to breathe clean air.
'Finally passing Ella's Law will save lives, as it will make sure we get new targets, and the funding for local areas to achieve them by cutting down on the many causes of toxic pollution, from road traffic to wood burning.'
Ms Adoo Kissi-Debrah said: 'I am delighted Sian and the cross-section of MPs are taking forward Ella's Law in parliament.
'Tackling air pollution should not be a partisan issue, it affects us all, in every constituency in the country.
'I believe that everyone has a right to breathe clean air, no matter where they live, the colour of their skin or their socio-economic background.
'We know that air pollution affects most people in this country, but the harshest effects are felt by poorer and marginalised communities.
'I hope this Labour Government will therefore take forward this Bill to protect all children and adults from the devastating effects of breathing toxic air.'
The announcement comes as campaigners, health professionals, local authorities and schools across the country will mark Clean Air Day on Thursday.
In the UK, toxic air pollution is estimated to cause between 29,000 and 43,000 premature deaths every year, according to The Committee on the Medical Effects of Air Pollution.
Sarah Sleet, chief executive at Asthma + Lung UK, said: 'These early deaths represent a failure of government to act as current policies and targets do not do enough to protect public health.
'Toxic air has a detrimental impact on the millions of people living with a lung condition in the UK – with four out of five telling us that it makes their breathing difficulties worse.
'We need action now to protect the public's lungs.'
Ella's estate, over which Ms Adoo-Kissi-Debrah acts as administrator, sued the Environment Department (Defra), the Department for Transport and the Department of Health and Social Care for compensation over her 'illness and premature death'.
In October last year, three Government departments settled the claim brought by law firm Hodge Jones & Allen for an undisclosed sum, and issued a statement telling Ms Adoo-Kissi-Debrah 'we are truly sorry for your loss' and that no child should have to suffer as Ella did.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
30 minutes ago
- The National
Angela Rayner does not rule out following US into war in Middle East
Standing in for the Prime Minister as he attends the G7 Summit in Canada, Rayner was faced with questions in the Commons over the UK Government's stance on following president Donald Trump into war with Israel against Iran if he was to launch strikes. Trump has demanded 'unconditional surrender' and has warned Iranian leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei that the US knows where he is but has no plans to kill him, 'at least not for now'. READ MORE: Donald Trump shares fawning message from extremist US ambassador to Israel Trump initially distanced himself from Israel's surprise attack on Friday that triggered the conflict, but in recent days has hinted at greater American involvement, saying he wants something 'much bigger' than a ceasefire. The US has also sent more warplanes to the region. Deputy leader of the Liberal Democrats, Daisy Cooper, said at PMQs: "In 2003, we Liberal Democrats were incredibly proud to lead the case against the Iraq war. "A war in which the UK blindly followed the US, in a move that was not back by the United Nations. "In light of reports that president Trump is seriously considering joining the war between Israel and Iran, launching a US strike against Iran's nuclear facilities, can the Deputy Prime Minister confirm that if president Trump does do this that today's Labour Government will not blindly follow the US into war again?" Rayner responded with: "The one thing I will say is that we agree with president Trump, that Iran must never have nuclear weapons. "But we've been consistent in urging Iran to engage with the diplomatic process and work with the United States, and we continue to support that diplomatic efforts." Earlier at the G7 Summit, Starmer had insisted Trump was interested in de-escalation in the Middle East, saying 'nothing' he had heard from the president suggested Washington was poised to get involved. In a statement on Monday, before Trump's departure, leaders reiterated their 'commitment to peace and stability' but stopped short of calling for a truce between Israel and Iran. British Typhoon fighter jets have also been deployed to the region, which Defence Secretary John Healey said on Tuesday was 'part of the moves to reinforce de-escalation in the region, to reinforce security in the region, and may also be used to help support our allies'.


Scottish Sun
31 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Winter fuel payment SCRAPPED for 100,000 Scots – check if you're impacted
The new plans will see only 720,000 pensioners benefit from the increased payment NATS chiefs today scrapped the winter fuel payment for around 100,000 pensioners despite slamming Sir Keir Starmer's decision to cut the payment last year as a 'betrayal'. SNP ministers announced they would follow Chancellor Rachel Reeves and only pay the benefit to elderly people who have an income of less than £35,000. Advertisement 1 Social justice secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said: 'This approach ensures a higher level of support" Credit: Alamy In Scotland, this will be worth £203 for those under 80, and £305 for those over 80 - slightly higher than the £200 and £300 payments in England and Wales. However, the previously planned £100 payment to all pensioners has been scrapped, leaving the richest without a winter fuel payment. The new plans will see 720,000 pensioners benefit from the increased payment, around 100,000 fewer than the 815,000 set to receive the universal payment. Social justice secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said: 'This approach ensures a higher level of support which those most in need will receive. Advertisement 'The UK Government's decision to cut the Winter Fuel Payment last winter was a betrayal of millions of pensioners, and their recent U-turn is welcome if belated.' Following the Chancellor's u-turn, all pensioners in England and Wales will now get a Winter Fuel Payment or £200 or £300 - but the cash will be clawed back via the tax system for anyone who earns over £35,000. The changes announced by Ms Reeves last week will result in further funding increases for the Scottish Government, which the First Minister said is expected to be around £120million. And Nats ministers said they would use that cash to mirror the Westminster policy for their own devolved benefit called the Pension Age Winter Heating Payment. Advertisement It comes after John Swinney insisted on Monday no Scottish pensioner would 'receive less than they would under the new UK scheme'. Speaking at an event on public sector reform in Glasgow, the First Minister hit out at the initial decision to cut the benefit. Fuel duty hike is double blow after Winter Fuel Payment loss, says pensioner He said: 'To be quite blunt about it, I don't believe cutting this winter lifeline was ever going to save a penny. 'Making millions of pensioners poorer makes them also colder and makes them also sicker, and that in turn puts up the bill for our social services and our NHS.' Advertisement He added: 'It's one of the reasons we were so quick to step in to protect pensioners in Scotland as best as we could from that wrong decision by the UK Government. 'But now that they've seen the error of their ways, my Government will once again do the right thing by Scotland's pensioners.'


The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
Government urged to do more to show it values public services
A senior union leader has urged the Government to do more to show it values public services and the workers who deliver them. Christina McAnea, general secretary of Unison, told her union's annual conference in Liverpool that if the Government could change its mind on so many issues, it could change it on taxation. 'Tax wealth and profits, and raise the money needed to fix our country. That's the message I'll continue to take to Government,' she told delegates. 'I want Labour to do more to show it values our public services, and the people – our members – who deliver them. 'How do I think they should pay for this? 'Not by taking money away from those least able to afford it, but by taking it from those with the deepest pockets.' Ms McAnea said Unison's job was to hold Labour to account, to tell the party to do its job better. She added: 'Just as we did when they attacked benefits – we were one of the first unions to come out against the cut to the winter fuel allowance. 'They've changed their stance, we've not. 'Some commentators say Labour changing their policies is a sign of weakness. 'I disagree – I think it's a sign of maturity, and of growing into the role of Government after 14 years out in the cold – and it's a sign they're listening to us.'