FedEx 757 accident prompts NTSB call for door latch inspections
The National Transportation Safety Board has issued new safety recommendations to Boeing and the Federal Aviation Administration regarding evacuation slides on certain aircraft types.
The recommendations stem from an ongoing investigation into an emergency landing, involving a FedEx Boeing 757-200 in Chattanooga, Tennessee.
On Oct. 4, 2023, FedEx flight 1376 experienced a hydraulic system failure shortly after takeoff from Chattanooga Metropolitan Airport. The flight crew attempted an emergency gear-up landing, during which the aircraft sustained substantial damage.
When evacuating, the crew encountered issues with both the left (L1) and right (R1) doors. The L1 door would not fully open due to an incorrectly routed deployment strap, while the R1 door was difficult to open because its slide pack jammed.The NTSB's investigation revealed that the R1 door's bannis latch, which releases the slide pack, did not conform to required modifications specified by the FAA. The airworthiness directive mandated changes to prevent slide packs from jamming doorways during emergencies.
The aircraft's R1 bannis latch had only one link instead of the required three and lacked other necessary hardware, investigators stated.
Following the incident, FedEx (NYSE: FDX) inspected its entire Boeing 757 fleet and found that about 24% of doors were not compliant with either AD 86-09-09 or a subsequent directive, AD 2001-15-01. These findings prompted Boeing to issue a multioperator message alerting other airlines to the potential issue.
The NTSB's review of Boeing and FedEx maintenance manuals found inconsistent depictions of the correct bannis latch configuration, which could lead to confusion among maintenance personnel and the potential installation of nonconforming components.Based on these findings, the NTSB has issued several recommendations, including:
Boeing should issue a service bulletin advising 757 operators to inspect and, if necessary, modify or replace bannis latches to ensure correct configuration.
The FAA should require all Boeing 757 operators to conduct these inspections and modifications.
Similar recommendations were made for Boeing 737 models that use the same bannis latch design, including newer variants such as the -700 and -800.
Boeing should review and revise maintenance manuals to ensure consistent and accurate depiction of the correct bannis latch assembly for affected aircraft models.
The FAA should require operators to update their maintenance manuals accordingly.
The Chattanooga gear-up landing remains under investigation. While the aircraft suffered damages, no injuries were reported following the accident.
(This article is republished from Airline Geeks)
The post FedEx 757 accident prompts NTSB call for door latch inspections appeared first on FreightWaves.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why ChargePoint Stock Plunged Today
ChargePoint's sales slumped in its fiscal Q1, and missed analyst targets. The company's quarterly loss was twice what Wall Street expected. Management thinks sales will fall farther in fiscal Q2. 10 stocks we like better than ChargePoint › Shares of electric vehicle charging company ChargePoint Holdings (NYSE: CHPT) short-circuited Thursday morning, plunging 19.8% through 10:05 a.m. ET after the company reported twice as big a loss as anticipated for its fiscal 2026 first quarter. Heading into the company's earnings report, analysts had been forecasting that ChargePoint would report losses of $0.06 per share on more than $100 million in sales in the period, which ended April 30. In fact, ChargePoint's losses were $0.12 per share, and sales fell by 8.8% year over year to $97.6 million. The news wasn't all bad. ChargePoint did improve its gross profit margin from 22% a year ago to 29%. Operating costs also declined, which improved operating margins. On the bottom line, quarterly losses were the aforementioned $0.12 per share -- not great, but at least better than the $0.17 per share that ChargePoint lost a year ago. However, part of the improvement was due to ChargePoint issuing a lot of new shares, spreading its losses among 8.4% more shares outstanding. Its GAAP net loss was $57.1 million, down 20% from $71.8 million a year prior. Still and all, investors seem unhappy with the report, and at least part of the reason for that is management's guidance. ChargePoint predicts its fiscal Q2 2026 sales will land in the $90 million to $100 million range. About three-quarters of that range is less than it earned in fiscal Q1, suggesting the strong possibility that revenue will shrink sequentially. That contrasts poorly with the predictions of Wall Street analysts, whose consensus view was that ChargePoint's top line would grow respectably to more than $108 million in fiscal Q2. It almost goes without saying that ChargePoint didn't guide investors to expect any profits in its fiscal Q2. The best the company was willing to offer on that point was that it "remains committed to its plans of achieving positive non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA during a quarter in fiscal year 2026." So, it's targeting sort of a profit in at least one quarter, but it wouldn't say which one. That vague hope hardly seems a good reason to buy ChargePoint stock. Before you buy stock in ChargePoint, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and ChargePoint wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,538!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $869,841!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 789% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Rich Smith has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why ChargePoint Stock Plunged Today was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why Boeing Still Uses Yokes Instead Of Side Sticks
Yokes, at least for aircraft controls and not electric cars like Teslas, go all the way back to the early 1900s, before hydraulics were on planes. Since the pilot's input physically moved the necessary cables attached to the plane's moving parts, they'd really need to put their muscle into it. That meant having a big, sturdy thing they could grab with both hands and wrestle with. The yoke, also called a control column, was form meeting function. That function has changed a lot in the modern era, however. In a time when most planes are fly-by-wire (meaning the pilot's input goes to a computer, which then figures out which parts of the plane to move), the yoke may seem like a bit of a relic. Indeed, European aviation juggernaut Airbus ditched the control column in 1985 with the introduction of its A320. Opting instead for a side stick -- a much fancier version of a joystick control -- Airbus let its pilots make small, simple hand movements that the computer would translate to the rest of the aircraft. And yet, to this day, America's airliner powerhouse Boeing continues to put a yoke on every single one of its commercial planes. It's not that it missed the memo of what Airbus was up to, though. Boeing continues to believe that a yoke confirms the importance of the pilot over the computer, and it believes that very prominence distinguishes its planes from the competition. Read more: How Much Do Car Salespeople Make? The Pay Structure Explained Boeing has at least thought about switching to side sticks as far back as the development of the venerable 737 in the 1960s. Over the decades, however, it has stuck with the yoke. For one thing, that makes it easier for pilots of one Boeing plane to jump into the cockpit of another, since this pivotal system is essentially the same in all of them. That reduces retraining costs and preserves a pilot's comfort and familiarity. Using a yoke is also a much more actively involved experience than using a side stick. Even though most modern Boeings are fly-by-wire (though, notably, not the troubled 737 MAX), the company still requires the pilot to make a number of decisions about the flight that might otherwise be automated. The idea is to put the pilot in the center of the experience, rather than hope the computer is working correctly. In addition, the yokes of the pilot and co-pilot are designed to give direct tactile feedback to each other. This way, when one of them makes a move, the other can both see it (since the yokes are in front of them) and feel it. This keeps the pilot and co-pilot in better coordination and helps prevent them from accidentally fighting each other's controls -- coordination that could be vital in emergency situations. Yokes are, by their nature, big and bulky things right in front of the pilot. That also takes up a lot of visual space, making the cockpit cluttered. One of the reasons Airbus switched to sticks, which are small and to the pilot's side, was to free up room for more, and bigger, displays. The emphasis of the Airbus experience, therefore, is not so much on the flying as on the monitoring of critical data and information. The fly-by-wire computer can handle all the little details. Depending on the pilot, that might be viewed as a major convenience or a major loss of human value. But the Airbus design doesn't allow for direct feedback between the pilot's and co-pilot's sticks (even though this technology does exist). Since they can't even see each other's sticks (because they're off to the side), there's no real way for the pilot and co-pilot to know exactly what the other is doing at any given moment. This can be dangerous in an emergency. Indeed, the tragic crash of Air France flight 447 was attributed to this exact issue. Of course, one way Airbus might get around this is by ditching the co-pilot altogether. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Autohome Inc. to Hold Annual General Meeting on June 27, 2025
BEIJING, June 5, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Autohome Inc. (NYSE: ATHM; HKEX: 2518) ("Autohome" or the "Company"), the leading online destination for automobile consumers in China, today announced that it will hold its annual general meeting of shareholders (the "AGM") at 18th Floor, Tower B, CEC Plaza, 3 Dan Ling Street, Haidian District, Beijing, The People's Republic of China on June 27, 2025 at 4:00 p.m. (Beijing time). Holders of record of ordinary shares of the Company at the close of business on June 2, 2025 (Hong Kong time) are entitled to notice of, to attend and to vote at, the annual general meeting or any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof. Holders of the Company's American depositary shares ("ADSs") as of the close of business on June 2, 2025 (New York time) who wish to exercise their voting rights for the underlying ordinary shares must act through the depositary of the Company's ADSs, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas. The Notice of AGM, which sets forth the resolution to be submitted to shareholder approval at the meeting, and form of proxy for the AGM are available on the Company's website at The Company has filed its annual report on Form 20-F, including its audited financial statements, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). The Form 20-F can be accessed on the Company's website at as well as on the SEC's website at The Company has also published its annual report for Hong Kong purposes pursuant to the Rules Governing the Listing of Securities on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited ("HKEX"), which can be accessed on the Company's website at as well as the HKEX's website at About Autohome Inc. Autohome Inc. (NYSE: ATHM; HKEX: 2518) is the leading online destination for automobile consumers in China. Its mission is to relentlessly reduce auto industry decision-making and transaction costs driven by advanced technology. Autohome provides occupationally generated content, professionally generated content, user-generated content, and AI-generated content, a comprehensive automobile library, and extensive automobile listing information to automobile consumers, covering the entire car purchase and ownership cycle. The ability to reach a large and engaged user base of automobile consumers has made Autohome a preferred platform for automakers and dealers to conduct their advertising campaigns. Further, the Company's dealer subscription and advertising services allow dealers to market their inventory and services through Autohome's platform, extending the reach of their physical showrooms to potentially millions of internet users in China and generating sales leads for them. The Company offers sales leads, data analysis, and marketing services to assist automakers and dealers with improving their efficiency and facilitating transactions. Autohome operates its "Autohome Mall," a full-service online transaction platform, to facilitate transactions for automakers and dealers. Further, through its websites and mobile applications, it also provides other value-added services, including auto financing, auto insurance, used car transactions, and aftermarket services. For further information, please visit For investor and media inquiries, please contact: Autohome SongInvestor Relations Director Tel: +86-10-5985-7483E-mail: ir@ Christensen China LimitedSuri ChengTel: +86-185-0060-8364E-mail: View original content: SOURCE Autohome Inc. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
