
New A.I. Project Explores Mysteries of Delacroix, Master of Romanticism
Barthélémy Jobert is so engrossed in the 19th century that he takes an expansive view of it: For him it began intellectually in the 1760s and ran into the 1920s. A leading art historian in Paris and former president of what is now Sorbonne University, he is particularly expert in the work of Eugène Delacroix, the French Romantic artist best known for his 1830 painting 'Liberty Leading the People,' a stridently anti-royalist work depicting citizens rising up against a despot. Now, Jobert will be getting a significant boost in his ability to use artificial intelligence and other 21st-century technologies in his yearslong quest to explore Delacroix's art and resolve mysteries about its attribution.
This week, Schmidt Sciences, a nonprofit founded by the former Google chief executive Eric Schmidt and his wife, Wendy Schmidt, plans to announce a new grantmaking program that will underwrite Jobert's project, known as Digital Delacroix, with funding thought to be in the high six figures. Jobert aims to digitize and analyze many things Delacroix — his letters and journals, the murals he painted in the second half of his career, even contemporary newspaper accounts of the man and his work — and cross-reference them for scholarly purposes while putting them online for others to explore. The grant from Schmidt will allow him to obtain more computing power and augment his current team of six by hiring a couple of researchers trained in both art history and A.I. — a rare breed, even in France.
For Schmidt Sciences, Digital Delacroix is the first of a projected 10 to 15 grant recipients that will receive a total of $10 million to apply A.I. to research in the humanities. Outlays are expected to range from less than $100,000 to as much as $1.5 million. (Schmidt Sciences would not provide an exact figure for its support of Digital Delacroix.) Sorbonne University made a brief announcement of the organization's involvement in February, shortly after an international A.I. summit was held in Paris, but its role has not been detailed until now.
For Jobert, it's the culmination of a passion he's had for almost 40 years, ever since he was a young teaching fellow at Harvard. He was standing in Boston's Museum of Fine Arts before Delacroix's 'The Lamentation,' an 1848 canvas that shows mourners surrounding the body of Christ after the crucifixion, when he was struck by a figure in the foreground: John the Baptist, draped in the red cloak that often symbolizes his beheading. 'I cannot explain why,' Jobert said in a video interview, 'but for me, this red cloak is the image of soul.'
At this point, Jobert has assembled an informal consortium of French institutions that includes units of the Ministry of Culture and the National Center for Scientific Research as well as a center for the humanities, a center for A.I. and other agencies at Sorbonne University. Work on digitizing the texts is well underway, so Jobert's attention is currently centered on the murals Delacroix painted for the grand buildings occupied by the French Parliament, in rooms that are almost never open to the public.
His focus is on the National Assembly — the lower house of Parliament, which occupies the 18th-century Palais Bourbon. 'We have two projects,' he said. 'The first one is to make them accessible on a website' — to enable people to take a virtual tour of the legislature's library, the vast chamber where Delacroix labored for nine years, and to zoom in on anything they want. The second goal is to analyze these murals to settle questions of attribution: What did Delacroix paint himself, and what did he leave to his assistants? 'This is the part in which A.I. is playing the main role,' he said.
It's also the part where Schmidt Sciences steps in. 'This question of multiple authorship is a really tricky one,' said Brent Seales, the American computer scientist who heads the organization's humanities-and-A.I. branch. Using A.I. to solve it is hard, he added, 'which is one of the reasons I love it.'
Seales has encountered hard problems before. Years ago he and his team at the University of Kentucky invented a process that used A.I., among other technologies, to decipher the contents of carbonized papyrus scrolls excavated from the banks of the Dead Sea and from a Roman villa that was buried in the eruption that destroyed Pompeii.
'As philanthropists, we have the ability to take risks that government and businesses cannot or will not,' Wendy Schmidt said in an email. Bloomberg currently estimates the Schmidts' wealth at $32.5 billion.
One reason the attribution effort is expected to be difficult is that it relies on analytical A.I., a branch of the field that's quite distinct from generative A.I., which set off the current frenzy with the release of tools like ChatGPT in 2022. Compared with the breakneck advances generative A.I. has made since, progress in analytical A.I. seems almost tortoise-like.
To figure out who painted what, researchers under Jobert's direction have made up-close, high-resolution photographs of the murals and reconstructed the works in digital 3-D using photogrammetry. Technical data on Delacroix and other painters is being provided by a research unit within the Ministry of Culture. All of this will be fed into a computer vision system that will be trained to recognize Delacroix's brushstrokes and those of his studio assistants. 'We think there's a high possibility it will work,' said Xavier Fresquet, deputy director of the Sorbonne Center for Artificial Intelligence.
Jobert wants to do the same with the murals in an even grander chamber in the 17th-century Palais du Luxembourg, home of the Senate. But his ultimate goal is far more ambitious than that: a virtual reconstruction, using generative A.I., of the allegorical murals by Delacroix that once adorned the Salon de la Paix in the Hôtel de Ville, the city hall of Paris. Their central element was 'Peace Descends to Earth,' a ceiling panel that depicted, in the words of the 19th-century writer and critic Théophile Gautier, 'the earth weeping, raising her eyes to heaven to plead for an end to her sorrows.'
Earth's prayers would go unanswered, in life if not in art. In 1871, eight years after Delacroix's death, his murals went up in flames along with the rest of the building when the revolutionaries of the Paris Commune torched the place as they were being crushed by government forces. What remains in the archives is a single photograph, Delacroix's sketches, some etchings and two watercolors presented to Queen Victoria in 1855 by the Emperor Napoleon III. Nonetheless, Jobert is hopeful that he'll be able to come up with a reasonable facsimile of the Hôtel de Ville murals.
'We won't give you an exact reproduction of the room as it was. That's impossible,' he said. 'But we will give you what it could have been' — and would be still, if peace had indeed descended.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time Magazine
2 hours ago
- Time Magazine
Why Waymo's Self-Driving Cars Became a Target of Protesters in Los Angeles
As protesters and police clash across Los Angeles and beyond, a striking image from the mayhem has been that of graffiti-strewn white cars engulfed in flames. But these aren't ordinary cars. They've got sensors protruding from the top and sides—and, critically, they've got no drivers. Waymo, a robotaxi company, found itself at the center of the demonstrations against the Trump Administration's Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids after a group of protesters over the weekend, according to the Los Angeles Times, approached a parked row of the autonomous vehicles and smashed their windows, slashed their tires, spray-painted them with anti-ICE slogans, and set them on fire. While eye-catching, the trend is also extremely dangerous. Electric vehicles, like those in Waymo's fleet, have lithium-ion batteries, and in a post on X, the L.A. Police Department warned: 'Burning lithium-ion batteries release toxic gases, including hydrogen fluoride, posing risks to responders and those nearby.' According to Scientific American, first responders exposed to the fumes of burnt lithium-ion batteries without protection historically 'have developed throat burns and breathing difficulties upon arriving,' and, depending on the hydrogen fluoride levels, individuals can start coughing up blood within minutes of exposure. At least six Waymo vehicles across the county have reportedly been the target of vandalism, resulting in the company temporarily suspending operations in the area 'out of an abundance of caution.' California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass have condemned the violence and destruction, which Newsom attributed to 'insurgent groups' and 'anarchists' who have infiltrated otherwise peaceful protests. President Donald Trump, who mobilized the National Guard to respond to the situation, has called the demonstrators ' troublemakers ' and ' paid insurrectionists.' Here's what to know. What is Waymo? Waymo is a subsidiary of Alphabet, Google's parent company, and grew out of the Google Self-Driving Car project that began in 2009. It launched its robotaxi business in 2020 in limited markets, which grew to include Los Angeles in 2024. While the company says its mission 'is to be the world's most trusted driver,' a national survey earlier this year found that '6 in 10 U.S. drivers still report being afraid to ride in a self-driving vehicle' while the proportion of people enthusiastic about the development of the technology has actually decreased from 18% in 2022 to 13% in 2025. Waymo vehicles were involved in 696 accidents across the U.S. between 2021 and 2024, or about one accident every other day. MKP Law Group, a Los-Angeles based firm that represents clients involved in accidents, acknowledged in a blog post that this statistic 'is not necessarily indicative of Waymo causing those accidents, as some may have been the fault of the other involved drivers.' Studies show that self-driving technology is likely safer than most human drivers. Waymo has also reportedly annoyed some people, including those who find self-driving vehicles to be an eyesore as well as locals where the vehicles routinely get stuck. Neighbors near a Waymo charging station in Santa Monica have complained about noise pollution caused by the driverless vehicles honking at each other in the parking lot. Waymo vehicles as well as other self-driving cars have previously been the target of vandals, particularly in California, where Waymo is headquartered. In January, a Waymo car was torn apart in Los Angeles. In February 2024, another Waymo car was smashed and set ablaze in San Francisco. And in July 2024, a man was charged with slashing the tires of 17 Waymo cars in San Francisco. Why is Waymo being targeted in the L.A. protests? Several potential explanations have emerged for why Waymo vehicles were targeted during the protests in Los Angeles. The Wall Street Journal reported that part of the reason the cars were vandalized was to obstruct traffic—a traditional, albeit controversial, protest tactic. Some social media users have suggested that self-driving vehicles in particular have become a new target because they are seen by protesters as ' part of the police surveillance state.' Waymo's cars are equipped with cameras that provide a 360-degree view of their surroundings, a tool that has been tapped by law enforcement, according to reports. Independent tech news site 404 Media reported in April that the Los Angeles Police Department obtained footage from a Waymo driverless car to use as part of an investigation into an unrelated hit-and-run. And Bloomberg reported in 2023 that police have increasingly relied on self-driving cars and their cameras for video evidence. Chris Gilliard, a fellow at the Social Science Research Council, told Bloomberg that self-driving vehicles are 'essentially surveillance cameras on wheels,' adding: 'We're supposed to be able to go about our business in our day-to-day lives without being surveilled unless we are suspected of a crime, and each little bit of this technology strips away that ability.' Waymo told Bloomberg at the time that it 'carefully' reviews every request from police 'to make sure it satisfies applicable laws and has a valid legal process.' Some activists have also suggested that the burning of Waymo vehicles should garner less sympathy from onlookers. 'There are people on here saying it's violent and domestic terrorism to set a Waymo car on fire,' racial justice organizer Samuel Sinyangwe posted on X. 'A robot car? Are you going to demand justice for the robot dogs next? But not the human beings repeatedly shot with rubber bullets in the street? What kind of politics is this?' 'There is no human element to Waymo,' climate and labor organizer Elise Joshi similarly posted on X. 'It's expensive and bought-out politicians are using it as an excuse to defund public transit. I pray on Waymo's downfall.'


Tom's Guide
2 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
I'm stoked about iOS 26 Call Screening, but it proves Apple Intelligence is still playing catch up — here's why
Apple had a lot to share with its announcement of iOS 26 during its WWDC 2025 keynote yesterday (June 9). Not only will the iPhone software get a dramatic makeover when it's released later this fall with Apple's new Liquid Glass design, but there were several new features introduced that are coming to the iPhone's core apps. In particular, I'm excited that Apple's making it easier for iPhones to reduce the amount of spam calls thanks to a new feature called Call Screening. But after watching the Call Screening demo in action, it's nowhere as thorough as what some of Google's Pixel phones can do when it comes to the same task. I know this because I religiously lean on Call Screen with my Pixel 9 Pro XL to take phone calls on my behalf, relying on Google Assistant to help me make actionable decisions. What sets Google's version apart is how it can come up with contextual responses — whereas Apple's implementation simply screens calls to see if they're spam or not. Without contextual awareness actions, it proves how Apple Intelligence is still playing catch up to what other AI leaders like Google provide. The nice thing about Call Screening is that you might actually end up dealing with fewer spam calls in your life, which is always a good thing. This iOS 26 feature will automatically take calls from unknown numbers silently in the background,; if they're actual humans and share their responses, your iPhone will proceed to ring — complete with what appears to be a transcription of their message. This is a good first step because I like how Call Screening won't ring your iPhone unless it determines it's not a telemarketer or spam message, so that saves you from having to deal with them. In the current iteration, the phone call appears on your iPhone with the notification that it's a possible spam call, but it requires your intervention to take the call to find out what it is. At least with Call Screening, you don't have to make that interaction. Call Screen makes me feel like I have an actual assistant taking them for me While we just found about Call Screening in iOS 26, Google's Call Screen feature still feels superior from my point of view — mainly for how the Google feature does more than to field the phone call. Google Assistant not only screens a phone call, but listens to the responses from people as to why they're calling. That gives you contextual actions for responding, showing off the strength of Google's AI. Those contextual responses come in the form of quick replies that pop up in the app, where you make the call on which action to take. For example, if the call is about a package delivery, you'll get responses that can the caller to drop off the package by the door, come back another time, or something else. I've used Call Screen on the Pixel for other things too, like a friend asking about a move date I've committed to. Google Assistant is smart enough to discern what they're asking and gives me relevant responses to choose, like telling them that I'll be there on time or perhaps to reschedule it. I can't tell you enough about how Call Screen has been such a godsend ever since I started using it first with the Pixel 8 Pro. When I'm stuck in a meeting where I physically can't take a call, or simply don't want to speak with whoever's on the other end of the line, Call Screen makes me feel like I have an actual assistant taking calls on my behalf. That'll be tough for Apple to match. While Apple's Call Screening seeming lacks the actionable responses that Google offers, I'm still hopeful that there's more to come with this feature. There wasn't a full deep dive into Apple Intelligence this week as there was at last year's event, with Apple hinting that more will be shared around this in the coming year, Call Screening could ultimately get the same contextual awareness as Google's version. Perhaps Apple is saving a later event to introduce proper Apple Intelligence features with iOS 26? I hope so because so far this proves exactly how Apple is still trailing its rivals when it comes to offering robust AI capabilities. Siri definitely has a big role to fill with Call Screening if it's going to do more than just be the in-between person for phone calls, as I suspect that it needs to be intelligent to not only transcribe the conversation accurately — but to also be smart enough to take action.


Forbes
3 hours ago
- Forbes
Google's Gmail Update—Yes, Delete Your Phone Number Now
Why you should delete your number. A raft of headlines will suddenly worry Gmail users, as a researcher proves that a user's private phone number can be 'brute-forced' from their Google account using just their Gmail address. So, do you need to delete the phone number on your account? The answer is yes, there's one account setting where you do need to delete it. Per 404Media, the researcher known as brutecat 'was able to figure out the phone number linked to any Google account, information that is usually not public and is often sensitive, according to the researcher, Google, and 404 Media's own tests.' Google has confirmed the attack and it has deployed an update: 'This issue has been fixed. We've always stressed the importance of working with the security research community through our vulnerability rewards program and we want to thank the researcher for flagging this issue. Researcher submissions like this are one of the many ways we're able to quickly find and fix issues for the safety of our users.' There are major privacy implications in 'brute-forcing the phone number of any Google user,' as brutecat describes it, not least because it's the unique identifier in secure messaging and account recovery, two areas where socially engineered attacks are rife. Fortunately, this was a proof of concept and has not been exploited — that we know. Your phone number is held in two places in your Google account — account recovery and two-factor authentication (2FA), where it's used to text codes when you sign in or access sensitive settings within the account. As I recommended last week, you should only use your number as an account recovery option but delete it for 2FA. Google calls this two-step verification (2SV), and you can find details on changing your settings here. You should only use 2FA linked to physical hardware, which means passkeys, authenticator apps or for the truly security hardened, physical keys. One of the implications of this phone number leak is SIM swapping, where an attacker armed with your number can trick a phone company into issuing a new SIM and so utilize your account. This open up risk, with most 2FA still SMS-based. You do not want an attacker armed with both your Gmail address and your SIM card. The even biggest risk is a fake call claiming to be from a technical support desk. Google has been hit hard by such attacks and has patched as it goes. It emphasizes it will never call users with a security or account issue, but still those attacks come. And so, in addition to deleting your phone number as a 2FA option, you should never engage with any technical or customer support desk from a major brand that calls or texts on the premise of an account or payment or password issue.