Vietnam attracts global manufacturers despite US tariff increases
Despite steep US tariffs, Vietnam continues to attract strong foreign investment – especially in manufacturing and industrial real estate – driven by policy incentives, improving infrastructure and its strategic role in the move of the global supply chain away from China.
Vietnam's economic ties with the United States are deep. In 2024, exports to America totalled US$136.6 billion, accounting for nearly 30 per cent of the country's gross domestic product. While the imposition of tariffs dealt a blow to Vietnam's manufacturing sector, its May manufacturing purchasing managers' index recovered slightly to 49.8 after falling to 45.6 in April, signaling early signs of stabilization.
Two sectors – manufacturing and real estate – are leading Vietnam's foreign investment surge. As of April 2025, newly approved foreign investment reached US$13.82 billion, up 39.9 per cent year on year, according to Vietnam's Ministry of Finance. Of that, US$8.9 billion flowed into manufacturing, and US$2.83 billion into real estate, which jumped 61.9 per cent.
Industrial and construction-related sectors grew 7.42 per cent in the first quarter of 2025, contributing more than 40 per cent to GDP.
Speaking at the Vietnam Industrial Parks Development Forum on May 29, Nguyen Thi Dung, vice chair of the Vietnam Industrial Real Estate Association, emphasized that infrastructure investment in industrial parks has become an urgent priority. As prime land in central areas dwindles, demand is shifting to second-tier provinces.
But challenges remain. Nguyen cited four bottlenecks: complicated approval procedures, lack of a unified infrastructure plan, land acquisition issues and poor inter-regional connectivity.
A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU
Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business
Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies.
Sign Up
Sign Up
In an interview with Caixin, Lance Li, CEO of BW Industrial, a major Vietnamese industrial real estate platform, said Vietnam's land supply system differs significantly from China's. In China, land is allocated by the government, enabling fast supply at low cost; in Vietnam, land is sold by first-tier developers, with higher prices and longer acquisition timelines.
Most land in Vietnam is freehold, adding further delays to new supply. The land acquisition process is complex and time-consuming, making it difficult to rapidly increase supply, Li said. In southern centers such as Binh Duong and Dong Nai, available land is nearly exhausted.
Industrial land prices in Vietnam are now often higher than in Chinese mainland, with rents rising about 6 per cent a year, Li said.
Vietnam has 416 industrial parks covering a total of nearly 1.29 million hectares. To accommodate the accelerating shift of global manufacturing, the government plans to add 221 new parks, expand 76 and reconfigure 22 by 2030.
BW Industrial, founded in 2018 by Warburg Pincus and Becamex IDC, now operates more than 50 projects across 12 key provinces, managing 10 million square meters of land and US$3 billion in assets. Li, who joined in 2021 from ESR China, oversees nearly 4.4 million square meters of developed or under-construction properties.
Li said China-based firms moving overseas are not doing so uniformly. Each company's decision depends on internal dynamics. He warned that companies should not assume Vietnam is automatically cheaper. Many firms face high hardware costs, lower labor productivity and infrastructure constraints.
'From the Trump 1.0 era to the Covid-19 pandemic, and now to Trump 2.0, market dynamics have changed significantly, and the types and pace of corporate relocation have also evolved,' Li said.
On labor, Li noted that after three months' training, Vietnamese workers could reach 80 per cent or more of Chinese workers' efficiency, while earning less than 80 per cent of Chinese wages — still an advantage. But only a few firms achieve parity, often relying on automation and advanced management.
The pandemic was a turning point. Initially, only final product manufacturers moved out of China. But Covid paralyzed logistics worldwide, sparking widespread supply chain concerns. The industry shifted from 'just in time' to 'just in case,' forcing suppliers to localize.
Stricter rules of origin also play a role. Many countries now demand higher local content in exported goods. 'To qualify for certificates of origin, the entire supply chain has to move,' Li said.
After China lifted Covid restrictions in late 2022, another wave of companies went abroad – not due to sudden shifts, but as long-delayed decisions were finally executed. Since 2023, Chinese firms continue to expand overseas, each driven by different factors – be it rising orders, cost-cutting or domestic policy shifts.
Despite some post-entry disappointments, Vietnam still holds a manufacturing edge in Southeast Asia. Confucian values instill discipline, and labor costs are lower than in Thailand but higher than in the Philippines.
Government efficiency, political stability and a pragmatic, open stance add to Vietnam's appeal. The country has signed 17 free trade agreements and maintained low average tariffs, even before the Trump-era trade tensions.
However, uncertainties persist. Li said clients are increasingly seeking guidance amid new tariff rumors. Trump's trade stance remains unpredictable, creating some investors wary while others push forward.
He expects US tariffs on China to stay high, while those on other countries may be negotiated down. The strategy, he said, is classic 'raise high, retreat slowly' diplomacy.
Looking ahead, Li believes China's outbound manufacturing push will intensify over the next three years. As long as US-China tensions persist, the shift is inevitable. Even China's cost advantages can't offset steep tariffs.
With lead manufacturers relocating, tier-one and tier-two suppliers are following, forming entire supply chains abroad. The speed of this evolution depends on how quickly capacity is built up overseas.
Still, Vietnam must manage rising land and labor costs. Wages rise 6 per cent to 7 per cent each year, and in advanced areas, salaries now rival China's central and western regions. Labor-intensive businesses also face potential strikes and labor disputes, Li warned. CAIXIN GLOBAL
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Oil prices hold near 7-week high as market waits for news from US-China trade talks
[NEW YORK] Oil prices held near a seven-week high on Tuesday as the market awaited direction from trade talks between the US and China. Analysts have said a trade deal between the countries with the world's two biggest economies could boost prices by supporting global economic growth and increasing oil demand. Brent crude futures slid 17 cents, or 0.3 per cent, to settle at US$66.87 a barrel, while US West Texas Intermediate crude fell 31 cents, or 0.5 per cent, to settle at US$64.98. On Monday, Brent settled at its highest since April 22 and WTI at its highest since April 3. Trade talks between the US and China stretched through a second full day and into the evening in London as the two countries pushed for a breakthrough on duelling export controls that have threatened to unravel a delicate tariff truce. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said trade talks with Chinese officials were going well and he hoped they would end on Tuesday night, but said they could run into Wednesday. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The World Bank, meanwhile, slashed its global growth forecast for 2025 by four-tenths of a percentage point to 2.3 per cent, saying that higher tariffs and heightened uncertainty posed a 'significant headwind' for nearly all economies. On the supply side, allocations to Chinese refiners showed that Saudi Arabia's state oil company Saudi Aramco will ship about 47 million barrels of oil to China in July, 1 million barrels less than June's allotted volume, Reuters reported. The Saudi allocations could be an early sign that the unwinding of Opec+ production cuts might not result in much additional supply, said Harry Tchilinguirian, group head of research at Onyx Capital. 'The prospect of further hikes in Opec supply continues to hang over the market,' ANZ senior commodity strategist Daniel Hynes said in a note. Opec+, which pumps about half of the world's oil and includes the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and allies such as Russia, put forward plans for an output increase of 411,000 barrels per day for July as it looks to unwind production cuts for a fourth straight month. A Reuters survey found Opec's May increase to oil output was limited, with Iraq, the second biggest Opec producer behind Saudi Arabia, pumping below target to compensate for earlier overproduction, and Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates making smaller increases than agreed. Elsewhere, Iran said it would soon make a counter-proposal for a nuclear deal in response to a US offer that Tehran deems 'unacceptable,' while US President Donald Trump made clear that the two sides remained at odds over whether Tehran would be allowed to continue enriching uranium on Iranian soil. Iran is the third-largest Opec producer and any easing of US sanctions on Tehran should allow Iran to export more oil, which should reduce crude prices. Meanwhile, the European Commission proposed an 18th package of sanctions against Russia for its invasion of Ukraine, aimed at Moscow's energy revenues, banks and military industry. Russia was the world's second biggest crude producer in 2024 behind the US, and any increase in sanctions will likely keep more of that oil out of global markets, which could support oil prices. US oil inventories and exports The American Petroleum Institute trade group and the US Energy Information Administration are due to release US oil inventory data on Tuesday and Wednesday, respectively. Analysts forecast energy firms pulled about 2 million barrels of oil from US stockpiles during the week ended June 6, marking the first time they withdrew oil from storage for three weeks in a row since January. That compares with an increase of 3.7 million barrels during the same week last year and an average increase of 2.8 million barrels over the past five years (2020-2024). REUTERS
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
US: Stocks advance as China trade talks drag on
[NEW YORK] Wall Street stocks advanced on Tuesday as markets hoped for progress in US-China trade talks while digesting the World Bank's lowered economic growth forecast. A second day of high-level talks between the United States and China in London stretched into the evening on Tuesday without any concrete announcement. FHN Financial's Chris Low pointed to upbeat comments from Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, while also noting that 'there was a TikTok channel associated with Chinese television suggesting that there are still some significant differences between the two sides.' The Dow Jones Industrial Average finished up 0.3 per cent at 42,866.87. The broad-based S&P 500 climbed 0.6 per cent to 6,038.81, while the tech-rich Nasdaq Composite Index also gained 0.6 per cent to 19,715.00. The negotiations aim to keep the world's biggest two economies on course for an accord after each side earlier this spring imposed draconian tariffs on each other. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Citing trade tensions and the resulting policy uncertainty, the World Bank lowered its 2025 projection for global GDP growth to 2.3 per cent in its latest economic prospects report, down from 2.7 per cent expected in January. Global growth and inflation prospects for this year and next have worsened because of 'high levels of policy uncertainty and this growing fragmentation of trade relations,' said World Bank Group chief economist Indermit Gill. 'Without a swift course correction, the harm to living standards could be deep,' Gill added. Investors will get a fresh reading on US inflation Wednesday with release of consumer price index data. Among individual companies, Disney rose 2.7 per cent after disclosing that it reached an agreement on the pricing of NBC Universal's 33 per cent stake in Hulu, resolving a years-long appraisal process. Disney will pay an additional US$438.7 million for the stake. The transaction is expected to close on or before July 24. Tesla shot up 5.7 per cent on anticipation of the company's upcoming launch of self-driving vehicles in Texas. The electric vehicle company teased the introduction on Musk's X social media platform. Chip giant Intel surged 8.0 per cent on optimism about the company's new technology. AFP
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
The G7 is at a critical crossroads
THE Group of Seven (G7) could well face an existential crisis at the Kananaskis summit because of US President Donald Trump. Whither the G7? In the 1980s and 1990s, the G7 – led by the US – steered the global economy. But with the rise of emerging market powerhouses, the G7's relative heft declined. The Group of 20's (G20) Pittsburgh summit in September 2009 declared the newer, bigger, broader G20 the premier forum for its leaders' international cooperation, assigning the G7 an informal role. Then, over the following 15 years, the G20 floundered. Economic performance in Russia and Brazil weakened, as did China's subsequently. Russia invaded Crimea and Donbas in 2014 and launched its horrific full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. US-China tensions mounted amid Chinese President Xi Jinping's increased authoritarianism and America's heightened focus on economic statecraft, including the first Trump administration's pursuit of a more protectionist and isolationist course. A reinvigorated role for the G7 As the G20 stumbled, the G7 gathered renewed momentum. It was not a smooth ride, as epitomised by the strained US relations with the rest of the G7 at the 2018 Charlevoix summit, when Trump shamefully disavowed the communique to which all had just agreed and launched verbal attacks on the summit's host, Canada's then-prime minister Justin Trudeau. The administration of former US president Joe Biden, however, helped revive the G7 as a cohesive, democratically aligned forum. The G7 rolled out sanctions on Russia, including blocking US$300 billion in Russian central bank and oligarch assets. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up It helped raise support for Ukraine, including by transferring proceeds from Russia's immobilised assets, although unfortunately failing to seize and send all those Russian holdings to Ukraine. The G7 limited Russian energy revenues, including imposing a price cap on Russia's oil exports. Members worked together on tackling cybersecurity, which would not have been feasible by the G20 given the presence of Russia and China. The G7 adopted a hardened line against China's challenge to Western security. All this cohesion, trust and unity are unravelling as the Jun 15-17 Kananaskis summit approaches. US relations with its longtime allies in Europe have become highly strained. Trump is tearing apart the glue that holds the G7 together, and it now faces the question of whether it can even continue, or function properly, at least, over the next four years while Trump is president. It is hard to reach a positive answer for several reasons. Trump's attacks on the European Union (EU), claiming that the bloc was formed to 'screw' America, fly in the face of transatlantic unity and basic comity, and America's longstanding support for the EU. His tariff threats undermine the liberal trade policies that promoted decades of transatlantic prosperity. He is right in arguing that Europe must do more for itself, especially on defence. But shunning America's closest democratic allies while embracing Russian President Vladimir Putin and other authoritarian leaders undermines the cohesion underpinning the G7's revival. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, always an ardent pro-Atlanticist, shockingly said that his absolute priority will be to strengthen Europe as quickly as possible in order to achieve independence from the US, because Americans under this administration are clearly indifferent to the fate of Europe. Other European leaders have echoed his startling remarks. Avoiding a fragmented future Trump seemingly wishes to abandon the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (Nato), or disregard its responsibilities. He appears to see little value or have any interest in the G7 as a 'democracy' club, given his support for authoritarians. Indeed, he has again called for Russia to be readmitted to the G7, despite its barbaric war against Ukraine and Putin's dictatorship. Other G7 leaders have rejected Trump's call. Trump has shown utter disregard for Ukraine, even denying that Russia was the aggressor, notwithstanding the rest of the G7's steadfast strong support. His berating of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, supported by Vice-President JD Vance, sent chills up the backs of European leaders and was quickly rebuffed by them. Trump has turned America's policies on climate change on their head, while Europe continues to do its best to forge ahead. European officials have reservations about trusting and working with Trump's intelligence team. Moreover, Trump's deprecations and disdain for Canadian sovereignty will only exacerbate the underlying tensions surrounding the Kananaskis summit. The foundations supporting the Western alliance, Nato, liberal trade and the G7 – and, frankly, American global leadership – are being torn asunder by the current US administration. Whatever the status of these issues at Kananaskis, enormous damage has been done. The G7 Kananaskis summit may be a frigid affair, even if it is warm and sunny outside. OMFIF The writer is US chair of the Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum