Kemi Badenoch opens door to ‘ghetto law'
Asked whether she would consider a similar policy for the UK, Mrs Badenoch told an audience at the Policy Exchange think tank on Monday that she had 'looked at it' and would be talking about it more.
She said: 'I think integration is not enough. I say assimilate, I think assimilation should be the target, and if people don't assimilate, then they integrate.
'But we've had so many, so many people, so high numbers, people from lots of different places, which is not what immigration used to look like, and I think we need to move from passive to active integration.'
Saying her ideas were 'along the lines' of the Danish policy, she added: 'We need to do what works for the UK, it's not exactly the same situation, we have a much bigger population, and so many other things that would require adjustments, but that sort of thing, yes.'
Mrs Badenoch was speaking to Lord Moore, the crossbench peer and Telegraph columnist, as part of Policy Exchange's project to mark the centenary of Margaret Thatcher's birth.
'Unstable' families
She went on to say she wanted to see the state doing less and did not want to see an 'active state' in areas outside policing and defence.
Recalling Baroness Thatcher, she also argued for society to do more to prevent 'unstable' families from being formed.
Asked about the role of personal responsibility in family policy, she said: 'I think that we need to start looking more at the prevention side of it.
'How do we make sure people don't start families that are unstable in the first place? I don't think that government needs to get overly involved in that.
'Society, and there is such a thing as society, needs to have some form of supporting families as well.'
It is amid competition between the Tories and Reform UK for socially conservative voters, especially on the issue of immigration.
'Very Left-wing'
Nigel Farage, the Reform leader, has said that Britain's immigration system is fundamentally broken, and called for an overall cap on the number of legal migrants.
Mrs Badenoch said on Monday that Reform was not a centre-right party but 'very Left-wing'.
She also attacked the Labour government, arguing that Lord Hermer, the Attorney General, had engaged in 'legal fetishism' by prioritising international law during the Iran-Israel conflict.
'With regards to the Government, I think there is a complete absence of moral clarity and, in fact, moral courage,' she said.
'I do think it is quite extraordinary the position they found themselves in where the Foreign Secretary is unable to say whether or not he believes that the action was lawful. It's a completely preposterous situation because if there's a counter-attack from Iran, they will probably come out and say that it is lawful. They clearly don't think it's lawful, because if they did, they would have come out and said so.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
UK lifts warning for Qatar as Trump says Iran and Israel have agreed ceasefire
The UK has lifted advice for its citizens to shelter in place in Qatar after Iran launched a retaliatory attack on a US military base there. Iran launched a missile attack on the base after America's strikes on its nuclear facilities on Saturday. However, US President Donald Trump appeared to react positively, calling the move 'a very weak response' and thanking Tehran 'for giving us early notice' to avoid any casualties. He then claimed Israel and Iran had agreed a 'complete and total ceasefire' to be phased in over 24 hours. Foreign Secretary David Lammy had urged Iran to 'take the off ramp' and return to the negotiating table with the US after American B-2 stealth bombers and a salvo of submarine-launched missiles hit Iran's nuclear facilities on Saturday night. But after a US security alert, the Foreign Office advised British nationals to 'shelter in place' and Qatar shut its airspace as a precaution. The attacks came shortly after. Armed forces minister Luke Pollard said the UK was monitoring the 'fast-changing situation' closely and that 'the UK Government utterly condemns any escalation'. 'Force protection now is at its highest state across all deployed units in the Middle East,' he told the Commons. 'The additional RAF Typhoon jets announced by the Prime Minister have now arrived in the region to reinforce our posture, deter threats and reassure our partners, and I want to be clear, we will not rule out sending further capabilities if they are required,' Mr Pollard said. Meanwhile, the UK started evacuating Britons from Israel, with the first group of 63 flown back via Cyprus and due to return to the UK on Monday. Downing Street said 'around 1,000' people had requested a seat on an evacuation flight – a quarter of the 4,000 who had registered their presence in Israel or Palestine with the Foreign Office. The Government has withdrawn staff from its embassy in Iran and it is operating 'remotely', Mr Lammy told MPs. The Foreign Secretary previously spoke of a two-week window for a diplomatic solution after Mr Trump's apparent decision last week to delay US military action. On Monday, he said the window had 'narrowed' but told MPs the need for a diplomatic solution remained. Mr Lammy said: 'My message for Tehran was clear, take the off ramp, dial this thing down, and negotiate with the United States seriously and immediately. 'The alternative is an even more destructive and far-reaching conflict, which could have unpredictable consequences.' Downing Street had said that preventing Tehran from obtaining a nuclear bomb was a 'good thing' for the UK, but declined to comment on whether the US strikes complied with international law. Meanwhile, oil prices reached their highest level for nearly six months over fears a regional conflict could restrict supply, especially if Iran decided to blockade the Strait of Hormuz. Mr Lammy told MPs the Government was 'closely monitoring' the energy markets and urged Iran to keep the Strait of Hormuz open, saying a blockade would be 'a monumental act of economic self-harm' and make reaching a diplomatic solution even harder.
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Keir Starmer heads to Nato summit where he will vow to spend 5% of GDP on defence - but PM is accused of using 'smoke and mirrors' to 'con' Donald Trump
Sir Keir Starmer 's pledge to increase defence and security spending to 5 per cent of GDP by 2035 was last night branded 'a con'. The Prime Minister will unveil the promise at a Nato summit today, with the alliance's 31 other members also expected to sign up to it. It will commit Britain to spending 3.5 per cent of GDP on core defence spending, such as troops and weapons, plus a further 1.5 per cent on security-related domestic infrastructure. The summit comes after Sir Keir's meeting yesterday with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky at No 10. But critics pointed out that the pledge does not accelerate spending on core defence beyond what has already been promised by Labour. By contrast, Germany said it would accelerate its spending to hit the core defence target by 2029 – six years early – amid growing global instability and the prospect of a war in the Middle East. Sir Keir also faced questions about how the commitment would be paid for amid stagnant growth and the prospect of tax hikes this autumn. The Royal United Services Institute, a leading defence and security think-tank, estimates hitting the target on core defence alone could cost an extra £40 billion a year. Until now, the Government has pledged to increase core defence spending to 2.6 per cent of GDP in 2027. But under the Nato agreement, this will remain the same. The 1.5 per cent of GDP spending on security-related domestic infrastructure would be hit by 2027. However, Nato members effectively decide themselves whether they're hitting this part of the target and there are fears Labour will try to include items not strictly related to defence. Downing Street sources said, for example, that it could include spending on beefing up energy security amid the switch to NetZero and fighting migrant-smuggling gangs. Former defence secretary Sir Ben Wallace posted on X: 'Tomorrow at the Nato summit we will witness the UK Government trying to con the US and Nato with spin on defence spending. 'By folding in other departments' spending and with no real defence £ increases, the PM will claim 5 per cent. 'The threat to our country is real not spin. This Government thinks it can use smoke and mirrors to deceive the public and Donald Trump. 'This is an insult to our troops who will see no significant new money. It fools no one.'
The Independent
35 minutes ago
- The Independent
Liz Kendall says welfare reforms will create ‘a better future'
Liz Kendall has said the Government's flagship welfare reforms will create the 'better future we seek to build for our constituents and our country', as she faced backbench Labour MPs. The Work and Pensions Secretary's appearance at a Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP) meeting on Monday night came after warnings from Labour backbenchers in the Commons that the reforms will lead to 'appalling poverty'. Under the proposals, ministers will limit eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC). Ms Kendall's appearance at the committee was her first since the Government published its welfare reform Bill, and since Labour MP Vicky Foxcroft resigned as a Government whip because of her concerns over the package. Ms Kendall told the meeting there is 'no route to social justice based on greater benefit spending alone'. Ministers have previously said the reforms could save up to £5 billion a year. But in a sign they are now emphasising a moral case for the Bill over its financial savings, Ms Kendall told MPs: 'The path to a fairer society – one where everyone thrives, where people who can work get the support they need, and where we protect those who cannot – that is the path we seek to build with our reforms. 'Our plans are rooted in fairness – for those who need support and for taxpayers. 'They are about ensuring the welfare state survives, so there is always a safety net for those who need it. They're about putting proper safeguards in place to protect the most vulnerable. 'But above all they are about our belief that everyone can fulfil their potential and live their hopes and dreams when, collectively, we provide them with real opportunities and support. This is the better future we seek to build for our constituents and our country.' More than 20 MPs asked Ms Kendall questions about the reforms during the PLP meeting, the PA news agency understands, with most being broadly supportive, but a small minority insisting they would vote against the plans in the Commons. MPs leaving the meeting told journalists there was far more consensus about the reforms than it outwardly appeared. But in the Commons before the gathering, Labour MPs continued to voice their concerns. Richard Burgon, Leeds East MP, said: 'Isn't the simple and sad truth that any MP who votes for this upcoming welfare Bill is voting to take Pip from disabled people who need assistance to cut up their food, wash themselves and go to the toilet?' Work and Pensions minister Sir Stephen Timms replied: 'No. What people will be voting for is reforms to open up opportunities for people who have been denied opportunities for far, far too long. We're putting that right.' Andy McDonald, MP for Middlesbrough and Thornaby East, said: 'Ministers have highlighted the scale of Pip recipients expected to lose payments make up one in 10 of the total Pip caseload, suggesting the impact of the cuts will be limited, but that's still 370,000 current recipients expected to lose on average £4,500. 'But these numbers rest on a set of assumptions that the OBR (Office for Budget Responsibility) has described as highly uncertain. DWP (Department for Work and Pensions) data shows there are 1.3 million people currently receiving Pip daily living payments who would not meet the new criteria. 'So before MPs are asked to vote on imposing such appalling poverty, will the DWP or the OBR provide further evidence underpinning these claims?' Sir Stephen replied: 'Well, the OBR has published its assessment. (Mr McDonald) is absolutely right, their assessment is that one in 10 of those who are receiving Pip in November next year will have lost it by 2029/30. 'Following that, we will be able to introduce the biggest investment there has ever been in employment support for people out of work on health and disability grounds, because we don't want any longer to track people on low income for years and years and years, we want people to be able to enter work and fulfil their ambitions, and that's what the investment will allow.' The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill will be debated on July 1, when it receives its second reading in the Commons. Pip is a benefit aimed at helping with extra living costs if someone has a long-term physical or mental health condition or disability and difficulty doing certain everyday tasks or getting around because of their condition. Data for Pip claimants begins in January 2019, when the number was 2.05 million. An impact assessment published alongside the Bill confirmed previously published estimates that changes to Pip entitlement rules could see about 800,000 people lose out, with an average loss of £4,500 per year.
