Nose job boom in Iran where procedure can boost social status
All of the women in Iranian model Azadeh's family have had nose surgeries, each feeling the pressure to conform with Western beauty standards in a country where female bodies are heavily policed.
To Azadeh, smoothing out the bump in what Iranians would call the "Persian nose" she was born with proved a lucrative investment.
Since the 1979 Islamic revolution, Iranian women have been required to dress modestly and cover their hair, and the beauty industry has become almost entirely centred on the face.
Having rhinoplasty -- a nose job -- can make a major difference, Azadeh told AFP.
"After the operation, not only have I earned myself a modelling job with better social standing but I'm also earning three times more and I'm more respected by clients," she said.
Azadeh, 29, asked that her surname be withheld because women models can face social pressure in Iran.
According to the US-based International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ISAPS), more than 264,000 cosmetic operations were performed in Iran in 2023, with rhinoplasty being the most common.
- A cultural trend -
Across Tehran and other Iranian cities, brightly coloured billboards advertise beauty clinics and cosmetic procedures, offering promises of sculpted noses, flawless skin and perfect teeth.
Many people with bandaged noses can be seen on the streets, a testament to the popularity of rhinoplasty.
"It has become more of a cultural trend," said rhinoplasty surgeon Hamidreza Hosnani who performs up to 20 operations a week at his well-equipped clinic in the capital.
And that trend has evolved, becoming more and more tied to social identity and status, especially as more women have defied the strict dress code.
Such defiance became more marked following the mass protests sparked by the 2022 death in custody of 22-year-old Iranian Kurd Mahsa Amini.
In Iran, where the minimum wage is around $100, basic rhinoplasty costs up to $1,000 -- significantly cheaper than in other countries, Hosnani said.
Millions of Iranians have long struggled with soaring prices and a plunging currency, driven in part by years of international sanctions.
"I even had to borrow the money required for the operation from my friends and family, but the money was well spent, and it was completely worth it," Azadeh said.
Reyhaneh Khoshhali, a 28-year-old surgical assistant, had the operation four years ago, and regrets not having it sooner.
"My nose really did not look good aesthetically and I wanted to be more beautiful," she said.
"If I could go back, I would have had the operation earlier."
- Unauthorised clinics -
For years, Iran has hosted highly advanced medical centres, even becoming a destination for foreigners seeking high-quality and affordable cosmetic surgery.
However, the procedures can also come with risks.
The Iranian authorities have repeatedly warned about the growing number of unauthorised clinics performing cosmetic procedures.
In February, a dozen unlicenced practitioners were arrested and several operating theatres in Tehran's Apadana Hospital were closed because of unauthorised cosmetic procedures, the health ministry said.
In 2023, three women died in a single day -- November 7 -- during cosmetic surgery in three separate incidents in Tehran, media reported at the time.
Ava Goli has yet to undergo her rhinoplasty operation, and said that finding a reliable doctor involved some research.
"I saw some people whose nose job did not look good... and yeah, it really made me scared at times," the 23-year-old told AFP.
Yet the demand for cosmetic surgery in Iran remains high -- and the pressure to keep up is not limited to women.
Bahador Sayyadi, a 33-year-old accountant, said he had to borrow money so he could have a hair transplant.
"My financial situation isn't great, but thanks to a loan I got recently, I will be doing the procedure just in time before my wedding," he said.
"Men should also take care of themselves these days, just like women."
pdm/mz/srm/ser/tc
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Business News
2 hours ago
- Time Business News
How Culture Shapes Our View of Wellbutrin for Anxiety
In today's globalized world, the way we understand and interpret mental health treatments is deeply influenced by cultural beliefs, values, and norms. One such medication that has garnered attention in recent years is wellbutrin anxiety. Originally approved as an antidepressant and smoking cessation aid, it has also been used off-label for treating anxiety in specific cases. However, public and medical perceptions of using Wellbutrin for anxiety vary widely depending on cultural background. Understanding how culture shapes our view of this drug provides insight not just into Wellbutrin's reception, but into broader societal attitudes about mental health and pharmacological treatment. When it comes to treating ADHD, stimulant medications play a crucial role in improving focus and reducing impulsivity. Two Vyvanse vs adderall prescribed options are Vyvanse and Adderall, each with distinct characteristics. Vyvanse is a prodrug, meaning it's inactive until metabolized in the body, leading to a smoother and longer-lasting effect. In contrast, Adderall contains a mix of amphetamine salts that act more quickly but can have a shorter duration. Both medications target similar brain chemicals but differ in onset time and side effects. Choosing between Vyvanse vs Adderall often depends on individual response and lifestyle needs. Culture plays a critical role in shaping how individuals perceive mental health, diagnose emotional distress, and seek treatment. In Western societies, particularly in the United States, there is a growing acceptance of using medication for managing mental health conditions like depression and anxiety. The biomedical model dominates—mental health is largely seen as a result of neurochemical imbalances, treatable through pharmaceutical intervention. This belief system naturally influences the openness toward medications like Wellbutrin, even for off-label uses such as anxiety. In contrast, in many non-Western cultures, mental health is more likely to be seen through spiritual, communal, or holistic lenses. Psychological distress might be attributed to personal failure, spiritual imbalance, or societal disharmony. These cultural frameworks often result in stigmatization of psychiatric drugs or skepticism about their necessity. As a result, someone in a collectivist culture might be more hesitant to use Wellbutrin for anxiety, fearing social judgment or believing that non-pharmacological methods like meditation, herbal remedies, or community support are more acceptable. One of the major cultural factors that influences the use of Wellbutrin is stigma—both internal and societal. In many cultures, there is significant stigma attached to taking psychiatric medication, often rooted in a belief that mental illness indicates personal weakness or failure. Even in countries like the U.S., where psychiatric drug use is widespread, people often express reluctance or shame in discussing their medication openly. Wellbutrin's branding as a 'non-typical' antidepressant and its use in smoking cessation has somewhat reduced this stigma for some users. It doesn't carry the same weight as more commonly used SSRIs like Prozac or Zoloft. However, when used for anxiety—a condition often seen as less severe or 'less legitimate' than depression in some circles—users may face added pressure or disbelief. Cultural norms that promote stoicism, self-reliance, or silence around emotional distress can further discourage individuals from accepting Wellbutrin as a viable treatment for anxiety. How a medication is marketed also plays a substantial role in shaping cultural perceptions. In the United States, direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising is legal and widespread. Television ads often portray medications like Wellbutrin as life-changing tools, providing visual narratives of transformation—from despair to joy, from isolation to connection. This imagery feeds into a cultural narrative that medical solutions are the most efficient and desirable route to wellness. However, this is not the case globally. In countries where pharmaceutical advertising is restricted or banned, public knowledge of medications like Wellbutrin often comes from doctors or health professionals, not TV commercials or social media. As a result, cultural narratives about these drugs are more medically grounded and less emotionally driven. In such societies, Wellbutrin may be seen more clinically and less symbolically—as a neutral tool rather than a symbol of modern self-care or empowerment. Cultural differences in healthcare systems also affect the way Wellbutrin is prescribed and understood. In the United States, the healthcare model allows for a greater degree of patient choice and provider flexibility. Off-label use, such as prescribing Wellbutrin for anxiety, is relatively common. Physicians may be more willing to explore alternative applications of existing drugs, especially if patients advocate for them. In other countries, stricter regulations, standardized treatment protocols, and less patient involvement in treatment decisions can result in a more conservative approach. Doctors may hesitate to prescribe Wellbutrin for anxiety if it's not officially approved for that use, regardless of emerging evidence or individual cases. This cautious stance is not necessarily due to mistrust of the drug, but due to systemic differences in risk tolerance and adherence to evidence-based guidelines. How cultures define and handle emotions also deeply influences the acceptability of using medications like Wellbutrin for anxiety. In some Western cultures, expressing emotions openly and prioritizing emotional well-being is encouraged. Anxiety is increasingly seen as a legitimate health issue requiring treatment, and patients are encouraged to seek out solutions, whether therapeutic or pharmacological. In more reserved cultures, where emotional restraint and control are highly valued, anxiety might be normalized or downplayed. Instead of seeking treatment, individuals might be encouraged to 'tough it out' or turn to traditional healing practices. In these environments, suggesting a pharmaceutical solution like Wellbutrin may be met with resistance or disbelief—not necessarily because the drug is distrusted, but because the condition it treats isn't universally acknowledged in the same way. The rise of online health communities and social media platforms has begun to blur traditional cultural boundaries. People from different countries and backgrounds can now share their experiences with medications like Wellbutrin, creating a global dialogue. On platforms like Reddit, YouTube, and TikTok, individuals openly discuss the pros and cons of using Wellbutrin for anxiety. These discussions can demystify the drug for some, validate others' experiences, and challenge deeply ingrained cultural beliefs. Younger generations, especially digital natives, are more likely to seek health information online and adopt perspectives that differ from those of their parents or cultural predecessors. In some cases, this has led to increased openness about mental health and reduced stigma around medication use, even in cultures that historically resisted psychiatric intervention. As a result, cultural perceptions of Wellbutrin are gradually shifting, becoming more nuanced and inclusive. Wellbutrin's use for anxiety, while still considered off-label, offers a fascinating case study in how cultural beliefs shape medical treatment. From the stigma surrounding psychiatric medication to healthcare system practices and emotional expression norms, countless factors influence how this drug is perceived and utilized. While Western cultures may embrace Wellbutrin more readily as a modern solution to mental health struggles, non-Western societies often approach it with caution, shaped by different traditions, values, and healthcare infrastructures. As global conversations about mental health continue to evolve, it's essential to recognize that there is no single, universal view of medications like Wellbutrin. Each perspective is valid in its own cultural context. By understanding these cultural nuances, we can foster more inclusive, respectful, and informed approaches to mental health treatment across the world. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Get Ready to Hear a Lot More About Your Mitochondria
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s warning about mitochondria slipped in between the anti-vaccine junk science and the excoriation of pharmaceutical drugs as 'the No. 3 killer in our country.' He was speaking in 2023 to Joe Rogan, elaborating on the dangers of Wi-Fi—which no high-quality scientific evidence has shown to harm anyone's health—and arguing that it causes disease by somehow opening the blood-brain barrier, and by degrading victims' mitochondria. The mention of mitochondria—the tiny structures that generate energy within our cells—was brief. Two years later, mitochondrial health is poised to become a pillar of the MAHA movement, already showing up in marketing for supplements and on podcasts across the 'manosphere.' Casey Means, President Donald Trump's newest nominee for surgeon general, has singled out the organelle as the main casualty of the modern American health crisis. According to Means (who has an M.D. but no active medical license), most of America's chronic ailments can be traced to mitochondrial dysfunction. Should she be confirmed to the post of surgeon general, the American public can expect to hear a lot more about mitochondria. Among scientists, interest and investment in mitochondria have risen notably in the past five years, Kay Macleod, a University of Chicago researcher who studies mitochondria's role in cancer, told me. Mitochondria, after all, perform a variety of crucial functions in the human body. Beyond powering cells, they can affect gene expression, help certain enzymes function, and modulate cell death, Macleod said. When mitochondria are defective, people do indeed suffer. Vamsi Mootha, a mitochondrial biologist based at Massachusetts General Hospital and the Broad Institute, told me that rare genetic defects (appearing in about one in 4,300 people) can cause the organelles to malfunction, leading to muscle weakness, heart abnormalities, cognitive disability, and liver and kidney problems. Evidence also suggests that defects in mitochondria directly contribute to symptoms of Parkinson's disease, and could be both a cause and an effect of type 2 diabetes. Other conditions' links to mitochondria are blurrier. Researchers see aberrant mitochondria in postmortem biopsies of patients with illnesses such as Alzheimer's, cancer, and fatty-liver disease, Mootha said; whether those damaged mitochondria cause or result from such conditions is not yet clear. But according to Good Energy, the book Means published last year with a top MAHA adviser—her brother, Calley—mitochondrial dysfunction is a veritable plague upon the United States, responsible for both serious illness and everyday malaise. In their view, modern Western diets and lifestyles wreck countless Americans' metabolic health: Every time you drink unfiltered water or a soda, or feel the stress of mounting phone notifications, you hurt your mitochondria, they say, triggering an immune response that in turn triggers inflammation. (Damaged mitochondria really can cause inflammation, Macleod said.) This chain of events, the Meanses claim, can be blamed for virtually every common chronic health condition: migraines, depression, infertility, heart disease, obesity, cancer, and more. (Casey Means did not respond to requests for comment; reached by email, Calley did not respond to my questions about mitochondria, but noted, 'There is significant scientific evidence that healthy food, exercise and sleep have a significant impact on reversing chronic disease.') Good Energy follows a typical wellness playbook: using a mixture of valid and dubious research to pin a slew of common health problems on one overlooked element of health—and advertising a cure. Among the culprits for our mitochondrial ravaging, according to the Meanses, are poor sleep, medications, ultraprocessed foods, seed oils, too many calories, and too few vitamins, as well as chronically staying in comfortable ambient temperatures. The Means siblings therefore recommend eschewing refined sugar in favor of leafy greens, avoiding nicotine and alcohol, frequenting saunas and cold plunges, getting seven to eight hours of uninterrupted sleep a night, and cleansing your life of environmental toxins. Some studies indeed suggest that mitochondrial function is linked with sleep and temperature, but they've all been conducted on cell cultures, organoids, or mice. According to Macleod, evidence suggests that diet, too, is likely important. But only one lifestyle intervention—exercise—has been definitively shown to improve mitochondrial health in humans. The Meanses are riding a wave of interest in mitochondrial health in the wellness world. Earlier this year, the longevity influencer Bryan Johnson and the ivermectin enthusiast Mel Gibson both endorsed the dye methylene blue for its power to improve mitochondrial respiration; Kennedy was filmed slipping something that looks a lot like methylene blue into his drink. (Kennedy did not respond to a request for comment; the FDA has approved methylene blue, but only as a treatment for the blood disease methemoglobinemia.) AG1, formerly known as Athletic Greens, formulates its drinkable vitamins for mitochondrial health. Even one laser-light skin treatment promises to 'recharge failing mitochondria.' The enzyme CoQ10 is popular right now as a supplement for mitochondrial function, as is NAD, a molecule involved in mitochondria's production of energy. NAD IV drips are especially beloved by celebrities such as Gwyneth Paltrow, Kendall Jenner, and the Biebers. These supplements are generally thought to be safe, and some preliminary research shows that NAD supplementation could help patients with Parkinson's or other neurodegenerative diseases, and that CoQ10 could benefit people with mitochondrial disorders. Patients whose symptoms are clearly caused or made worse by deficiencies in a specific vitamin, such as thiamine, can benefit from supplementing those vitamins, Mootha said. But little research explores how these supplements might affect healthy adults. [Read: The MAHA takeover is complete] In Good Energy, as well as on her website and in podcast appearances, Casey Means promotes a number of supplements for mitochondrial health. She also recommends that people wear continuous glucose monitors—available from her company, Levels Health, for $184 a month—to help prevent overwhelming their mitochondria with too much glucose. (According to Macleod, glucose levels are only 'a very indirect measure' of mitochondrial activity.) As with so many problems that wellness influencers harp on, the supposed solution to this one involves buying products from those exact same people. At best, all of this attention to mitochondria could lead Americans to healthier habits. Much of the advice in Good Energy echoes health recommendations we've all heard for decades; getting regular exercise and plenty of fiber is good guidance, regardless of anyone's reasons for doing so. Switching out unhealthy habits for healthy ones will likely even improve your mitochondrial health, Jaya Ganesh, a mitochondrial-disease expert at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, told me. After all, 'if you consistently beat your body up with unhealthy habits, everything is going to fall sick,' Ganesh said. But the mitochondrial approach to wellness carries risks, too. For patients with genetically caused mitochondrial disease, lifestyle changes might marginally improve some symptoms, Ganesh said, but attempting to cure such conditions with supplements and a healthy diet alone could be dangerous. Means also calls out medications—including antibiotics, chemotherapy, antiretrovirals, statins, and high-blood-pressure drugs—for interfering with mitochondria. Macleod told me that statins really do affect mitochondria, as do some antibiotics. (The latter makes sense: Mitochondria are thought to have evolved from bacteria more than a billion years ago.) That's no reason, though, to avoid any of these medications if a doctor has determined that you need them. [Read: America can't break its wellness habit] And yet, a whole chapter of Good Energy is dedicated to the idea that readers should mistrust the motives of their doctors, who the authors say profit by keeping Americans sick. The book is less critical of the ways the wellness industry preys on people's fears. Zooming in on mitochondria might offer a reassuringly specific and seemingly scientific explanation of the many real ills of the U.S. population, but ultimately, Means and MAHA are only helping obscure the big picture. Article originally published at The Atlantic
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Archaeologists Found a 6,200-Year-Old Skull. Then They Noticed Something Very Wrong.
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: The burial site Chega Sofla has many skeletons with elongated skulls, likely from a practice called cranial bandaging where people use wrapped fabric to permanently reshape the skull in infancy and early childhood. Researchers discovered one skeleton with a cone-shaped skull that died from blunt force trauma. The study used CT scans to analyze the thickness of the elongated skull and determine whether the severity of the injuries could be attributed to the cranial bandaging. Much to your grandma's dismay, your tattoos and piercings are types of body modifications, or procedures that deliberately alter the human body. Humans have experimented with these alterations for much of our existence. And while your 'sick ink' may be widely accepted in the Western world, other cultures have body modification rituals that are much more extreme by our standards. Cranial bandaging is the practice of wrapping strips of fabric around a child's growing skull to permanently modify the shape. When performed over several years, cranial bandaging results in an elongated, cone-shaped head. Many skeletons with these modified skulls have been found at Chega Sofla, a site in western Iran that dates all the way back to 4,700 B.C. The site features dozens of graves that range in size from single burials to entire family tombs. Researchers for the Zohreh Prehistoric Project have studied the area for more than a decade, and they recently discovered the remains of a woman with an elongated skull that was inexplicably bashed in. Published in the International Journal of Osteoarchaeology on May 22, the researchers' new study details the traumatic head injury that killed the woman about 6,200 years ago. 'We know this woman experienced the fracture in the final moments of her life,' lead author of the study Mahdi Alirezazadeh told Live Science, 'but we don't have any direct evidence to say that someone intentionally struck her.' Alirezazadeh and the other researcher on the study, Hamed Vahdati Nasab, used CT scans to get a closer look at the woman's (referred to as BG1.12 in the study) skull. They focused on the thickness of her cranial bones and something called the diploë, or the spongy bone tissue found between the external and internal calvaria layers (think of diploë as the insulation in the walls of the skull). Researchers found that BG1.12's bones and their diploë were much thinner than that of a typical skull, although they noted that this is to be expected with cranial alterations. They explain that because of the thinness, the skull was likely much less effective at protecting the brain from external forces—like a blunt-force blow—than a normal skull would be. The triangular fracture on BG1.12's skull runs from the front to the left side of her head. According to the study, 'an intense force delivered by an object with a wide edge impacted the skull of this young woman during her final moments.' Alirezazadeh explains that they can't necessarily attribute the woman's death to her modified skull because the trauma was so severe. He also noted that another fractured skull was found at the site, except it was unmodified. 'It should be noted that the blow was so severe that it would have fractured a normal, unmodified skull as well,' the researcher told Live Science. 'So we cannot attribute cranial fractures solely to modified skulls,' he later continued. At Chega Sofla, people with and without cranial modifications are buried together, so the woman's skeleton has yet to be identified. Researchers are also still uncertain whether the woman sustained her injuries accidentally—or if she was murdered. You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
