logo
Airplane Stowaway Is Convicted of Infiltrating Flight to Paris

Airplane Stowaway Is Convicted of Infiltrating Flight to Paris

New York Times22-05-2025

The woman went through the legal system much as she went through Kennedy International Airport, by ducking, dodging and imposing her own reality.
Svetlana Dali, 57, evaded layers of security to board a flight to France without a ticket or passport in November. On Thursday, she was convicted in Brooklyn federal court of being a stowaway. Sentencing guidelines call for zero to six months in prison.
Ms. Dali, a U.S. resident who had emigrated from Russia, wore a red turtleneck underneath an army-green jacket, listened impassively through a Russian-speaking interpreter as the jury foreman read the verdict.
The verdict wrapped up a trial in which federal prosecutors in the Eastern District of New York highlighted shocking security breaches. The incident raised concerns about how someone could have boarded an international flight without showing a passport or a ticket during one of the year's busiest travel periods.
Ms. Dali rejected a plea deal, insisting on going to trial despite a low likelihood of winning, and took the unusual step of testifying in her own defense. Ms. Dali repeatedly interrupted the trial by talking, and, on Tuesday, she asked to personally question witnesses, a request that Judge Ann M. Donnelly denied.
'Ms. Dali, please let your lawyer talk for you,' Judge Donnelly said.
The basics were not in dispute. On Nov. 26, Ms. Dali boarded Delta Flight 264 from New York to Paris with no boarding pass or passport.
She had arrived at Kennedy by AirTrain and was turned away from an initial security screening after she could not produce a boarding pass. Then, Ms. Dali tried to enter through a line for flight crews and airport employees, but was directed to the main screening area.
Ms. Dali subsequently avoided the podium where a Transportation Security Administration official would have checked her identification, and she then went through security with her bags, an airport security manager testified. At the gate, Ms. Dali evaded a ticket check by walking in the middle of two lines of passengers.
In an interview with an F.B.I. agent on Dec. 4, Ms. Dali said that, though France was the 'worst country,' she had to go there because she was being poisoned by the U.S. government with phosphates and polonium.
Limping up to the stand on Wednesday, Ms. Dali calmly answered questions from her lawyer and a prosecutor, using an interpreter.
In Ms. Dali's retelling, she arrived at Terminal 4 and 'just walked onto the airplane.' She hid in a bathroom for most of the flight, where she was 'throwing up blood,' she testified.
Cleomie Meme, a flight attendant, testified that about an hour into the flight, she noticed that one of the bathrooms had been locked for a long time and knocked. Ms. Dali, inside with both of her bags, opened the door and mimed that she was about to vomit.
Concerned, Ms. Meme offered Ms. Dali water and a plastic bag. Ms. Dali remained in the bathroom for several more hours, before Ms. Meme again knocked.
This time, Ms. Dali darted to a bathroom on the other side of the plane.
The pursuit went on. Ms. Meme asked Ms. Dali to return to her seat. Ms. Dali meandered through the aisles, and when asked for her name, said 'Amy Hudson.' After Ms. Meme told her she couldn't find that name on the manifest, Ms. Dali said she was, in fact, 'Emily Hudson.'
Ms. Meme, who described the stowaway as 'defiant,' eventually persuaded Ms. Dali to sit in a seat at the back of the plane reserved for the crew, and the plane landed less than a minute later. French police officers apprehended her at Charles de Gaulle airport.
Brooke Theodora, a prosecutor, told jurors that Ms. Dali 'knew exactly what she was doing.'
'She knew she didn't have a boarding pass, and she knew she needed one,' Ms. Theodora said.
In a filing this month, prosecutors wrote that Ms. Dali had tried to fly without papers before. On Nov. 24, she went through security at Bradley International Airport outside Hartford, Conn., without a boarding pass, prosecutors said.
In February 2024, Ms. Dali was found hiding in a bathroom in a secure location at Miami International Airport. The incidents were 'calculated trial runs,' Ms. Theodora said.
Ms. Dali first appeared in court on Dec. 5 and was released on bail. Days later, she was arrested again after she removed her GPS monitor and traveled on a bus toward the Canadian border.
Ms. Dali's lawyer, Michael Schneider, acknowledged that Ms. Dali had boarded the plane without proper documentation, but argued that the blame lay with the T.S.A. and the airline.
'Ms. Dali wanted to leave the country,' Mr. Schneider told jurors. 'She kept knocking, and Delta opened the door.'
In his closing statement, Mr. Schneider seemed to acknowledge the improbability of an acquittal for Ms. Dali.
'To be fair, you might be sitting there like, 'Buddy, everyone knows you need a ticket to get on a plane,'' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal appeals court to hear arguments in Trump's long-shot effort to fight hush money conviction
Federal appeals court to hear arguments in Trump's long-shot effort to fight hush money conviction

CNN

time25 minutes ago

  • CNN

Federal appeals court to hear arguments in Trump's long-shot effort to fight hush money conviction

Five months after President Donald Trump was sentenced without penalty in the New York hush money case, his attorneys will square off again with prosecutors Wednesday in one of the first major tests of the Supreme Court's landmark presidential immunity decision. Trump is relying heavily on the high court's divisive 6-3 immunity ruling from July in a long-shot bid to get his conviction reviewed – and ultimately overturned – by federal courts. After being convicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records, Trump in January became the first felon to ascend to the presidency in US history. Even after Trump was reelected and federal courts became flooded with litigation tied to his second term, the appeals in the hush money case have chugged forward in multiple courts. A three-judge panel of the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals – all named to the bench by Democratic presidents – will hear arguments Wednesday in one of those cases. Trump will be represented on Wednesday by Jeffrey Wall, a private lawyer and Supreme Court litigator who served as acting solicitor general during Trump's first administration. Many of the lawyers who served on Trump's defense team in the hush money case have since taken top jobs within the Justice Department. The case stems from the 2023 indictment announced by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat, who accused Trump of falsely categorizing payments he said were made to quash unflattering stories during the 2016 election. Trump was accused of falsifying a payment to his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, to cover up a $130,000 payment Cohen made to adult-film star Stormy Daniels to keep her from speaking out before the 2016 election about an alleged affair with Trump. (Trump has denied the affair.) Trump was ultimately convicted last year and was sentenced without penalty in January, days before he took office. The president is now attempting to move that case to federal court, where he is betting he'll have an easier shot at arguing that the Supreme Court's immunity decision in July will help him overturn the conviction. Trump's earlier attempts to move the case to federal court have been unsuccessful. US District Judge Alvin Hellerstein, nominated by President Bill Clinton, denied the request in September – keeping Trump's case in New York courts instead. The 2nd Circuit will now hear arguments on Trump's appeal of that decision on Wednesday. 'He's lost already several times in the state courts,' said David Shapiro, a former prosecutor and now a lecturer at John Jay College of Criminal Justice. And Trump's long-running battle with New York Judge Juan Merchan, Shapiro said, has 'just simmered up through the system' in New York courts in a way that may have convinced Trump that federal courts will be more receptive. Trump, who frequently complained about Merchan, has said he wants his case heard in an 'unbiased federal forum.' Trump's argument hangs largely on a technical but hotly debated section of the Supreme Court's immunity decision last year. Broadly, that decision granted former presidents 'at least presumptive' immunity for official acts and 'absolute immunity' when presidents were exercising their constitutional powers. State prosecutors say the hush money payments were a private matter – not official acts of the president – and so they are not covered by immunity. But the Supreme Court's decision also barred prosecutors from attempting to show a jury evidence concerning a president's official acts, even if they are pursuing alleged crimes involving that president's private conduct. Without that prohibition, the Supreme Court reasoned, a prosecutor could 'eviscerate the immunity' the court recognized by allowing a jury to second-guess a president's official acts. Trump is arguing that is exactly what Bragg did when he called White House officials such as former communications director Hope Hicks and former executive assistant Madeleine Westerhout to testify at his trial. Hicks had testified that Trump felt it would 'have been bad to have that story come out before the election,' which prosecutors later described as the 'nail' in the coffin of the president's defense. Trump's attorneys are also pointing to social media posts the president sent in 2018 denying the Daniels hush money scheme as official statements that should not have been used in the trial. State prosecutors 'introduced into evidence and asked the jury to scrutinize President Trump's official presidential acts,' Trump's attorneys told the appeals court in a filing last month. 'One month after trial, the Supreme Court unequivocally recognized an immunity prohibiting the use of such acts as evidence at any trial of a former president.' A White House spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment. If Trump's case is ultimately reviewed by federal courts, that would not change his state law conviction into a federal conviction. Trump would not be able to pardon himself just because a federal court reviews the case. Bragg's office countered that it's too late for federal courts to intervene. Federal officials facing prosecution in state courts may move their cases to federal court in many circumstances under a 19th century law designed to ensure states don't attempt to prosecute them for conduct performed 'under color' of a US office or agency. A federal government worker, for instance, might seek to have a case moved to federal court if they are sued after getting into a car accident while driving on the job. But in this case, Bragg's office argued, Trump has already been convicted and sentenced. That means, prosecutors said, there's really nothing left for federal courts to do. 'Because final judgment has been entered and the state criminal action has concluded, there is nothing to remove to federal district court,' prosecutors told the 2nd Circuit in January. Even if that's not true, they said, seeking testimony from a White House adviser about purely private acts doesn't conflict with the Supreme Court's ruling in last year's immunity case. Bragg's office has pointed to a Supreme Court ruling as well: the 5-4 decision in January that allowed Trump to be sentenced in the hush money case. The president raised many of the same concerns about evidence when he attempted to halt that sentencing before the inauguration. A majority of the Supreme Court balked at that argument in a single sentence that, effectively, said Trump could raise those concerns when he appeals his conviction. That appeal remains pending in state court. 'The alleged evidentiary violations at President-elect Trump's state-court trial,' the Supreme Court wrote, 'can be addressed in the ordinary course on appeal.'

Man shot, killed after firing at Pasco deputies with gun strapped to hand: Officials
Man shot, killed after firing at Pasco deputies with gun strapped to hand: Officials

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Man shot, killed after firing at Pasco deputies with gun strapped to hand: Officials

The Brief A man was killed after firing multiple rounds at Pasco deputies from a gun that was strapped to his hand. Pasco deputies said they were trying to make contact with the man because of a court order for a mental health evaluation. Two deputies fired their guns during the incident. DADE CITY, Fla. - A man is dead after firing multiple rounds at Pasco County deputies from a gun that was strapped to his hand, officials said. The Pasco Sheriff's Office said the shooting happened at around 8:30 p.m. in the Rose Avenue area of Dade City. What we know Colonel Tait Sanborn with the sheriff's office said during a news conference that they were trying to serve a court order for him. Officials said the family was seeking a court order for a mental health evaluation, and that he was known to have a gun on him. Follow FOX 13 on YouTube Deputies said they were trying to get in contact with the man from inside the home on Tuesday, but there was no response from him. They continued, and were able to see the man after opening a door, and tried getting him to come out. Dig deeper Ultimately, officials said he was warned that the deputies were going to deploy chemical agents to try and get him out of the house. Sanborn said those chemical agents were deployed in the house after he continued to not listen to commands. After that, deputies said he fired four rounds at deputies from a gun that was strapped to his hand, meaning it couldn't be released. That's when deputies returned fire, killing the man. Two deputies fired their guns during the shooting out of the seven that were at the scene, Sanborn said. The Source The information in this story was provided by the Pasco Sheriff's Office. STAY CONNECTED WITH FOX 13 TAMPA: Download the FOX Local app for your smart TV Download FOX Local mobile app:Apple |Android Download the FOX 13 News app for breaking news alerts, latest headlines Download the SkyTower Radar app Sign up for FOX 13's daily newsletter

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store