Jacinta Allan is either delusional or dogged by claiming election was a mandate for SRL
The federal Liberals looked to tie Albanese to Allan in key federal seats with flyers and posters depicting both leaders under the title 'double trouble for Victorians'.
While the Albanese government did not campaign on the SRL – it refused to commit federal funds to the $35 billion project beyond the $2.2 billion it had previously announced – Allan said the project was implicitly on the ballot due to the Coalition's pledge to scrap it.
'I think if you spend any time out and about on the ground in local communities, the Suburban Rail Loop was being talked about,' she said. 'It was being talked about on doors. It was being talked about on the streets. The communities understood.'
When asked whether she accepted that her government's unpopularity was a genuine issue for her federal colleagues in the campaign, Allan did not address the question directly. She suggested every vote for federal Labor was, in effect, an endorsement of her government.
'What Victorians were focused on is what federal and state Labor governments are focused on. We share a value set in the Labor movement. We are on the side of working people, we are on the side of families. We understand, in a global, challenging economic environment, that families are looking to their government to do more.'
Steve Dimopoulos, one of the state MPs who applauded the arrival of his leader on Monday, took the argument one step further.
'Three-year-old kinder, women's health, infrastructure projects, employment, free TAFE – they are all Labor values and, frankly, they are policy initiatives that the Victorian Labor government has come up with, and good governments, like (South Australian Premier Peter) Malinauskas and the prime minister have taken a leaf out of that book.
Loading
'We are the powerhouse of Labor values in this country.'
Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles, during an interview with ABC Radio, was asked whether the SRL had helped the federal campaign. 'I think ultimately, this was an election which was decided on federal issues,' he said. 'One of the things that is clear in Australian politics is that ultimately, Australians do know the tier of government they are voting for.'
Labor's long-serving member for McEwen, Rob Mitchell, put it more bluntly. He confirmed people had concerns about the state government but said they were over-ridden by those about what a Dutton government would mean. 'People were smart enough to know there was a difference,' he told this masthead.
'There were plenty of people who said, 'Look, I'm not overly happy with Labor, you haven't fixed everything.' But, particularly with women, if you said, 'Do you want Peter Dutton as your prime minister?', it was a pretty simple f--k no.'
Evidence of voters separating state and federal issues can be found in polling booths in Melbourne's west, where voters cast ballots on Saturday only three months after having their say in the Werribee state byelection.
In Manor Lakes and Wyndham Vale, the same polling places which returned primary votes of 30 and 27 per cent for state Labor MP John Lister endorsed federal MP Joanne Ryan with 45 per cent of the vote.
At Manorvale Primary School in Werribee, the same electors who reduced Labor's vote to just 24.4 per cent in the byelection gave Labor 42.6 per cent in the federal poll.
Victoria played a critical role in the re-election of the Albanese government. Federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers said on election night that it was the state Labor needed to successfully defend to win. Depending on which way undecided electorates fall, it may end up delivering 27 of 38 Victorian seats to the federal government.
At the same time, the 1.4 per cent swing towards Labor recorded in Victoria on Saturday was half the strength of the national swing. In NSW, it was 3.2 per cent, South Australia 5 per cent, and in Tasmania, it was 8 per cent.
Over the Christmas and new year break, ALP party polling warned of a very different outcome. Three party figures, not authorised to discuss internal research, suggested that Labor was at risk of losing Aston, Chisholm, Dunkley and Bruce in Melbourne's east and south-east, Hawke and Gorton in the city's west, and McEwen in the north.
The party's polls and focus group research indicated that dissatisfaction with the Victorian government was a significant cause of voters turning away from Labor. This is consistent with the findings of published polls, including surveys conducted for this masthead by Resolve Political Monitor.
Loading
Allan's supporters say the election result shows this research was either flawed or wrongly interpreted, and the Victorian Labor brand is strong. Allan argues it is now an academic point because the decision of voters trumps the polls, party research and the views of her detractors. 'I'm not focused on commentators. I'm focused on what Victorians are saying,' she said.
The premier is adamant Victorians want the SRL. This is why, on the morning after an election weekend, she drove to Clarinda in Melbourne's south-east, put on a high-vis vest and declared that major construction work was starting to prepare for the arrival of tunnel-boring machines at the end of this year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Liberals concede tax cut stance a 'strategic mistake'
The coalition's new finance spokesman has conceded campaigning against tax cuts was a significant error, promising to push for lower rates in the next term of parliament. James Paterson said the coalition's position against Labor's two-part tax cuts, which would be a reduction of more than $500 a year from July 2027, had cost votes at the May election. While a review of policies was being carried out after the election loss, Senator Paterson said lower taxes would be a significant part of the platform. "We made a strategic mistake at the last election by opposing a tax cut and taking to the election repealing of that tax cut, and that's not a mistake we'll repeat," he told ABC's Insiders program on Sunday. "It's certainly in the Liberal Party's DNA to argue for and advocate for lower taxes whenever they can be afforded and whenever they are achievable." It comes as the coalition has come out against Labor's policy to double the tax rate on superannuation balances above $3 million. The tax rate would increase to 30 per cent in a bid to limit the number of people using their super balances for tax deductions, rather than their retirements. Senator Paterson said the policy was a grab for revenue. "We're never going to make that easier for the government, and we're fighting this because we're opposed to it in principle and we're proud to do so," he said. The median super balance for 60 to 64-year-olds is roughly $200,000 for men and $150,000 for women, with the vast majority of retirees unlikely to feel the impact of Labor's proposal. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Thursday said the changes would make the superannuation system fairer. Opposition industrial relations spokesman Tim Wilson said the government had broken trust with voters on the proposal. "Many people walked into the polling booth at the last election didn't think that the government was going to impose a new tax on unsold assets that was going progressively creep into the superannuation balances of millions of Australians," he told Sky News.


West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Liberals concede tax cut stance a 'strategic mistake'
The coalition's new finance spokesman has conceded campaigning against tax cuts was a significant error, promising to push for lower rates in the next term of parliament. James Paterson said the coalition's position against Labor's two-part tax cuts, which would be a reduction of more than $500 a year from July 2027, had cost votes at the May election. While a review of policies was being carried out after the election loss, Senator Paterson said lower taxes would be a significant part of the platform. "We made a strategic mistake at the last election by opposing a tax cut and taking to the election repealing of that tax cut, and that's not a mistake we'll repeat," he told ABC's Insiders program on Sunday. "It's certainly in the Liberal Party's DNA to argue for and advocate for lower taxes whenever they can be afforded and whenever they are achievable." It comes as the coalition has come out against Labor's policy to double the tax rate on superannuation balances above $3 million. The tax rate would increase to 30 per cent in a bid to limit the number of people using their super balances for tax deductions, rather than their retirements. Senator Paterson said the policy was a grab for revenue. "We're never going to make that easier for the government, and we're fighting this because we're opposed to it in principle and we're proud to do so," he said. The median super balance for 60 to 64-year-olds is roughly $200,000 for men and $150,000 for women, with the vast majority of retirees unlikely to feel the impact of Labor's proposal. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Thursday said the changes would make the superannuation system fairer. Opposition industrial relations spokesman Tim Wilson said the government had broken trust with voters on the proposal. "Many people walked into the polling booth at the last election didn't think that the government was going to impose a new tax on unsold assets that was going progressively creep into the superannuation balances of millions of Australians," he told Sky News.


The Advertiser
2 hours ago
- The Advertiser
'No justification': minister seeks tariff breakthrough
Australia will keep pressuring the US to remove tariffs imposed by Donald Trump, the trade minister says, ahead of a likely meeting between Anthony Albanese and the president. The two leaders could meet on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada next week, with the economic measures imposed by Mr Trump around the world set to dominate discussions. As Australia looks to negotiate for an exemption on tariffs, Trade Minister Don Farrrell was optimistic a deal could be reached. "I certainly haven't given up on the prospect of getting these tariffs removed, and every opportunity I get, I'll continue to pursue that argument with the United States," he told Sky News on Sunday. "There is no justification for the United States to impose tariffs on Australia ... we want all of the tariffs removed, not just some of them." Mr Trump recently signed off on doubling tariffs on exports on steel and aluminium from 25 to 50 per cent. All other Australian exports to the US have been slapped with a 10 per cent tariff. But opposition finance spokesman James Paterson said any meeting between the prime minister and US president should have happened sooner. He said an exemption on steel and aluminium secured by the UK showed it was possible Australia could receive a similar outcome. "Australia is at least as good an ally of the United States as the United Kingdom is and so there's no reason why the prime minister shouldn't at least be able to secure that exemption," Senator Paterson told ABC's Insiders program. Senator Farrell met with US trade representative Jamieson Greer last week and said he pushed the case for all of the economic measures to be removed. The minister was hopeful a similar approach that removed $20 billion worth of tariffs on Australian goods entering China could be used with America. "We didn't retaliate on that occasion, and bit by bit, we managed to get all of those tariffs that had been applied on Australia by China removed. I'd like to do the same with the United States," he said. "It's only by open discussion, honest discussion with out allies in the United States that I think we can do that." Senator Paterson said the coalition would be open to the idea of a critical minerals stockpile that could be used as a bargaining chip in any tariff negotiations. "It is something that Australia could do which would represent an economic opportunity and a strategic contribution," he said. As the US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth urged Australia to increase its defence spending by billions of dollars to 3.5 per cent of GDP, Senator Farrell said the federal government had already proved its commitment through the AUKUS submarine deal. Australia is looking to up its total spent on defence to 2.3 per cent. "We are committed to the defence of this country, we are committed to a significant uplift in the amount of spending," Senator Farrell said. "(AUKUS) is going to be a project that's worth more than $360 billion, so I think we've talked the talk." Senator Paterson said the opposition was still committed to its election platform of increasing defence spending to three per cent. Australia will keep pressuring the US to remove tariffs imposed by Donald Trump, the trade minister says, ahead of a likely meeting between Anthony Albanese and the president. The two leaders could meet on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada next week, with the economic measures imposed by Mr Trump around the world set to dominate discussions. As Australia looks to negotiate for an exemption on tariffs, Trade Minister Don Farrrell was optimistic a deal could be reached. "I certainly haven't given up on the prospect of getting these tariffs removed, and every opportunity I get, I'll continue to pursue that argument with the United States," he told Sky News on Sunday. "There is no justification for the United States to impose tariffs on Australia ... we want all of the tariffs removed, not just some of them." Mr Trump recently signed off on doubling tariffs on exports on steel and aluminium from 25 to 50 per cent. All other Australian exports to the US have been slapped with a 10 per cent tariff. But opposition finance spokesman James Paterson said any meeting between the prime minister and US president should have happened sooner. He said an exemption on steel and aluminium secured by the UK showed it was possible Australia could receive a similar outcome. "Australia is at least as good an ally of the United States as the United Kingdom is and so there's no reason why the prime minister shouldn't at least be able to secure that exemption," Senator Paterson told ABC's Insiders program. Senator Farrell met with US trade representative Jamieson Greer last week and said he pushed the case for all of the economic measures to be removed. The minister was hopeful a similar approach that removed $20 billion worth of tariffs on Australian goods entering China could be used with America. "We didn't retaliate on that occasion, and bit by bit, we managed to get all of those tariffs that had been applied on Australia by China removed. I'd like to do the same with the United States," he said. "It's only by open discussion, honest discussion with out allies in the United States that I think we can do that." Senator Paterson said the coalition would be open to the idea of a critical minerals stockpile that could be used as a bargaining chip in any tariff negotiations. "It is something that Australia could do which would represent an economic opportunity and a strategic contribution," he said. As the US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth urged Australia to increase its defence spending by billions of dollars to 3.5 per cent of GDP, Senator Farrell said the federal government had already proved its commitment through the AUKUS submarine deal. Australia is looking to up its total spent on defence to 2.3 per cent. "We are committed to the defence of this country, we are committed to a significant uplift in the amount of spending," Senator Farrell said. "(AUKUS) is going to be a project that's worth more than $360 billion, so I think we've talked the talk." Senator Paterson said the opposition was still committed to its election platform of increasing defence spending to three per cent. Australia will keep pressuring the US to remove tariffs imposed by Donald Trump, the trade minister says, ahead of a likely meeting between Anthony Albanese and the president. The two leaders could meet on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada next week, with the economic measures imposed by Mr Trump around the world set to dominate discussions. As Australia looks to negotiate for an exemption on tariffs, Trade Minister Don Farrrell was optimistic a deal could be reached. "I certainly haven't given up on the prospect of getting these tariffs removed, and every opportunity I get, I'll continue to pursue that argument with the United States," he told Sky News on Sunday. "There is no justification for the United States to impose tariffs on Australia ... we want all of the tariffs removed, not just some of them." Mr Trump recently signed off on doubling tariffs on exports on steel and aluminium from 25 to 50 per cent. All other Australian exports to the US have been slapped with a 10 per cent tariff. But opposition finance spokesman James Paterson said any meeting between the prime minister and US president should have happened sooner. He said an exemption on steel and aluminium secured by the UK showed it was possible Australia could receive a similar outcome. "Australia is at least as good an ally of the United States as the United Kingdom is and so there's no reason why the prime minister shouldn't at least be able to secure that exemption," Senator Paterson told ABC's Insiders program. Senator Farrell met with US trade representative Jamieson Greer last week and said he pushed the case for all of the economic measures to be removed. The minister was hopeful a similar approach that removed $20 billion worth of tariffs on Australian goods entering China could be used with America. "We didn't retaliate on that occasion, and bit by bit, we managed to get all of those tariffs that had been applied on Australia by China removed. I'd like to do the same with the United States," he said. "It's only by open discussion, honest discussion with out allies in the United States that I think we can do that." Senator Paterson said the coalition would be open to the idea of a critical minerals stockpile that could be used as a bargaining chip in any tariff negotiations. "It is something that Australia could do which would represent an economic opportunity and a strategic contribution," he said. As the US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth urged Australia to increase its defence spending by billions of dollars to 3.5 per cent of GDP, Senator Farrell said the federal government had already proved its commitment through the AUKUS submarine deal. Australia is looking to up its total spent on defence to 2.3 per cent. "We are committed to the defence of this country, we are committed to a significant uplift in the amount of spending," Senator Farrell said. "(AUKUS) is going to be a project that's worth more than $360 billion, so I think we've talked the talk." Senator Paterson said the opposition was still committed to its election platform of increasing defence spending to three per cent. Australia will keep pressuring the US to remove tariffs imposed by Donald Trump, the trade minister says, ahead of a likely meeting between Anthony Albanese and the president. The two leaders could meet on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada next week, with the economic measures imposed by Mr Trump around the world set to dominate discussions. As Australia looks to negotiate for an exemption on tariffs, Trade Minister Don Farrrell was optimistic a deal could be reached. "I certainly haven't given up on the prospect of getting these tariffs removed, and every opportunity I get, I'll continue to pursue that argument with the United States," he told Sky News on Sunday. "There is no justification for the United States to impose tariffs on Australia ... we want all of the tariffs removed, not just some of them." Mr Trump recently signed off on doubling tariffs on exports on steel and aluminium from 25 to 50 per cent. All other Australian exports to the US have been slapped with a 10 per cent tariff. But opposition finance spokesman James Paterson said any meeting between the prime minister and US president should have happened sooner. He said an exemption on steel and aluminium secured by the UK showed it was possible Australia could receive a similar outcome. "Australia is at least as good an ally of the United States as the United Kingdom is and so there's no reason why the prime minister shouldn't at least be able to secure that exemption," Senator Paterson told ABC's Insiders program. Senator Farrell met with US trade representative Jamieson Greer last week and said he pushed the case for all of the economic measures to be removed. The minister was hopeful a similar approach that removed $20 billion worth of tariffs on Australian goods entering China could be used with America. "We didn't retaliate on that occasion, and bit by bit, we managed to get all of those tariffs that had been applied on Australia by China removed. I'd like to do the same with the United States," he said. "It's only by open discussion, honest discussion with out allies in the United States that I think we can do that." Senator Paterson said the coalition would be open to the idea of a critical minerals stockpile that could be used as a bargaining chip in any tariff negotiations. "It is something that Australia could do which would represent an economic opportunity and a strategic contribution," he said. As the US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth urged Australia to increase its defence spending by billions of dollars to 3.5 per cent of GDP, Senator Farrell said the federal government had already proved its commitment through the AUKUS submarine deal. Australia is looking to up its total spent on defence to 2.3 per cent. "We are committed to the defence of this country, we are committed to a significant uplift in the amount of spending," Senator Farrell said. "(AUKUS) is going to be a project that's worth more than $360 billion, so I think we've talked the talk." Senator Paterson said the opposition was still committed to its election platform of increasing defence spending to three per cent.