How to Fake Your Way Through the Super Bowl
Hey, can I ask you something? Just between you and me?
Yeah, shoot.
I … don't really understand this Super Bowl thing.
You don't understand the Super Bowl? The ubiquitous event that dwarfs every other American entertainment option? The seasonal culmination of a sport woven deep within the rich tapestry of a mighty country?
Shhh! I don't want everyone to know!
Maybe you're not from the United States. Or were the kind of child who watched 'Meet the Press' on Sunday. Or maybe you just prefer pickleball. We've got you covered. You've come to the right place to find out all about this year's Super Bowl with no tears or embarrassment.
Great! When is the game, and who's playing?
The Super Bowl is the final game of the season of the National Football League, the mammoth league with the $100 billion television contract and teams worth $5 billion or more. This year, the Philadelphia Eagles will face the Kansas City Chiefs in New Orleans on Sunday starting at 6:30 p.m. Eastern on Fox, although pregame coverage starts at 1 p.m.
Uh, Chiefs? That wouldn't be a reference to …
Yes, Native Americans, and that makes some people pretty uncomfortable. The team in Washington changed its name in 2020 from a slur against Native Americans. Kansas City's name, for now, will not change.
Give me some memorable Super Bowl moments.
There are so many to choose from. In Super Bowl III in 1969, Joe Namath predicted his New York Jets would beat the heavily favored Baltimore Colts, and then backed up his boast with a victory.
To promote their appearance in Super Bowl XX in 1986, members of the Chicago Bears made a cringey pop video, 'The Super Bowl Shuffle,' and then won anyway, by a record margin. The New York Giants upset the undefeated New England Patriots when a player caught the ball by trapping it on his helmet (XLII, 2008).
The game has never been canceled, but it has been halted for half an hour by a blackout (XLVII, 2013).
Last season (LVIII), Kansas City won in overtime, 25-22. It was the first Super Bowl in which the lead changed hands on the last play.
I hear the halftime shows have gotten more elaborate.
There have been many memorable Super Bowl halftime shows, including one with a 'wardrobe malfunction' (Justin Timberlake and Janet Jackson, XXXVIII, 2004) that was the subject of a New York Times documentary.
In the first Super Bowl halftime show in 1967, Al Hirt, the trumpeter and band leader, performed to a live audience of some 67,000 fans.
The producers of the N.F.L.'s biggest event of the year have gradually raised the ante of the show's musical acts, from university marching bands decades ago to the world's biggest pop stars, including Madonna, Paul McCartney, U2 and Beyoncé. Last year's performer was Usher; Kendrick Lamar takes the stage this year.
Who still uses Roman numerals?
The N.F.L. does, except in 2016 when they called it Super Bowl 50 because Super Bowl L looked a little silly. This year's game is the absolutely, positively unsilly-looking Super Bowl LIX.
Can you explain the rules of football quickly?
OK, but we are going to oversimplify.
There are 11 players on a side, but the key player is the quarterback. He takes the oblong ball at the start of each play, and he either hands it to a player who tries to run with it or he throws it downfield for a receiver to catch. Teams have four tries, or 'downs,' to advance the ball at least 10 yards (9.1 meters, but don't get caught saying that when surrounded by football fans).
The other team will try to stop them from doing so, a process that often ends with one or more players grabbing the player with the ball and hurling him to the ground abruptly.
Sometimes a player will do something wrong (a 'penalty') and the referee will signal this by throwing what looks like a yellow hankie (the announcers will say that 'a flag is on the field').
The field is 100 yards long, and a team making it to the end (the 'end zone') gets 6 points (a 'touchdown,' very good), and 1 more if it can kick a ball through some big metal posts (the 'goal posts') afterward. There are other ways to score, but we promised to keep it simple.
Sorry, soccer fans, the game cannot end in a tie. If it does, the teams play 'overtime' until a winner is determined.
Wait, why is this sport called football? The feet seem secondary. And is an oblong spheroid really a 'ball?'
Amazingly, you are not the first person to make these observations. A hoary joke says that the game should really be called 'hand egg.'
American football evolved from 'rugby football' in the late 19th century. The transition came in 1906, when teams began passing the ball forward instead of only backward. The N.F.L. was founded in the 1920s and started the Super Bowl championship game in 1967 after a merger with a smaller upstart, the American Football League.
There are several variations of football around the globe. What Americans call soccer is football or fútbol in much of the rest of the world. Canadian football is similar to the American game, but teams can charmingly score a 'rouge,' worth 1 point. Australia's football involves men with very little padding passing the ball by hitting it with their fists.
Who are some players to look for on Sunday?
The quarterback for Kansas City is Patrick Mahomes, and Philadelphia's is Jalen Hurts. You'll see a lot of them whether you look for them or not.
On defense, look for Chris Jones of Kansas City to terrorize Hurts, and Jalen Carter and Zack Baun of the Eagles to do the same against Mahomes.
In an era when passing is usually a lot more important than running, the Eagles have a transcendent running back, Saquon Barkley.
And a key man for Mahomes to pass the ball to will be …
The one who is dating Taylor Swift?
You got it. Kansas City's Travis Kelce, perhaps the best player ever at his position, tight end, has raised his profile even more with his relationship with music's global superstar, Taylor Swift. She often attends his games, causing some purists to grumble that shots of her in the luxury boxes are overshadowing the game, although a close look last season revealed her total screen time is actually fairly limited.
I hear there's a record on the line.
Should Kansas City win, it would become the first team ever to win three consecutive Super Bowls.
One caveat though: There were N.F.L. champions long before the name 'Super Bowl' was coined. And the Green Bay Packers won three N.F.L. titles in a row in 1929-31 and 1965-67, with the last two of those being the first two Super Bowls.
Give me a slightly sophisticated 'take' to say during the action.
When it is fourth down, yell for the team with the ball to try a play ('go for it'), rather than kick the ball away or try for a field goal. Fans have always loved this aggressive strategy, and the game is catching up. While coaches used to routinely kick even when they were inches away from a first down, they now are much more inclined to try for the yards.
When in doubt, say 'the game is won in the trenches.' Or 'edge rusher' or 'Tampa 2' or 'Jet sweep.' Your football-loving friends will nod sagely.
Can I bet on this?
No one knows exactly how much money is bet on the Super Bowl, but it's a lot — more than $10 billion, according to estimates, much of it illegally. The most common way to bet is through the point spread (Kansas City is a 1 1/2-point favorite, meaning they must win by at least 2 points for bettors backing them to cash in).
But you can also bet on almost anything related to the game: how many yards a particular player will gain, who will win the coin toss that starts the game or which song Kendrick Lamar will sing first in the halftime show.
The game lasts for hours. I think I'll take a break during the commercials.
Don't do it. Advertisers spend a fortune to get a slot during the Super Bowl, and then another fortune to create new, funny and memorable ads for the occasion. Especially if the game is a blowout, the ads may be the next day's major talking point.
I've heard the sport has a dark side.
Sadly, yes. The size of the players and the violence of their hits mean that the possibility of serious injury is always there. Worse, players who take repeated hits to the head risk developing C.T.E., a degenerative brain disease.
Players who receive blows to the head now must leave the field and be examined for a concussion.
More and more fans are tempering their enjoyment of the sport with the sobering knowledge that the players entertaining us on the field are doing so at grave risk.
Now all I need is one funny thing to tell people at the Super Bowl party I've just spontaneously decided to host.
Around the time of the game, internet searches for 'Super Bowl' go way up. But so do searches for 'superb owl,' as rapidly typing fans put the space in the wrong place.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC Sports
an hour ago
- NBC Sports
Walsh ties Douglass' 50m free American record
Gretchen Walsh held off Torri Huske with a time of 23.91, tying Kate Douglass' 50m free American Record at U.S. Swimming Championships in Indianapolis.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ravens Urged To Sign Lamar Jackson To Mega-Extension
Ravens Urged To Sign Lamar Jackson To Mega-Extension originally appeared on Athlon Sports. The Baltimore Ravens are one of the few teams in football that would not trade their quarterback for anything. Lamar Jackson doesn't just make the Ravens perennial contenders. He's the engine of the offense and the biggest factor in forging Baltimore's identity. Advertisement He's also eligible for an extension, and after several quarterbacks have separated Jackson from the top of the market. Jackson signed a five-year, $260 million contract that temporarily made him the sport's highest-paid player. By average annual value, he now ranks 10th. Subsequently, a new deal could be signed before the season, rightfully putting him amongst the best-compensated passers in the NFL. NFL Media recently urged the Ravens to sign Jackson to a massive extension, ranking him as the player most deserving of a raise. 'Jackson and Patrick Mahomes could probably hold a spot on top of this list forever -- or at least for as long as they are playing football, no matter what their game checks look like,' Tom Blair wrote. 'How much is too much to pay a walking, talking ticket to Super Bowl contention?' Advertisement Jackson almost won his third MVP in 2024 (he took home first-team All-Pro recognition), and it may have been his best season. In terms of passing production, it was easily his most impressive campaign. Jackson logged his first 4,000-yard season in 2024. He led the NFL in touchdown percentage, yards per attempt, passer rating, and quarterback rating. His athleticism under center is unparalleled, making Baltimore's ground game as dangerous as its aerial attack. No passer has more gravity, giving him a skill set only constrained by market tradition and the salary cap. 'Every team is chasing exactly this kind of superpowered generational QB, but most will never get close to rostering one. That feverish pursuit has helped inflate the quarterback market to the point that, somewhat ludicrously, nine signal-callers are paid more per year than the two-time MVP. Advertisement 'The game of Highest-Paid-Player Hot Potato often, of course, seems to be driven more by timing than merit, but this discrepancy is begging to be corrected with a new deal for one of the top talents in football. Hopefully, Baltimore's willingness to publicly discuss the topic is a sign that balance will be restored soon -- and with fewer bumps on the road to resolution than we saw last time.' If there were any doubts about Jackson's worthiness the last time around, he obliterated them with back-to-back MVP-caliber campaigns. Jackson has shown no signs of slowing down, and as he grows into one of the game's best passers, Baltimore can feel even more confident in ensuring he is around for as long as possible. It's only a matter of time before the Ravens make Jackson the highest-paid player in the sport for the second time. Related: Lamar Jackson Is Too Good To Lead NFL in Passing Related: Ravens Won't Play Games With Potential Lamar Jackson Extension This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 8, 2025, where it first appeared.
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
New '1984' foreword includes warning about ‘problematic' characters
The 75th anniversary edition of George Orwell's novel 1984, which coined the term 'thoughtcrime' to describe the act of having thoughts that question the ruling party's ideology, has become an ironic lightning rod in debates over alleged trigger warnings and the role of historical context in classic literature. The introduction to the new edition, endorsed by Orwell's estate and written by the American author Dolen Perkins-Valdezm, is at the center of the storm, drawing fire from conservative commentators as well as public intellectuals, and prompting a wide spectrum of reaction from academics who study Orwell's work. Perkins-Valdez opens the introduction with a self-reflective exercise: imagining what it would be like to read 1984 for the first time today. She writes that 'a sliver of connection can be difficult for someone like me to find in a novel that does not speak much to race and ethnicity,' noting the complete absence of Black characters. She also describes her pause at the protagonist Winston Smith's 'despicable' misogyny, but ultimately chooses to continue reading, writing: 'I know the difference between a flawed character and a flawed story.' 'I'm enjoying the novel on its own terms, not as a classic but as a good story; that is, until Winston reveals himself to be a problematic character,' she writes. 'For example, we learn of him: 'He disliked nearly all women, and especially the young and pretty ones.' Whoa, wait a minute, Orwell.' That framing was enough to provoke sharp critique from novelist and essayist Walter Kirn on the podcast America This Week, co-hosted with journalist Matt Taibbi. Kirn characterized the foreword as a kind of ideological overreach. 'Thank you for your trigger warning for 1984,' he said. 'It is the most 1984ish thing I've ever f***ing read.' Later in the episode, which debuted on June 1, Kirn blasted what he saw as an imposed 'permission structure' by publishers and academic elites. 'It's a sort of Ministry of Truthism,' he said, referring to the Ministry of Truth that features prominently in the dystopian novel. 'They're giving you a little guidebook to say, 'Here's how you're supposed to feel when you read this.'' Conservative commentator such as Ed Morrissey described the foreword as part of 'an attempt to rob [Orwell's work] of meaning by denigrating it as 'problematic.'' Morrissey argued that trigger warnings on literary classics serve to 'distract readers at the start from its purpose with red herrings over issues of taste.' But not all responses aligned with that view. Academic rebuttal Peter Brian Rose-Barry, a philosophy professor at Saginaw Valley State University and author of George Orwell: The Ethics of Equality, disputed the entire premise. 'There just isn't [a trigger warning],' he told Newsweek in an email after examining the edition. 'She never accuses Orwell of thoughtcrime. She never calls for censorship or cancelling Orwell.' In Rose-Barry's view, the foreword is neither invasive nor ideological, but reflective. 'Perkins-Valdez suggests in her introduction that 'love and artistic beauty can act as healing forces in a totalitarian state,'' he noted. 'Now, I find that deeply suspect... but I'd use this introduction to generate a discussion in my class.' Taibbi and Kirn, by contrast, took issue with that exact line during the podcast. 'Love heals? In 1984?' Taibbi asked. 'The whole thing ends with Winston broken, saying he loves Big Brother,' the symbol of the totalitarian state at the heart of the book. Kirn laughed and added, 'It's the kind of revisionist uplift you get from a book club discussion after someone just watched The Handmaid's Tale.' Perkins-Valdez, a Black writer, Harvard graduate and professor of literature at American University, also noted the novel's lack of racial representation: 'That sliver of connection can be difficult for someone like me to find in a novel that does not speak much to race and ethnicity at all.' Kirn responded to that sentiment on the show by pointing out that Orwell was writing about midcentury Britain: 'When Orwell wrote the book, Black people made up maybe one percent of the population. It's like expecting white characters in every Nigerian novel.' Richard Keeble, former chair of the Orwell Society, argued that critiques of Orwell's treatment of race and gender have long been part of academic discourse. 'Questioning Orwell's representation of Blacks in 1984 can usefully lead us to consider the evolution of his ideas on race generally,' he told Newsweek. 'Yet Orwell struggled throughout his life, and not with complete success, to exorcise what Edward Said called 'Orientalism.'' Keeble added, 'Trigger warnings and interpretative forewords... join the rich firmament of Orwellian scholarship-being themselves open to critique and analysis.' Cultural overreach While critics like Kirn view Perkins-Valdez's new foreword as a symptom of virtue signaling run amok, others see it as part of a long-standing literary dialogue. Laura Beers, a historian at American University and author of Orwell's Ghosts: Wisdom and Warnings for the Twenty-First Century, acknowledged that such reactions reflect deeper political divides. But she defended the legitimacy of approaching Orwell through modern ethical and social lenses. 'What makes 1984 such a great novel is that it was written to transcend a specific historical context,' she told Newsweek. 'Although it has frequently been appropriated by the right as a critique of 'socialism,' it was never meant to be solely a critique of Stalin's Russia.' 'Rather,' she added, 'it was a commentary on how absolute power corrupts absolutely, and the risk to all societies, including democracies like Britain and the United States, of the unchecked concentration of power.' Beers also addressed the role of interpretive material in shaping the reading experience. 'Obviously, yes, in that 'interpretive forewords' give a reader an initial context in which to situate the texts that they are reading,' she said. 'That said, such forewords are more often a reflection on the attitudes and biases of their own time.' While the foreword has prompted the familiar battle lines playing out across the Trump-era culture wars, Beers sees the conversation itself as in keeping with Orwell's legacy. 'By attempting to place Orwell's work in conversation with changing values and historical understandings in the decades since he was writing,' she said, 'scholars like Perkins-Valdez are exercising the very freedom to express uncomfortable and difficult opinions that Orwell explicitly championed.' Related Articles Gabbard Links 'Ministry of Truth' to Obama Speech, Calls Biden 'Front Man'Tulsi Gabbard Compares Biden Admin to Dictatorship Over 'Ministry of Truth'Joe Biden's Disinformation Board Likened to Orwell's 'Ministry of Truth'Memory Holes, Mobs and Speaker Pelosi | Opinion 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
