
Canadian E-Bike Brand Movin' Rolls into NYC with Long-Range Turbo Model
06/03/2025, Toronto, ON // KISS PR Brand Story PressWire //
In July 2024, the streets of New York City welcomed a new player in the battle for urban mobility: Movin' Ebikes. The Canadian-born electric bicycle brand opened its first U.S. flagship store at 95 Avenue B, New York, NY 10009, bringing its high-performance Turbo Electric Bike to one of the most demanding cycling environments in North America.
Founded in 2021 by entrepreneur Parwaiz Nijrabi, Movin' Ebikes was born out of the pandemic-era transportation crisis. Nijrabi envisioned a practical, cost-effective alternative to cars that could meet the high-mileage needs of urban riders, particularly gig workers and commuters. 'E-bikes aren't just green gadgets; they're the smarter choice for modern cities,' he said in a recent interview.
Now, with New York as its next frontier, Movin' is pitching itself as part of the solution to the city's mobility challenges—and not a moment too soon.
The Urban Gridlock Dilemma
New York City residents face a daily struggle with traffic congestion, expensive vehicle ownership, and mounting environmental concerns. Car ownership in the city can cost upwards of $15,000 annually when accounting for fuel, maintenance, and parking. Meanwhile, subways and buses are often overcrowded, and New York's climate goals have placed increasing pressure on both individuals and industries to embrace cleaner transport.
E-bikes have emerged as a compelling alternative. They cut through traffic, reduce emissions, and offer flexibility without the expense of owning a car. Yet, the rise of electric bikes hasn't been entirely smooth.
In recent years, a wave of battery fires linked to uncertified lithium-ion units has raised alarm. In 2022 alone, New York City recorded 219 e-bike-related fires, leading to 147 injuries and six deaths. By early 2023, 33 additional incidents had already occurred. These statistics have forced the city to take action, introducing regulations and safety standards. One such effort is the 2025 'Charge Safe, Ride Safe' plan, which offers delivery workers free trade-ins for UL-certified e-bikes.
A Safer, Smarter Ride
Movin' Ebikes has stepped into this landscape with a clear value proposition: long-range, safety-certified bikes built to endure. The star of its U.S. debut is the Movin' Turbo, an electric bike that features a UL2271-certified Samsung battery—a seal of approval that aligns directly with New York's new safety regulations.
With a range of up to 100 miles per charge, the Turbo is engineered for riders who clock dozens of miles daily. It blends performance with practicality, featuring a lightweight frame and components designed for ease of use. That means delivery riders can power through a full shift without recharging, and city commuters can cover long distances with confidence.
Movin's store on Avenue B is more than just a retail outlet. Open six days a week from 10 AM to 8 PM, it doubles as a service and education hub. Visitors can test ride bikes, book rentals, and access maintenance services. Staff are trained to assist both new and seasoned riders, offering guidance on safe riding practices and battery care—a much-needed touch in a city where e-bike misuse has had deadly consequences.
Bridging the Gap for Urban Workers
The arrival of Movin' comes at a crucial time for New York's estimated 65,000 delivery workers. These riders form the backbone of the city's gig economy, yet often lack access to safe, reliable equipment. Movin' positions its Turbo model as a practical solution to that gap: a low-maintenance, high-endurance bike that doesn't compromise on safety.
And the economics make sense. With car ownership costs far exceeding the price of a Movin' Turbo, which avoids gas and parking expenses entirely, the financial appeal is clear. Routine maintenance is minimal, and UL certification helps ensure the bike is a safer bet compared to cheaper, uncertified options on the market.
Supporting the City's Green Vision
Movin' isn't just selling bikes; it's selling a vision aligned with New York's climate and safety goals. E-bikes produce zero emissions, reduce road congestion, and offer a sustainable solution for dense cities. By focusing on quality and certification, Movin' also bolsters efforts to eliminate unsafe e-bikes from the streets.
The company's North American expansion could be seen as a strategic partnership with cities rather than mere market penetration. From reducing battery fire risks to increasing the appeal of active transportation, Movin' checks many of the boxes city planners are prioritizing.
Riding into the Future
For New Yorkers ready to rethink how they get around, Movin' offers a compelling option. Whether you're a delivery rider powering through the boroughs or a commuter tired of subway delays, the Turbo model promises a ride that's efficient, safe, and environmentally sound.
To learn more, visit the Movin' store at 95 Avenue B or explore their models online at Movin' Ebikes. With this new chapter, the Canadian brand looks set to make a lasting impression on America's busiest streets—one ride at a time.
Original Source of the original story >> Canadian E-Bike Brand Movin' Rolls into NYC with Long-Range Turbo Model
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
9 minutes ago
- Forbes
Why We're Dodging These 3 Gold CEFs (Even With Gold Soaring)
A lump of gold on a stone floor getty Here's a surprise from a die-hard closed-end fund (CEF) fan like me: Sometimes CEFs aren't your best bet. I'll admit, that's tough for me to say—especially when the average CEF yields a historically high 9.1%. (CEF yields are usually around 8.5%). That high yield partly reflects the fact that many CEFs are trading at steep discounts to their net asset value (NAV). Translation: The fund is trading for less than what its underlying portfolio is worth. That, in turn, has resulted in lower prices among some CEFs, along with higher yields (as yields and prices move in opposite directions). All of this simply means that CEFs are generally out of favor right now, which is an opportunity for us. But not every CEF is ripe for buying. We especially want to avoid the three top performers among CEFs with market caps over $200 million: ASA Gold and Precious Metals (ASA), the Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and the Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF). The fact that these funds have booked strong runs this year shouldn't come as a surprise: They're all gold funds, and gold has taken off due to rising economic uncertainty (the usual fuel for the yellow metal). Even so, as you can see, there are some clear differences in performance here, and those are worth unpacking. Gold Funds Ycharts Above we see that the Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust—with the somewhat confusing 'CEF' ticker, not to be confused with CEFs in general (in purple)—and PHYS (in blue) have similar returns to the benchmark SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) ETF (in green), at around 25%. Then there's ASA (in orange), which has more than doubled even the best of these three other funds. There is some logic at work here. For starters, PHYS and GLD really should track each other, since they both devote almost 100% of their portfolios to physical gold (both own gold bars that are locked up in vaults), and both have similar expense ratios (0.4% for GLD, 0.41% for PHYS). The lower performance of 'CEF' is also not surprising, given that the fund also holds silver, and the 'poor man's gold' hasn't done as well as its yellow counterpart this year. ASA, however, is the clear outperformer. That's thanks in part to its ownership of several gold-mining stocks. Its largest position, G Mining Ventures Inc., a Canadian firm that explores for precious metals, has nearly doubled year to date. ASA's fast short-term gain is, of course, great, but it's unlikely to last. Here's why. Note that, if we go back to 2010, the year the last of these funds, PHYS, launched, we see that GLD (again in green) outran all three of the CEFs. This shows that CEFs were poor options in the case of gold. Moreover, ASA (again in orange) was actually the worst performer, returning just 53% over 15 years, and being in the red for most of that time. ASA Underperforms Ycharts In terms of key takeaways, there are a few here. First, if you want to hold gold, this is a rare case where an ETF, not a CEF, is the better choice. Second, gold is not a great play for income, given that the highest yielder among these funds is ASA, with a puny 0.2%. Third, gold itself is a poor play for the long term, no matter how you invest in it. To see why, all we need to do is splice the S&P 500's performance (in pink below) into that last chart. Gold Underperforms Ycharts It doesn't get much clearer than that! This, however, is where the good news ends for ETF investors. Because when it comes to investing in stocks (or pretty well any other asset class, for that matter), you're far better off with CEFs. Let's take a look at the Adams Diversified Equity Fund (ADX), a CEF we've held in my CEF Insider service since its earliest days: We bought ADX in July 2017, just a few months after CEF Insider's launch. Here's how the fund—current yield: 9% (and in orange below)—has done since, as compared to the S&P 500 index fund SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), in purple, with dividends reinvested: ADX Outperforms Ycharts This chart says it all: CEFs like ADX can crush the S&P 500 and pay us generously while doing so. Plus they give us access to top-notch management and upside-generating discounts to NAV, too. Those are strengths no index fund can match. Michael Foster is the Lead Research Analyst for Contrarian Outlook. For more great income ideas, click here for our latest report 'Indestructible Income: 5 Bargain Funds with Steady 10% Dividends.' Disclosure: none
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge approves NCAA House settlement, changing the landscape of collegiate athletics
Very late on Friday afternoon, we got a massive end-of-the week news dump when a judge officially approved a settlement in the NCAA v. House case. With the ruling, the landscape of college athletics will soon look very different than it has prior. The goal of the settlement is to provide structure to the NIL landscape in college football, which is currently effectively a free-for-all. Following the ruling, On3 discussed some of the ramifications of the ruling. 'Since the NCAA was founded in 1906, institutions have never directly paid athletes, On3's Pete Nakos wrote. 'That will now change with the settlement ushering in the revenue-sharing era of college sports. Beginning July 1, schools will be able to share $20.5 million with athletes, with football expected to receive 75%, followed by men's basketball (15%), women's basketball (5%) and the remainder of sports (5%). The amount shared in revenue will increase annually. Advertisement 'Power Four football programs will have roughly $13 to $16 million to spend on rosters for the 2025 season. Many schools have front-loaded contracts ahead of the settlement's approval, taking advantage of contracts not being vetted by the newly formed NIL clearinghouse . . . ' . . . The settlement also imposes new restrictions on college sports. An NIL clearinghouse will be established, titled 'NIL Go' and run through Deloitte. All third-party NIL deals of $600 or more must be approved by the clearinghouse. If not approved, the settlement says a new third-party arbiter could deem athletes ineligible or result in a school being fined. In a gathering at the ACC spring meetings last week, Deloitte officials reportedly shared that 70% of past deals from NIL collectives would have been denied, while 90% of past deals from public companies would have been approved.' It remains to be seen exactly how the new rules will affect USC specifically. Given the Trojans' recent hire of Chad Bowden and the subsequent revamping of their recruiting operation, USC seemingly has the right people in place to bring the program into college football's new era. This article originally appeared on Trojans Wire: NCAA House settlement approved, as college sports braces for impact
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
WWDC to focus on redesigns as Apple remains sidelined on AI, Bloomberg says
Apple's (AAPL) upcoming Worldwide Developers Conference will do little to assuage fears that the iPhone maker is a laggard in AI, Blomberg's Mark Gurman reports. Instead, the event will focus on design and productivity enhancements for its long-established operating system franchises. The company's keynote address will introduce redesigned software interfaces for the iPhone, iPad, Mac, Apple TV and Apple Watch, in addition to more minor tweaks to the Vision Pro headset. As part of the end-to-end overhaul, the company is also making a sweeping change to its software branding, which will shift from version numbers to a year-based system. That means Apple will introduce iOS 26, iPadOS 26, tvOS 26, visionOS 26, macOS 26 and watchOS 26 – named for 2026. Internally, the operating systems are known as Luck, Charisma, Discovery, Cheer and Nepali, respectively, the author notes. The AI changes will be surprisingly minor are unlikely to impress industry watchers, especially considering the rapid pace of innovation by Alphabet's (GOOG) (GOOGL) Google, Meta Platforms (META), Microsoft (MSFT) and OpenAI, the publication adds. Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter Published first on TheFly – the ultimate source for real-time, market-moving breaking financial news. Try Now>> See the top stocks recommended by analysts >> Read More on AAPL: Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue Apple's growing list of issues hinders AI reboot, WSJ says Apple expands partnership in India with Tata, Reuters reports Morning News Wrap-Up: Thursday's Biggest Stock Market Stories Apple says App Store ecosystem facilitated $1.3T in developer sales in 2024 This Is How Much Analysts Expect Apple's (AAPL) EPS to Fall after Court Ruling