
The conservative case for keeping USAID
TODAY'S STARTING POINT
Over the weekend, the US Agency for International Development looked to be on the verge of shutting down. The Trump administration had frozen aid the agency distributes and moved to put most of its staff on leave. On Friday, after crews pried the agency's name off of its Washington headquarters and Trump urged its closure, a federal judge
Democrats have responded to the administration's moves with anger and dismay. Their concerns echo the case for the existence of USAID that political liberals often make: It helps people in need. The agency's efforts to vaccinate children, treat HIV and malaria, avert famine, and reduce maternal and infant mortality have likely saved tens of millions of lives in poor and struggling countries — all for less than 1 percent of the US federal budget.
But there is also a case for USAID that political conservatives have long emphasized — including some of the Republican lawmakers now watching Trump dismantle it. In their telling, the agency exists to benefit Americans, not just foreigners. It does so by preventing diseases from reaching the United States, promoting global stability, and maintaining America's international power.
Advertisement
Today's newsletter explains this conservative case for USAID — and why Trump seems intent on decimating it anyway.
Outflanking rivals
The 'America-first' case for USAID dates to its birth. When Congress and John F. Kennedy created the agency in 1961, at the height of the Cold War, they saw it as both a moral imperative to help poorer countries and as a tool to enhance US power. The Soviets,
'It was partly an expression of American idealism, that America should be a force for good in the world, partly an expression of an enlightened self-interest,' says Larry Diamond, a consultant to USAID during the George W. Bush administration who is now a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution.
Advertisement
That twin rationale lasted for decades. Though some congressional Republicans have called for cuts or other changes to USAID, bipartisan majorities and presidents of both parties kept funding — and expanding — it. Ronald Reagan, another Republican who sought to shrink government,
More recently, Republicans have looked to USAID to counter a different international rival: China. Since 2013, China has spent an estimated $1 trillion to help Asian, African, and Latin American countries build highways, bridges, and other infrastructure, known as the
The handful of Republicans who have (gently) pushed back against Trump's plans for USAID make a similar case. 'We need an aid program to match the Chinese effort,' Senator Roger Wicker of Mississippi
If Trump does shut down the agency, China could fill the vacuum. 'We're going to be number two in the world,' Diamond said, 'and China's going to be number one. I don't see any way in which this makes America great again.'
National security
USAID funds warning systems to detect and contain disease outbreaks. It helps foreign governments reduce corruption and improve efficiency, lowering a country's chances of descending into conflict. And it rushes humanitarian aid after natural disasters, lessening displaced residents' incentive to flee abroad.
Advertisement
Marco Rubio, who has echoed Trump's criticisms of USAID, which he now oversees as secretary of state, suggested it was 'critical to our national security' back when he was a senator. 'Foreign aid is not charity,' Rubio tweeted in 2017, when Trump's first administration tried to cut USAID's funding. (Congress rebuffed those efforts.)
Gutting the agency risks more pandemics, more wars, and more migration, Diamond warns. 'We have to be in the game,' he said. 'If we're not globally engaged, it's gonna blow back on us.'
Win friends, influence people
During the Cold War, USAID promoted economic growth in part to prevent countries from coming under Soviet sway. Doing so strengthened trade relations, cultivated ideological allies, and boosted America's
More recently, the agency has focused on women. Research shows that countries that allow women to move around freely, go to school, vote, work, and start businesses tend to be more stable and democratic. When USAID launched a program supporting female entrepreneurs during Trump's first term, his daughter Ivanka
Trump's case
If USAID so benefits us, why is Trump trying to decimate it? He has accused the agency, without evidence, of 'tremendous fraud,' claimed that 'radical left lunatics' run it, and suggested in the past that most foreign aid is 'stupid.' He and his allies seem to believe that less American engagement with the rest of the world — and less American money going to it — is better for America.
Advertisement
But without USAID, Diamond says, what happens overseas may not stay there. 'Even if you think about it in only isolationist terms, only what's good for us here in the United States, this is not going to be good for us.'
Read more:
Spending $153 million to pay its bills put USAID in DOGE's crosshairs. (
See the Tesla employees, lawyers, and other Elon Musk allies who are helping him hollow out federal agencies. (
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a financial watchdog, seems to be next. The administration ordered it to halt nearly all work. (
The administration is also cutting federal funding through the National Institutes of Health. Scientists say it will
🧩
6 Across:
32°
POINTS OF INTEREST
Dr. Anthony Fauci spoke during the presentation of his book "On Call" in Washington, D.C., last June.
Jose Luis Magana/Associated Press
Boston and Mass.
Blanketed:
Search this database
T accident:
Two Green Line trolleys
'Being Human':
Boston's Museum of Science will hold a yearlong series of programs
Living in fear:
Venezuelans in Massachusetts
Reform, interrupted:
The Department of Justice has been negotiating police reforms with Worcester after finding a pattern of civil rights violations by officers there.
New England
States' suit:
Connecticut, Maine, Rhode Island, and Vermont are among 13 states
Donations needed:
Even as food insecurity is on the rise in Rhode Island, a Providence food pantry is asking for help after revealing it has
The Nation
'Cowardly':
The American Academy of Pediatrics and other medical interest groups haven't spoken out against Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s nomination to be health secretary,
No survivors:
Crews on Saturday recovered the remains of all 10 victims after a small plane crashed last week near Nome, Alaska. (
Next steps:
Proud Boys leaders, freed from prison by Trump after Jan. 6, are contemplating running for office. (
The World
Armed:
The State Department plans to sell more than $7 billion in weapons to Israel, after Trump met with the country's prime minister. (
Back home:
Hamas freed three more Israeli hostages as part of its cease-fire deal, in exchange for Palestinian prisoners' release. (
Uncovered:
Libya authorities found the bodies of nearly 50 migrants and refugees in two mass graves in the country's southeastern desert. (
Church and state:
King Charles and Queen Camilla will visit Pope Francis at the Vatican in April in celebration of the Catholic Church's special Jubilee year. (
BESIDE THE POINT
🩷 Boston at a Bargain:
Friday is Valentine's Day, so this week's
📱
Take a break:
Feeling uneasy about the amount of time you're spending on your phone?
🎶 Your own solo:
Why everyone should
🐍
Poison party:
A homeowner in Australia thought he had just a few snakes in his backyard mulch pile. Reptile relocation folks uncovered
😕
Internal storm:
You're a high-functioning, helpful, capable person, but inside is a swirl of discontent. Do you have '
🏢
Built better:
J.J. Carroll House, an affordable housing development for seniors,
is designed to help residents
🧁
Edible art:
Jennifer Lee, a Johnson & Wales senior with her own bakery, will be
🏠
No place like home:
A seven-bedroom Cape Cod home that the actress Judy Garland once rented is
Advertisement
🪦
Epilogue:
Fletcher Wiley, nicknamed Flash, was a Boston attorney who shattered racial barriers as the first Black chairman of the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce.
📧 Want this sent to your inbox?
Ian Prasad Philbrick can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
14 minutes ago
- Fox News
Republican attorneys general accuse California of excusing 'lawlessness'
FIRST ON FOX: Nearly all Republican attorneys general blasted California's Democratic leaders on Tuesday in a joint statement, accusing them of condoning criminal behavior and saying they left President Donald Trump with no choice but to activate thousands of National Guard soldiers. "In California, we're seeing the results of leadership that excuses lawlessness and undermines law enforcement," 26 attorneys general wrote in the statement, first provided to Fox News Digital. "When local and state officials won't act, the federal government must." The attorneys general said Trump's decision to federalize the National Guard to address anti-immigration enforcement riots and protests that broke out in parts of Los Angeles County over the weekend was the "right response." Their remarks stand in direct contrast to those of Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom and other Democrats across the country, who widely condemned Trump's decision to send the military into California as an unnecessary escalation. Newsom sued Trump over the move and accused the president of stripping California of its sovereignty. Presidents federalizing the National Guard, which is a state-based military force that falls under the dual control of governors and presidents, is rarely carried out without the consent of a governor. Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr, who led the attorneys general in issuing the statement, told Fox News Digital in a brief interview he felt Newsom was "gaslighting" the public by saying California's local and state law enforcement had the unrest under control and did not need Trump to intervene. "We all saw what was happening," Carr said. "There were federal law enforcement officers that were being attacked by mobs. And in fact, I read articles where local law enforcement were saying they were overwhelmed and they needed help. My question is, why in the world would he not accept the help of the federal government at a time where there was mob rule, where there was arson that was taking place, where assaults were occurring, instead of coddling the criminals that are doing this again?" Carr said those opposed to the Trump administration's immigration raids could "peacefully disagree with what the federal government is doing." Newsom, for his part, alleged that Trump exacerbated the riots, echoing a position some criminal justice advocates take that an immediate show of force in response to intensifying protests is an ineffective approach. In Newsom's lawsuit, attorneys wrote that Trump's decision was not only unwise but also an unlawful and "unprecedented usurpation of state authority and resources." Fox News Digital reached out to the California Attorney General's Office for comment.


Politico
14 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump reverses Army base names in latest DEI purge
President Donald Trump announced on Tuesday that he plans to revert the names of seven major Army bases back to the Confederate generals for which they were originally named. 'We are also going to be restoring the names to Fort Pickett, Fort Hood, Fort Gordon, Fort Rucker, Fort Polk, Fort A.P. Hill and Fort Robert E. Lee,' Trump said. 'We won a lot of battles out of those forts, it's no time to change.' Trump's announcement, during a speech to soldiers at Fort Bragg, follows Biden-administration era alterations in 2023 that changed the installation names to honor new, non-Confederate individuals. Those included changing Fort Hood to Fort Cavazos, for the Army's first four-star Hispanic general. The Army previously redesignated Fort Liberty, previously known as Fort Bragg, to its original name, but honoring Private First Class Roland L. Bragg, a World War II hero instead of the Confederate general Braxton Bragg. The service also redesignated Fort Moore, after Gen. Hal Moore and his wife Julia Compton Moore, for Fred G. Benning, who won the Distinguished Service Cross during World War I. The Army is taking the same approach for the bases tapped for renaming on Tuesday, finding award-winning soldiers with the same last names as the Confederate generals to name the bases after, according to a statement released by the service after the president's speech. The president gave no timeline for the name changes and it was not immediately clear whether the Army's bases would be renamed after Confederate generals or soldiers from different eras. One army official, granted anonymity because they weren't authorized to speak, said they were caught off guard by the rapid-fire developments, which could take months to Army did not immediately respond to POLITICO's request for comment. Though the Trump administration insisted the redesignations were in-line with laws that prevent the Pentagon from naming bases after Confederate leaders or battles, Ty Seidule, a retired Army brigadier general who was the vice chair of the Congressional Naming Commission, which is tasked with relabeling bases and U.S. military assets, said that Trump's decision went against the spirit of the new rule enacted after the George Floyd protests. 'The bottom line is he's choosing surname over service,' said Seidule, who's now a visiting professor at Hamilton College. 'It is breaking the spirit of a law that was created by the will of the American people through their elected representatives.' Seidule said that the commission, which was made up of three Republicans, one Democrat and four retired flag officers, spent 20 months seeking input from the public and got 33,000 responses to change the names of Army bases and other installations and assets named after Confederates, including several U.S. Navy ships. But he said the decision still reflected that the Trump administration 'realizes that Confederates chose treason to preserve slavery, and they are unworthy of having bases named for them in America in 2025.' On Tuesday, Trump criticized Biden at several points during his speech, which was full of asides about immigration, transgender Americans and the spending bill currently being debated in Congress. His political comments in front of hundreds of soldiers from the 82nd Airborne Division led to a smattering of boos from the mostly uniformed audience when he criticized former President Joe Biden. Audience members also jeered when Trump mentioned California Gov. Gavin Newsom, whom the president clashed with over protests in California that were sparked by the Trump administration's immigration raids. Presidents normally avoid giving political speeches to military personnel. 'Do you think this crowd would have showed up for Biden,' Trump said at one point in his remarks. 'I don't think so.' 'We will liberate Los Angeles and make it free, clean and safe again,' Trump said, claiming parts of the city are under the control of international criminal gangs. The president has ordered 4,000 California National Guard soldiers and 700 Marines to Los Angeles, though so far only about 300 guardsmen have entered the city. The Marines are positioned outside Los Angeles, where they're undergoing training on crowd control, said one defense official who was granted anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media. The move to rename Army bases comes just days after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth moved to relabel a Navy vessel named after gay rights activist Harvey Milk as well as other ships named after civil rights leaders and women. Seidule, the retired Army brigadier general who served on the Biden-era naming commission, said that Trump's decision creates the risk that future administrations could take turns renaming the Army's bases. 'What happens if some other administration would name something after someone that one party thinks is just absolutely beyond the pale,' said Seidule. 'I think that this could absolutely be a tennis match.' Sam Skove contributed to this report.


The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Granholm: Democrats would ‘welcome' Musk ‘helping us out'
Former Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm said Tuesday that Democrats would 'welcome' tech billionaire Elon Musk 'helping us out' after an intense clash between Musk and President Trump last week. 'I think the Democrats would welcome him helping us out, politically, but — financially, etc.,' Granholm said at Politico's 2025 Energy Summit. 'But, maybe, maybe not, I don't know. I'm not running.' Last Thursday, a fight between Musk and Trump over the president's 'big, beautiful bill' earlier in the week escalated rapidly on Musk's X platform and Trump's Truth Social platform. The president said the tech billionaire 'just went CRAZY!' and threatened Musk's government contracts. Musk alleged that Trump had ties to convicted sex offender and financier Jeffrey Epstein on X. The public spat followed the end of Musk's recent service in the Trump administration and an alliance with the president that appeared to start off strong. Musk endorsed Trump in July 2024 in the wake of Trump surviving an assassination attempt in Pennsylvania. Musk's administration service was marked by intense backlash from those on the left and Democrats over actions taken by Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) on the federal government. Trump's ex-personal attorney Michael Cohen on Saturday said that Trump isn't done with tech billionaire Elon Musk yet. 'They're going to really go after Elon Musk like nobody has seen, ever, in this country, because they can,' Cohen told MSNBC's Ali Velshi.