logo
The conservative case for keeping USAID

The conservative case for keeping USAID

Boston Globe10-02-2025

TODAY'S STARTING POINT
Over the weekend, the US Agency for International Development looked to be on the verge of shutting down. The Trump administration had frozen aid the agency distributes and moved to put most of its staff on leave. On Friday, after crews pried the agency's name off of its Washington headquarters and Trump urged its closure, a federal judge
Democrats have responded to the administration's moves with anger and dismay. Their concerns echo the case for the existence of USAID that political liberals often make: It helps people in need. The agency's efforts to vaccinate children, treat HIV and malaria, avert famine, and reduce maternal and infant mortality have likely saved tens of millions of lives in poor and struggling countries — all for less than 1 percent of the US federal budget.
But there is also a case for USAID that political conservatives have long emphasized — including some of the Republican lawmakers now watching Trump dismantle it. In their telling, the agency exists to benefit Americans, not just foreigners. It does so by preventing diseases from reaching the United States, promoting global stability, and maintaining America's international power.
Advertisement
Today's newsletter explains this conservative case for USAID — and why Trump seems intent on decimating it anyway.
Outflanking rivals
The 'America-first' case for USAID dates to its birth. When Congress and John F. Kennedy created the agency in 1961, at the height of the Cold War, they saw it as both a moral imperative to help poorer countries and as a tool to enhance US power. The Soviets,
'It was partly an expression of American idealism, that America should be a force for good in the world, partly an expression of an enlightened self-interest,' says Larry Diamond, a consultant to USAID during the George W. Bush administration who is now a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution.
Advertisement
That twin rationale lasted for decades. Though some congressional Republicans have called for cuts or other changes to USAID, bipartisan majorities and presidents of both parties kept funding — and expanding — it. Ronald Reagan, another Republican who sought to shrink government,
More recently, Republicans have looked to USAID to counter a different international rival: China. Since 2013, China has spent an estimated $1 trillion to help Asian, African, and Latin American countries build highways, bridges, and other infrastructure, known as the
The handful of Republicans who have (gently) pushed back against Trump's plans for USAID make a similar case. 'We need an aid program to match the Chinese effort,' Senator Roger Wicker of Mississippi
If Trump does shut down the agency, China could fill the vacuum. 'We're going to be number two in the world,' Diamond said, 'and China's going to be number one. I don't see any way in which this makes America great again.'
National security
USAID funds warning systems to detect and contain disease outbreaks. It helps foreign governments reduce corruption and improve efficiency, lowering a country's chances of descending into conflict. And it rushes humanitarian aid after natural disasters, lessening displaced residents' incentive to flee abroad.
Advertisement
Marco Rubio, who has echoed Trump's criticisms of USAID, which he now oversees as secretary of state, suggested it was 'critical to our national security' back when he was a senator. 'Foreign aid is not charity,' Rubio tweeted in 2017, when Trump's first administration tried to cut USAID's funding. (Congress rebuffed those efforts.)
Gutting the agency risks more pandemics, more wars, and more migration, Diamond warns. 'We have to be in the game,' he said. 'If we're not globally engaged, it's gonna blow back on us.'
Win friends, influence people
During the Cold War, USAID promoted economic growth in part to prevent countries from coming under Soviet sway. Doing so strengthened trade relations, cultivated ideological allies, and boosted America's
More recently, the agency has focused on women. Research shows that countries that allow women to move around freely, go to school, vote, work, and start businesses tend to be more stable and democratic. When USAID launched a program supporting female entrepreneurs during Trump's first term, his daughter Ivanka
Trump's case
If USAID so benefits us, why is Trump trying to decimate it? He has accused the agency, without evidence, of 'tremendous fraud,' claimed that 'radical left lunatics' run it, and suggested in the past that most foreign aid is 'stupid.' He and his allies seem to believe that less American engagement with the rest of the world — and less American money going to it — is better for America.
Advertisement
But without USAID, Diamond says, what happens overseas may not stay there. 'Even if you think about it in only isolationist terms, only what's good for us here in the United States, this is not going to be good for us.'
Read more:
Spending $153 million to pay its bills put USAID in DOGE's crosshairs. (
See the Tesla employees, lawyers, and other Elon Musk allies who are helping him hollow out federal agencies. (
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a financial watchdog, seems to be next. The administration ordered it to halt nearly all work. (
The administration is also cutting federal funding through the National Institutes of Health. Scientists say it will
🧩
6 Across:
32°
POINTS OF INTEREST
Dr. Anthony Fauci spoke during the presentation of his book "On Call" in Washington, D.C., last June.
Jose Luis Magana/Associated Press
Boston and Mass.
Blanketed:
Search this database
T accident:
Two Green Line trolleys
'Being Human':
Boston's Museum of Science will hold a yearlong series of programs
Living in fear:
Venezuelans in Massachusetts
Reform, interrupted:
The Department of Justice has been negotiating police reforms with Worcester after finding a pattern of civil rights violations by officers there.
New England
States' suit:
Connecticut, Maine, Rhode Island, and Vermont are among 13 states
Donations needed:
Even as food insecurity is on the rise in Rhode Island, a Providence food pantry is asking for help after revealing it has
The Nation
'Cowardly':
The American Academy of Pediatrics and other medical interest groups haven't spoken out against Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s nomination to be health secretary,
No survivors:
Crews on Saturday recovered the remains of all 10 victims after a small plane crashed last week near Nome, Alaska. (
Next steps:
Proud Boys leaders, freed from prison by Trump after Jan. 6, are contemplating running for office. (
The World
Armed:
The State Department plans to sell more than $7 billion in weapons to Israel, after Trump met with the country's prime minister. (
Back home:
Hamas freed three more Israeli hostages as part of its cease-fire deal, in exchange for Palestinian prisoners' release. (
Uncovered:
Libya authorities found the bodies of nearly 50 migrants and refugees in two mass graves in the country's southeastern desert. (
Church and state:
King Charles and Queen Camilla will visit Pope Francis at the Vatican in April in celebration of the Catholic Church's special Jubilee year. (
BESIDE THE POINT
🩷 Boston at a Bargain:
Friday is Valentine's Day, so this week's
📱
Take a break:
Feeling uneasy about the amount of time you're spending on your phone?
🎶 Your own solo:
Why everyone should
🐍
Poison party:
A homeowner in Australia thought he had just a few snakes in his backyard mulch pile. Reptile relocation folks uncovered
😕
Internal storm:
You're a high-functioning, helpful, capable person, but inside is a swirl of discontent. Do you have '
🏢
Built better:
J.J. Carroll House, an affordable housing development for seniors,
is designed to help residents
🧁
Edible art:
Jennifer Lee, a Johnson & Wales senior with her own bakery, will be
🏠
No place like home:
A seven-bedroom Cape Cod home that the actress Judy Garland once rented is
Advertisement
🪦
Epilogue:
Fletcher Wiley, nicknamed Flash, was a Boston attorney who shattered racial barriers as the first Black chairman of the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce.
📧 Want this sent to your inbox?
Ian Prasad Philbrick can be reached at

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's former Commerce Secretary, Wilbur Ross, says the US-China deal is still far from comprehensive
Trump's former Commerce Secretary, Wilbur Ross, says the US-China deal is still far from comprehensive

Business Insider

time23 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Trump's former Commerce Secretary, Wilbur Ross, says the US-China deal is still far from comprehensive

President Donald Trump's former Secretary of Commerce doesn't think the trade deal between the US and China is close to being "done." "It looks as though they made a fairly modest deal, mostly focusing on export controls on both the US side and the China side," Wilbur Ross, who was part of the first Trump administration, told Business Insider. "So it's far from a comprehensive deal." On Wednesday morning, Trump said on Truth Social that the deal with China is now "done." "It seems more or less to be reiterating the deal they thought they had set a few weeks ago," Ross said of the deal. China and the US reached a trade framework agreement on Tuesday, after their respective negotiation teams held two-day talks in London. The current Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick, is part of the US trade talk team. "Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China," Trump added in all caps in the post. "Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities (which has always been good with me!)." Ross said that the deal has not addressed many important issues, including intellectual property, so it may be too soon to call this a victory. "The Chinese side has been very careful to say it still needs to be approved by President Xi," said Ross. "When we negotiated with the China side last time, it wasn't unusual for the trade negotiators to agree to something, and then they would go back to Xi, and he would not go along with it." This year in duties on imports from China reached up to 245% on some goods. On May 14, many of the tariffs on China were reduced to 30% for 90 days, with a deadline of August 12. A 10% baseline tariff is still in place on the rest of the world, while additional higher tariffs on 75 countries have been paused until July 9. Ross said that it would be important to complete at least a few deals with key trading partners before the tariff pause on 75 countries expires. "I think that will help clear the air for the stock market because it'll start to show a direction and that there is a way to get all these things resolved," he said. "It's very important from a bond market point of view and from an equity market point of view."

Trump Treasury Secretary Suddenly Backtracks on Major Tariff Deadline
Trump Treasury Secretary Suddenly Backtracks on Major Tariff Deadline

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Treasury Secretary Suddenly Backtracks on Major Tariff Deadline

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent indicated that Donald Trump is again intending to move the goalposts for his global tariff policy. The United States is fast approaching the end of the president's 90-day pause on his sweeping global tariffs on July 9, but while testifying before the House Ways and Means Committee on Wednesday, Bessent said that 'Liberation Day' Part 2 may not come to pass so soon. 'I would say, as I have repeatedly said, that there are 18 important trading partners. We are working toward deals on those. And it is highly likely that those countries that are negoti—or trading blocs, in the case of the EU—who are negotiating in good faith, we will roll the date forward to continue good-faith negotiations,' Bessent said. 'If someone is not negotiating, then we will not,' he added. The Trump administration has not even vaguely approached its initial promise to crack 90 deals in 90 days, only announcing two unfinished deals, with the U.K. and China. Crucially, Trump's paltry set of terms with China isn't even a deal. China referred to it as merely a 'framework,' while Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said it was a 'handshake for a framework' that both Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping need to approve. Trump seems intent on running the country's economic policy in 90-day increments, prolonging economic uncertainty that has roiled the markets and sent prices rising. But the president's failure should hardly come as a surprise, as the stated purpose of his tariffs—not to ensure economic prosperity but to bring U.S. trading partners to their knees—defies all logic and reason. With only two half-deals made, and a suddenly unclear horizon, it's not clear how TACO Trump will ever reach the goal of 200 trade deals he'd claimed to have made in April. Especially considering that there aren't even that many countries.

Congress to grill Kathy Hochul on NY sanctuary laws — and local GOP offers spicy advice over what questions they should ask
Congress to grill Kathy Hochul on NY sanctuary laws — and local GOP offers spicy advice over what questions they should ask

New York Post

time33 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Congress to grill Kathy Hochul on NY sanctuary laws — and local GOP offers spicy advice over what questions they should ask

ALBANY – State Republican lawmakers offered advice to their congressional counterparts ahead of Gov. Kathy Hochul testimony on Thursday over sanctuary policies – outlining a list of questions to fling at the Democrat. The GOP legislators sent a letter to House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer ahead of Hochul's trip to Washington, DC where she'll be grilled by a congressional panel on the Empire State's sanctuary laws. 'Governor Hochul's sanctuary state policies have played a direct role in the ongoing migrant crisis throughout our state, despite bipartisan concern including repeated warnings from New York City Mayor Eric Adams,' Assemblyman Michael Tannousis (R-Staten Island) wrote in the letter, cosigned by various other New York GOP lawmakers. Advertisement 'We believe that Governor Hochul must be held accountable for her failure to reverse the state's sanctuary policies and recklessness with taxpayer dollars,' Tannousis continued. Gov. Kathy Hochul is set to testify on capitol hill Thursday on New York's sanctuary city laws and its handling of the influx of migrants. Hochul is voluntarily appearing before the House committee on Capitol Hill and will testify alongside Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker. The hearing is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. Advertisement In their letter, the Republican state lawmakers ask the House Republicans to ask Hochul to outline: Why New York continued to accept migrants during the height of the crisis The vetting process for migrants and concerns about public safety A shady $432 million no-bid contract awarded to DocGo to help mitigate the crisis Her justification for roughly $4 billion the state has spent dealing with migrants Why some municipalities weren't reimbursed with costs associated with the migrants Tannousis said he wants the House Oversight committee to follow through after Hochul's testimony to deliver 'accountability.' The governor has tried to navigate a vague middle ground when it comes to the state's sanctuary policy, which is still based on a 2017 executive order issued by then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo who is now running for mayor of New York City. Advertisement Assemblyman Michael Tannousis and other Albany Republicans wrote a letter to the House panel suggesting areas where they should hammer Hochul. Michael McWeeney Hochul had promised specifics and clarity over her guidance on how New York would work with federal immigration authorities. Instead, her office only provided a list of four broad categories of situations that would trigger state law enforcement to work with the feds, such as if ICE has a judicial warrant or when relevant to investigating another crime committed in New York. Hochul had previously said she was 'happy to go down' to DC for the hearing. 'I'll tell them our policy in the state of New York is not to use state resources, our state police, to enforce the civil infractions,' Hochul said earlier this year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store