
Congresswoman's outrageous Muslim slur that has enraged everyone in DC
A Republican congresswoman is under fire after she misidentified a Sikh religious leader as Muslim and declared he should never have been allowed to deliver the House's morning prayer.
Rep. Mary Miller (R-Illinois), a far-right lawmaker with a history of inflammatory remarks, drew immediate condemnation from both sides of the aisle after the shocking social media post on Friday.
Miller claimed it was 'deeply troubling' for a non-Christian to lead the prayer and falsely stated the United States was founded as a Christian nation.
The backlash was swift, and within hours, Miller had deleted the post without explanation.
Leaders in both parties slammed her remarks as ignorant, bigoted, and fundamentally un-American.
The controversy began after Miller misidentified Giani Surinder Singh, a Sikh religious leader from New Jersey, as a Muslim declaring on X that he 'should have never been allowed' to lead the House of Representatives' morning prayer.
Even worse, she invoked a debunked claim that America was 'founded as a Christian nation' and demanded the government 'reflect that truth.'
Her comments, posted in the early morning hours, were later edited and saw her replacing 'Muslim' with 'Sikh', before ultimately being hastily deleted altogether.
Miller later edited her tweet which saw her replacing 'Muslim' with 'Sikh', before ultimately being hastily deleted altogether
But the damage was done and Miller was condemned with a ferocity rarely seen in the capital's often polarized chambers.
'It's deeply troubling that such an ignorant and hateful extremist is serving in the United States Congress. That would be you, Mary,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-New York) blasted on X, leading a chorus of denunciations that crossed party lines.
Rep. Nick LaLota (R-New York), one of the first Republicans to speak out, didn't mince words.
'A Sikh prayer on the House floor doesn't violate the Constitution, offend my Catholic faith, or throttle my support for Israel,' he posted. 'Live and let live.'
LaLota later expanded: 'While our nation's founding was indeed shaped by Judeo-Christian values, the First Amendment unequivocally guarantees that our government remains neutral toward all religions.'
Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-New Jersey), who invited Singh to offer the prayer, stood firmly behind his guest.
'As a Catholic, I take my faith seriously and I also believe part of being American is respecting other people's faiths too,' Van Drew said in a statement.
'The Sikh community is peaceful, generous, and deeply rooted in family and service - values we should all appreciate, no matter our religion.'
Democrat Rep. Grace Meng (D-New York) was fuming at Miller's actions
Democrats were no less scathing.
Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-New Jersey) wrote: 'It's deeply troubling that someone with such contempt for religious freedom is allowed to serve in this body.'
'What's deeply disturbing is the blatant ignorance and anti-Sikh, anti-Muslim xenophobia coming from my colleague across the aisle,' Rep. Grace Meng (D-New York) fumed, adding, 'The tweet may have been deleted, but we still have the receipts.'
Rep. Jared Huffman (D-California) couldn't resist a biting historical jab: 'I often say that I serve in Congress with some of the greatest minds of the 18th century. With Miller, I may need to take it back a few more centuries.'
The uproar extended far beyond Capitol Hill as civil rights groups, religious organizations and advocacy coalitions piled on.
The Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus (CAPAC) issued a blistering statement accusing Miller of 'anti-Sikh and anti-Muslim bigotry.'
'Sikhs and Muslims practice two separate and distinct religions, and conflating the two based on how someone looks is not only ignorant but also racist,' the group said.
The Sikh Coalition demanded a formal apology, with Executive Director Harman Singh declaring: 'Congresswoman Miller should apologize for her remarks - to both the Sikh and Muslim communities, because no one should be targeted on the basis of their identity.'
Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-New Jersey) wrote: 'It's deeply troubling that someone with such contempt for religious freedom is allowed to serve in this body.'
Rep. Jared Huffman (D-California) couldn't resist a biting historical jab
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-New York) blasted Miller on X, leading to a chorus of denunciations that crossed party lines
The Muslim Public Affairs Council echoed the call. 'We were intentionally founded as a nation of all faiths,' said Haris Tarin, the group's vice president. 'Apparently she must have forgotten about the First Amendment in this country.'
Even the Hindu American Foundation weighed in, lambasting Miller's comments as 'racist, xenophobic, and plainly un-American.'
For Miller, this was not a first offense. Her political career has been punctuated by repeated incendiary remarks.
In 2021, she faced fierce criticism for stating, 'Hitler was right on one thing: Whoever has the youth has the future,' a comment for which she later apologized.
In 2022, at a Trump rally celebrating the fall of Roe v. Wade, Miller raised eyebrows again when she declared it a 'victory for white life,' a gaffe her office attributed to a misread of prepared remarks.
Despite Miller's claims, the United States was not founded as a Christian nation. The First Amendment expressly prohibits any establishment of religion, safeguarding the rights of all faiths - or none at all.
Article VI of the Constitution further enshrines this principle, stating: 'No religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.'
The tradition of opening House sessions with prayer dates back centuries, with faith leaders from a wide array of religious backgrounds - including Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Sikhism - offering invocations.
Giani Surinder Singh, the man at the center of this controversy, was praised by Van Drew for embodying American values through his 'peace, humility, and service toward all.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump to send National Guard to Los Angeles after violent anti-ICE protests
Donald Trump has ordered the National Guard onto the streets of Los Angeles after a second day of violent protests against his immigration policies. Protesters on Saturday confronted federal immigration officers who had been carrying out raids on local businesses in Paramount, on the outskirts of LA. Border Patrol officers in riot gear and masks deployed tear gas and flash-bang grenades to disperse demonstrators outside an industrial park where federal vehicles were targeted. Protesters used cement blocks and shopping carts to block the road and jeered at officers, shouting at them to get Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers (ICE) 'out of Paramount'. 'We see you for what you are,' they shouted, and 'You are not welcome here'. One handheld sign read, 'No Human Being is Illegal.' Tom Homan, the White House's border czar, told Fox News on Saturday that the National Guard will be sent to the city as the protests continued to escalate. 'We are going to bring the National Guard in tonight,' Mr Homan said. 'American people, this is about enforcing the law – and again, we're not going to apologise for doing it.' It follows a protest outside a detention centre in down-town LA on Friday night during which dozens of people were arrested as they demonstrated against a series of ICE raids on workplaces earlier in the day. LA's mayor, Karen Bass, a Democrat, provoked fury from Republicans after she claimed that activity by ICE was meant to 'sow terror' in the nation's second-largest city. ICE Acting Director Todd Lyons attacked Ms Bass for the city's response to the protests. 'Mayor Bass took the side of chaos and lawlessness over law enforcement,' Mr Lyons said. 'Make no mistake, ICE will continue to enforce our nation's immigration laws and arrest criminal illegal aliens.' ICE had taken 40 people into custody earlier on Friday after searching multiple locations including a clothing warehouse in the city's fashion district. A tense scene unfolded as a crowd tried to block agents from driving away. Advocates for immigrants' rights said people had also been taken into detention after being stopped by ICE officers outside Home Depot stores and a doughnut shop. The action came after a judge found probable cause that an employer was using fictitious documents for some of its workers, according to representatives for Homeland Security Investigations and the US Attorney's Office. Kristi Noem, the Homeland Security Secretary, posted a message on social media addressing 'LA rioters' and warning that interference with immigration enforcement would not be tolerated. 'You will not stop us or slow us down,' Ms Noem said on X, adding that ICE 'will enforce the law' and that 'if you lay a hand on a law enforcement officer, you will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.' Dan Bongino, the FBI Deputy Director, confirmed multiple arrests had been made on Friday. He posted on X: 'You bring chaos, and we'll bring handcuffs. Law and order will prevail.' DHS said in a statement that recent ICE operations in LA resulted in the arrest of 118 immigrants. Following the Friday arrests, protesters gathered in the evening outside a federal detention centre, chanting, 'Set them free, let them stay!' Some held signs with anti-ICE slogans, and some people scrawled graffiti on the building. Among those arrested at the protests was David Huerta, regional president of the Service Employees International Union. Justice Department spokesperson Ciaran McEvoy confirmed that he was being held on Saturday at the Metropolitan Detention Centre in LA ahead of a court appearance on Monday. It was not clear whether Mr Huerta had legal representation. Chuck Schumer, the Democratic Senate Minority leader, called for his immediate release. In a social media post, Mr Schumer cited a 'disturbing pattern of arresting and detaining American citizens for exercising their right to free speech.' The immigration arrests come as Mr Trump and his administration push to fulfil promises of mass deportations across the country.


Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
George Orwell estate accused of censorship after putting trigger warning at start of Nineteen Eighty-Four
George Orwell's estate has been accused of censorship after a 'trigger warning' was added to his classic novel Nineteen Eighty Four. The preface of the the 75th anniversary edition suggests Orwell's protagonist Winston Smith is 'problematic' and that readers may find his views on women 'despicable'. The introductory essay was written by US novelist Dolen Perkins-Valdez and critics claim it risks undermining the revolutionary novel's warning against state control of thought. Orwell's dystopian hyperbolic future is set under an authoritarian regime, where citizens are punished by the 'Thought Police' for subversive thoughts. It follows Winston Smith and a minor bureaucrat who secretly rebels against the regime with Julia, a fellow party member. But their doomed affair comes to an end and the hearts of readers are broken when they are arrested, tortured and brainwashed into betraying one another. The novel has been hailed as one of the most influential pieces of literature of all time. Now, the author's estate has been accused of ideological policing. US writer Walter Kirn said on the podcast America this Week: 'We're getting someone to actually convict George Orwell himself of thought crime. 'We're not yet in a world where books and classic books are being excised or eliminated,' Kirn added, but warned the Orwell estate-approved edition of 1984 had been 'published with an apology for itself'. The book already had a foreword written by American novelist Thomas Pynchon, leading Mr Kirn to question why a second was needed. 'These people felt they needed an introduction before the old white man's introduction. So this version of 1984 has a trigger warning!' He called it 'the most 1984-ish thing I've ever f***ing read'. Ms Perkins-Valdez wrote she was enjoying the novel until Winston revelas himself to be a 'problematic' character who 'disliked nearly all women, and especially the young and pretty ones.' She added the novel doesn't address race and as a black woman she found it difficult to connect with the characters. The anniversary edition of the 1949 classic is published by Berkley Books, an imprint of Penguin Random House.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Presidential candidate shot and seriously wounded in Colombia, reports say
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.