logo
Arizona judge denies Lori Vallow Daybell's request for new trial

Arizona judge denies Lori Vallow Daybell's request for new trial

Yahoo24-05-2025

An Arizona judge on Friday denied a request from Lori Vallow Daybell for a new trial after jurors found her guilty of conspiring to murder her then-husband, Charles Vallow.
She asked for a new trial on May 1, just over a week after she was found guilty, claiming misconduct from jurors and prosecutors and claimed the judge was not impartial. She also argued that statements from Tylee Ryan and Alex Cox — who are both dead — should have been allowed in the trial, that part of a detective's testimony should not have been allowed and that she should have been given the opportunity to use newer download technology on her husband's phone.
Arizona Judge Justin Beresky denied that any of these things caused prejudice against Lori Daybell.
Daybell was given five life sentences in Idaho after being found guilty of murdering her two children, 16-year-old Tylee Ryan and 7-year-old JJ Vallow, and conspiring to murder them and Tammy Daybell, before marrying Chad Daybell.
In an interview immediately after the Arizona trial, a juror seemed to say he knew she had already been given multiple life sentences before the end of the trial. In multiple other comments in media interviews, however, the same juror verified he did not know until after the guilty verdict was delivered.
The judge considered all of the statements that juror made to the media and ruled in Friday's decision that there was not a 'clear indication of juror misconduct' or any evidence of prejudice against Daybell from this — which she would have needed to prove.
Beresky maintained his previous ruling, saying out-of-court statements from Tylee and Cox would be considered hearsay because they are dead and could not testify. He said Daybell was invited to bring specific statements from them for him to consider outside the jury's presence during the trial, but she never did.
The judge also determined that Daybell did not offer any evidence that the information she might have found on Vallow's phone could have negated her guilt.
Beresky also found that none of the arguments in her request for a new trial 'come close' to establishing misconduct from prosecutors.
Daybell's argument of prosecutorial misconduct included claims that the prosecutor repeatedly brought up her religion throughout the trial, thus violating her rights to religious freedom. The judge determined this was not the case.
'The (Religious Freedom Restoration Act) does not protect someone from committing criminal acts in the name of religion,' he said.
Beresky also determined he correctly ruled to strike witnesses from her list because she did not establish they had any relevant information, and did not show prejudice against her. He said she was told she could make the request again if she had new arguments that the witnesses were relevant, but she did not.
The judge did agree that he made a comment that was 'not necessary' — when denying an objection from prosecutors while Daybell, acting as her own attorney, was questioning Serena Sharpe, but he said it did not show bias or partiality. That comment was: 'To the extent that you are comparing yourself to these biblical figures I will allow it.'
Bereksy said that although he should not have made the comment, there was no evidence it influenced jurors.
Daybell asked to be sentenced in this case after her next criminal trial. That trial, on charges alleging she conspired to murder Brandon Boudreaux, her niece's then-husband, will begin in June.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Protests Spread
The Protests Spread

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

The Protests Spread

The protests, once contained to small corners of Los Angeles, have spread across the country. And cities are waking up to more. Downtown Los Angeles is currently under a curfew. Police officers wrestled protesters to the ground in New York, used chemical agents in Atlanta and monitored large demonstrations in Chicago, where people vandalized vehicles and threw water bottles at them. In Los Angeles, the police flew in a helicopter and threatened over a loudspeaker to arrest anyone who broke the curfew downtown. The fight between California and the Trump administration has also escalated. In a nationally televised speech, Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat who may have presidential ambitions, argued that Trump's deployment of 5,000 federal troops to Los Angeles had put the U.S. on the verge of authoritarianism. 'Democracy is under assault right before our eyes,' Newsom said. 'The moment we've feared has arrived.' The protests are expected to continue today: Marines will be in Los Angeles to protect immigration agents and federal buildings, expanding the government's rare use of military force on domestic soil. The Texas governor, Greg Abbott, has called in the National Guard ahead of protests planned in San Antonio. Trump threatened that protesters across the country would be met with 'equal or greater force' than those in Los Angeles, which he called 'a trash heap.' He promised to 'liberate' it. Below, we explain what is happening. The raids continue The protests are a widespread rebuke of Trump's immigration policies. The president won the election on a pledge to conduct mass deportations, and he has used cinematic raids to signal he's making good on that promise. As anger spreads in cities, Trump is digging in. Agents are rushing to arrest undocumented migrants, and he has sent federal troops to work with them. National Guard troops accompanied federal immigration officers on raids across Los Angeles. The Marines will also provide security to ICE agents as they do their work today, a government spokeswoman said. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Inside the digital hunt for a child sex abuser
Inside the digital hunt for a child sex abuser

Washington Post

timean hour ago

  • Washington Post

Inside the digital hunt for a child sex abuser

Secret Service agent Tanner Hubbard was about to leave home for the gym early one morning when he saw a message marked 'urgent' on his work phone. It came from one of the agency's analysts posted with Europol in Amsterdam who was alerting U.S. law enforcement to chilling videos discovered on an online forum by undercover police in Australia. They showed the sexual abuse of two very young girls. Time stamps indicated they were filmed somewhere in the eastern United States.

Trump Seeks Quick Path to Supreme Court in Hush Money Appeal
Trump Seeks Quick Path to Supreme Court in Hush Money Appeal

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

Trump Seeks Quick Path to Supreme Court in Hush Money Appeal

Donald Trump's lawyers will be back in court Wednesday to renew their push to dismiss the New York jury verdict that makes him the only person convicted of a felony to serve as president. Trump was convicted last year in Manhattan state court of 34 counts of falsifying business records to cover up hush money payments to an adult film star. His lawyers will argue to judges on the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals that the state case should be transferred to federal court.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store