Trump approved Iran attack plans on Tuesday but then decided to hold off, report says
President Donald Trump approved plans to join Israel in attacking Iran on Tuesday but delayed putting them into action to see if Tehran would pledge to abandon its nuclear ambitions, according to a report.
The president delivered his private instructions in the White House Situation Room, The Wall Street Journal reports, but has so far delayed giving the final order.
'I have ideas on what to do but I haven't made a final – I like to make the final decision one second before it's due,' Trump told reporters on Wednesday.
A White House aide told the Journal that Trump is continuing to monitor developments and will act accordingly, adding that multiple options remain on the table.
So far, U.S. involvement has been carefully restricted to helping Israel block Iranian missiles and drones, according to officials.
At present, Iran shows little sign of backing down and continued its missile assault on southern Israel overnight, causing 'extensive damage' to a major hospital, the Soroka Medical Center in Beer Sheba.
Explosions were also heard in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv while Iran's Arak heavy water reactor was hit in retaliatory strikes.
Israel began its Operation Rising Lion offensive six days ago, killing several top military leaders and subsequently striking some 1,100 targets, provoking an aggressive backlash from Tehran.
Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio originally stressed that the U.S. was not involved and that the president had made efforts to dissuade Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu from resorting to military action to stop Iran from developing a nuclear bomb.
But Trump's messaging has since been much more mixed, and the president has reportedly fallen out with his Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, over her opposition to intervention by 'warmongers' playing at brinkmanship.
Talks with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Gen. Dan Caine continued on Wednesday after the two men had appeared before the Senate Armed Forces Committee and after Trump had publicly repeated his calls on Tehran to surrender, allowing the threat of reprisals, should the country fail to comply, hanging in the air.
'I may do it, I may not do it,' he told reporters on the South Lawn of the White House. 'The next week is going to be very big, maybe less than a week.'
Iran reacted angrily to his words, with its United Nations Mission saying in a statement: 'Iran does NOT negotiate under duress, shall NOT accept peace under duress, and certainly NOT with a has-been warmonger clinging to relevance.'
The personal insult is unlikely to endear Trump to their cause, and Iran's Fordow uranium-enrichment facility is considered a probable target if the president does give the go-ahead to attack.
Earlier this week, the U.S. military began relocating tanker planes and fighter jets to air bases in Europe and ships into the Mediterranean so as to 'provide options to President Donald Trump as Middle East tensions erupt into conflict between Iran and Israel,' according to administration officials cited by Reuters.
During his appearance before Congress yesterday, Hegseth said any decision would be made 'at the presidential level,' adding that the Pentagon is working 'to ensure everything at our disposal is available to ensure maximum force protection against any contingency.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Musk publicly rips White House aide who prompted his falling out with Trump
Elon Musk has blasted a top White House aide, who reportedly prompted his public falling out with Donald Trump, branding him as a 'snake.' The tech billionaire posted the stinging response to a new report in The New York Post, claiming that Sergio Gor – director of presidential personnel and vetting members of Trump's team – had not vetted himself for the role. 'He's a snake,' Musk wrote on X, weeks after unleashing a barrage of posts against the president himself in an explosive online clash. Musk later apologized to the president. Gor is in charge of vetting around 4,000 members of the executive branch, using old social media posts, political donations and remarks to select those loyal to the president. However, The Post's report found that he has not yet submitted official paperwork about his own background. Such documentation is needed to procure a permanent security clearance. Three sources insiders told the outlet that Gor has not turned in his Standard Form 86, or SF-86 – a hefty set of questions spanning more than 100 pages, that is required for officials who need high-level security clearances. In a statement to The Independent, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt branded the report 'baseless gossip.' Another official added: 'Mr. Gor is fully compliant with all applicable ethical and legal obligations. His security clearance is active, any insinuation he doesn't maintain a clearance is false.' The beef between Musk and Gor allegedly came to a head as the Tesla boss prepared to depart the White House. The pair rivalry intensified Trump's decision to withdraw the nomination of Jared Isaacman – a close friend of Musk's – to be the next administrator of NASA. Rumours spread that Gor was behind the decision and intended it as an 'out-the-door 'f*** you' to Musk.' Gor, according to the Post, developed a grudge against Musk after the tech mogul 'humiliated' him in front of other cabinet members. After the event, Gor would publicly boast every time Tesla's stock plunged, according to reports. That version of events has been disputed, however, with complaints from Republican senators about Isaacman's track record as a Democratic donor also given as a reason for the decision. 'Perception is reality, though, and I'm pretty sure Elon thought the NASA situation was a last insult,' an official told Axios at the time. 'So here we are.'
Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Crane driver wakes up to find Donald Trump... and dozes off again
A crane operator was caught napping behind Donald Trump during an event at the White House on Wednesday. The worker appeared to briefly wake up, notice the US president below him, and go back to sleep. The moment was captured on video during the ceremonial installation of two 100ft (30.5m) flags on the White House lawn. One by one, a beaming Mr Trump posed for photos with the workers tasked with erecting the 'most magnificent poles made,' as he described them on his Truth Social platform. But while he shook hands with the workers wearing bright yellow t-shirts, the president appeared to be unaware that the crane operator, wearing sunglasses, a cap and sleeping just a few metres behind in the crane's cabin, was dozing off. Social media users were quick to make light of the faux pas, with one user on X noting the unidentified man had missed out on a handshake with 'the most important man in the world'. Another user joked the employee was 'emulating' Mr Trump's behaviour at 'any event where he is seated' while another asked: 'Did the guy in the crane pretend to be asleep to avoid the Trump selfie?' The new flag poles were erected on the North and South lawns of the White House. This is the first in a series of intended renovations to the White House lawn, with plans to pave over the grass of the famous Rose Garden apparently in the works. Mr Trump has also added his personal touches to the interior of the presidential home, hanging his own mugshot in the building and adding Mar-a-Lago-style gold accents in a large renovation of the Oval Office's decor. 'I bet they all voted for Trump' Mr Trump described the flags as 'the largest you'll ever see'. He told the press in front of the contractors tasked with the job: 'I don't know them but I love them,' and, 'I bet they all voted for Trump,' while criticising the federal reserve and hailing the success of his tariffs. The contractors were seen laughing awkwardly behind the president while the press asked him about the heightening tensions in the Middle East. Mr Trump looked for reassurance from the workers that they agreed the Russia-Ukraine war would've 'never happened' if he were president, and described the conflicts as 'stupid'.
Daily Mirror
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Have your say on whether the UK should get involved in the Iran-Israel conflict
As the Israel-Iran conflict rages on, we're asking: should the UK join the fighting? With tensions rising and Western involvement looming, is military action the right move - or should we continue pushing for diplomacy? As Keir Starmer continues to call for de-escalation between Israel and Iran - we're asking if you think the UK should join the fighting. The seventh day of conflict came 24hrs after Iran's supreme leader rejected U.S calls for surrender - and warned that any military involvement by the Americans would cause "irreparable damage to them." There's little sign so far that either side is willing to back down, and with that comes mounting concern the conflict will draw Western powers into it - but would you want our country getting involved? Take our poll below. The Prime Minister has refused to rule out defending Israel against Iranian attacks, despite a warning from Tehran that this could lead to British bases in the region being targeted. However, a No. 10 spokesperson said the UK would not support efforts aimed at regime change in Iran, with Keir Starmer urging that Iran's nuclear program be addressed through negotiations rather than military action. Meanwhile, last night Donald Trump continued to consider whether to deploy American forces to assist Israel in targeting Iran's military facilities. This comes after days of Israeli airstrikes on Iran, followed by Tehran's missile attacks on Israeli towns and cities in response. Speaking to broadcasters this morning, the Prime Minister said: "Obviously all of us, the UK included, are very concerned about the nuclear programme that Iran is developing, long been concerned about that. "We also completely recognise Israel's right to self defence. But the principle is that we need to de-escalate this. There's a real risk of escalation here that will impact the region, possibly beyond the region, into Gaza and obviously It's already having an impact on the economy." Should the UK get involved in the Iran-Israel conflict? Take our poll below and if you can't see it, click here Mr Starmer went on: "I've been absolutely clear about this - yes the nuclear issue has to be dealt with, but it's better dealt with through negotiations than by way of conflict." When Donald Trump took office in 2018, he withdrew the US from the nuclear deal with Iran, which had restricted Iran's nuclear activities since its signing in 2015. While Britain has consistently called for de-escalation, it has deployed two refueling tankers and 14 Typhoon jets to Cyprus to safeguard British personnel and interests in the Middle East. The Foreign Office has evacuated family members of British Embassy staff from Israel but has not advised UK nationals to leave the country. Asked if Mr Starmer would prefer Mr Trump to go down the route of diplomacy rather than military action, a No 10 spokesman said: "The Prime Minister has been clear that his priority is de-escalation. Clearly de-escalation is the priority, and we would not want to see anything that ramps up the situation. That is our priority. We have been clear on that for a number of days now. De-escalation remains this Government's priority." What do you think? Should the UK get involved in the Iran-Israel conflict? Take our poll above and expand on your feelings in the comments below.
