logo
From The Hindu, June 4, 1975: Namibia: India demands sanctions against S. Africa

From The Hindu, June 4, 1975: Namibia: India demands sanctions against S. Africa

The Hindu3 days ago

New York, June 3: India's Permanent Representative at the U.N., Mr. Rikhi Jaipal, has told the Security Council that 'there is a clear case' for imposing mandatory measures under the Charter against South Africa for its refusal to quit Namibia.
Intervening in the Council's discussions on Namibia yesterday, he said the U.N. was fully justified to take these measures since all other steps had failed.
The mandatory measures envisaged by him, though not specifically stated at the Council meeting, included an arms embargo, economic sanctions and severance of diplomatic relations with South Africa by all member States.
Although India is not a member of the Council, it asked for the floor to reaffirm its views on the Namibian question. India has supported the case of the Namibian people for self-determination and independence right from the start.
Mr. Jaipal said that the crux of the Namibian issue was the Security Council's resolution calling on South Africa to withdraw its illegal presence from the area and to transfer power to the people of Namibia 'with the assistance of the U.N.' But, he said, quite simply, the Pretoria Government 'does not accept that the U.N. has any role in Namibia.'
'We are thus in a quandary. The territory has international status but the U.N. has no effective role concerning it or the future of its people. There is a conflict here between 'de jure' responsibility and 'de facto' authority.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Impossible To Ignore China In Confrontation With Pak: Shashi Tharoor
Impossible To Ignore China In Confrontation With Pak: Shashi Tharoor

NDTV

time5 hours ago

  • NDTV

Impossible To Ignore China In Confrontation With Pak: Shashi Tharoor

Washington: China is an 'absolutely impossible factor to ignore' in India's latest confrontation with Pakistan, Congress leader Shashi Tharoor has said, emphasising that a thaw in relations between Delhi and Beijing over the past few months was 'seemingly making good progress' before the conflict. Mr Tharoor, who is leading a multi-party parliamentary to the US, said, 'I'm not going to mince my words, but we are aware that China has immense stakes in Pakistan." His remarks came during an interaction with representatives of think tanks organised at the Indian Embassy here on Thursday. The largest single project under the Belt and Road Initiative is the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, Mr Tharoor said, adding that 81 per cent of Pakistani defence equipment is from China. 'Defence may be the wrong word here. Offense in many ways,' he said. "China is an absolutely impossible factor to ignore in what has been our confrontation with Pakistan,' Mr Tharoor said. He noted that despite the tensions between China and India since the Galwan Valley clashes in June 2020, "we had actually begun a thaw with China in September of last year, which was seemingly making good progress before this tragedy occurred.' Mr Tharoor added that 'then we saw a very different China' in terms of its practical support for Pakistan, even on the Security Council. 'We have no illusions about what the challenges are in our neighbourhood, but I want to remind you all that India has consistently chosen a path of keeping open channels of communication, even with our adversaries," he said. "We have tried as much as possible to focus on development, on growth, on trade. Our trade with China is still at record levels. It's not that we are adopting a posture of hostility, but we would be naive' not to be aware of these other currents around, he said. Pakistan is currently a non-permanent member of the UN Security Council. Following the April 22 Pahalgam attack, the UN Security Council had on April 25 issued a press statement on the 'terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir' in which the members had condemned it in "the strongest terms'. 'The members of the Security Council underlined the need to hold perpetrators, organisers, financiers and sponsors of this reprehensible act of terrorism accountable and bring them to justice,' the press statement had said. However, the press statement did not mention The Resistance Front as the group responsible for the attack after Pakistan managed to get the name removed with the support of China. In October last year, India and China firmed up a disengagement pact for Depsang and Demchok, the last two friction points in eastern Ladakh. Days after the agreement was finalised, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping held talks in Kazan, Russia, and took a number of decisions to improve ties. External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar met Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in November last year in Rio de Janeiro on the sidelines of the G20 Summit and the two met again in February this year in Johannesburg. During a conversation at the Council on Foreign Relations earlier in the day, Mr Tharoor was asked about the Chinese military equipment that Pakistan used in the conflict against India and if there is a reassessment over this. 'Frankly, the reassessment took place while the fighting was going on,' Mr Tharoor said. He added that when India saw what the Pakistanis were attempting to do using Chinese technology, for instance, the 'kill chain' that the Chinese specialise in, where the radar, GPS, planes and missiles are all linked together and they react instantly, 'we simply did things in a different way. Otherwise, we wouldn't have been able to hit' 11 Pakistani airfields and 'we wouldn't have been able to breach the Chinese-supplied air defences. 'So it's clear that assessments were taking place while the fighting was happening, and we were recalibrating our strategies in order to end as effectively as we were able to end,' Mr Tharoor said. 'The fact is China has immense stakes in Pakistan, the largest single project on the Belt and Road Initiative is the one in Pakistan - the China- Pakistan Economic Corridor. So we have no illusions about the degree of commitment that China may well be feeling towards Pakistan.'

What Shashi Tharoor Said On Pakistan At United Nations Anti-Terror Panels
What Shashi Tharoor Said On Pakistan At United Nations Anti-Terror Panels

NDTV

time5 hours ago

  • NDTV

What Shashi Tharoor Said On Pakistan At United Nations Anti-Terror Panels

Washington: India is not friendless in the UN Security Council and Pakistan chairing its Taliban Sanctions Committee and being named vice-chair of the Counter-Terrorism Committee is a designation without much practical consequence, Congress leader Shashi Tharoor has said. Tharoor is leading a multi-party Parliamentary delegation to the US to brief key interlocutors about the threat of Pakistan-backed terrorism faced by India and India's strong resolve against terrorism. "These committees all work on consensus and it's not really possible for a chairman to single-handedly get something through that the others resist or push a particular line that other countries are not in favour of," Tharoor said during an interaction at the Indian Embassy here on Thursday. Pakistan, a non-permanent member of the Security Council for the 2025-26 term, will chair the Council's Taliban Sanctions Committee for 2025 and will be vice-chair of the Counter-Terrorism Committee of the 15-nation UN organ. Guyana and Russia will be vice-chair of the 1988 Taliban Sanctions Committee. Algeria will chair the 1373 Counter-Terrorism Committee while France and Russia will be the other vice-chairs. Pakistan will also be co-chair of the Informal Working Groups on Documentation and Other Procedural Questions and on the General UNSC Sanctions Issues. India has consistently reminded the international community that Pakistan is host to the world's largest number of UN-proscribed terrorists and entities. Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden was hiding in Pakistan's Abbottabad for years and was killed in an operation by the US Navy Seals in May 2011. During the Parliamentary delegation's interaction at the Embassy with think tankers and young professionals, Tharoor was asked about Pakistan chairing the two UNSC sanctions committees. Noting that there are half a dozen counterterrorism committees of the UNSC, he said that Council members take turns presiding over such bodies. "So as long as Pakistan is on the Security Council, this kind of "privilege" might come their way... We are not exactly friendless on the Security Council, so we're fairly confident that that is going to be a designation without much practical consequence," he said. He underlined that India's Permanent Mission to the UN in New York will monitor this carefully. On Wednesday, during a press conference at the Embassy, responding to a question by PTI on Pakistan given charge of the two committees, Tharoor said "it's a Taliban Committee these guys have got. I don't know what the feelings of the Afghans are about this, but there you are." Tharoor said UNSC members get the monthly rotating presidency of the Council. "It's as simple as that. There's nothing more than that. And many of these positions are rotational.... There are a number of UN institutions and committees, and so one shouldn't exaggerate, all the members of the Council automatically belong to all these committees and chairmanship rotates." He highlighted that there are various committees of the Security Council, such as one pursuant to resolution 1540 that deals with preventing non-state actors from acquiring, developing or using nuclear weapons. "It would have been really funny if Pakistan had been given that particular chairmanship, but that at least mercifully, has not happened." Pointing out that the UNSC committees work on consensus, he said there is no way that the chairman, whoever it may be, can get a particular point of view through or get something accepted or rejected merely by virtue of being chairman. "The others will weigh in very heavily. And we are not exactly friendless in the Security Council, and therefore in its committees," he said. The delegation, which had arrived from India in New York on May 24, had travelled to Guyana, Panama, Colombia and Brazil before arriving in Washington Tuesday afternoon for the last leg of the tour. Tharoor pointed out that the delegation did not go to the United Nations headquarters in New York. "For us, it's more a series of bilateral exercises with countries that we believe need to be sensitised to our point of view, and as I said, that mission has been successful." The delegation led by Tharoor includes Sarfaraz Ahmad (JMM), Ganti Harish Madhur Balayogi (TDP), Shashank Mani Tripathi (BJP), Bhubaneswar Kalita (BJP), Milind Deora (Shiv Sena), Tejasvi Surya (BJP) and India's former Ambassador to the US Taranjit Sandhu. It met US Vice President J D Vance, with Tharoor describing the meeting as "excellent". A parliamentary delegation from Pakistan led by Chairman of the Pakistan People's Party and former Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari also landed in the US at the same time as the Tharoor-led delegation from India. Bhutto met UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres with his delegation as well as Security Council Ambassadors in Pakistan's bid to internationalise the conflict with India as well as the Kashmir issue. Tripathi added that during the delegation's travels, countries voiced support for a permanent seat for India at the UN Security Council. "So this whole idea of Security Council that we've been saying, what was very interesting for us is that other countries are thinking the same about India, which is a very helpful thing." Sandhu added this highlights how seriously Pakistan will take terrorism, especially in the "responsible position" they are given and it also talks of how much authority and power the Pakistani "General or Field Marshal" has given the delegation led by Bhutto. (Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Lebanese army warns Israeli airstrikes might force it to freeze cooperation with ceasefire committee
Lebanese army warns Israeli airstrikes might force it to freeze cooperation with ceasefire committee

New Indian Express

time5 hours ago

  • New Indian Express

Lebanese army warns Israeli airstrikes might force it to freeze cooperation with ceasefire committee

BEIRUT: The Lebanese army condemned Friday Israel's airstrikes on suburbs of Beirut, warning that such attacks are weakening the role of Lebanon's armed forces that might eventually suspend cooperation with the committee monitoring the truce that ended the Israel-Hezbollah war. The army statement came hours after the Israeli military struck several buildings in Beirut's southern suburbs that it said held underground facilities used by Hezbollah for drone production. The strikes, preceded by an Israeli warning to evacuate several buildings, came on the eve of Eid al-Adha, a Muslim holiday. The Lebanese army said it started coordinating with the committee observing the ceasefire after Israel's military issued its warning and sent patrols to the areas that were to be struck to search them. It added that Israel rejected the suggestion. The U.S.-led committee that has been supervising the ceasefire that ended the 14-month Israel-Hezbollah war in November is made up of Lebanon, Israel, France, the U.S. and the U.N. peacekeeping forces in Lebanon known as UNIFIL. 'The Israeli enemy violations of the deal and its refusal to respond to the committee is weakening the role of the committee and the army,' the Lebanese army said in its statement. It added such attacks by Israel could lead the army to freeze its cooperation with the committee 'when it comes to searching posts.' Since the Israel-Hezbollah war ended, Israel has carried out nearly daily airstrikes on parts of Lebanon targeting Hezbollah operatives. Beirut's southern suburbs were struck on several occasions since then.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store