Labour ‘should not aim to copy right-wing populism but offer alternatives'
Labour should not copy the ideas of rising right-wing populists following its poor showing in local elections, but counter them with a bold, progressive agenda, the latest report by an influential think tank warns.
The Government cannot simply retry the ideas of past Labour administrations in the modern era if it wants to hold onto power, the Institute For Public Policy Research (IPPR) also said in its latest research, backed by former Labour foreign secretary David Miliband.
The report can be read as somewhat of a counter to groups like Blue Labour, which have suggested ministers adopt some of the ideas and language of the party's opponents on the political right in order to counter the rise of populist parties like Reform UK.
Following the May local elections, in which Labour lost a broad swathe of council seats across England to Reform UK, ministers have emphasised action to tackle migration and crime, policy areas where Reform leader Nigel Farage has sought to present a tough front.
The IPPR, which was influential on policy during the Blair and Brown governments and has seen several of its staff move into Sir Keir Starmer's administration, warned the 'forward march of populism is in full swing' in its report titled 'Facing the future'.
Labour should 'shift from defence to offence, from reactive to proactive, from apology to confidence', and show itself to be 'a disruptor, not defender, of the status quo' in order to combat its insurgent political foes, it said.
The report, which is directed not just at Labour, but progressive parties across the Western world, suggested ministers face a hard task because 'the progressive engine of ideas seems to have run out of steam'.
'When parties don't have new ideas, they reach back for old ones, or imitate others. Neither of these approaches will work at a moment of great change and challenge,' it said.
In a stark warning not to rehash the ideas of New Labour, or even older Labour governments, the IPPR added that progressives 'cannot simply reach back to yesterday's men in search of their ideas, goals and policies'.
'Their world has dissolved, so their ideas are out of date,' the report added.
The rising importance of national borders, broken faith in the global financial markets, and a lack of common public ground due to the fragmented way people now read the news, are among the reasons Labour cannot simply attempt to re-hash the so-called 'Third Way' of politics it championed in the 1990s and 2000s, the IPPR said.
The populist right's brand is meanwhile boosted when Labour and other progressive parties attempt to ape their ideas, the think tank warned.
'The challenge is to address the changes and grievances they speak to, but with progressive ideas and solutions,' it added.
David Miliband, the former Labour foreign secretary and brother to Energy Secretary Ed Miliband, gave his backing to the research.
Mr Miliband, who wrote the report's foreword, said adopting new ideas could lead Labour to oversee a 'virtuous circle of social, political and economic renewal, in which security and opportunity reinforce each other'.
He added: 'That is what happened after Labour was elected in 1945 and 1997, and what is needed again. The policies of those periods are time-bound; no one is suggesting those policies should be regurgitated. But the lessons in how new ideas can power new politics are important.'
The report concludes by saying Labour and its political allies around the world must now discuss and share progressive ideas for governing in the near future, a period which could be 'destabilising'.
The Labour Government, because of the long period before the next general election is expected to take place, has a chance to play a 'co-ordinating role' in these efforts, it added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Swinney apology to Gypsy Travellers ‘significant milestone', campaigner says
A campaigner has lauded the First Minister's apology over the 'cultural genocide' of Gypsy Travellers in Scotland as a 'significant milestone' for her community. Roseanna McPhee welcomed the apology, which she said was the result of years of campaigning. John Swinney made the formal apology at Holyrood on Thursday over 'unfair and unjust policies' that caused 'trauma' in what was known as the 'tinker experiment'. Between 1940 and 1980, the so-called experiment – supported by councils and the UK Government – attempted to strip away the nomadic lifestyle of Gypsy Travellers, providing rudimentary and often cramped huts for people to live in. A report published by the Scottish Government stated that 'the context within which the TE (tinker experiment) occurred is best understood as cultural genocide'. Ms McPhee, whose family was among those settled in Pitlochry on the former Bobbin Mill site, had grown up in a prefabricated Second World War-style Nissen hut which had no electricity and used candles for light. She welcomed the First Minister's apology, but said more needed to be done to stop the discrimination that her community continues to face. First Minister @JohnSwinney has apologised in @ScotParl for historical policies affecting Gypsy/Traveller communities, acknowledging they were unacceptable and caused enduring harm. More information here: — Scot Gov Fairer (@ScotGovFairer) June 25, 2025 She told the PA news agency: 'It's a milestone that we have reached in our long, long campaign, with no resources and just two or three generals and few food soldiers, really, because most people want to hide. 'I think the fact we managed to achieve that apology from the Government is a significant milestone. 'We're hopeful that discussions shall move forward, and perhaps something may be done about the general level of racism which we suffer, particularly in relation to public bodies.' Ms McPhee said the apology could have been 'more robust' and expressed disappointment that Mr Swinney did not label the Tinker Experiment as 'cultural genocide', the description used in the report published by the Government. 'Cultural genocide is a crime against humanity,' she said. 'They did not name the offence. They did not say they took full responsibility of the offence. 'However, it's a positive step on the road towards the discussion around restitution and just satisfaction.' Asked if she believed the Scottish Government should offer redress to affected families, she said: 'I absolutely believe it. 'If you'd been kept in degrading conditions as long as I have, with 16 health conditions and prevented from working with a joint-honours degrees and two post-graduates I think you might see some reason to have redress too.'


CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
CNN's Wolf Blitzer and Pamela Brown defend US military members involved in Iranian attacks
Coming out of President Trump's news conference in the Netherlands, CNN anchors Wolf Blitzer and Pamela Brown rejected Trump's claim that CNN has "demeaned" the service of military members who were involved in the US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend. "I speak as a former Pentagon correspondent and we appreciate, we love the men and women of the United States military who risk their lives to protect all of us," Blitzer said.


Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Rubio cracks up at Trump's reaction to NATO leader calling president 'daddy'
Secretary of State Marco Rubio cracked up laughing when President Donald Trump gave his reaction to NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte calling the commander in chief "daddy" earlier Wednesday. During their bilateral meeting in The Hague, Netherlands, Trump discussed the U.S.' role in brokering a fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran, saying both countries were like "two kids in a school yard" who "fight like hell" for a short time before "it's easier to stop them." Rutte interjected, "Then daddy has to sometimes use strong language." Trump had used profanity in front of reporters outside the White House before boarding Marine One on Tuesday, saying about Israel and Iran that they "have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f--- they're doing. " At a subsequent press conference Wednesday, Rubio broke into hysterics when a reporter from Sky News asked Trump about the remark. The reporter reminded Trump that Rutte, "who is your friend.… He called you daddy." "Do you regard your NATO allies as kind of children?" the reporter asked. Trump responded lightheartedly, and Rubio could be seen standing next to him starting to smile and laugh. "No, he likes me. I think he likes me. If he doesn't, I'll let you know. I'll come back, and I'll hit him hard. Okay?" Trump said jokingly. "He did. He did it. Very affectionate," Trump added of Rutte. "'Daddy, You're my daddy.'" The reporter pressed on with a more serious tone, as Rubio continued to laugh. "Do you regard your NATO allies, though, as kind of like children?" she said. NATO leaders on Wednesday committed that the member states would contribute 5% of GDP annually to defense and security obligations by 2035. "You're obviously appreciative of that," the reporter said. "But do you hope that actually they're going to be able to defend themselves, defend Europe on their own?" "I think they'll need help a little bit at the beginning, and I think they'll be able to," Trump said. "I think they're going to remember this day and this is a big day for NATO. You know, this was a very big day." "It's been sort of an amazing day for a lot of reasons, but also for that," Trump added, referencing how the greater contributions were decades in the making. Trump claimed it was not possible until he came along. The reporter pressed, "Do you think they can do it without you, though in the future? Can they do more states?" "I mean, you have to ask Mark," Trump said, concluding the press conference. The president had noted earlier that the only NATO member that did not agree to hike its defense contribution was Spain.