Chimps use medicinal plants to treat their wounds
Wild chimpanzees have been observed self-medicating their wounds with plants, providing medical aid to other chimps and even removing others from snares left by human hunters, new research suggests.
The behaviors — which are documented in a new study published in the journal Frontiers in Evolution and Ecology on Wednesday — provide new clues about the origin of medical care in humans.
The study combines historical data and about eight months of new observations, including many captured on video and in photos. It provides added evidence that our closest living relatives will chew plants and apply makeshift poultices to wounds, clean other animals' wounds by licking them, and use leaves for a hygienic scrub after sex or defecation. Chimps were also seen pressing wounds and dabbing medicinal leaves to wounds.
The results, particularly as they provide evidence that chimpanzees who are not kin care for one another, add new fuel to the debate over whether humans are the only species capable of providing prosocial, or altruistic, care to others.
'One of the things humans have clung onto is that we're this very special species, because we are capable of altruism and we're capable of empathy,' said Elodie Freymann, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Oxford and the first author of the study. 'Animals are helping each other out. They're capable of identifying others in need and then addressing those specific needs.'
Chimpanzees and bonobos, another primate species, are the closest genetic relatives to humans. The study adds to a growing body of research that suggests the concept of health care could have evolved millions of years ago, before humans were a species.
'It's likely that our shared common ancestor also would have been capable of these care behaviors as well,' Freymann said.
A growing body of research suggests other animal species might self-medicate, with varying levels of sophistication. Elephants, for example, have been shown to consume leaves used for medicinal purposes by humans, and some researchers suggest the animals are addressing specific needs, like digestion.
The volume of research into animal medication behaviors is increasing and outside researchers said this is important evidence that could open a window into our humanity's past.
'In our ancestors, we have examples of health care in humans since Neanderthals or even before, but what's very interesting is that we still don't understand fully how these kind of exploratory behaviors evolved,' said Alessandra Mascaro, a primatologist and doctoral candidate at Osnabrück University in Germany, who was not involved in the paper. "We are just scratching the surface."
In 2022, Mascaro published a study showing that chimpanzees in Gabon applied insects to their wounds, and she hopes more observations will help determine how the animals developed that behavior.
Studying chimpanzee medication behaviors is challenging work because the behaviors are relatively rare.
In this study, Freymann spent two four-month periods in the Budongo Forest in Uganda, following wild chimpanzees familiar enough with human researchers that they'll ignore their presence. It can be physical and demanding to follow chimps.
'There can be days where you're just sitting at the base of a tree while they eat for eight hours, and there can be days where you're hacking through vines and crossing rivers and stuck in clay pits — your day is completely determined by what the group feels like doing,' said Freymann, who would take notes about what the chimps ate, if they were sick or injured and how the animals interacted.
Freymann observed several instances of chimpanzee care behaviors during her field work. She also came across a historic logbook of observations kept at the research field site, which featured instances that didn't fit into previous research studies. She found patterns of medical care that dated back into the 1990s.
'When people pool their results and their observations, you can start seeing these amazing stories kind of come into view," she said.
Between her own observations, the logbook and additional data sources, Freymann documented 41 cases of wound care in chimpanzees, including 34 incidents of self-care and seven of care for others, the study says. Four instances of care for others involved animals that were not closely related.
'The findings show that some types of prosocial behavior towards nonkin may be more widespread than previously thought,' said Isabelle Laumer, a primatologist and cognitive biologist at the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior in Germany, who was not involved in the new research. 'More detailed investigation is needed.'
Mascaro, who researched the health behavior of chimps in Gabon, said the new research in Uganda showed that chimps in different geographies exhibited medical care behaviors, which bolsters confidence that the behavior is common across the geography of the species.
'We didn't know much about the chimpanzees on that side of Africa,' Mascaro said.
Self-medication has been documented in other primates. Laumer published a study last year showing an orangutan in Indonesia repeatedly chewing leaves and applying the material to a wound on its face to heal a wound received in a fight. The plant the orangutan used to medicate is not usually eaten by the species, but it is known to humans as a pain reliever.
This line of research, broadly, suggests that primates are capable of finding and determining the medicinal value of plants.
'Chimpanzees rely on the forest, not just for food, and not just for shelter, but really as a medicine cabinet,' Freymann said, adding that it's important to preserve the forest resources primates depend upon.
She added that humans likely learned from these creatures and evolved a sense for medicinal plants in the past. And she suggested that pharmaceutical companies could use these animals' knowledge to identify useful medical resources in the future.
'If we want to hone in on these amazing medicinal resources, watching and learning from the animals is an incredibly effective way to do it if it's done ethically and responsibly,' Freymann said.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
The scientist who believes he's found the answer to permanent weight loss
We all know someone with a fast metabolism. Or at least we think we do. They have a voracious appetite and yet never seem to put on weight. Is it that some people genetically are predisposed to be fatter than others? Perhaps our hormones are to blame, the type of foods we eat, even our gut health. There are certainly lots of competing theories for why some of us pile on the pounds, with corresponding diet advice. And all of them are a distraction, at least according to Prof Keith Frayn, one of the world's leading experts on metabolism. Having spent over 50 years studying metabolic health, he thinks we've made it all more complicated than it needs to be. Instead of cutting out carbs, drinking kefir, or avoiding low-fat/full-fat (depending on which influencer guru you prefer), he wants us to strip our thinking right back to basics: calories in, calories out. 'Arguments against this energy balance model are simply distracting us from what must be done,' says the emeritus professor of human metabolism at the University of Oxford. 'I'm not denying there are genetic effects on body weight, but as far as we can tell they act by changing how much you eat. Not how much you burn off. I think people have to understand that.' His book, A Calorie is a Calorie: The Inescapable Science that Controls our Body Weight is a rigorous account of the science of energy balance, in which he dispels the myth that some people have faster metabolism than others. If it's an excuse you've ever used yourself, then that probably isn't what you want to hear. As Prof Frayn adds: 'I know this is probably an unpopular view, but I've come at it as a scientist. Not as a celebrity influencer.' The energy balance model asserts that if we take in more energy than we expend, we will store the rest. Conversely if we expend more than we take in, our energy stores will be depleted, and hence our weight will fall. However the theory has become unpopular. 'People say it can't be that simple, or else we wouldn't be where we are,' says Prof Frayn. This suspicion that the cause of the obesity epidemic must be more complicated than calories in and calories out has led scientists – and a host of social media influencers – to posit alternative theories. We're often told to ditch the white bread and give rice a wide berth if we want to lose weight. The reasoning being that they quickly convert to sugar, which is then stored as fat. This so-called carbohydrate-insulin model has been widely promoted in recent years. Hence many of us worry about blood sugar spikes and follow-low carb diets. However, Prof Frayn says: 'I'm not convinced that spikes of blood sugar are bad for you. I don't think there's a lot of evidence for that, other than they make you hungry again more quickly. Whereas if you eat more unrefined fruit and vegetables they're going to take longer to be processed and keep you full for longer.' So it is not that carbohydrates are more likely to be laid down as fat, but rather they encourage you to eat more calories overall, affecting energy balance. 'A review of published studies has confirmed that low-carbohydrate diets help with weight loss because of reduced calorie intake rather than any specific effects of the lowering of carbohydrates,' he says. Popularised by the late Dr Michael Mosley whose 5:2 diet proved immensely popular as a method for losing weight, the suggestion being that it would encourage a period of fat burn. However research suggests that alternate-day fasting is about as effective as a typical low-calorie diet for weight loss. 'Time-restricted eating, intermittent fasting – so many of these ideas are just ways of altering energy intake: they do not change the underlying principle of energy balance,' says Prof Frayn. Related to the concept of intermittent fasting is the idea that our gut microbiome influences our weight. Prof Tim Spector has also popularised the idea of giving your gut a rest so that it can work more efficiently. There are clear observations to be made when you compare obese and lean people by looking at the microorganisms in their faeces, they have rather different populations. If obese people lose weight, it changes towards what we see in lean people. 'You can interpret that to say that the bacteria are causing them to become obese, but there is no proof of that,' says Prof Frayn. 'We don't have any experiment that would show that it is the different families of bacteria causing changes in body weight. It probably is so in mice, but mice are very different from humans.' Can dieting damage your metabolism? If you believe in weight set point theory then you might believe that it does. The theory suggests that when we diet after a time, our bodies will fight reduced calorie intake by dialling up hunger pangs and slowing down your metabolism to bring us back to our weight set point. Prof Frayn does not find it a credible theory in the long term. 'When you are on a restricted calorie intake, your energy expenditure does go down, that's clear in starvation studies, and the question is how long that persists,' he says. The evidence, he suggests, shows this slowing is only temporary. Prof Frayn cites data from the National Weight Control Registry database, an ongoing, observational study of individuals who have lost weight and kept it off. Analyses of the post-obese women found their body composition and energy expenditure was, in fact, very similar to those women who had never been overweight. This would not be the case if set-point theory was accurate. 'What people say is that it was hard, but the longer they are at a low weight, the easier it becomes. That's partly because they get used to a different way of eating and they exercise more.' Barely a week goes by without a headline alerting us to the dangers of ultra-processed foods. Dr Chris van Tulleken, an author, NHS doctor and health broadcaster, is one such voice who believes they are driving obesity, thanks to their hyper-palatability. Others suggest they might somehow be tricking us into eating more with their clever combinations of chemicals that override our satiety centres. But is this really the case? 'My belief is that we don't have evidence that it is anything other than they are high in calories and low in fibre, and therefore not filling enough,' says Prof Frayn. 'The problem is that they are tasty and make you want to eat more.' Hence we eat more calories. So how is it that some people can eat what they like, while the rest of us only have to look at a croissant before our thighs start expanding? This, says Prof Frayn, is a fundamental mistruth. He cites the example of his two friends Bobby and Alex (names have been changed). Alex is large-framed and muscular, while Bobby is petite. When they talk about food, it seems that Bobby is the one who is continuously eating. Does it mean he has a fast metabolism? The answer, says Prof Frayn is, no. The truth is that Alex is under-reporting his true calorie intake. This is a problem that has confounded generations of scientists trying to study energy. Recent studies are finally showing just how unreliable we are at recording our own diets. 'You can find people who appear to eat very different amounts and yet they weigh the same. But when you bring them into the lab and study them it all disappears. It has to come down to the fact we're not getting the information right about what they're eating.' When it comes to calories, some foods are denser than others. In 1992 when British explorer Sir Ranulph Fiennes and his companion Dr Mike Stroud attempted to reach the North Pole, they needed food that packed a calorific punch for its weight. 'They knew they would spend months pulling these heavy sledges and they knew they'd be expending a lot of energy and that they had to carry what they were taking. So it was 'how do we maximise the amount of energy in those rations?'' They did it by adding butter. To everything. 'If you add fat to things you will add energy to things without much weight. It creates very calorific foods,' explains Prof Frayn. It means that if you want to lose weight, clearly trying to cut fat out of your diet might be useful. Take the example of muesli, which Prof Frayn has for his breakfast. 'If you look at the nutrition label on muesli and compare it to granola, you've added a good 50 calories with the latter [because of the added oils]. You're just adding calories in the form of fat.' One might argue it makes it tastier. And certainly if you don't have a weight problem, go ahead and enjoy your granola. But in the Prof Frayn household, 'it's not worth the calories' is a well-used phrase. Caloric density is not the only reason that a diet rich in fruits and vegetables is a sensible one. There is strong evidence from observational studies, as well as clinical trials, that high dietary fibre intake is associated with lower body weight. There may be several reasons for this, says Prof Frayn: 'One is simply that dietary fibre is 'filling'. It's difficult to overeat when your plate is full of fibre-rich foods. Another effect of dietary fibre is that it interferes with our ability to digest nutrients. Adding fibre reduces the absorption of carbohydrates, fat and proteins.' However, while you will excrete more calories in your faeces on a very high fibre diet, Prof Frayn says it should not be overstated: 'I think there's a lot of good reasons that we should increase our fibre intake but that's probably because it fills you up. It probably does good things to your gut microflora but the effect on reducing the digestibility of the calories that you're eating is really small.' Consuming one macronutrient does present an advantage in the energy balance model; protein. 'When we eat protein, the body will use what it needs to replenish its protein stores because we're turning over proteins all the time. Anything else will be oxidised,' explains Prof Frayn. 'We don't have a way of storing protein other than laying it down in our muscles and so on. And some people would describe it as a hierarchy of oxidation. Protein oxidises before carbohydrates and fat if you eat in excess.' It also has this thermic effect. 'When you eat a meal for a short while, your metabolic rate will be elevated as you process the food and digest it. And that's slightly bigger for protein than it is for carbohydrates or fat. So you do burn off a few more calories.' Although again, Prof Frayn says the effects should not be overstated. 'It isn't a huge effect'. However if you are trying to lose weight you should opt for lean cuts. 'Not burgers and fatty bacon. Protein sources like beans are even better because they've got more fibre.' If that's the 'in' taken care of, what of the 'out'? The role of exercise in weight loss has been underplayed in recent years, with diet doing most of the heavy lifting. Prof Frayn thinks that has been a big mistake. Not only has our food environment dramatically changed, but so has our physical one. 'There are wonderful photographs from Oxford in the 1950s at the end of the working day at the big car factory, and the roads are just full of bicycles.' Nowadays most people drive to work and they spend many more hours sitting, either at work or in front of the TV. And we're over-reporting our activity rates, too; adults in Britain think that they watch an average of less than 20 hours of television a week, or around three hours a day, but official statistics collected by the Broadcasters' Audience Research Board (BARB) show that the true average in 2010 was more than 30 hours a week, or over four hours a day. 'There's been much downplaying of exercise, with people saying, 'Oh you've got to exercise two hours to burn a biscuit off,' but I don't think that's logical,' says Prof Frayn. 'It is almost impossible to maintain your calorie balance unless you do some exercise.' People who have more muscle burn more calories. But if you're trying to lose weight by just restricting calories, then you will lose muscle mass as well. Building up muscle might mean the rate of weight loss is a bit slower but it will help in the longer term. 'It will help you keep it off once you've got it down,' notes Prof Frayn. So why has exercise fallen out of favour amongst diet gurus? 'If I'm really honest I think there are people who don't want to exercise and want to find reasons to say that it's not really helpful.' If there is one thing that Prof Frayn would like us all to be, it is to be more cynical, both about advice we read from celebrity influencers, and also about what others say they eat. 'You can't judge somebody's metabolism by a chat about what they tend to eat, or by watching them having their lunch,' he says. As well as thinking about what we eat, Prof Frayn wants us to think about how we move. 'Exercise is something special. We need to all do it if we possibly can. It does something to our calorie balance in a way that we might not even yet understand.' Far from being daunting, remembering the energy balance model can be empowering. 'There's nothing wrong with having a treat now and then. It's ultimately all about balance.' This article was originally published in January 2025 and has been updated Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
We've Finally Seen The Skyscraper Tsunami That Shook Earth For 9 Days
In September 2023, Earth rumbled. Seismic monitoring all over the globe registered a strange signal that repeated every 90 seconds over a whopping nine days, petering out in a way never before seen. Then the same thing happened a month later. Subsequent analysis of those signals determined that the cause of that trembling was likely a giant megatsunami rocking back and forth, slapping against the sides of a fjord in Greenland – generating a standing wave known as a seiche. Now, scientists have finally actually seen the event, in satellite data captured while the event was in progress. It's the observation needed to confirm that the cause of the seismic signal was indeed a seiche, giving us an answer to the age-old question: if a seiche forms in a Greenland fjord and no one is around to see it, does it shake the planet? "This study is an example of how the next generation of satellite data can resolve phenomena that has remained a mystery in the past," says ocean engineer Thomas Adcock of the University of Oxford in the UK. "We will be able to get new insights into ocean extremes such as tsunamis, storm surges, and freak waves. However, to get the most out of these data we will need to innovate and use both machine learning and our knowledge of ocean physics to interpret our new results." According to the analysis of the seismic data, the trigger that unleashed the megatsunami was a melting glacier that sent two giant landslides toppling into the remote Dickson fjord in East Greenland. The resulting splashes generated powerful tsunamis that, with nowhere else to go, sloshed back and forth for days, reaching a peak height of 7.4 to 8.8 meters (24.3 to 28.9 feet). Because of the remote location, however, no one actually saw either event – not even a military vessel that visited the fjord three days into the first one. But humanity has eyes in the sky. There's a satellite mapping technique called altimetry that measures the height of the surface of the planet (including bodies of water) based on how long it takes a radar signal to travel down to the surface and bounce back up again. Most altimetry measurements were unable to record the seiches, because the resolution isn't high enough and the measurements are taken too far apart in time. But a NASA mission launched in 2022 called the Surface Water Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite has an instrument that is able to take measurements of the height of water with unprecedented precision. The satellite just so happened to have taken measurements at intervals during the days following both events. So the researchers on the new study used this data, collected by SWOT's Ka-band Radar Interferometer, to compile elevation maps of the fjord. Their results showed clear and significant height variations in the water, which was rising as a 2-meter standing wave reverberating back and forth across the fjord. That was it: the team had finally laid eyes on the seiches that were thought to have sent such strange signals rumbling around the world. The next step was to link the two phenomena. By comparing their observations to seismic data, the researchers were able to reconstruct the characteristics of each wave, and the evolution of each event, even for time periods that the satellite had not observed. They were able to rule out other possible explanations for the seismic signals, and confirm that the seiches were responsible. It's a beautifully tidy result that will help us study such events in the future. "Climate change is giving rise to new, unseen extremes. These extremes are changing the fastest in remote areas, such as the Arctic, where our ability to measure them using physical sensors is limited," says engineer Thomas Monahan of the University of Oxford. "This study shows how we can leverage the next generation of satellite Earth observation technologies to study these processes. SWOT is a game changer for studying oceanic processes in regions such as fjords which previous satellites struggled to see into." The research has been published in Nature Communications. Astronauts Reveal The Shocking Beauty of Lightning From Space Sloths The Size of Elephants Roamed America, Before Abruptly Vanishing This Giant Snail Lays Eggs Out of Its Neck… Yes, Seriously
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
New method provides key to accessing proteins in ancient human remains
A new method developed by researchers at the University of Oxford could provide the key to accessing proteins in ancient human remains. The technique, created by scientists at the Nuffield Department of Medicine, offers a breakthrough in extracting and identifying proteins from preserved soft tissues such as brain, muscle, and skin - sources of biological information that have long remained out of reach. Alexandra Morton-Hayward, a postgraduate researcher who led the study, said: "Until now, studies on ancient proteins have been confined largely to mineralised tissues such as bones and teeth. "But the internal organs - which are a far richer source of biological information - have remained a 'black box' because no established protocol existed for their analysis. Our method changes that." The team tested 10 different extraction techniques on 200-year-old human brain tissue collected from a Victorian workhouse cemetery. Authors of the study (L-R), Dr Sarah Flannery, Alexandra Morton-Hayward, Professor Roman Fischer, and Dr Iolanda Vendrell (Image: Roman Fischer) They found urea, a major component of urine, was able to break down cells and release proteins. The extracted proteins were then separated and identified using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. By also using high-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry - which separates ions by their movement in an electric field - the researchers increased the number of proteins identified by up to 40 per cent. Ms Morton-Hayward said: "It all comes down to separation: by adding additional steps, you are more likely to confidently identify molecules of interest. "It is a bit like dumping out a bucket of Lego: if you can start to discriminate between pieces by colour, then shape, then size, etc the better chance you have of making something meaningful with it all." Using the full process, the team identified more than 1,200 ancient proteins from just 2.5mg of brain tissue. This is the most diverse set of proteins ever recovered from archaeological material. The researchers believe the method could transform scientists' understanding of health and disease in past populations. Professor Roman Fischer, senior author and researcher at the Centre for Medicines Discovery, said: "By enabling the retrieval of protein biomarkers from ancient soft tissues, this workflow allows us to investigate pathology beyond the skeleton, transforming our ability to understand the health of past populations." Proteins outlast DNA in archaeological remains and reveal more about a person's life and health than genetic material alone. Dr Christiana Scheib, from the University of Cambridge, who was not involved in the study, said: "It is key to first develop the best way to obtain relevant information from these materials, which is what this study does. "This type of fundamental experimental work is crucial for the field to move forward."