The Trump Supporters Who Didn't Take Him at His Word
This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here.
Ask Trump supporters why they like the president, and chances are good you'll hear something like: He tells it like it is and says what he means. The question, then, is why so many of them refused to take him at his word. Over the first three weeks of the second Trump presidency, a recurrent motif is that Trump does exactly what he said he would, and then people who backed him react with shock and dismay.
If you're surprised, you weren't paying attention—and judging from recent examples, many people weren't. When Trump announced his plan (I'm using the word generously) to occupy the Gaza Strip and convert it into an international real-estate development, the chairman of Arab Americans for Trump, which formed to back him during the election, expressed shock and betrayal, and announced that the group would rename itself Arab Americans for Peace. Some Arab American voters may have felt compelled to lodge a protest vote against Joe Biden's handling of the war in Gaza, even if it meant contributing to Trump's win, but no one should have been surprised that a guy who used Palestinian as an insult during the campaign was not a sincere champion for the people of Gaza.
Some Venezuelan Americans in Florida are feeling similar outrage. Trump continued to make gains with Hispanic voters in 2024, but this month he ended Temporary Protected Status, a designation that allows noncitizens to stay in the country, for about 300,000 Venezuelans, with more TPS designees likely to lose their status later. 'They used us,' the Venezuelan activist Adelys Ferro told NPR. 'During the campaign, the elected officials from the Republican Party, they actually told us that he was not going to touch the documented people. They said, 'No, it is with undocumented people.'' In fact, both Trump and Vice President J. D. Vance said they wanted to deport people legally allowed in the country, such as Haitians in Springfield, Ohio. Some voters just convinced themselves that their own groups wouldn't become targets.
They're not alone. Some Kentucky educators who voted for Trump are aghast that his administration is trying to cut off federal funding that they need to keep their schools functioning, despite his campaign-trail promises to abolish the Department of Education. 'I did not vote for that,' one principal told CNN. 'I voted for President Trump to make America first again and to improve our lives.' The Fraternal Order of Police, the nation's largest police union, endorsed Trump for president, then decried Trump's decision to pardon January 6 rioters who attacked police officers—never mind that he had promised pardons while campaigning. CEOs and bankers who decided they liked Trump better because he favors low taxes and less regulation are suddenly chagrined to learn that he was serious about tariffs. A Missouri farmer who voted for Trump is horrified that the administration is freezing federal funding for conservation programs, even though Trump promised to eliminate environmental programs and slash government spending.
All of this was foreseeable. In a 2015 tweet that remains depressingly relevant a decade later, Adrian Bott joked: ''I never thought leopards would eat MY face,' sobs woman who voted for the Leopards Eating People's Faces Party.' But I don't want to single out ordinary citizens. Even Republican members of Congress are doing the same dance—cheering on Trump cuts in general but scrambling to protect their own states from losing any federal money. They ran for office with the Leopards Eating People's Faces Party, but they never expected the leopards to eat their faces too.
Other Trump promises were pretty dubious if you listened to the rest of his plans. 'Starting on day one, we will end inflation and make America affordable again,' he said. But Trump's signature campaign ideas were large tariffs and mass deportation. Both of these are inflationary: Tariffs raise the price of goods, and mass deportation makes labor scarcer, raising salaries, which in turn drives prices higher. Today, the Federal Reserve released the first Consumer Price Index update of Trump's term, finding 3 percent inflation. That's a hair above economists' expectations but in line with last month's figures. Persistent inflation shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone, and not only because of the sharp rise in egg prices, driven by bird flu, that my colleague Lora Kelley covered last week.
You don't need an economics degree to predict this. You just had to heed the many warnings about it, which even Fox News covered. Or you could just listen to what Trump said, as when he suggested that tariffs would pay for child care or that Biden's encouragement of wind power was responsible for inflation. These aren't just the kinds of comforting nonsense all politicians sometimes peddle; they're incoherent. Since winning the election, he has downplayed his inflation promises and announced a set of tariffs that, although not fully felt yet, may already be edging prices higher. Now Trump wants the Fed to drop interest rates, which would stimulate the economy—and likely increase inflation.
When Trump ran for president in 2016, uncertainty about his seriousness was understandable. He was a legendary merchant of hyperbole, and no one was sure where his persona ended and his real political intentions began. No such excuse applies anymore—as I pointed out in September, Trump was president once, and he tried to keep most of his big promises, albeit often ineffectively. This time around, Trump said he was going to do these things—and hey, he tells it like it is.
Related:
Trump was president once.
Trump's plan to supercharge inflation (From June)
Here are three new stories from The Atlantic:
David Frum: Why the COVID deniers won
The hidden costs of Musk's Washington misadventure
So about that asteroid that could hit Earth ...
Today's News
Trump spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin and discussed entering negotiations to end the war in Ukraine.
Former Representative Tulsi Gabbard was confirmed as the director of national intelligence.
Marc Fogel, an American schoolteacher who had been wrongfully detained in Russia since 2021, was released from prison and landed in the U.S. last night.
Evening Read
The Tesla Revolt
By Patrick George
Donald Trump may be pleased enough with Elon Musk, but even as the Tesla CEO is exercising his newfound power to essentially undo whole functions of the federal government, he still has to reassure his investors. Lately, Musk has delivered for them in one way: The value of the company's shares has skyrocketed since Trump was reelected to the presidency of the United States. But Musk had much to answer for on his recent fourth-quarter earnings call—not least that in 2024, Tesla's car sales had sunk for the first time in a decade.
Read the full article.
More From The Atlantic
Why Silicon Valley lost its patriotism
Donald Trump and the politics of looking busy
Presidents may not unilaterally dismantle government agencies.
The government waste DOGE should be cutting
Afrikaner 'refugees' only
Culture Break
Read. Pick up one of these seven books when you want to quit.
Play. A radical tweak makes the video game Civilization more realistic—and more depressing, Spencer Kornhaber writes.
Play our daily crossword.
P.S.
When I'm not writing about politics, I like to moonlight as The Atlantic's jazz writer. One of these days, I want to profile the tenor saxophonist James Brandon Lewis, who I think may be the most dynamic figure in jazz today. He released a new album, Apple Cores, on Friday, and it's typically excellent—which is to say, it's excellent and also not beholden to any particular type. Like Sonny Rollins, a clear inspiration, Lewis makes music that's adventurous and challenging but doesn't require a deep immersion in jazz to appreciate. I especially like 'Prince Eugene,' which is driven by the percussionist Chad Taylor's hypnotic mbira riff.
— David
Stephanie Bai contributed to this newsletter.
Explore all of our newsletters here.
When you buy a book using a link in this newsletter, we receive a commission. Thank you for supporting The Atlantic.
Article originally published at The Atlantic
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
29 minutes ago
- USA Today
US appeals court won't reconsider Trump's $5 million loss to E. Jean Carroll
US appeals court won't reconsider Trump's $5 million loss to E. Jean Carroll A divided 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has left intact its Dec. 30 decision upholding a $5 million verdict against Donald Trump Show Caption Hide Caption Judges deliberating on Trump's E. Jean Carroll appeal Judges are deliberating on whether the jury that awarded E. Jean Carroll $5 million should have been allowed to hear other allegations. NEW YORK, June 13 (Reuters) - Donald Trump failed to persuade a federal appeals court to reconsider the $5 million verdict won by E. Jean Carroll after a jury found that the U.S. president sexually abused and defamed the former magazine columnist. A divided 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan on June 13 left intact its Dec. 30, 2024, decision upholding the jury award. Carroll, now 81, accused Trump of attacking her around 1996 in a Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing room in Manhattan, and defaming her in an October 2022 Truth Social post by denying her claim as a hoax. More: Trump loses appeal of sexual abuse and defamation judgment in E. Jean Carroll case Jurors decided in May 2023 that Trump had sexually assaulted Carroll, and defamed her by lying. They did not find that Trump raped Carroll, as she had claimed. More: Did Donald Trump rape E. Jean Carroll? Here's what a jury and judge said. In seeking reconsideration, Trump maintained that the trial judge erred in letting jurors review the 2005 "Access Hollywood" video of him bragging about his sexual prowess, and a "pile-on" of inflammatory evidence that he mistreated two other women. One, businesswoman Jessica Leeds, said Trump groped her on a plane in the late 1970s. The other, former People magazine writer Natasha Stoynoff, said Trump forcibly kissed her at his Mar-a-Lago estate in 2005. Trump has denied their claims. More: Jury finds Donald Trump liable in civil sex abuse case of E. Jean Carroll Trump, who turns 79 on June 14, is separately appealing an $83.3 million jury verdict in January 2024 for defaming Carroll and damaging her reputation in June 2019, when he first denied her claim about the Bergdorf encounter. The president is arguing in that appeal that the U.S. Supreme Court's decision last July providing him substantial criminal immunity shields him from liability in Carroll's civil case. In his 2019 and 2022 denials of Carroll's accusations, Trump said she was "not my type" and had made up the rape claim to promote her memoir.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Defense stocks trade higher after Israel airstrikes in Iran raise Middle East tensions
Defense stocks climbed early Friday after Israel launched a series of airstrikes on Iran, raising tensions in the Middle East and heightening fears of a broader regional conflict. Lockheed Martin (LMT) stock gained as much as 3% early Friday, while shares of Northrop Grumman (NOC) and RTX (RTX) rose closer to 2%. The three companies supply weapons to Israel through their contracts with the US government. US stocks were lower at the open, with the S&P 500 and Nasdaq off about 0.7% while the Dow fell 1.1%. Overnight futures fell nearly 2% in immediate reaction to Israel's airstrikes, which were first reported near 8:00 p.m. ET on Thursday. Oil prices were the biggest mover on Friday, rising as much as 8%. Defense stocks have been on the rise over the past year, with Friday's gains bringing RTX stock's gain to north of 35% over the past year, while Northrop Grumman is up 19.5%. Lockheed Martin has risen a more modest 3.9% over that time frame. Palantir (PLTR), a defense contractor that has benefited both from the bid in defense names and its role in the AI boom, traded flat Friday morning. Its stock has soared more than 480% over the last year and is the best performer in the S&P 500 year-to-date. RTX has outperformed Wall Street's expectations since the fourth quarter of 2022. Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman have beat analysts' projections in seven and six of those nine quarters, respectively. The Trump administration has promised a $1 trillion budget for US defense but its fiscal 2026 budget looks set to fall short of that goal. On Thursday night, Israel launched what it called a "preemptive strike" against Iran targeting its nuclear facilities. The attacks continued into Friday, killing 78 people in Tehran including Iran's top military leadership. Iran's foreign minister described the attacks as a 'declaration of war' and its supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Israel 'should expect severe punishment.' US President Trump urged Iran to 'make a deal' in a post on Truth Social Friday. 'There has already been great death and destruction, but there is still time to make this slaughter, with the next already planned attacks being even more brutal, come to an end,' he wrote. 'Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire. No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.' Laura Bratton is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on Bluesky @ Email her at Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Axios
35 minutes ago
- Axios
How much NASA spends on science in Utah
NASA spends an average of $11 million annually in Utah on scientific missions, per data from The Planetary Society, a pro-space nonprofit. Why it matters: NASA's science efforts bear the brunt of cuts to the agency in the Trump administration's proposed budget, which would slash science funding by nearly 50% to $3.9 billion. The big picture: Science represents roughly 30% of NASA's budget, supporting missions like space telescopes, robotic probes and satellites that gather data about Earth's changing climate. While not always as headline-grabbing as human spaceflight, NASA's science activity has greatly enhanced our scientific understanding of both Earth and our celestial neighborhood. By the numbers: NASA supported 2,375 jobs in Utah and generated $486.6 million in economic output and $17.2 million in state tax revenue in fiscal year 2023, per a state report. Over 60 suppliers in the state have contributed to the agency's Artemis moon exploration program. The intrigue: The proposed cuts come as some Utah officials want to position the state as a leader in space innovation. Gov. Spencer Cox signed a bill in March appropriating $1 million to study the feasibility of a spaceport in Utah for potential space exploration. Zoom out: California (about $3 billion), Maryland ($2 billion) and Texas ($614 million) saw the most average annual NASA science spending across fiscal 2022-2024, the data shows. Zoom in: Missions on the chopping block in President Trump's NASA budget include the Mars Sample Return, an ambitious joint American-European plan to collect Martian soil samples and bring them to Earth for further study. Nearly 20 active science missions would be canceled in total, the Planetary Society says, representing more than $12 billion in taxpayer investments. What they're saying: A chief concern, Planetary Society chief of space policy Casey Dreier tells Axios, is that already paid-for probes and telescopes would be deactivated even though they're still delivering valuable data. "They keep returning great science for the very fractional cost to keep the lights on. And a lot of these will just be turned off and left to tumble in space," Dreier says