You Are Completely Unprepared for What Tesla's Robotaxi Actually Looks Like
We've finally gotten a glimpse at one of Tesla's Robotaxis in action.
But don't expect your socks to be blown off. As seen in a bystander's footage taken in Austin, Texas, that Elon Musk has proudly reshared, it's literally just a black Model Y with the word "Robotaxi" scrawled on the side in a painfully outdated graffiti font. The future is truly upon us.
"Beautifully simple design," Musk tweeted, presumably through a pained grimace.
https://twitter.com/SawyerMerritt/status/1932478438775902575?
To be clear, this isn't the Cybercab, Tesla's currently in-development car that's supposed to function exclusively as an autonomous taxi, with an extremely boneheaded design that features only two seats and no steering wheel. What we're seeing, instead, is a regular Tesla with a software update (and a mid-life crisis design flourish.)
"These are unmodified Tesla cars coming straight from the factory," Musk explained in a followup tweet, "meaning that every Tesla coming out of our factories is capable of unsupervised self-driving!"
The self-driving cabs are right around the corner. According to a Bloomberg report last month, Tesla plans to launch its Robotaxi service in Austin on June 12, with development reportedly ahead of schedule.
Around the time of the reporting, Musk confirmed in a tweet that the automaker had completed its first test of operating a Robotaxi with no human behind the wheel on a public road. In the recent footage, there was no driver physically present, either.
The cab service will start with about 10 vehicles operating in the city, according to Musk. At first, only Tesla employees will be allowed to ride in them. But Musk insisted that the service will quickly expand, if all goes to plan. In one of his trademark grand promises, the billionaire estimated that the city would be crawling with over 1,000 Tesla robotaxis "within a few months" of launching, and upped the ante further by adding that more than a million self-driving cars would be roaming American roads by the end of 2026.
There are still huge question marks hovering over the entire thing. Tesla's current self-driving offerings, like its misleadingly named Full Self-Driving feature, are considered to have Level 2 autonomy. That means a human driver must be physically present and ready to take control at any moment.
But Robotaxis will need to operate at Level 4 autonomy and higher, which entails they're capable of driving with no human present, though only in limited conditions. That's a concerning leap, as Tesla's safety record with its existing FSD is already questionable, and it's yet to demonstrate that it can even accomplish Level 3.
The choice of location explains a lot. Texas virtually has no special regulations in place for autonomous vehicles. A prospective Robotaxi basically just has to follow the same safety requirements as any other car, along with having cameras and other data recording systems installed. And due to a 2017 Texas law, cities can't intervene by imposing their own regulations, leaving everything handled by the state.
At this stage, it's also unclear how Tesla plans to teleoperate the vehicles, a term that describes the use of humans to remotely supervise or even completely control the Robotaxis as they prowl public roads — something that Tesla's competitors in the space also do, though they try to avoid talking about. Tesla has put up listings for developing a teleoperation system — but, perhaps tellingly, has avoided providing any further details.
More on Tesla: Cybertruck Sales Are So Bad That We Gasped
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk controversy creates new problem for Tesla stock
Elon Musk controversy creates new problem for Tesla stock originally appeared on TheStreet. Last week, a social media post from Elon Musk caused many people to stop what they were doing and look down at their phones. Even for the Tesla () CEO, known for his controversial and bold opinions, what they saw seemed surprising. Musk had previously announced plans to cease his political spending. But only a few days later, he accused Trump of having direct ties to notorious criminal Jeffrey Epstein and alleged that without his help, the Republican president would not have won last year's election. 💵💰💰💵 Since then, Tesla has been in the spotlight, as the dispute between two of the world's most powerful men continues. While TSLA stock initially plunged on news of the argument, it has since regained some of its momentum. Even as shares slowly trend upward, though, experts speculate that short sellers may regard the Musk-Trump fallout as an opportunity to bet against the stock. Over the past few months, Musk's behavior has sparked a global backlash against Tesla's brand, causing sales to fall across the U.S. and Europe. This clear indication of consumer sentiment toward him has caused some financial experts, including Tesla shareholder and fund manager Ross Gerber, to call for him to step Musk announced that he would be stepping back from his role with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), TSLA stock surged, and some investors speculated that the company's troubles were over. But now his falling out with Trump has generated further uncertainty. When a prominent company starts showing signs of weakness or instability, short sellers are likely to start closing in. So far, Tesla's recent declines have been highly profitable for those willing to bet against it. The Wall Street Journal reports that as TSLA stock plunged last week, short sellers pocketed up to $4 billion, noting: 'Investors have made $7 billion betting against Tesla year-to-date, a roughly 30% return. Elon Musk's company is currently the second most shorted stock in the U.S. by total value of the position, with around $27.7 billion of shares sold short, according to S3.' Betting against an industry-leading company like Tesla will always carry some risk, regardless of how bleak its prospects may appear. But experts see a case for shorting TSLA stock, provided investors understand its volatile nature, which includes surging unexpectedly. 'I think Musk dragged Tesla into a political spectacle,' Galileo FX CEO David Materazzi tells TheStreet. 'That creates perceived instability. Short sellers don't need real damage, just the illusion of it. Volatility invites them in. When the CEO becomes the story, the stock turns into a target.' Financial education platform First Information's CEO Vince Stanzione holds a short position in TSLA. He says his reasons are 'business not personal,' however, citing the company's high valuation and questionable market share over the feud between Musk and Trump. More Tesla News: The 'anti-Tesla' gives American buyers more good news Analyst sets eye-popping Tesla stock price target Elon Musk's feud with Trump is hurting an unexpected investment 'The P/E ratio is over 100 and growth the last few years has been near zero,' he says of Tesla. 'The bulls will say you're paying for the future and Elon Musk's brilliance, and I am not disputing that Tesla could have some future hits in the pipeline, but Elon Must is very good at promising 'jam tomorrow' which never seems to materialize, or if and when it does, it's not the flavour he promised.' Stanzione also raises a concern regarding Tesla's foray into robotics, something on which Musk has hinged a lot of the company's prospects. This part of Tesla's business just became more complicated due to the abrupt departure of one of its leaders.'Unless robotaxis start showing up en masse by the end of this year, then investors will keep selling,' states Stanzione. 'I am very bullish on robotics. It's something I have been investing in for over a decade, especially in medical and military uses, however, Tesla is not the only game in town.' He names rivals such as Hyundai Motor Group and Boston Dynamics, both of which are making notable advances in the robotics field that could threaten Tesla's progress. Chief Analyst Dan Buckley also highlights the potential valuation problem, stating 'Tesla short sellers may see their edge in the long-term mismatch between its ~$1 trillion valuation and the current reality of its business – i.e., nearly all auto-based revenue – and the uncertain viability of its highly speculative emerging tech bets.' That said, Buckley advises investors considering a Tesla short to 'treat political feuds as a volatility amplifier rather than a directional signal' and highlights the importance of caution when betting against such an unpredictable Musk controversy creates new problem for Tesla stock first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 10, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 10, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Xi Plays Long Game on US-China Trade as Trump Seeks Quick Wins
(Bloomberg) — While Donald Trump hailed the outcome of trade talks in London, Xi Jinping walked away with an understated strategic gain: a negotiating process that buys China time and helps defuse the threat of more harmful tariffs and technology curbs. Shuttered NY College Has Alumni Fighting Over Its Future Trump's Military Parade Has Washington Bracing for Tanks and Weaponry NYC Renters Brace for Price Hikes After Broker-Fee Ban NY Long Island Rail Service Resumes After Grand Central Fire Do World's Fairs Still Matter? Shortly after two days of negotiations wrapped, Trump declared Wednesday on social media that a deal had been 'DONE' to restore the flow of critical magnets from China, and pledged to lift curbs on student visas. Hours earlier, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick revealed Washington would unwind its recent tech curbs, if niche metals essential to US auto and defense firms now flowed fast enough. China's focus was very different. A People's Daily commentary on Thursday — Beijing's most substantial comments so far on the talks — made no mention of export controls. Instead, the Communist Party mouthpiece touted an 'institutional guarantee' established in Geneva for the two sides to bridge differences via a 'consultation mechanism.' In a long-awaited leaders' call before the London negotiations, Xi told Trump the importance of using this channel, it added. The contrast illustrates a disconnect in how the world's biggest economies want to manage their trade dispute, and broader rollercoaster relationship. While Trump seeks quick deals done directly with top leaders, Xi favors a framework led by his lieutenants that wards against being blindsided. Such haggling could drag on for years, with the 'Phase One' deal from the first trade war taking most of Trump's first term. 'Xi is playing a longer game on US-China trade. His time in office is simply much longer than Trump's,' said Christopher Beddor, deputy China research director at Gavekal Research. 'That's not to say there's never any short-term thinking, but the lack of term limits presents very different incentives than for Trump.' While slow-walking negotiations allows China the chance to assess how hard a bargain Trump drives with other nations, the lingering uncertainty is bad for business, he added. Xi showed last week he can be flexible, getting on the phone with Trump as ties spiraled, breaking from the protocol to set up such an interaction. In the Biden era, then National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan and Foreign Minister Wang Yi would huddle in foreign locations for days before their leaders spoke directly, managing outcomes and expectations. While the Geneva talks last month wrapped with an identical US-China statement, suggesting a degree of alignment, that accord quickly fell apart over US claims China reneged on a promise to release shipments of rare earths. Beijing says it always intended to keep in place a permit process, which American companies complained moved so slowly some factories were forced to pause production. The lack of a detailed read out from either side this time around has left much in doubt, including on what Beijing committed to on the export of niche metals used in everything from fighter jets to electric vehicles. Lutnick told CNBC on Wednesday that China was going to approve 'all applications for magnets from the United States companies right away' — a sweeping claim that appeared to leave plenty of room for disappointment. Chinese Commerce Ministry spokesman He Yadong pledged his country would 'fully consider the reasonable needs and concerns of all countries in the civilian sector,' at a regular press briefing in Beijing on Thursday, adding that approval work was being strengthened. 'The Chinese incentive is also to keep cards close to their chest, and not make a lot of proclamations about what they have or have not committed to,' said Arthur Kroeber, founding partner and head of research at Gavekal. 'There is a lot of leeway for them within the whole export licensing regime.' One approach could be to restart enough export licenses so commercial buyers aren't stymied, but not so much that firms can stockpile, thus blunting Beijing's future leverage, he added. Adding to the fuzziness, Trump declared on social media that China now faces a 55% charge, a number that appears to include levies introduced during his first presidency. It also combines a 10% baseline duty imposed by Trump and a 20% tax tied to fentanyl trafficking — an area where Beijing was seen as having room to negotiate if it stepped up scrutiny of its companies. Lutnick cast doubt on that, and raised questions about the nature of future negotiations, saying that tariffs on China would 'definitely' stick at their current level. That suggests a 90-day pause set to expire in August on Trump's blanket 145% rate was now irrelevant. Such a position also dilutes the incentive for Beijing to offer concessions in future trade talks, if tariffs can't budge. While China has felt the pain from US levies, with exports to the world's largest economy plunging 34% in May, Trump appears to be in the bigger hurry to get a deal. His administration is facing a self-imposed July 9 deadline to either strike pacts with dozens of global trading partners or reimpose sweeping tariffs. In a sign of the Republican leader's growing impatience, he warned Wednesday that he will soon send letters to countries saying, 'this is the deal, you can take it or leave it.' Exemplifying that willingness to keep things moving, Trump's team in a rare move this week put export controls on the negotiating table — previously, such tools have been justified with national security concerns, and were largely off limits. Watering down that rationale could open the door to more cooperation, and advance Trump's stated goal to 'open up China to American trade.' Still, China is unlikely to agree to large purchases of goods that compete in areas where Beijing is looking to build self sufficiency and nurture its own national champions. Rebalancing their economies, a concept touted by US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, could involve attracting more Chinese investment into the US. Policy whiplash by the Trump administration might deter many Chinese companies from pouring money into the US economy, even if Xi were to encourage them to do so. Addressing these issues will take time, presumably requiring long discussions using the mechanism that China and US included in what Beijing called their 'hard won' agreement. 'Some people say that the result of the London talks was just a framework,' said Zhu Junwei, a former researcher in the People's Liberation Army who is now director of American research at Grandview Institution in Beijing. 'It's better to have a framework than have nothing.' —With assistance from Jing Li and Lucille Liu. American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software US Tariffs Threaten to Derail Vietnam's Historic Industrial Boom The SEC Pinned Its Hack on a Few Hapless Day Traders. The Full Story Is Far More Troubling ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Billionaire Blavatnik courted to take Daily Telegraph stake
The billionaire who has bankrolled DAZN, the sports-streaming service, is being courted to take a stake in The Daily Telegraph alongside the newspaper's new American majority-owners. Sky News has learnt that Sir Len Blavatnik, whose holding company Access Entertainment owns assets in Britain, including the Theatre Royal Haymarket, has been approached by RedBird Capital Partners about becoming a minority investor in the Telegraph titles. Two sources close to the situation said on Thursday that Sir Len was being sounded out about a deal, although they cautioned that no agreement had been struck and it remained unclear whether one would be. Sir Len, who was knighted by the late Queen Elizabeth II for services to philanthropy in 2017, is a prolific investor in the arts, media and entertainment industries. Access Entertainment is run by Danny Cohen, the former BBC director of television. Announcing its agreement to acquire Telegraph Media Group last month for an enterprise valuation of £500m, RedBird Capital said it was "in discussions with select UK-based minority investors with print media expertise and strong commitment to upholding the editorial values of the Telegraph". This was principally a reference to Lord Rothermere, the Daily Mail proprietor, who remains in talks to pay more than £30m for a stake in the Mail's rival right-leaning newspaper group. Goldman Sachs is advising DMGT on the investment, with a deal the subject of ongoing discussions, according to insiders. Read more: The Abu Dhabi state-backed vehicle IMI is still expected to acquire the maximum 15% stake in the Telegraph permitted under proposed new media ownership rules. The government's decision to set the ownership threshold at 15% follows an intensive lobbying campaign by newspaper industry executives concerned that a permanent outright ban could cut off a vital source of funding to an already-embattled industry. However, the deal faces continued opposition from parliamentarians, with The Guardian reporting on Thursday that a cross-party group had written to Lisa Nandy, the culture secretary, warning of "potential Chinese state influence" because of links between RedBird Capital chair John Thornton and China's sovereign wealth fund. This suggestion has been dismissed by RedBird Capital insiders. Ukraine-born Sir Len's portfolio of investments includes DAZN, which is now also backed by a Saudi sports group, mobile games studio Tripledot and Scenario Two, a theatre production company. Dovid Efune, the owner of The New York Sun, is meanwhile continuing to assemble a rival bid for the Telegraph, having secured backing from Jeremy Hosking, the prominent City investor. His prospects, however, look to have diminished after the former chancellor, Nadhim Zahawi, was reported to have withdrawn from his so-called 'British bid'. The Telegraph titles' parent company was forced into insolvency proceedings two years ago by Lloyds Banking Group, which ran out of patience with the Barclay family, their long-standing owner. RedBird IMI, a joint venture between the two firms, paid £600m several months later to acquire a call option that was intended to convert into ownership of the Telegraph newspapers and The Spectator magazine. That objective was thwarted by a change in media ownership laws, which banned any form of foreign state ownership. Some parliamentarians are continuing to argue that a 15% threshold would be too high, and that the proposed rules are ambiguous because they potentially allow for more than one state investor to aggregate their holdings in British newspapers. The Spectator was sold last year for £100m to Sir Paul Marshall, the hedge fund billionaire, who has installed Lord Gove, the former cabinet minister, as its editor. RedBird Capital has been contacted for comment, while a call to Access Industries' London office went unanswered on Thursday lunchtime.
