Bear necessity: A drone can be lifesaver in grizzly country
"If it's black, fight back; if it's brown, lie down; if it's white, well say goodnight." Such is the forlorn advice for any camper or mountaineer unfortunate enough to encounter a bear on the prowl.
Unless packing heat, people have little chance of surviving an encounter should one of the giants move in for the kill. The polar bear is the world's biggest land carnivore with some males weighing upwards of 700 kg; lone hunters capable of killing prey more than twice their size such as narwhals and walruses.
While omnivorous, North American brown bears can be nearly as large, with paws the size of dinner plates that can down a bull moose with a single well-placed swipe.
And though smaller, female bears are arguably more dangerous than males if startled while out and about with their cubs: Think of the wince-inducing scene in "The Revenant" when Leonardo di Caprio's trapper character is mauled by a momma grizzly after chancing upon her little ones in the wilderness.
But there could be a life-saving method for campers and hikers that does not involve strapping on a rifle. According to Wesley Sarmento of the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, using "a highly maneuverable, buzzing drone" resulted in him "scattering bears with accuracy" when they were found to be getting too close for comfort.
Grizzlies are "an imposing predator that can take down prey as large and dangerous as an adult bison," warned Sarmento, who wrote up his findings for the journal Frontiers in Conservation Science.
After having limited success using trained dogs, firecrackers and non-lethal rounds, Sarmento found using a drone meant he "could precisely chase bears exactly where I wanted them" without having to get out of his truck.
"Even at night, I could find bears from afar with the thermal camera, and then fly in closer to move them away from towns, homes, and livestock," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
June full moon this week has major lunar standstill. Won't happen again until 2043
June's full moon promises to be a special sight, if Mother Nature cooperates. June's full moon will be at its lowest point since 2006 since we're in the middle of a major lunar standstill. You'll have to wait awhile before it rolls around again; It won't happen again until 2043. If you're outside, the moon will appear larger than normal low on the horizon and may even be orange or reddish. Here's what to know. The next full moon will be on Wednesday, June 11, with the peak occurring at 3:44 a.m. ET. 'The June full Moon got the name 'strawberry moon' from a number of North American native tribes, since the wild strawberry reaches peak ripeness and is ready for harvesting in June,' according to the Farmers Almanac. "Because of the importance of the wild strawberry as a spring food staple, the name 'Strawberry Moon' was given to the June full moon by the Algonquin, Ojibwe, Dakota, Lakota, Chippewa, Oneida, and Sioux tribes." June's full moon will be special. "In the Northern Hemisphere, it will be the lowest full moon seen until 2043, staying unusually close to the horizon " according to the Old Farmer's Almanac. Look for the full moon at 3:44 a.m. ET June 11, about 22 degrees above the southern horizon. "When the moon is low in the sky it appears especially big." The last time the full moon was this low was 18.6 years ago, according to in what's known as a major lunar standstill. It won't happen again until 2043. As the moon shines through the thick layer of air, it may appear golden, orange, or even reddish. June's full moon is the closest full moon to the summer solstice, which falls on June 21 this year. The summer solstice marks the longest day of the year in the Northern Hemisphere. Look toward the southern horizon at 3:44 a.m. ET on June 11. Can't pull yourself out of bed? You can see it later but that's the time it will reach its peak. Make sure you have a clear view since the moon will only be about 22 degrees above the horizon. "Every day, the moon rises in the east and sets in the west, but the location of the moonrise and moonset on the horizon changes, moving from north to south to north again over the course of a month. Throughout the 18.6-year lunar cycle, the northernmost and southernmost extremes also change," said. "During a major lunar standstill, the northernmost and southernmost moonrise and moonset are at their farthest distance apart. This affects how long the moon appears to stay in the sky." Called a 'major lunar standstill,' the natural phenomenon doesn't take place over one day but over about two years when the moon rises and sets at more northerly and southerly spots along the horizon, said. According to the remaining full moons of 2025 are: Thursday, July 10: 4:37 p.m. ET, buck moon Saturday, Aug. 9: 3:55 a.m. ET, sturgeon moon Sunday, Sept. 7: 2:09 p.m. ET, corn moon Monday, Oct. 6: 11:48 p.m. ET, hunter's moon (super moon) Wednesday, Nov. 5: 8:19 a.m ET., beaver moon (super moon) Thursday, Dec. 4: 6:14 p.m. ET, cold moon (super moon) The summer solstice occurs at 10:41 p.m. ET, June 20 this year. The solstice marks the exact time when the sun reaches it northernmost point in the sky, according to EarthSky. In the Northern Hemisphere, the June solstice marks the shortest night and longest day of the year. This article originally appeared on Treasure Coast Newspapers: June full moon is June 11. How to view in Florida lunar standstill
Miami Herald
2 days ago
- Miami Herald
Ships in Antarctica destroying planet's oldest living animals
By Stephen Beech Antarctic sea life - including the oldest living creatures on the planet - are at risk from increasing number of ships dropping anchor there, warns a new report. Underwater video footage has revealed for the first time the impact of anchor and chain damage caused by cruise, research, fishing and other vessels on the Antarctic sea floor. Species at risk include giant volcano sponges which may live up to 15,000 years, say scientists. Global shipping activity is becoming more widespread, even in the most remote regions of the planet. Now, an international research team has gathered the first video evidence of anchoring and chain damage in Antarctic waters. Study first author Matthew Mulrennan said: "This is the first time the impacts of ship anchoring and chain damage are documented in Antarctic waters. "Activities in Antarctica have a lot of strict rules around conservation, yet ship anchoring is almost completely unregulated." Co-author Dr. Sally Watson, of the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research in New Zealand, said: "Documentation is way overdue, given the importance of these ecosystems and the protections we place on them. "Anchoring impacts are understudied and underestimated globally. "It's so important to recognize and mitigate the impacts across all industries and limit planned anchoring." At least 195 tourism, research, and fishing vessels, as well as private yachts were recorded in anchorable depths in Antarctica during the 2022-23 season. But it is likely that more ships operate there without licenses, according to the research team. During the austral summer of that year, the team used underwater cameras to observe the seafloor at 36 sites across the Antarctic Peninsula and South Georgia Island. Footage, published by the journal Frontiers in Conservation Science, was captured close to the surface, midwater, and one metre above the sea floor. It showed disturbances to the seafloor and marine life where ships had anchored. Grooves, striations and mud deposits from anchor retrieval were visible in the substrate of the ocean floor. At the disturbed sites, little to no marine life was present. Instead, the researchers observed crushed sponge colonies and a lack of benthic biomass. Dr. Watson said: "We know that anchor impacts in tropical reefs can last a decade. "In muddy sediment the scours can still be visible over a decade later. "Ecological recovery is really site specific. Things in cold waters are much slower growing than in warmer temperatures so I expect that recovery would take longer the higher the latitude." The researchers say future research should look at the short- and long-term impacts of anchoring on the seabed, recovery periods, and the impacts on the broader ecosystem. Mulrennan added: "Anchoring is likely the most overlooked ocean conservation issue in terms of global seafloor disruption; it is on par with the damages from bottom trawling. "It's a pressing environmental issue, but it's out of sight, out of mind." The post Ships in Antarctica destroying planet's oldest living animals appeared first on Talker. Copyright Talker News. All Rights Reserved.
San Francisco Chronicle
4 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Study says California is overdue for a major earthquake. Does that mean ‘the big one' is coming?
Unlike other earthquake-prone places around the planet, California is overdue for a major quake, according to a recent study. But that doesn't mean a catastrophic event like the 1906 San Francisco earthquake is on the verge of striking. 'A fault's 'overdue' is not a loan payment overdue,' said Lucy Jones, founder of the Dr. Lucy Jones Center for Science and Society and a research associate at the California Institute of Technology, who wasn't part of the work. The new study reported that a large share of California faults have been running 'late,' based on the expected time span between damaging temblors. The researchers compiled a geologic data set of nearly 900 large earthquakes on active faults in Japan, Greece, New Zealand and the western United States, including California. Faults are cracks in the planet's crust, where giant slabs of earth, known as tectonic plates, meet. The Hayward Fault is slowly creeping in the East Bay and moves around 5 millimeters per year, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. But sometimes plates get stuck and pressure builds. Earthquakes occur when plates suddenly slip, producing a jolt of energy that causes the ground to shake. Scientists study ruptured rock layers deep beneath the surface to estimate when large earthquakes occurred in the past. In the new study, the authors collected data stretching back tens of thousands of years. For a region spanning the Great Basin to northern Mexico, this paleoearthquake record stretched back about 80,000 years. For California, the record extended back about 5,000 years. The scientists used these records to calculate how much time typically passes between large surface-rupturing earthquakes around the planet. The average interval was around 100 years for some sites on the San Andreas Fault; it was 2,100 years on the less famous Compton thrust fault beneath the Los Angeles area. About 45% of the faults analyzed for California are running behind schedule for a major earthquake, meaning that more time has passed since the last large quake on a fault than the historical average. In the other regions studied, this statistic ranged from 9% to 18%. The researchers' analysis only included large surface-rupturing earthquakes. It didn't include the magnitude 6.9 Loma Prieta earthquake in 1989, which was below the magnitude 7 threshold that the study authors used for quakes on the San Andreas Fault. The authors associated seismic punctuality with slip rates, or how fast the two sides of a fault move past each other. 'Our analysis showed that the faster the faults are moving, the more likely it is that they will appear overdue,' said study author Vasiliki Mouslopoulou, a senior scientist at the National Observatory of Athens, in Greece. In tectonically active California, the San Andreas Fault has a particularly high slip rate. The Pacific and North American plates slide past each other an average of more than inch per year in some spots. 'Faults in California are among the fastest-slipping faults in the world,' Mouslopoulou said, adding that other factors are also probably contributing due to the pattern of chronically late large earthquakes. Previous studies had also shown that seismic activity has been unusually subdued in California, compared with paleorecords. A 2019 study reported that there's been a 100-year hiatus in ground-rupturing earthquakes at a number of paleoseismic sites in California, including on the San Andreas and Hayward faults. The authors of the 2019 study treated large earthquakes at these sites as independent events, akin to flipping pennies and counting how many turn up heads. They calculated a 0.3% probability that there'd be a 100-year hiatus in ground-rupturing quakes across all the California sites. Scientists have suggested that there could be earthquake 'supercycles,' with large quakes occurring in clusters, with less active periods in between. 'There are these longer-term, decadal, century-long ups and downs in the rate of earthquakes,' Jones said. Potentially, California is in a quiet time and large earthquakes are currently less likely. Katherine Scharer, a U.S. Geological Survey research geologist who wasn't part of the new research, commended the authors of the study, explaining that compiling the paleoseismic records was a 'tremendous amount of work' and will enable more scientists to investigate earthquakes. California's relatively sparse big earthquake activity could be connected to the geometry of its faults. While the analyzed faults in California were more or less in line with each other, those in other regions resembled 'a plate of spaghetti,' Scharer said. 'From the study, I think you would say that the main California faults are mechanically different somehow than the averages from these other places,' Glenn Biasi, a geophysicist with the U.S. Geological Survey, who wasn't part of the new work. Biasi emphasized that it's impossible to say if California's faults are truly overdue for a big earthquake. 'The faults slip on their own schedule and for their own reasons,' Biasi said. Scientists can't accurately predict large earthquakes in advance but paleoearthquake data could help. The authors of the new study found that, excluding California's recent lack of large earthquakes, faults around the entire planet have generally produced surface-rupturing quakes at intervals expected from paleoearthquake and historic records. Considering such data could improve earthquake forecasts, Mouslopoulou said.
