logo
Stalemate outside SSC: No breakthrough in talks as Mamata & Bratya make appeal

Stalemate outside SSC: No breakthrough in talks as Mamata & Bratya make appeal

Indian Express23-04-2025

The stalemate between the state government and the protesting school employees, who were terminated from services by the Supreme Court, continued on Tuesday night.
There was no breakthrough in the talks between the officials of the School Service Commission and a six-member delegation of the teachers as hundreds of protesters continued their gherao of the West Bengal School Service Commission office in Salt Lake.
Earlier in the day, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee urged them to return to their duty, assuring that they would continue to get their salaries.
At an administrative review meeting in Paschim Medinipur district, the chief minister, addressing the protesting teachers, said: 'Why are you sitting under the scorching sun? Go back to school. Take classes peacefully. You don't have to worry about your salary. Those who are inciting you will not pay you. The government will pay your salary.'
Assuring that the government will file a review petition in the Supreme Court for reinstatement of their jobs, Banerjee asked them not to press for the release of the 'tainted' and 'untainted' list of candidates.
On April 3, the top court invalidated the appointment of 25,753 teachers and staffers at state-run and aided schools, calling the entire selection process 'vitiated and tainted'.
The state government had earlier promised to release the list of 'tainted' and 'untainted' candidates of the 2016 SSC examination by April 21 (Monday) but failed to do so.
'I have spoken to them (protesting teachers) at least 10 times since yesterday evening. If I was in Kolkata, I could have settled it in a second. Some people are adamant on getting the list of tainted and untainted published. Why are you stepping into all these? You don't need to see who is eligible and who is not eligible. The state government is there to see that. There are courts. We will see what the court says. You work, you need to see whether you have a job or not. You need to see whether you are getting paid or not,' she said.
'You can trust us on this. Trust those who have given back jobs. Don't trust those who are taking away jobs… A few people are sitting in Bengal, just to take away jobs. They don't do the people's work. They just go to courts and file PILs (Public Interest Litigation). The court is not responsible for this. We give jobs, and they take it away,' the CM said without taking names of the Opposition parties.
In Kolkata, state Education Minister Bratya Basu clarified that the government after consulting with legal experts, decided against publishing the list of 'tainted' and 'untainted' candidates, saying it would amount to 'contempt of court'.
'The state government is with the agitating teachers. Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has assured all sorts of help. We are working in the interest of those who lost their jobs, and will continue to do so,' he said.
'We are filing a review petition. So, I request the agitating teachers not to act in any way that may weaken our petition, violate the Supreme Court's order, or result in contempt of court by them or us,' he added.
'The Government will not take any strict action. We believe in talks. Have we used any force? We are hopeful that they will sit for talks. We are cooperating, but they have gheraoed the SSC office and are not allowing them to work. How can both happen? We don't want a single innocent person to suffer. We would like them to withdraw the strike immediately,' Basu added.
Basu refuted allegations that anything had been said about the first three counselling lists being untainted. 'Why are they (the protestors) talking about counselling when that was not even given in the Supreme Court's order? The SC has clearly said that those who are not tainted can go to school. They are calling for trouble for their review petition,' he added.
Meanwhile, after the meeting with SSC officials late Tuesday evening, Chinmoy Mondol, a leader of the protesting school staff, said: 'They ( SSC) cleared that all untainted teachers, irrespective of counselling, will get salary and take classes. We are not satisfied with this. Tomorrow, the court is going to hear a petition on OMR sheets publication. We are waiting for the hearing. We want a certified list and publication of OMR sheets, or our protest will continue.'
PTI adds: Protesting teachers Tuesday accused Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee of making 'false promises of job security'.
They also alleged that the SSC has lost all credibility after its failure to publish the list of untainted candidates and, by extension, identify the deserving teachers, by the deadline of 6 pm on Monday.
'The CM asked us not to be apprehensive about the list of the tainted and untainted. She said the government will take care of that. After they fail to come up with the list of untainted candidates on the SSC website as promised on April 22, do they have any more credibility?'
Samirul Islam, a retrenched teacher of Malda district, told PTI, sitting in front of the SSC office.
He alleged that the state government is only trying to buy time so that the movement fizzles out.
Dipankar Bhowmik, a jobless teacher of Dakshin Dinajpur district, said, 'What she has claimed will not stand judicial scrutiny.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'If there has been a crime, why wasn't it punished,' asks Jagdeep Dhankhar on Justice Yashwant Varma issue
'If there has been a crime, why wasn't it punished,' asks Jagdeep Dhankhar on Justice Yashwant Varma issue

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

'If there has been a crime, why wasn't it punished,' asks Jagdeep Dhankhar on Justice Yashwant Varma issue

Is a parliamentary motion to remove Justice Yashwant Varma the answer, Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar asked a gathering of Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association, in Chandigarh on Friday (June 6, 2025) adding that 'if there has been a crime, why wasn't it punished?' Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju on Wednesday (June 4, 2025) said the government would bring out a resolution in Parliament in the monsoon session for impeachment motion against Justice Varma. Justice Varma was subject of a probe by a Supreme Court-appointed panel after a fire incident at his Delhi residence led to the discovery of several burnt sacks of cash at the outhouse. Mr. Dhankhar said the government of the day was handicapped because of a three-decade-old judicial order that did not allow it to register a First Information Report (FIR) without permission from the judiciary. The Vice-President said, 'So I pose a question to myself, in deep pain, worried, concerned, in anguish — why was that permission not given? That was the minimum that could have been done on the earliest occasion.' He also questioned why even after the Supreme Court probe, Justice Varma has not been punished. 'I have raised the issue. Ultimately, if a motion is brought to remove a judge, is that the answer? If there has been a crime, a culpable act shaking the foundations of democracy — the rule of law, why wasn't it punished? We have lost more than three months, and the investigation has not even been initiated. Whenever you go to court, they ask why the FIR was delayed.' The permission should have been granted soon after the cash was discovered and if not then it should have come up at least when the Supreme Court-appointed panel filed its report considering the 'compulsive, expedient situation'. The cash haul, Mr. Dhankhar said, was 'obviously tainted, unaccounted, illegal and unexplained' and the system must move to find out 'whose money it is.' He further asked, 'Has the money influenced the judiciary in judicial work? All these issues are agitating not only the minds of lawyers but also people on the street. But let the lid be blown off the can of worms. Let these skeletons in the cupboards come out. Why was there no FIR? Why has there been no investigation at all?' The gap between 'may be true' and 'must be true', the Vice-President said, is very thin. 'But this thin distance has to be negotiated by evidence of unimpeachable veracity. So, I put innocence at a very high level. I am not aware of who is guilty. But one thing is for sure — a crime of great enormity, shaking the foundations of the judiciary and democracy, has taken place. I hope it will be addressed,' he said.

Delhi HC grants relief to CLAT-PG candidates, asks to declare results soon
Delhi HC grants relief to CLAT-PG candidates, asks to declare results soon

Business Standard

timean hour ago

  • Business Standard

Delhi HC grants relief to CLAT-PG candidates, asks to declare results soon

The Delhi High Court on Friday granted relief to CLAT-PG candidates over alleged discrepancies in the answer key and directed the consortium of NLUs to declare results soon. A bench of Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela's decision came over the plea of students in relation to a couple of answers in the key. The court, however, rejected the objection with respect to the declared answer to a third question, and asked the consortium of national law universities (NLUs) to accordingly award marks to the candidates. The court passed the order while deciding three pleas seeking rectification of errors in the final answer key of the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT)-PG 2025. The bench's verdict highlighted the issue of a high fee of Rs 1,000 charged by the consortium per question for raising the objection to the provisional answer key, observing there ought to be a "fine balance" between the concerns of the candidates and the institutions. While comparing the fee charged for objected questions by other organisations, the fees sought by the consortium "appeared to be excessive and disproportionate" but the consortium's concern that it was required to keep frivolous individuals and coaching institutes at bay also did not appear to be "fanciful or imaginative", it added. The bench, however, expected the consortium to take heed of its observations and take appropriate steps to "avoid such excessive fee in the next examinations". "It may be advisable for the consortium to place this issue before the committee headed by Justice G. Raghuram (retd) for his valuable opinion which may be adhered to by it," the bench said. The court ruled on the correctness of the answers in the answer key after considering each question and the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioners and the consortium. CLAT determines admissions to undergraduate and postgraduate law courses in national law universities in the country. CLAT PG 2025 was held on December 1, 2024. Multiple pleas were filed in different high courts alleging several questions in the exam were wrong. On February 6, the Supreme Court transferred all the petitions over the issue to the Delhi High Court for a "consistent adjudication". The top court passed the direction on the transfer petitions of the consortium.

Rajasthan's stalled projects
Rajasthan's stalled projects

India Today

time2 hours ago

  • India Today

Rajasthan's stalled projects

When the Supreme Court, in March this year, ordered the demolition of kitschy replicas of the 'Seven Wonders' built along the banks of Ajmer's 12th-century Ana Sagar Lake—a protected wetland—it wasn't judicial activism so much as a belated course correction for a folly committed two years ago. Around the same time, Rajasthan chief minister Bhajan Lal Sharma ordered the dismantling of Jaipur's 16-km-long Bus Rapid Transit System (BRTS), a corridor completed 15 years ago but never brought into use. Blamed for traffic chaos and fatal accidents, the BRTS had become emblematic of the state's flawed urban planning.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store