logo
Has Scotland fallen for English nationalist Nigel Farage?

Has Scotland fallen for English nationalist Nigel Farage?

Independenta day ago

As a Londoner with Scottish roots, I too liked to think of the Scots as different from the English. But the facts are against me.
The Scots are fond of imagining that they are more compassionate and more left-wing than the English, but the evidence of social surveys is that their attitudes to crime, immigration, public services and taxation are broadly the same.
Whenever I am in Scotland I have been told that ' Nigel Farage could never be popular here'; that he is a caricature of an English nationalist; and besides, we voted to stay in the European Union.
Except that, even in Scotland, 38 per cent voted to leave. And polling for next year's Scottish parliament election shows Reform going up while Labour is going down. The two most recent polls had Reform and Labour neck and neck on 18-19 per cent.
The Scottish parliament by-election in Hamilton today is the big test of the Reform surge in Scotland. The seat was held by the Scottish National Party until the death from cancer of Christina McKelvie at the age of 57. Labour should win here. The SNP has lost support since the last Scottish parliament elections in 2021, and if the result today were to reflect Scotland-wide opinion polls, Labour would win, despite its loss of support since Keir Starmer formed a UK government in London.
But this is a by-election, in which protest voting is magnified and 'a plague on all your establishment houses' is often the dominant sentiment among those citizens motivated to turn out at all. Labour is now the London establishment, and the winter fuel payment cut is just as unpopular here as anywhere else.
When Jack Davey, an enterprising blogger, interviewed a pensioner in the constituency she said Labour 'took me money' and, asked which party she was going to vote for, said: 'The Scottish one.'
But the SNP is the Edinburgh establishment, in power in Scotland for decades and with little to show for it. Hence the expectation that Ross Lambie, the Reform candidate, could come a strong second – and might even win.
If he does, it will be as significant a victory as Sarah Pochin's six-vote triumph in the Runcorn by-election last month. The symbolism of a strong Reform performance here will send a message directly to the heart of Downing Street, because this is Morgan McSweeney's backyard. Imogen Walker, the wife of the prime minister's chief of staff, is the MP for Hamilton and Clyde Valley, which covers part of the Scottish parliament constituency.
But the Reform surge also matters because of its effect on hard electoral arithmetic. In the short term, it means that the SNP is likely to hold on to government in Scotland because the opposition is split. If Reform gains more ground, it could even be the official opposition in the Scottish parliament after next year's elections.
This week's defection of Jamie McGuire, a young Labour councillor in Renfrewshire, to Reform could have been a one-off, or it might be a sign that the tectonic plates are shifting.
In the longer term, it adds to the threat to Labour at the next general election. A big chunk of Starmer's majority comes from the 37 seats that Labour holds in Scotland. Another comes from the 27 Labour seats in Wales, where Farage has long been expecting to do well in next year's Senedd elections.
Whatever happens in today's by-election, Labour's comforting assumption that Scotland and Wales are somehow immune to Farage's appeal will be dented. Reform is eating up the party's working-class base across the whole of Great Britain. The voters of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse will show today that they have more in common with the voters of Runcorn and Helsby than the romantics of Scottish exceptionalism ever thought possible.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK government signals it will not force tech firms to disclose how they train AI
UK government signals it will not force tech firms to disclose how they train AI

The Guardian

time16 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

UK government signals it will not force tech firms to disclose how they train AI

Campaigners have accused ministers of lying to parliament and the creative industries after the government signalled it would not force AI companies to disclose how they train their models. Ministers are holding firm in a standoff with the House of Lords, which has called for artists to be offered immediate copyright protection against artificial intelligence companies. Peers voted by 221 to 116 on Wednesday to insist on an amendment to the data bill that would force AI firms to be transparent about what copyrighted material they use to train their models. In an amendment tabled on Friday, the government dismissed the Lords' request and reiterated its promise to publish an economic impact assessment and technical reports on the future of AI and copyright regulation. Beeban Kidron, the cross-bench peer and film director who has campaigned on behalf of the industry, said during Wednesday's debate that she would 'accept anything that the Commons does' after this week. 'I will not stand in front of your Lordships again and press our case,' she said. But the News Media Association (NMA), which represents publishers including the Guardian, said peers could table further amendments to the data bill when it returns to the Lords next Wednesday. Industry figures said the government was acting in bad faith by not addressing the Lords' concerns and called for it to make further amendments of its own before MPs vote on it on Tuesday. Kidron said: 'The government has repeatedly taken all protections for UK copyrights holders out of the data bill. In doing so they have shafted the creative industries, and they have proved willing to decimate the UK's second biggest industrial sector. They have lied to parliament, and they are lying to the sector.' She said the government's action 'adds another sector to the growing number that have an unbridgeable gap of trust with the government'. Owen Meredith, chief executive of the NMA, said: 'the government's refusal to listen to the strong view of the Lords … risks undermining the legislative process. 'There is still time for the government to do the right thing, and take transparency powers in this bill. This would be a key step towards rebuilding trust with a £126bn industry.' Sign up to Headlines UK Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion The government's approach to copyright has drawn the ire of major creative artists and organisations including Paul McCartney, Kate Bush and the National Theatre, with Elton John describing the situation as an 'existential issue' this week. Opponents of the plans have warned that even if the attempts to insert clauses into the data bill fail, the government could be challenged in the courts over the proposed changes. The consultation on copyright changes, which is due to produce its findings before the end of the year, contains four options: to let AI companies use copyrighted work without permission, alongside an option for artists to 'opt out' of the process; to leave the situation unchanged; to require AI companies to seek licences for using copyrighted work; and to allow AI firms to use copyrighted work with no opt-out for creative companies and individuals. Kyle has said the copyright-waiver-plus-opt-out scenario is no longer the government's preferred option, but Kidron's amendments have attempted to head off that option by effectively requiring tech companies to seek licensing deals for any content that they use to train their AI models.

Archbishop of Canterbury job advert goes live – and for the first time they could be a woman
Archbishop of Canterbury job advert goes live – and for the first time they could be a woman

Sky News

time20 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Archbishop of Canterbury job advert goes live – and for the first time they could be a woman

A job description for the next Archbishop of Canterbury has gone live, seeking a leader with the "utmost integrity" - and, for the first time in the church's history, they could be a woman. Justin Welby left the vacancy in January after resigning following a damning review into the Church of England 's handling of a sexual abuse scandal. The archbishop is the most senior bishop and is the spiritual leader of the church and worldwide Anglican Communion. This week, a so-called 'statement of needs' was published by the Diocese of Canterbury, setting out a long list of requirements for the 106th archbishop. These include: A person with "theological depth" who is a strong communicator with people of all ages and backgrounds; Someone of the "utmost integrity who is able to speak honestly" about issues and injustices in the church; A "servant leader who shows compassion towards the disadvantaged and marginalised"; Being "unapologetic about offering a Christian perspective to local, national, and international dialogue"; A willingness to ordain and consecrate both men and women, support the ministry of both, and may themselves be male or female; Having previously "worked, and will continue to work constructively" around ongoing discussions around blessing services for same-sex couples, but also someone who can "embrace" both those who support and oppose same-sex marriage in the church. Women have been ordained in the Church of England for a number of years, but no woman has ever been in the top role. Candidates have historically already held senior leadership roles. They must be at least 30 years old - and generally younger than 70. Typically, rather than applying, candidates are "invited" to take part in the process. Earlier this year, a public consultation with over 11,000 people took place to give people the opportunity to submit candidates and desirable qualities. It is thought the candidate could be announced by the autumn, a year after Mr Welby resigned from the job. Mr Welby announced he was stepping down in November 2024 following failures in handling a church abuse scandal involving barrister and religious camp leader John Smyth QC. He is thought to be the most prolific abuser associated with the church.

Piri piri monkfish with runner bean relish
Piri piri monkfish with runner bean relish

Telegraph

time21 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Piri piri monkfish with runner bean relish

Monkfish on the bone is perfect for a piri piri dish like this – its firm flesh stands up to the heat and a good roast. You can use other fish, just go a bit gentler with flakier varieties when it comes to cooking and serving. The relish is a great way to use up a glut of runner beans – you can also serve it as part of an antipasti spread or with grilled meats and veg. Requires marinating time. Overview Prep time 20 mins Cook time 35 mins Serves 4 Ingredients For the marinated fish 4-5 red chillies juice of 1 lemon 4 garlic cloves, peeled 2 bay leaves ½ tbsp white wine vinegar or cider vinegar 2 tsp paprika 60ml vegetable or rapeseed oil 1 x 1kg monkfish tail or 2 x 500g tails, trimmed For the relish handful of runner beans (about 6-7), trimmed and diced 1 red onion, finely chopped ½ tbsp white wine vinegar or cider vinegar 2 medium tomatoes (seeds removed), diced ½ red chilli, finely chopped 1 tbsp chopped coriander, plus extra to serve 2 tbsp olive or rapeseed oil

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store