North Dakota resolution urging to end same-sex marriage advances
Rep. Bill Tveit, R-Hazen, speaks during a Jan. 27, 2025, committee hearing. On Feb. 24, 2025, Tveit advocated for a resolution urging the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn same-sex marriage. (Michael Achterling/North Dakota Monitor)
The North Dakota House of Representatives passed a resolution Monday proclaiming the interpretation of marriage as between one man and one woman.
The measure passed on a 52-40 vote and will advance to the Senate for its consideration.
House Concurrent Resolution 3013, sponsored by Rep. Bill Tveit, R-Hazen, urges the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn its 2015 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which has protected same-sex marriage for the last decade.
Tveit told lawmakers that marriage had always been between a man and a woman until 10 years ago and said the country would not be able to perpetuate itself without men and women having children.
'As you are well aware, two cannot conceive or birth a child except for coming together of a female and a male,' Tveit said. 'Based on the laws of nature, it's just that simple.'
While the Supreme Court does have the ability to interpret laws, the resolution states, it doesn't give justices the power to 'legislate from the bench to enact policy decisions.'
'If same-sex couples desire a collaborative union of a sort, or a legal bonding, they must call it anything but marriage,' Tveit said.
During debate on the resolution, Rep. Austin Foss, D-Fargo, said he never thought one year after marrying the man he loves in North Dakota that he would have to fight for their right to exist.
'This hurts,' Foss said. 'I don't come into your church, into your home, and force you to relabel your relationship just because I don't agree with it.'
He added, if the Supreme Court does overturn the previous ruling, same-sex couples would lose tax incentives and parental rights. Military families would lose rights to spousal benefits and they could also lose end-of-life rights, which could lead to them being discounted when making important decisions involving their partners.
'I cannot imagine my husband at the end of his road, in his hospital bed dying, and I would have no rights to any decision-making on how that moves forward,' Foss said.
Foss said he knows the measure was a resolution that won't change North Dakota law, but the message it sends to members of the LGBTQ community is that they are not welcome.
'It's a message to the world that North Dakota, if you are like me, you are not welcome here,' Foss said. 'If you don't conform to the ideas that we have about creating a family, you are not welcome here. That's not North Dakota nice. That's not even Christian-like.'
In an interview after the vote, Foss said he took a little solace in the fact that the vote was close and hopes calmer heads and allies prevail in the Senate.
'I am a North Dakotan and for somebody to tell me that I'm not, it hurts,' Foss said. He added he did not speak to Tveit about the resolution before the floor vote.
'I will say that the support I received from those Republicans that did vote no on it has been helpful and nice,' he said.
If the resolution is passed by the Senate, it would be forwarded to the United State Supreme Court.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
31 minutes ago
- New York Post
Kathy Hochul's gutless silence on assisted suicide is a betrayal: Rep. Stefanik
Last month, Gov. Kathy Hochul attacked Republicans for their budget bill that aims to rein in wasteful and fraudulent federal spending. 'I believe that we should try to prevent our constituents from dying,' she declared. Now, just two weeks later, New Yorkers have proof that these words from Hochul's lips are a cruel lie. My heart shatters for our state: Hochul's gutless silence on the so-called assisted suicide bill passed by Albany's far-left Democrats isn't just cowardice; it's a betrayal of every New Yorker clinging to hope, a dagger in the backs of the vulnerable she swore to protect. In the last days of this year's legislative session, New York state Senate Democrats forced through a despicable measure, in a 35-27 vote, empowering doctors to prescribe lethal drugs to the terminally ill. This isn't 'dignity' or 'choice,' but a death sentence cloaked in deception, telling our elderly, our disabled and our sick that their lives aren't worth fighting for. The bill now sits on Hochul's desk, and where is she? Hiding. Silent. Dodging with a spineless 'she'll review the legislation' statement from her team. All while families of all political and spiritual backgrounds, all across New York, weep at the thought of our state allowing companies to profit off death. Hochul's hypocrisy knows no bounds. New York ranks dead last in access to palliative care, a compassionate lifeline that eases suffering and restores dignity for the terminally ill. Palliative care envelops patients in holistic support to manage pain and address emotional and spiritual needs, and it helps families navigate the unthinkable. It's doctors and nurses sitting bedside, listening to fears and crafting plans that honor life. It's the hand squeezed during a sleepless night, the reassurance that no one faces the end alone. Yet in Hochul's New York, only a fraction of those who need palliative services can access them — leaving the suffering to beg for comfort while leftist Democrats under her watch push a culture of death and despair. This failure compounds a broader crisis caused by Kathy Hochul's worthless leadership. One in five New Yorkers battles mental illness yearly, and hundreds of thousands go untreated. Those who live with disabilities are crushed by a cruel bureaucratic maze, worsened by Hochul's heartless overhaul of the Consumer Directed Personal Assistance Program, which put the desires of politically connected contractors over the needs of suffering families and caregivers. Again and again, her policies destroy hope for those in need — and yet she stands mute and inept as her party peddles a bill that whispers 'Give up' to a depressed veteran, tells a grandmother with cancer 'You're a burden' and screams to a disabled New Yorker, 'Your life isn't worth saving.' It's anti-human, it's anti-American, and it's a betrayal of the values that bind us as New Yorkers. Hochul's silence here speaks volumes, and it isn't indecision but complicity, trading vulnerable lives for political points with her far-left Democrat base. New Yorkers are heartbroken and furious. Under Hochul's catastrophic reign, crime surges, costs crush families, corruption festers — and now the sanctity of life itself is under assault. People are fleeing to Florida and other states, driven out by the worst governor in America who fails them at every turn. Hochul has the power to veto this moral travesty. She could champion life by investing in palliative care that wraps the suffering in dignity and love. Instead, her silence screams surrender. I won't stay silent. My heart burns for the mother praying for one more day with her child, for the disabled New Yorker fighting for respect, for every soul this bill would discard. New York needs real leadership — robust palliative-care programs, accessible mental-health services and dignified support for the disabled — not a state-encouraged push toward the grave. In 2026, New Yorkers will reject this failed governor at the ballot box and restore principled leadership that cherishes every life. Kathy Hochul, the clock is ticking. Veto this bill or you'll be remembered as the governor who truly let hope die. New Yorkers are watching — and we won't forget. Republican Elise Stefanik represents New York's 21st District in Congress.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Kennedy Center Boss Gave Top Job to Anti-Gay Birther
A MAGA conspiracy theorist has been fired from the Kennedy Center by its openly gay boss just a month into his job over his opposition to gay marriage. Floyd Brown, who was hired as vice president of development at the Kennedy Center over a month ago, was fired Wednesday after CNN reached out to him with questions about his previous controversial statements on social media about same-sex marriage and homosexuality. 'My firing came approximately two hours after @CNN sent an email asking me to comment on my past writings and statements about traditional marriage and homosexual influence in the @GOP,' Brown wrote on X Thursday. As a conservative media commentator, Brown had criticized the United States for legalizing same-sex marriage as well as calling homosexuality 'a punishment' and 'immoral.' As vice president of development at the Kennedy Center, Brown was responsible for overseeing major gift campaigns and the annual fund, which coordinates annual contributions from corporations, foundations, and individual donors, according to LinkedIn. His appointment and monthlong tenure had not garnered public attention until news of his firing broke. Brown said he was fired by Richard Grenell, who replaced former longtime Kennedy Center president Deborah Rutter earlier this year. Grenell is openly gay—a fact Brown underscored on X. 'CNN also contacted @RichardGrenell, who is a professing Christian and is married to a male spouse,' he wrote. 'I am at times outspoken on public policy. ... I also frequently speak at churches and Christian conferences.' Brown shared his response to CNN, in which he said, 'It was truly not my intention to offend anyone with my comments.' 'Comments rooted in my personal Christian views, which I have made in the past, have no impact upon my work here at the Kennedy Center nor do they impinge on my interactions with colleagues who do incredible work for the patrons of the Center,' he wrote. The Daily Beast has reached out to Brown for further comment. In his X post, Brown went on to claim that a request to speak with Grenell was denied, and the only explanation he was given for his dismissal was his remarks on marriage. 'Floyd, you must recant your belief in traditional marriage and your past statements on the topic, or you will be fired,' he recalled being told. Brown did not indicate who made the remark. 'Needless to say, I refused to recant and was shown the door. My beliefs are much more common to Biblical Christianity,' he said. Brown staunchly defended his 'Christian views,' saying that, as a Christian, he is 'called to work with others of different beliefs and worldviews.' 'I have never intended to attack or demean any person in my statements and have always shared the mission of Jesus, striving to love others unconditionally,' he said. Brown also spread conspiracy theories about former President Barack Obama on his now-deleted website, where he questioned the veracity of the former president's birth certificate and falsely claimed that Obama was Muslim. The MAGA loyalist did not address those comments in his response to CNN, instead focusing on his 'Christian beliefs.' Brown has also previously voiced his disapproval of 'homosexual self-proclaimed conservatives,' condemning the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) for its 'acceptance of the open promotion of the gay lifestyle inside the tent of conservatism' in a 2011 article. In that article, he further stated that homosexuality is 'a sin, and the addict is to be pitied and accepted in Christian love—but not the pusher or promoter of the agenda.' A source confirmed to CNN that Grenell did not meet with Brown, saying that Grenell was not involved in his hiring. They added that Grenell didn't even know Brown at all, despite Brown claiming that the pair met when Brown was a political organizer in Arizona.
The Hill
34 minutes ago
- The Hill
Appeals court denies Bob Menendez's bid to stay out of prison
A federal appeals court on Wednesday denied former Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.)'s last-ditch bid to avoid reporting to prison while he appeals his corruption conviction. In a terse order that offered no reasoning, a three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled 2-1 against Menendez. Judge Alison Nathan, an appointee of former President Biden, would have ruled in the New Jersey Democrat's favor. The decision lays the groundwork for Menendez to take his ask to the Supreme Court. But the clock is ticking, as he's set to report to prison on Tuesday to begin his 11-year sentence for trading bribes for political favors and other crimes. Menendez was convicted last year on 16 corruption charges, including accepting luxurious bribes with his wife, Nadine Menendez, from three New Jersey businessmen in exchange for his political clout and acting as a foreign agent of Egypt. It made him the first public official ever convicted of acting as a foreign agent while in office. Nadine Menendez was convicted on all counts she faced in April and is set to be sentenced on Sept. 11. She was accused of teaming up with her husband to accept the bribes, which included hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash, gold bars and luxury cars, and conspiring to turn him into a foreign agent of Egypt. She was initially set to be tried alongside her husband, but her trial was delayed following her breast cancer diagnosis and surgery. Two of the businessmen were also convicted at trial and reported to prison last month. The third pleaded guilty before facing a jury. A federal judge in April denied Menendez's request for release and he took the ask to the federal appeals court last month. Meanwhile, Menendez's allies have reportedly made overtures to the White House for a pardon from President Trump, who has not openly ruled out clemency for the ex-senator. The former New Jersey Democrat himself has also publicly sought to land on the president's good side. After his sentencing, he exclaimed that 'President Trump was right,' deeming his own prosecution 'political' and 'corrupted to the core' while suggesting that Trump's was, as well. Earlier Wednesday, he made a winding post on X about 'how weaponization works, alleging similarities between his prosecution and the president's. The Hill requested comment from Menendez's lawyer.
