Could COVID Boosters Be Delayed This Fall Because Of The Trump Admin? Experts Weigh In.
Every fall since 2021, new COVID-19 shots have been available to protect folks from the latest COVID-19 strains. This is because, just like the flu, COVID-19 mutates quickly and vaccines need to be updated to ensure the season's shot is targeting the right virus strain. This happens for both the flu shot and the COVID-19 shot, which is why new jabs are available roughly every September.
But in recent weeks, the future of the anticipated fall COVID-19 boosters has been questioned. There are rumors of a potential delay in distribution due to testing changes that many experts call unnecessary, and potential changes to the recommendations regarding who actually needs the shots. This is all part of the Trump administration's major changes to health care infrastructure.
It's worth knowing that COVID booster shot uptake in the U.S. has been very low, but the shots remain an important protection measure for everyone, especially for older adults and immunocompromised people who are more at risk of death or hospitalization from a COVID infection.
While the future of COVID boosters is not clear right now (so, don't panic), experts say a delay in vaccine availability or narrowing of eligibility could be dangerous. Here's why:
As mentioned above, COVID shots are updated every season (just like flu shots), so they best protect against the virus strain that's currently circulating.
'The plans were, as we did last year, to update the COVID vaccine to keep up with the changing COVID virus. This has been done very efficiently because we have enough information about the vaccines and how they work so that we don't have to do a prospective clinical trial with the influenza vaccine, and we have not, at least in the past, had to do that with COVID vaccine,' said Dr. William Schaffner, a professor of preventive medicine in the department of health policy at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tennessee.
But it's now been suggested by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary that there isn't enough data on COVID vaccines and that additional testing may be required before the shot is available. 'To do that with the COVID vaccine, I think that notion would be disputed by most of the people in the vaccine community, including myself,' Schaffner noted.
This is problematic because additional trials and testing take more time, so by the time the testing is done and analyzed, we could be way past the optimal time for COVID vaccination, which is the fall, he said.
More, a certain kind of testing that RFK Jr. is calling for, known as placebo testing, goes against medical ethical standards when it comes to the COVID booster (plus, the original COVID shot was already placebo tested).
'It does not meet our ethical standards to enroll people into a trial and say, we're going to give half of you nothing, withhold a vaccine from you, and the other people are going to get a vaccine when we already know the vaccine works, and we've got years worth of data to support that,' said Dr. Jodie Guest, the senior vice chair of the department of epidemiology at Emory University's Rollins School of Public Health in Atlanta.
'So that violates our human subject research ethics, and ultimately, it will delay vaccine for everyone,' Guest noted.
'Now, if the COVID vaccine were to be delayed or unavailable ... that would put a large segment of the population at risk of COVID,' Schaffner said.
This is particularly the case for people over 65 and those who are immunocompromised, added Guest. 'It will mean more hospitalizations. It will certainly mean more sickness. And we know that people in those categories are more likely to need hospital support if they do get COVID and get sick,' said Guest.
Deaths could increase, too. This past January when COVID levels were higher, there were nearly 1,000 deaths each week in the United States, added Guest. And currently, more than than 6,000 people have died of COVID in the U.S. in the past three months, said Katrine Wallace, an epidemiologist and assistant professor at the University of Illinois Chicago.
'A lot of people are not at risk for those severe complications from COVID, but there are a lot of people who are, and we are all going to know and love people who are in those higher-risk categories. And we really need to be thinking about that,' Guest said.
What's also unclear is who would be eligible for a new COVID shot this fall. Meaning, the recommendation guidelines could change.
The committee that decides who's eligible for the COVID vaccine (and any immunization, for that matter) is debating whether the COVID vaccine recommendations should stay as-is (everyone 6 months and older can get the jab) or if the recommendations should focus on high-risk people instead, Schaffner said. He noted that some other countries handle COVID vaccinations this way, and the committee is looking at that data.
Guest said that with less severe disease and complications from COVID, she's not surprised that there is talk of changing vaccine recommendations.
'I don't think we should restrict who is eligible for COVID vaccine boosters, but I do think we should be prioritizing who we want to make sure get them. And that's a very common thing to do,' Guest said.
Once again, it's unclear whether the vaccine recommendations will change at all, but if they do, Wallace said, she's concerned about what that would mean for health insurance coverage for those who want the vaccine but aren't eligible since health insurance doesn't cover things you aren't eligible for.
'So, that would be a problem for some people who want it,' Wallace added.
'There's also the issue of long COVID, right?' Wallace said. 'We have post-COVID conditions that happen to young people. That's not something that only happens to the elderly or people with pre-existing conditions.'
'Anybody can get long COVID, and it's really hard to predict who's going to get it,' Wallace said. One thing that does decrease the likelihood of long COVID is the COVID vaccine, which is concerning if recommendations are changed to exclude some folks.
The current conversations from the leaders at Health and Human Services, the FDA and more are only sowing distrust in the vaccines.
'It's making people question if they really need them or not. And we want to ask questions appropriately all the time in science, but we don't want to intentionally sow distrust,' Guest said.
'We want to be really careful about how we're eroding the way people think about it, and how important these vaccines have been, and how remarkable they have been in saving our lives,' she noted.
'All of these conversations are going to discourage the uptake of vaccines ... the current conversations about questioning the need for the vaccines and changing the way they're testing them, or what they might require, suggests that things were not done correctly originally, and that's not accurate,' Guest added.
'And it's going to sow further distrust in the vaccines, and that is going to be a very unfortunate outcome,' Guest said.
'I would just reiterate that we have now given the available vaccines against COVID in the millions upon millions of doses around the world,' Schaffner said.
'Put aside the notion that they are 'new' or 'experimental' — no, they're not. They have been studied as carefully as any other vaccine that was ever used around the world,' he added.
Regardless of any fall COVID shot changes, wearing a mask in crowded spaces, washing your hands and staying home when you are sick remain the best ways to keep yourself and others protected from COVID-19. It's also a good idea to test before gatherings, particularly if you're going to be around high-risk folks, Wallace said.
Schaffner added that if you are at high risk of severe disease or take care of someone who is, you can consider getting another COVID shot this spring or summer (before the new fall shots come out) for additional protection. If you're considering getting another COVID shot, it's best to talk to your doctor for guidance.
FDA Chief Downplays COVID Boosters After Suggesting No Updated Shots This Season
5 Things Doctors Never, Ever Do During Cold And Flu Season
White House Replaces COVID-19 Information Site With 'Lab Leak' Theories
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Measles resurgence highlights the toll of RFK Jr.'s anti-vaccine policies
After the U.S. surpassed 1,000 reported measles cases nationwide, it's clear the Trump administration is failing to protect our health and well-being. The measles outbreak in Texas is now the largest since 2000, when the country eliminated measles. And it's not yet over, threatening to make measles endemic in America again, where the risk of infection comes from within our country. Furthermore, two unvaccinated school-aged children in Texas died from measles, the first American children to die from the viral infection since 2003. Normally, a preventable infection causing avoidable deaths of children would lead to prompt government action. In 1991, I was a medical student with the U.S. Public Health Service in Philadelphia during a large measles outbreak. Over 1,000 people were infected, and nine children died. Government and public health leaders required home visits of infected children, mass immunization, education efforts and even court-mandated vaccinations. The outbreak was stopped. In Dec. 2014, a measles outbreak began at Disneyland and spread in communities with low vaccination rates. Public health action stopped this large outbreak at 125 cases. To prevent further outbreaks in California, I authored Senate Bill 277, which eliminated non-medical exemptions for school vaccines. And with further U.S. measles outbreaks in 2019, I authored Senate Bill 276 to crack down on fraudulent medical exemptions. These laws — championed by California parents demanding safe schools for children — raised statewide vaccination rates and shielded our communities. As Congress waits, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is dismantling decades of public health achievement that will make America sicker. Kennedy reduced vaccine outreach, removed key public health officials, spread disinformation from his official post and suppressed data while elevating conspiracy theorists to top positions. Kennedy and the Department of Government Efficiency fired a quarter of Health and Human Services staff, gutting the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and National Institutes of Health teams vital to outbreak response. He installed anti-vaccine extremists as advisors, including David Grier, a discredited researcher disciplined for unethical experiments on children with autism, to 'research' if vaccines cause autism, despite decades of research debunking this myth. The CDC has been muzzled: An analysis showing high rates of measles in low vaccination areas was suppressed, and dozens of Texas vaccination clinics were forced to close. When Kennedy dismantled the CDC's communication team, his former anti-vaccine organization, Children's Health Defense, filled the void with disinformation by publishing a fake CDC-branded vaccine 'safety' website that falsely linked vaccines to autism. The site mimicked official CDC design and branding, deliberately misleading the public. After news reports exposed the deception and forced the site's removal, no federal action has been taken to investigate or prosecute this unlawful impersonation of a federal agency. Furthermore, Dr. Peter Marks, the nation's top vaccine regulator who led President Donald Trump's Operation Warp Speed, refused a demand for false data on brain swelling and death caused by the Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccine, of which there are no credible cases. Kennedy forced him to resign. In his resignation letter, Marks wrote, 'it has become clear that truth and transparency are not desired by the secretary, but rather he wishes subservient confirmation of his misinformation and lies.' And what of the dead children from measles? Kennedy dismissed the first measles death, saying 'it's not unusual.' He blamed measles on poor nutrition, called vaccines a 'personal choice' that could cause 'adverse events' and claimed Vitamin A and cod liver oil treated measles. Subsequently, many Texas children hospitalized with measles also had Vitamin A toxicity. At his first Congressional hearing, Kennedy testified, 'I don't think people should be taking medical advice from me.' He then refused to answer whether he would vaccinate a child against polio. As Health and Human Services secretary, he cravenly refuses to save Americans in a public health crisis. How many children must get sick — and even die — before Congress demands that Kennedy and the Trump administration answer for these preventable deaths and the continued spread of a preventable disease? This flu season, as flu vaccination declined, 226 children died from influenza — the highest since the 2009-10 pandemic. Other preventable and deadly diseases, including polio and whooping cough, will also return when vaccination is hampered and discouraged. Our state has made progress in raising vaccination rates, but we are not immune to Kennedy's dangerous vaccine disinformation; California has communities with enough unvaccinated people to fuel a serious outbreak. Measles outbreaks in other states makes it imperative that California strengthen our public health defenses against sparks of infection. And California needs Congress to hold President Donald Trump and Kennedy accountable for not stopping preventable disease in America. Dr. Richard Pan is a pediatrician and former California state senator who authored landmark legislation to eliminate non-medical exemptions to school vaccination requirements in response to major measles outbreaks.


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump stokes fear, confusion with pulled emergency abortion guidance
The Trump administration sowed confusion and fear among physicians with its move this past week to rescind Biden-era guidelines to hospitals that provide life-saving abortions. While the move doesn't change the law, doctors and reproductive-rights advocates fear it will have a chilling effect on health care workers in states with abortion bans, ultimately harming pregnant women. Earlier this past week, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced they would rescind guidance issued during the Biden administration, which reinforced to hospitals that under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA,) abortions qualify as stabilizing care in medical emergencies. Emergency rooms in states with abortion bans have been struggling since the 2022 overturning of Roe v. Wade to understand when they can legally provide emergency abortions. After President Trump pulled the Biden-era guidance seeking to clarify that question, emergency room doctors will experience 'more confusion' and 'more fear,' according to health and legal experts who spoke with The Hill. 'Clinicians are scared to provide basic medical care, and this care is clearly in line with medical ethics … medical standards of care, and they're being put in this situation where they can't win,' said Payal Shah, director of research, legal and advocacy at Physicians for Human Rights. Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, at least 13 states have enacted near-total abortion bans, according to data from the Guttmacher Institute. There are exceptions in these states when continuing a pregnancy poses a threat to the health or life of the mother. However, most of the language in state laws is unclear on how that determination is made, resulting in instances of emergency rooms denying care. Doctors in states like Idaho, Texas and Tennessee have filed lawsuits requesting that lawmakers clarify when an abortion is allowed to save the life of a pregnant person. The doctors and patients involved in the lawsuits argue that state laws do not adequately protect pregnant patients in emergencies. Many of these states have severe punishments for doctors who violate abortion bans, like steep fines and prison time. 'For clinicians, there is actually no safe way to navigate this in this moment, and ultimately, that's how these laws are designed,' Shah said. 'They're designed to cause chaos and confusion. They're often written in ways that don't use medical terminology.' Without clear guidance, pregnant women suffer and sometimes die, as ProPublica has reported. One striking example of this is the 2023 case of Kyleigh Thurman, a Texas woman who was repeatedly denied care for a nonviable pregnancy after days of experiencing bleeding and pain. Health care workers discovered that she had an ectopic pregnancy, which is when a fertilized egg implants and begins to grow outside of the uterus, usually in a fallopian tube. Ectopic pregnancies are never viable and are life-threatening if not treated properly. It wasn't until her OB/GYN 'pleaded to hospital staff that she be given care,' that the hospital administered a shot ending her pregnancy, according to a complaint filed by the Center for Reproductive Rights on behalf of Thurman. The shot came too late, and the ectopic pregnancy ruptured Thurman's right fallopian tube, which was then removed. 'If a patient is actively hemorrhaging or experiencing an ectopic pregnancy which is also life-threatening, doctors need that clear guidance that yes, EMTALA applied,' said Autumn Katz, associate director of U.S. litigation at the Center for Reproductive Rights. A federal investigation into Thurman's case found that the Texas hospital violated EMTALA, according to a recent letter from the CMS. 'I finally got some justice,' Thurman said in a statement. 'I hope this decision will do some good in encouraging hospitals to help women in situations like mine.' Hospitals that violate EMTALA are subject to heavy fines and, in some extreme cases, risk losing a portion of their Medicare and Medicaid hospital funding, according to the National Institutes of Health. Former President Biden leaned on the law to preserve access to emergency abortion across the country, leading to a legal fight with Idaho, which has a strict abortion ban. The Supreme Court last year dismissed the case, declining to rule on the merits of a politically charged case. The rescinding of these guidelines also means hospitals that violate the law will likely not be investigated as often as they were under previous administrations, according to Shah. That lack of punitive risk means that hospitals could be incentivized to deny life-saving care for patients. 'The standard of EMTALA is pretty high,' said Katherine Hempstead, senior policy adviser at Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. 'This kind of takes that layer of reassurance away, and it will make a lot of providers feel very vulnerable.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
ProstaCleanse Aims to Deliver Healthy Prostate Support, Flow and Vitality
Natural Supplement Supports Prostate Function, Bladder Comfort, and Urinary Flow for Men Seeking Daily Wellness Tallmadge, June 07, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- ProstaCleanse, a men's wellness brand committed to natural urinary and prostate support, has updated its official website to provide enhanced information about its daily-use supplement. Designed for adult men seeking a routine-friendly wellness option, ProstaCleanse supports prostate function, urinary comfort, and bladder health in a once-daily capsule format. According to the official product website ( ProstaCleanse is formulated to work in harmony with the body's internal systems. The brand states that the supplement is intended to support healthy prostate activity, ease occasional urgency, and promote bladder control. These benefits align with the company's mission to offer simple, natural wellness solutions that fit into everyday routines—without restrictive diets or complex regimens. 'We created ProstaCleanse to provide men with a straightforward, natural option for daily wellness,' said a company spokesperson. 'Our focus is on safety, transparency, and making it easy for people to feel confident in their health routines.' The company affirms that ProstaCleanse is manufactured in U.S.-based facilities that adhere to strict safety and quality control protocols. The formulation features carefully selected ingredients chosen to align with common men's wellness goals, including support for urinary flow, nighttime comfort, and aging confidence. Product claims are clearly outlined on the brand's website and are not intended as medical advice. As noted on the supplement comes with a satisfaction guarantee for new customers. Interested individuals can find product details, ingredient information, FAQs, and secure ordering options directly on the official site. About ProstaCleanse ProstaCleanse is a wellness-focused supplement brand offering natural, easy-to-use support for men seeking prostate and urinary health solutions. Committed to clarity and simplicity, the brand develops quality-driven formulations that support men's confidence and well-being as part of daily self-care routines. Product and Contact Information Brand: ProstaCleanse Website: Email: support@ Phone: (863) 591-4284 Mailing Address: Jetpack fao Claro Returns, 285 Northeast Ave, Tallmadge, OH 44278, United States Disclaimer This release is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. The statements made about this product have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Individual results may vary. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before beginning any new dietary supplement. CONTACT: Email: support@ Phone: (863) 591-4284