
Letters: What gutting the Department of Education will actually do
Thank you for printing the op-ed by Paul Vallas, 'What would it mean if US Department of Education is abolished?' (Feb. 13). In this piece, Vallas argues that many functions of the Department of Education could still be alive and well under other departments. For example, he states that the Title I program that helps students with disabilities could be placed under the Health and Human Services Department. Does he really think that Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. will keep a program devoted to helping kids with physical and mental disabilities going strong when he will not even demand vaccines for school-aged children?
And Vallas suggests putting civil rights protections under the Department of Justice. Will this department protect kids from discrimination based on race, gender, sexual orientation, etc.? This will happen before or after schools must weed out any mention of diversity or equity? The DOJ is too busy firing its attorneys for doing their jobs to pay attention to civil rights violations. Nor would the department believe such violations exist.
Vallas misses the point of destroying the DOE in the first place. President Donald Trump wants all of its programs to be defunded, not put under new stewardship. He wants to save money from gutting all departments in order to pay his billionaire buddies huge tax breaks in exchange for getting him elected.
That is the bottom line.
— Jan Goldberg, Riverside
I am pro-Constitution
I take umbrage with the letters to the editor published on Feb. 17.
One letter criticizes Vice President JD Vance for saying 'judges aren't allowed to control the executive's legitimate power.' This, on its face, is true. Judges control an executive's illegitimate power. We do have something called separation of power.
In the same edition, a writer opines in criticizing a Paul Vallas op-ed that 'it is in the name of state control that women no longer have the right to an abortion nationwide.' This is false, the reason being our Constitution contains no mention of abortion and no right to privacy manufactured in the Roe v. Wade decision. The 10th Amendment states that powers not specifically reserved to the federal government be granted to the states. Instead of tearing down our system of government, the letter writer and others like her should start the process of proposing an amendment to our Constitution guaranteeing a right to abortion to all women nationwide.
I am not necessarily anti-abortion rights. I am pro-Constitution and our system of government.
— David Steadman, Chicago
DOE failing in mission
Paul Vallas' op-ed about the possible abolishment of the U.S. Department of Education is insightful. The DOE's lack of efficacy is demonstrated by the dismal proficiency scores of students in big-city public schools.
Part of the mission of the DOE, as stated on its website, is to 'supplement and complement the efforts of states, the local school systems … and students to improve the quality of education.' Yet the DOE does not appear to have provided improvement in the quality of education provided to students in major-city public schools.
As Vallas pointed out in a piece two years ago, in 2019, only 26% of all Chicago Public Schools 11th graders were found to be proficient in reading and math, according to state assessments. A 2023 report on college readiness found that only 1 in 4 New York City public high school graduates were prepared for college. In the 2023-24 school year, 43.1% of Los Angeles public school students met the targets for state proficiency in reading; in math, only 32.8% met the standards.
Many could argue that restoring control of education to the states would be in the best interest of public school students. The DOE is clearly not meeting its mission with regard to improving the quality of education for the students.
— Terry Takash, Western Springs
Both on same day?
Paul Vallas and Willie Wilson have been voted down by the citizens, but their tired, predictable and often faulty ideas continue to live on in the Tribune's opinion section for some reason.
Obviously, some on the editorial board think their frequent appearances worthwhile. While I don't, and I can deal with occasional appearances, both on the same day (Feb. 13) is a bit much for me. Have mercy!
— Brian Shannon, Oak Park
Interpreting laws
President Donald Trump signed a recent executive order stating that only the president or attorney general can speak for the U.S. when interpreting the meaning of laws. Trump wants regulatory agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency or Food and Drug Administration or even the courts to have no say in interpreting laws — only he or his appointed attorney general. Another consolidation of power and one more step toward becoming a dictatorship.
— John Regan, Lemont
Finding cost savings
I wanted to respond to a letter submitted by Bob Shea ('We need cost-cutting,' Feb. 17) wherein he applauds President Donald Trump for placing Elon Musk ('a bright man,' according to Shea) in control of said cost-cutting and states, 'All Americans should be grateful this despicable waste is being identified.'
First, Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency have provided no proof of any 'waste.' Instead, they have made hair-on-fire allegations of fraud and waste. For example, Musk recently proclaimed that Social Security benefits were being paid to 150-year-olds, intimating that fraud must be afoot. Evidently, this 'bright man' and his cadre of computer geniuses are unaware that the COBOL programming language used by Social Security automatically uses May 20, 1875, as a placeholder date when information is missing or corrupted. Indeed, the placeholder is simply meant to alert employees that someone needs to look at the file to determine what needs to be corrected. So, no — no benefits are being paid to 150-year-olds.
Rather than take a meat axe approach to vital programs and departments, a la Trump and Musk via DOGE, we would rather see qualified, thoughtful people carefully comb through the government to identify cost savings.
Perhaps let the Government Accountability Office continue said work and rehire the inspectors general that Trump dismissed, who are already tasked with rooting out waste, fraud and corruption.
— K. Worth, Grayslake
Defend IRA funding
It's not just about plastic straws going back into the White House or the Illinois carp reduction program getting delayed or about halting wind energy farms, making electric vehicles (EVs) more expensive to build and buy, and increasing greenhouse gases with 'drill, baby, drill' policies that will only worsen climate warming. It's also that the new administration is wholeheartedly redirecting the trajectory of our planet, jeopardizing our children's future.
So much of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) gives us hope that our climate and way of life could be saved with billions of dollars invested in clean energy, not to mention the thousands of new jobs it provides for Illinois alone.
The IRA provisioned almost $3 billion for Illinois, with investments in renewable energy through battery manufacturing, electric vehicle parts and solar technology. These initiatives help our economy and mitigate climate warming, as well as create 2,700 new jobs for Illinois. So what is the benefit of slashing these investments?
The current president, or any single person, should not be able to stop such funding permanently without congressional action or some kind of due process. Congress needs to step forward and be crystal clear about the economic and environmental benefits of the IRA.
I ask U.S. Sens. Tammy Duckworth and Dick Durbin and U.S. Rep. Brad Schneider, along with other Illinois federal lawmakers, to step up and defend the IRA investments for Illinois and for our very future.
— Jinah Yun-Mitchell, Lincolnshire
Stop runaway train
What is wrong with everybody in Congress? Can't they understand that the man in the office of the president of the United States is the frontman for billionaires conspiring to change this country to benefit only themselves? Where is the outrage?
Have the representatives who have sworn to uphold the Constitution simply lied to the American people? Republicans follow when they should regroup and lead the outrage at what is taking place in their party. They are largely to blame for this mess. They must realize what they are allowing to happen.
Democrats seem to be sleeping at the wheel or are in shock. Where is the leadership? Why isn't someone calling for this dangerous march to some kind of oligarchy or fascism that is underway at great speed to be recognized for what it is?
It must stop. No more lies. No more name-calling. No more conspiracy theories. No more revenge against people doing their jobs.
The craziness this administration has wrought is truly un-American. Fighting with our allies? Damaging relationships with other countries? Is it all about saving money? Have they taken a page from the Russian playbook on how to be morally corrupt aggressors? What about our alliances in Europe? What about rebuilding Ukraine? Let's not take over Gaza to make it another Riviera.
What is this administration actually trying to do?
Is there no integrity to be found anywhere in Washington? Elon Musk is in charge of this country's revenue. Who voted for him? How dare oligarchs infiltrate and purge departments created and authorized by past leadership to help people. What's really going on?
It is outrageous that these predators are pretending that they are somehow serving the public. We must demand that Congress serve and protect the American people. Let's tell our elected officials to get to work making new rules and reining in the runaway train that is President Donald Trump's administration. Things are happening that will lead to no good at all. Our representatives musts be loyal to us, the American people, and work to strengthen laws to stop this coup.
Otherwise, it will no longer be America in the end.
— Fran Orchard, Naperville
What if Biden did this?
Boy, if Joe Biden had been reelected and he were doing half the stuff President Donald Trump and his buddy Elon Musk are doing, we would suspect he was off his rocker.
— Cecelia Kubik, Willowbrook
National audit needed
Common sense, defined as practical judgment and sound reasoning in everyday matters, may not sound exciting. However, people are nostalgic for this straightforward concept, which appears outdated.
Our species has accumulated knowledge and passed it down over millennia, so the mistakes of previous humans will no longer need to be repeated. We are the beneficiaries of billions of errors made by our ancestors, and from that, we have developed common sense.
Our nation wastes valuable resources on matters that show little respect for their purpose. Those spending our money don't seem to have our best interests at heart. A national audit is currently underway to bring our fiscal situation under control. It's just common sense, and it's long overdue.
— Scott Thompson, Bloomington, Indiana
Start pushing back
Have MAGA supporters figured out yet that they've been fooled by our current president? Hopefully by now, many realize he was never going to actually be on their side and is only doing what's in his best interests. Instead of just trashing their MAGA hats and T-shirts, we hope that they start pushing back for proper governance lawfully.
In this critical moment, we all quickly and urgently need to demand that our legislators stand strong on our behalf. Let's do this together, no matter how we voted. The future of our country depends on it.
— Eileen Quinn, Elmhurst
Buy the crown already
I and many others who believe in a democratic society are tired of watching our democratic representatives chasing their tails in circles.
The Republican Congress, MAGA and our Supreme Court should just go ahead and purchase the crown and plant it on the head of their supreme appointed leader.
— Patty Stepek, Tinley Park
Praising prosecutor
Thank you for Tuesday's editorial in support of the New York federal prosecutor ('In praise of federal prosecutor Danielle Sassoon's bravery in the face of Trumpian intimidation'). Thank you for taking a stand against our dictatorial president.
— John Duffy, Elgin
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘No Kings' protest planned in Saint Clair
Schuylkill County Democrats are planning a 'No Kings' protest rally against President Donald Trump's administration. The plans calls for protesters to gather from 11 a.m. until noon at the pedestrian bridge at the Coal Creek Commerce Center off Route 61 in Saint Clair. 'No Kings is a nationwide day of defiance,' according to the website The idea evolved from Trump comparing himself to a king. Protests will occur all over the nation. The website lists York, Lancaster, Harrisburg, Carlisle and Jim Thorpe among the cities planning protests in Pennsylvania. Information about Saturday's event in Saint Clair was submitted to the national website, but for some reason did not make the list, said Todd Zimmerman, chairman of the Schuylkill County Democratic Committee. 'It's all free speech,' Zimmerman said about the objectives of the event. The rally coincides with Trump's 79th birthday and his administration's planned military parade and celebration of the U.S. Army's 250th birthday in Washington, D.C. Zimmerman expects some passerby on Route 61 during Saturday's rally will show support by honking their car horns, while others may be less enthusiastic. 'We created a constitution to prevent a dictatorship,' Zimmerman said, adding that the actions taken by the Trump administration have real world consequences. Democrats contend that the Trump administration is testing the tenets of the U.S. Constitution regarding the legislative, judicial and executive branches of government. News of immigrants being arrested has sparked protests around the county, most recently in Los Angeles. Here at home, Ruben Rojas-Vargas, of Pottsville, was arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents on May 30. Rojas-Vargas, 32, who has been in the United States for 16 years, was sent to a processing center in Phillipsburg, Centre County, where he remains, according to online records. 'We need immigrants,' Zimmerman said. 'I think the arrest of law-abiding immigrants is going to affect our economy.' With regards to security concerns for Saturday's rally, Saint Clair Borough Manager Roland Price said he has no plans to provide extra police presence for the event. 'I don't anticipate major issues,' Price said Friday. 'We have no objections to them protesting.'
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Biden-appointed judge thwarts Trump's attempt to clean house at consumer safety agency
A federal judge in Maryland on Friday ruled that President Donald Trump lacked the authority to fire three Democratic members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and ordered their reinstatement — teeing up another high-stakes court clash centered on Trump's ability as commander-in-chief to remove or otherwise control the members of independent agencies. U.S. District Judge Matthew Maddox, a Biden appointee, sided with the three ousted members of the board — Mary Boyle, Alexander Hoehn-Saric and Richard Trumka Jr. — in ruling that their firings were unlawful and ordered all three members to be reinstated to their posts. In his ruling, Maddox said that the tenured design and protection of the five-member, staggered-term CPSC board does "not interfere with" Trump's executive branch powers under Article II of the U.S. Constitution. Appeals Court Blocks Trump From Firing Federal Board Members, Tees Up Supreme Court Fight The decision is a near-term blow for Trump, and comes just weeks after the Supreme Court last month agreed to uphold, for now, Trump's removal of two Democratic appointees from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Merit Systems Protections Board (MSPB). Both board members had challenged their terminations as "unlawful" in separate lawsuits filed in D.C. federal court. The Supreme Court voted 6-3 in May to temporarily allow the firing of both board members, siding with lawyers for the Trump administration, who had urged the justices to keep both members on the job while the case continued to move through the lower courts. Read On The Fox News App In his ruling, Maddox sought to distinguish those cases from the terminations of members of the CPSC board and said that the Trump administration, in this case, had failed to identify neglect or malfeasance by any other Senate-confirmed commissioners on the CPSC, which is required by law to justify their removals. Judges V Trump: Here Are The Key Court Battles Halting The White House Agenda "For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds no constitutional defect in the statutory restriction on Plaintiffs' removal and that Plaintiffs' purported removal from office was unlawful," he said in the order. "The Court shall enter an Order granting Plaintiffs' motion, denying Defendants' motion, and providing declaratory and injunctive relief permitting Plaintiffs to resume their duties as CPSC Commissioners." The decision clears the way for the members to return to their roles on the board, pending an appeal to higher courts by the Trump administration. The case is the latest in a string of challenges centered on Trump's ability to remove members of independent boards. Like the NLRB and MSPB rulings, it centers on the 90-year-old Supreme Court decision known as Humphrey's Executor, in which the court unanimously ruled that presidents cannot fire independent board members without cause. Maddox invoked the uncertainty created by the preliminary posture of the NLRB and MSPB cases, which saw both plaintiffs removed and reinstated to their positions multiple times — which he said was the basis for ordering more permanent injunctive relief. "Disruption might have resulted in the instant case if Plaintiffs had been reinstated while this case was in its preliminary posture, only to have the Court later deny relief in its final judgment and subject Plaintiffs to removal again," said Maddox. "The risk of such disruption is no longer a factor now that the Court is granting permanent injunctive relief as a final judgment."Original article source: Biden-appointed judge thwarts Trump's attempt to clean house at consumer safety agency
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas politicians react to Israel's attack on Iran
AUSTIN (KXAN) — Several Texas leaders have shared their thoughts and reactions after Israel attacked Iran's capital early Friday. The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed Israel struck Iran's nuclear enrichment facility at Natanz, and Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Israel will face a 'severe punishment' over its attack on the country. Iranian missiles later struck Israel in retaliation. The Latest: Israel hit by missiles as Iran retaliates for strikes on nuclear sites News of the attacks has stirred up concern on social media, and several world leaders have posted their reactions. Lawmakers and politicians in Texas have also taken to the internet or issued statements in response to the attacks. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott posted on X Friday morning, 'Israel was forced to defend itself — and American interests — from the Iranian regime that was hell bent on building nuclear weapons that would have endangered the globe. Texas stands with our ally taking necessary action to protect its people & restore global stability.' Congressman Michael McCaul, chairman emeritus of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, released the following statement: 'President Trump gave Iran every chance to negotiate in good faith and to dismantle their nuclear program. 'Prime Minister Netanyahu was also clear: The alternative to diplomacy would be strikes on Iran — a message he reiterated to me when I met with him this month. Unfortunately, the regime chose not to take the path of peace — to prioritize their own interests over their people's. They brought this calamity on themselves. 'One thing is certain: Iran will not acquire a nuclear weapon, and our world is safer for it. They would be wise to come to the table and make an agreement with President Trump while the offer still stands. If they instead choose to harm U.S. troops in the region, they will once again regret it.' Senator Ted Cruz appeared on Newsmax with Greg Kelly late Thursday and posted the clip on X. 'Iran said they would not dismantle their advanced centrifuges. That was a giant middle finger to President Trump,' Cruz said in the post. 'Tonight, we saw the consequences of Iran's defiance.' He also appeared on Fox News, asking viewers to pray for Israel, posting the same message in a another post on X. 'Here's my message to the Ayatollah: If you strike at America, I have every confidence that President Trump will respond with overwhelming force,' Cruz said in the post. Senator John Cornyn posted a message in solidarity with Israel on X Thursday night. 'Israel has an unquestionable right to defend itself. I am proud to stand with Israel. #AmYisraelChai,' the post said. Democratic Congressman Greg Casar posted in opposition to Israel's strikes. 'Netanyahu's reckless strike risks provoking a wider war and pulling in the United States. Trump must oppose Netanyahu's escalation and pursue a diplomatic path to deal with Iran's nuclear program. Trump must not violate the Constitution by involving American troops in Netanyahu's war without coming to Congress,' Casar said in a post on X. Casar followed that up with another post, criticizing President Trump. 'Trump promised peace and stability. Then, he picked reckless partisans for top foreign policy jobs. Now he's egging on escalation in a conflict he already made worse by tearing up a nuclear deal that was working. Trump's recklessness is undermining stability abroad and putting American lives at risk. Trump must reverse course and deescalate the situation.' Rep. Lloyd Doggett also opposed Israel's preemptive strike and criticized President Trump. Doggett posted the link to a New York Times story headlined, 'What to Know About Israel's Strikes on Iran's Nuclear Program and Military Leaders,' along with his thoughts on the strikes. 'Trump's weakness again on full display,' Doggett said in the post on X. 'Just as he is too weak to stand up to war criminal Putin on Ukraine, Trump is too weak to restrain Netanyahu from interfering in ongoing negotiations for a peaceful way to prevent Iran from going nuclear. George W. Bush restrained Netanyahu from launching such an attack, but Trump is incapable of doing the same. Trump's weakness heightens the danger of the US being pulled into another deadly and costly Mideast war.' Rep. August Pfluger backed Israel. 'Israel has every right to defend itself. The United States stands firmly behind Israel,' he said in an X post. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.