Just three years left before 1.5C climate target slips out of reach, scientists warn
The world is on track to breach the 1.5C global warming threshold in the next three years, scientists have warned in a new international study.
If current emissions continue, humans will have released enough carbon dioxide by early 2028 to lock in 1.5C of long-term warming since preindustrial times, according to the study.
The 1.5C target set under the 2015 Paris Agreement is considered a critical limit beyond which climate impacts such as extreme heat, drought, storms and sea level rise could become far more dangerous, especially for the poorest and most vulnerable populations.
'Things aren't just getting worse. They're getting worse faster,' said Zeke Hausfather, study co-author from the tech firm Stripe and climate group Berkeley Earth.
'We're actively moving in the wrong direction in a critical period of time that we would need to meet our most ambitious climate goals. Some reports, there's a silver lining. I don't think there really is one in this one.'
The annual Indicators of Global Climate Change report, published in Earth System Science Data, brings together research from almost 60 leading climate scientists. It notes that the remaining 'carbon budget', the amount of CO2 that can still be emitted while staying below 1.5C, has shrunk to just 143 billion tonnes.
At current emission rates of 46 billion tonnes per year, the limit will be reached in less than three years.
So far, global temperatures have risen by about 1.24C, the study points out. And for the first time ever, the planet passed the 1.5C mark for an entire year in 2024, though the Paris target refers to sustained long-term warming typically measured over two decades.
Scientists say without drastic emissions cuts, the world will be unable to prevent warming from surpassing the threshold, leading to a rise in extreme weather events and climate-related disasters and increasing the risk of triggering irreversible changes.
The report also warns the carbon budget for 1.6C or 1.7C could be exceeded within nine years, which will significantly intensify these impacts.
Long-term estimates show current average global temperatures to be 1.24C higher than in the pre-industrial age. 'Under any course of action, there is a very high chance that we'll reach and even exceed 1.5C and even higher levels of warming,' Prof Joeri Rogelj, research director at the Grantham Institute, said. '1.5C is an iconic level but we are currently already in crunch time…to avoid higher levels of warming with a decent likelihood or a prudent likelihood as well and that is true for 1.7C, but equally so for 1.8C if we want to have a high probability there.'
But Prof Rogelj added that reductions in emissions over the next decade could still 'critically change' the rate of warming and limit the magnitude and the extent by which the world would exceed 1.5C.
'It's really the difference between just cruising through 1.5C towards much higher levels of 2C or trying to limit warming somewhere in the range of 1.5,' he said.
Piers Forster, professor of climate physics at the University of Leeds who has helped author the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports, said the new study highlighted how climate policies and pace of climate action were 'not keeping up with what's needed to address the ever-growing impacts'.
In 2024, the best estimate of observed global surface temperature increase was 1.52C, of which 1.36C could be attributed to human activity, caused by global greenhouse gas emissions, the scientists said.
The latest study found last year's high temperatures were 'alarmingly unexceptional' as the combination of human-driven climate change and the El Nino weather phenomenon pushed global heat to record levels.
While global average temperatures exceeded 1.5C for the first time last year, this didn't mean the world had breached the Paris agreement, which would require average global temperatures to exceed the threshold over multiple decades.
When analysing longer-term temperature change, the best estimates show that average global temperatures were 1.24C higher between 2015 and 2024 than in pre-industrial times, with 1.22C caused by human activities.
Elsewhere, the study noted that human activities were affecting the Earth's energy balance, with the oceans storing about 91 per cent of the excess heat, driving detrimental changes in every component of the climate system such as sea level rise, ocean warming, ice loss, and permafrost thawing.
Between 2019 and 2024, mean sea level also increased by around 26mm, more than doubling the long-term rate of 1.8mm per year seen since the turn of the 20th century.
Dr Aimee Slangen, research leader at the NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, argued the rise was already having an 'outsized impact' on low-lying coastal areas, causing more damaging storm surges and coastal erosion.
'The concerning part is that we know that sea-level rise in response to climate change is relatively slow, which means that we have already locked in further increases in the coming years and decades,' she said.
IPCC's last assessment of the climate system, published in 2021, highlighted how climate change was leading to widespread adverse impacts on nature and people.
'Every small increase in warming matters, leading to more frequent, more intense weather extremes,' Professor Rogelj said.
'Emissions over the next decade will determine how soon and how fast 1.5C of warming is reached. They need to be swiftly reduced to meet the climate goals of the Paris Agreement.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Climate change is coming for your G&T! Global warming could change the taste of gin, scientists warn
If there's one thing the Brits take seriously, it's their gin and tonic. It requires a precise blend of the spirit, mixer, lime wedge and – of course – ice. But the subtle fusion of flavours is at risk, experts have warned - with climate change to blame. Juniper berries are what give gin its distinct piney, woody and citrus-y notes. Now, scientists have found that volatile weather patterns – made more likely by climate breakdown – could make the botanical sweeter and spicier in some years and less intense during others. Experts from Heriot-Watt University's International Centre for Brewing and Distilling (ICBD) warned changing weather might be altering the flavour compounds in the berries. Like grapes, the climate and environment that junipers grow in can influence their intensity and dominant flavours. 'A wet harvest year can reduce the total volatile compounds in juniper by about 12 per cent compared to a dry year,' Matthew Pauley, an assistant professor at the ICBD told The Guardian. 'This has direct implications for the sensory characteristics that make gin taste like gin.' For their research, scientists distilled juniper berries from different regions across Europe including Albania, Bosnia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Kosovo and Italy. Analysis of the resulting spirits revealed berries from each region had distinct chemical profiles which gave them slightly different tastes. For example, gin from Albania has a higher abundance of orange and citrus compounds, while gin from Bosnia might have a more woody, pine-y taste. The team distilled juniper berries from varying harvest years and discovered the amount of rainfall in a given year could significantly impact the flavour of the berries. Wetter weather meant longer drying periods for the berries were needed, which changed the abundance of chemicals within them. They found the abundance of Alpha-humulene, which contributes to the berry's spicy and peppery notes, drops during rainy years. Beta-Caryophyllene, which provides citrus, floral and sweet attributes to juniper, also declines. And levels of Beta-myrcene, which helps provide a 'minty' taste to the berries, also decreases during wet harvest years. The countries involved in the study, which are located around southern and southeastern Europe, are expected to be significantly impacted by climate change. Experts predict this area of Europe will experience increased heatwaves and droughts – along with periods of intense rainfall that can vary drastically from year-to-year. The study showed that across all six countries the total harvest rainfall in 2017 was 1,218mm, which dropped to 774mm the following year. If this pattern continues then hotter, drier years could produce juniper berries that are especially sweet and spicy, while wetter seasons could results in a product that has markedly less intense flavour. Professor Annie Hill, the study's supervisor, said: 'For distillers, this means the flavour profile can shift depending on harvest conditions. 'For a multibillion-pound industry, which is increasingly focused on consistency and quality for its discerning customers, this represents a risk.' The study, published in the Journal of the Institute of Brewing, reads: 'Juniper berries and other plant botanicals are used in the production of beverages and contribute signature flavour and aroma. 'Inconsistent or inferior quality of botanicals is a concern and result in consumer dissatisfaction, and reduced sales. 'This work will be of interest to distillers, suppliers of botanicals and juniper farmers, and will inform drying regimes consequent on climate change.' The team said that the most likely outcome of the impact of climate change would be that gin distillers would choose to harvest their juniper berries from a different area. In a similar way to champagne companies buying vinewards in the south of England, previously non-suitable areas for growing juniper berries may be considered.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
City-killer asteroid on a collision course with the moon could shower Earth with SHRAPNEL – causing 10-years of damage to satellites in just a few days, experts warn
The world breathed a sigh of relief when NASA confirmed the city-killer asteroid 2024 YR4 was no longer likely to hit Earth. But scientists now warn that the threat posed by this deadly space rock is far from over. Astronomers say that the 60-metre asteroid still has a 4.3 per cent chance of slamming into the moon on December 22, 2032. This collision would shower Earth with a wave of shrapnel that could wreak havoc on satellites in orbit. According to simulations created by Dr Paul Wiegert, of the University of Western Ontario, the asteroid could hit the moon at over 29,000mph (46,800 kmph), carving out a 0.6 mile-wide crater in the biggest lunar impact in the last 5,000 years. If the asteroid hits in the right place, Earth's gravity might funnel between 10 and 30 per cent of the ejected material directly towards our planet. And this could have devastating consequences for the thousands of satelites in low-Earth orbit. Dr Wiegert's calculations show that the shrapnel could cause up to a decade's worth of damage in just days. 2024 YR4 was first discovered in December 2024 and quickly caused concern among astronomers as the chances of an impact with Earth rose. At its peak, astronomers predicted that the asteroid had a 3.1 per cent chance of hitting Earth in 2032. While emergency observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) soon confirmed that the asteroid would miss Earth, it also revealed a surprisingly high probability of a lunar impact. At around 60 metres wide, the city-killer's impact would unleash a blast 500 times larger than the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima. On the moon, the absence of an atmosphere to slow the space rock's approach could mean an even bigger impact. By simulating 10,000 possible impact scenarios, Dr Wiegert found that this would eject around 10,000 tonnes of material between 0.1 to 10 millimetres in size. How much of this material travels towards us depends on where the asteroid lands, but the simulations suggest a scenario in which up to 10 per cent is delivered. This would lead to the Earth experiencing rates of particle impacts between 10 and 1,000 times higher than normal. Dr Wiergert told the New Scientist: 'We were a little bit surprised at the possibility of there being a substantial amount of material at the Earth. 'Intuitively, the Earth is actually quite a small target when seen from the moon, and so your intuition is that not very much material would actually hit the Earth, but it turns out that the Earth's gravity can focus that material under certain conditions.' None of this material is likely to make it through Earth's atmosphere, but it would create a severe problem for satellites in low-Earth orbit and other spacecraft. Dr Wiegert points out that this debris could even affect the operations of lunar-orbiting spacecraft such as NASA's planned Lunar Gateway. Any debris that doesn't escape orbit would rain back down on the moon, damaging landers, rovers, and even threatening the lives of astronauts in the Artemis program. However, this would be particularly dangerous for the large satellite constellations, such as SpaceX's Starlink satellites, currently in orbit. In a preprint paper, submitted to the American Astronomy Society Journals, Dr Wiegert predicts that a lunar impact could lead to 'hundreds to thousands of impacts from mm-sized debris'. If lots of satellites are hit at once, these impacts can easily combine to cause more widespread disruption. Professor Burchell, a space scientist from the University of Kent, told MailOnline: 'A lot of satellites failing at once is worse than occasional failures spread over a decade, as the latter can be more readily managed without stretching resources. 'If all at once, it would risk temporarily overwhelming the response with short-term loss of provision.' The impact from lunar debris would typically be small, but could cause problems that cannot easily be repaired. Research conducted by Professor Mark Burchell suggests that debris just one millimetre across is large enough to damage solar cells, sever cables, and even penetrate astronaut space suits. Pieces up to 10 millimetres in diameter are large enough to break into the interior of spacecraft and cause 'increasing damage'. Professor Burchell told MailOnline: 'If a sensor is damaged, or a piece of cabling, the satellite as a whole is still there, but may lose performance or some essential capability. 'Think of this as the difference between a car crash which wrecks your car and getting a chip on the windscreen. The former is clearly bad, but a chip? It is liveable in most cases, but may fail.' POTENTIAL METHODS FOR ELIMINATING THE THREAT OF AN ASTEROID DART is one of many concepts of how to negate the threat of an asteroid that have been suggested over the years. Multiple bumps Scientists in California have been firing projectiles at meteorites to simulate the best methods of altering the course of an asteroid so that it wouldn't hit Earth. According to the results so far, an asteroid like Bennu that is rich in carbon could need several small bumps to charge its course. 'These results indicate multiple successive impacts may be required to deflect rather than disrupt asteroids, particularly carbonaceous asteroids,' researchers said. Nuke Another idea, known simply as 'nuke', involves blowing up a nuclear explosive close to the asteroid. However, this could create smaller but still potentially dangerous fragments of rock that could spin off in all directions, potentially towards Earth. Ion Beam Deflection With Ion Beam Deflection, plumes from a space probe's thrusters would be directed towards the asteroid to gently push on its surface over a wide area. A thruster firing in the opposite direction would be needed to keep the spacecraft at a constant distance from the asteroid. Gravity tractor And yet another concept, gravity tractor, would deflect the asteroid without physically contacting it, but instead by using only its gravitational field to transmit a required impulse. Professor Colin Snodgrass, an astronomer at the University of Edinburgh said: 'There have been a few concepts suggested, such as a 'gravity tractor' to slowly tow an asteroid away instead of pushing it with a kinetic impactor.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Unexpected passing object could help wipe out Earth
A recent study published in the journal Icarus indicates that passing field stars could cause more instability in our solar system than previously believed. Astronomers Nathan Kaib and Sean Raymond conducted thousands of computer simulations, identifying passing stars as the most probable trigger for future orbital changes over the next four billion years. The research suggests that the risk of instability for Jupiter could increase by 50 to 80 percent due to these gravitational interactions. The study also found an approximate 0.3 percent chance that Mars could be lost through collision or ejection, and a 0.2 percent probability of Earth being involved in a planetary collision or ejected. Despite these findings, which show a higher risk for Earth than previous research, one of the study's authors, Nathan Kaib, stated that these extreme outcomes are still not probable.
