First historic statue removed from George square today
All 11 statues will be taken down and put into storage for cleaning and restoration work during the redevelopment of the square.
When the work is complete, they will be returned to the square.
READ NEXT:More than 50 Orange parades in one day, the biggest of the year
Today, workers carefully removed the Robert Burns statue from its plinth in the square.
(Image: Colin Mearns)
The other statues, including the horseback monuments of Queen Victoria and Prince Albert, will be taken down over the next 10 days.
The Walter Scott Monument in the centre of the square and the Cenotaph will remain in place throughout the works.
The square has now been closed off with hoardings erected to allow workers to start the redevelopment.
READ NEXT: We want to start a family but we're stuck in Glasgow hotel with rats
After being lifted from the plinths, the statue of Scotland's national poet was wrapped in blankets for protection and later wrapped in an opaque black plastic and placed on a low-loader truck before being transported to storage.
(Image: Colin Mearns)
The statues will be removed and restored by Rupert Harris Conservation, a leading company in the field of statue and metalwork conservation.
The George Square and surrounding Avenues project is part of the wider Avenues programme, aimed at making the city centre more attractive, greener and better connected.
(Image: Colin Mearns)
The statues conservation work sits alongside the main contract for George Square and the surrounding Avenues, with the main contract - worth £20.499million - supported by £8.815million Glasgow City Deal City Region funding from both the Scottish and UK Governments.
Work on the main contract is expected to begin in the coming weeks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
22 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Dumfries and Galloway Scottish Water staff start week-long strike action
Members of three unions downed tools this morning with the walk out set to continue until Sunday. Staff at Scottish Water in Dumfries and Galloway have started seven days of strike action. The walk out comes after the latest pay deal was rejected by staff. The industrial action, which involves workers in the Unite, Unison and GMB Scotland unions, started on Monday and will continue until Sunday. Workers also downed tools in April. Unison Scottish Water branch secretary, Patricia McArthur, said: 'Staff are extremely frustrated. They deserve better than game-playing by senior Scottish Water managers. 'The company seems more interested in spending public money on anti-union tactics than in finding a solution to this pay dispute. 'Its managers proposed a possible pay offer, but then retracting it, only to come up with something much worse.' Unite general secretary, Sharon Graham, added: 'Scottish Water executives are short-changing their workers and the Scottish people while they laugh all the way to the bank with their eye-watering pay packages. "Our members will not be forced into accepting a pay offer which has barely moved an inch since October last year." 'Unite continues to stand with our members in their fight for better jobs, pay and conditions at Scottish Water.' Scottish Water's chief operating officer Peter Farrer said: 'This week's industrial action is unnecessary. It will mean union members losing valuable wages and add extra costs to the business which are ultimately paid for by customers. 'We invited the joint trade unions to talk over the weekend but unfortunately they refused to meet without preconditions. 'Given how close the vote against our latest pay offer was, we felt a resolution was possible and would be welcomed by all our colleagues. 'It is now time for the joint trade union leadership to return to the table with a sensible solution that ends this dispute. 'In the meantime, we have robust plans in place to maintain essential services should the trade unions press ahead with their strike action.'
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Prolonged efforts to close Perth port compared to getting man on the moon
Perth and Kinross Council voted to stop operating Perth Harbour as a commercial port in February 2023 but it remains open Perth and Kinross Council's leader has compared the efforts to close Perth Harbour as a commercial port to sending astronauts to the moon. In February 2023 councillors voted to close Perth Harbour as a commercial port but - over two years later - the port remains open despite only two vessels having used it in 2024/25. On Wednesday, May 28 councillors voted for Perth and Kinross Council to remain statutory harbour authority and close it as a commercial port but allow leisure use of Perth Harbour. The chairman of Perth Harbour Board - which has now been discontinued - Bailie Chris Ahern voiced his dissent at the meeting of PKC's Economy of Infrastructure Committee where the decision was made. As the committee gave its approval, SNP council leader Grant Laing said: "Everyone can agree it's taken a lot of time but there were a lot of attempts to put someone on the moon for the first time. If you're doing something for the first time, there are going to be setbacks." Moving it for approval, convener and deputy leader Eric Drysdale said: "The closure of a commercial harbour is not an easy option for this council or any council to take, but we have to balance the merits of continuing to run a loss-making harbour that is a drain on this council's finances against the benefits that may ensue through regeneration for leisure, tourism and nature conservation. "Discussions with Transport Scotland have concluded that the best course would be for the council to retain the statutory harbour authority duty but cease the competent harbour authority duties which will mean excluding commercial vessels over 24m. If agreed this will go to public consultation and will be submitted to Scottish Ministers for approval in due course. "Can I also acknowledge the significant contributions made by the Harbour Board and its dedicated members over the past few years? Their efforts have been invaluable and I would like to extend the committee's thanks to them for their work." After councillors voted in February to close Perth Harbour as a commercial port, it was marketed for long-term lease. One bid was submitted which was withdrawn on September 8, 2023. On September 15, 2023, Perth and Kinross Council requested a meeting with Transport Scotland to progress the draft Harbour Revision Order (submitted in June 2023). A council timeline put before councillors said PKC officers were advised by Transport Scotland "they had not yet received legal advice and were unable to provide feedback" and added: "Several subsequent requests for a meeting made with the same result." In December 2023 Transport Scotland acknowledged formal submission of the application for Harbour Revision Order but requested more information, which was provided by PKC in January 2024. During the lengthy process it emerged it was the first time a statutory port authority had considered relinquishing its duties. Cllr Willie Robertson described the timeline of discussions between PKC and Transport Scotland - outlined in an appendix to the Perth and Kinross Council report - as "unbelievable" reading. The Kinross-shire Liberal Democrat councillor Willie Robertson questioned the "huge delays" and "the fact they continually have to be chased up to move this process forward". He added: "We can't allow Transport Scotland to cost this council more and more money that we don't need to spend." PKC's strategic lead for Economy, Development and Planning Serge Merone said the council was working with Transport Scotland on a "change of approach to help reduce any delays in the coming weeks to take that to a successful outcome". Cllr Robertson responded: "I don't think we can allow Transport Scotland's incompetence to go unmarked. For me, it's just not acceptable." He requested a letter be written to Scotland's Transport Minister outlining the issues. Convener Eric Drysdale said: "I do accept this has been a protracted process to date and lessons have to be learnt. I can assure you necessary steps will be taken." Council leader Grant Laing added: "The problem is this has never been done before to a commercial port so there was no framework to work with. There is no legal advice to work to. "I've been as frustrated as anyone but we had to make sure we were compliant with all legalities." He added: "At least there will be a framework now if any other port wants to close down. "It's groundbreaking to close the commercial port and I think the result is quite good that it gives us an opportunity to have more leisure in the harbour." Despite having "virtually no commercial traffic", PKC has had to continue commercial operations - during the long process - and comply with legislation and guidance, which has come at a cost. PKC reported a net expenditure of £208,000 as of March 31, 2024. The projected net expenditure as of March 31, 2025 is estimated at around £100,000 - depending on potential income from vessels - and includes the legal fees relating to the port closure. However, PKC sold the Fair Maid tugboat for £500,000 in 2023-24. The estimated annual cost for PKC to remain as statutory harbour authority for leisure use - rather than as a commercial port - is around £65,000. The costs include: rent and rates; a designated person to provide independent assurance of marine safety management; a qualified harbourmaster to ensure compliance with the Port Marine Safety Code: maintenance; oil spill cover; replacement and repair of personal protective equipment, and running a website. Conservative leader John Duff said: "This is a sorry tale. Two years and four months ago we voted to close Perth Harbour and two years and four months later - somewhat belatedly - we're advised this is a first in the UK and it's too hard for Transport Scotland to conclude this and perhaps we should consider a Harbour Revision Order instead. "Objections could still mean this could take six to 18 months before we can rid ourselves of only some of the responsibilities in terms of running the harbour." He added: "Transport Scotland have certainly not covered themselves in glory in relation to the way and speed in which they have dealt with our situation and the various requests for information." The delays, in part, appear to have arisen from health and safety concerns for the remaining small vessel users of the harbour and ensuring maintenance and safety requirements would be met. A Transport Scotland spokesperson said: "We have recently received information regarding a proposed Harbour Revision Order for Perth Harbour. Our aim is to work closely with all prospective applicants to ensure any final application and subsequent order is robust, both legally and from a policy perspective. This involves increased scrutiny in the pre-application stage which helps support those objectives."
STV News
2 hours ago
- STV News
Achieving child poverty target could cost £920m a year in benefits, report warns
Scotland could meet its 2030 child poverty target—but a report has warned that this could cost £920m a year in benefits, with 'significant additional' spending also required to increase the number of parents in work. Chris Birt, associate director at the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) in Scotland, said its research shows: 'Holyrood has the chance to prove that it's up to the task of not just setting lofty ambitions, but straining every sinew to deliver on them.' PA Media The Joseph Rowntree Foundation examined the costs and impacts of different measures that could be introduced to tackle child poverty (Jane Barlow/PA). The think tank said there would be financial benefits from getting more parents into employment, and from helping those with jobs to work more hours. Doing this could increase tax revenues to the Scottish Government by £410m, it said, while cutting spending on universal credit by around £500 million a year. With 240,000 children living in poverty in Scotland, the JRF produced what it described as a 'toolkit' for parties running in the 2026 Holyrood election, setting out the impact different policies could have towards meeting the target of having less than 10% of youngsters in relative poverty by 2030–31. The think tank said it had 'deliberately not prescribed an exact course of action' but had instead 'shown the required scale of action needed'. To meet the target, the report said the next Parliament would need to 'lift around 100,000 children out of poverty' – adding this would 'require a laser-focused prioritisation'. The Meeting the Moment paper stresses that none of the measures it considered would achieve the target on their own. 'Even a near quadrupling of the SCP (Scottish child payment) to £100 a week per child at an annual cost of £1.14 billion would see a child poverty rate three percentage points above the targets,' it said. However it found increasing the SCP – which is given to low-income families for every child they have under the age of 16 – to £40 a week would have 'the best poverty reduction impact per pound'. This would cost an extra £190m a year – but on its own would only bring the child poverty rate down to 18%. However the research found that by supplementing the benefit for families with babies and for single parents, and by boosting take-up to 100% of those eligible, when combined with other measures – such as boosting employment among parents in poverty – 90,000 youngsters could be lifted out of poverty, meeting the 10% target. The report said: 'This would cost an additional £920m in targeted child benefits in Scotland (as well as other costs associated with increasing employment). 'It would also increase tax revenues by £410m because of increased parental employment. 'Universal credit expenditure could also fall by £500m as demand for it falls due to higher incomes through work.' Mr Birt said: 'Whoever forms the next Scottish Government has the chance to change what it means to grow up in Scotland. 'To do so, they must meet the Parliament's child poverty targets. Not only for Scotland's children and their futures, but to show those who often feel overlooked and ignored by politics that trust can be rebuilt through actions. 'This analysis gives each political party a detailed map to help them reach a Scotland free from child poverty. They may choose to take different routes to get there. But whichever route they take will require every ounce of determination and demand action at scale. 'The actions of Westminster governments may help, or hinder, but Holyrood has the chance to prove that it's up to the task of not just setting lofty ambitions, but straining every sinew to deliver on them.' Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said: 'I welcome this report from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation. 'We are absolutely committed to meeting the 2030 child poverty targets and thanks to the actions we are already taking, families in the poorest 10% of households are estimated to be £2,600 a year better off in 2025-26 and this value is projected to grow to an average of £3,700 a year by 2029-30. 'However our policies are having to work harder in the current economic context and as a result of decisions taken by the UK Government, such as keeping the two-child limit on Universal Credit which are holding back Scotland's progress. 'While the Joseph Rowntree Foundation predict child poverty will rise in other parts of the UK by 2029, they highlight that policies such as our Scottish Child Payment, and our commitment to mitigate the two-child limit, are behind Scotland 'bucking the trend'. 'We will publish our third child poverty delivery plan by the end of March 2026, setting out the actions to be taken between 2026-2031 to meet the 2030 targets. We will continue working closely with stakeholders, including the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, to shape that plan.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
