Pontypool property for auction with £80,000 guide price
The property, which also includes a usable loft space, is listed with Sage & Co Auctions for a guide price of £80,000.
Planning permission has already been granted for the conversion of the building into two two-bedroom apartments on the first floor, and a studio apartment on the ground floor.
The agent says the prospect of this development opportunity might appeal to investors and developers.
(Image: Sage and Co via Rightmove) The property could also appeal to those considering a conversion into a House of Multiple Occupancy (HMO), subject to obtaining the necessary planning consents.
The agent has outlined that drawings for this potential conversion into an HMO are available.
They highlighted the property's advantageous location in the heart of Pontypool town centre, with excellent access to local amenities, shops, schools, and transport links.
The estate agent added that various car parks nearby offer convenient parking solutions for both residents and visitors.
The building offers vacant possession and is advised to be Freehold.
(Image: Sage and Co via Rightmove)
It is an investment opportunity with potential for a range of uses, from developing modern apartments to establishing a business hub, or exploring other possibilities.
A buyer's premium will be applicable to all lots sold at auction, charged at 0.01 per cent including VAT of the final sale price (subject to a minimum of £995 including VAT).
The auction is to be held online, unconditionally, on July 2 at 6.05pm.
(Image: Sage and Co via Rightmove)
Pontypool, the location of the property, offers a blend of urban conveniences and countryside charm.
The town is home to Pontypool Park, with walking trails, a peaceful lake, and gardens.
Transport links offer comfortable commuting to major urban centres like Newport and Cardiff.
From high street shops to the historic Pontypool Indoor Market, shopping lovers are well-catered for.
The town also boasts the Blaenavon World Heritage Site in its vicinity.
Pontypool's fame extends to its rugby heritage, with the 'Pontypool front row' being prominent Welsh rugby stars of the 1970s.
It also has a rich industrial heritage, with iron forging history dating back to the Tudor times.
This is symbolised by the 'Pontypool Japan-ware', a lacquered and decorated ironware.
The town offers much to do, from exploring the natural and artificial beauty of Pontypool Park, visiting the dry ski slope and Shell Grotto, to ending the day at Folly Tower with a scenic view of Monmouthshire.
For those interested in local history, Pontypool Museum provides a deep dive into the town's industrial past.
Being on the edge of South Wales coalfields, Pontypool offers a range of outdoor activities from hiking, strolls, pottering around in the market, to soaking up culture and history.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Pembrokeshire Herald
an hour ago
- Pembrokeshire Herald
Sex offender built patio illegally on ancient priory ruins
David Chadwick calls for rail powers to be devolved to Wales after confirmation East-West Rail brings no funding uplift WELSH Liberal Democrat MP David Chadwick has criticised the UK Government after it confirmed that Wales will receive no additional funding from the £6.6 billion East-West Rail scheme, which runs entirely between Oxford and Cambridge in England. Mr Chadwick uncovered the detail through a written parliamentary question answered by the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport, Simon Lightwood. The project has been classified as an 'England and Wales' scheme, despite not including any infrastructure in Wales — a classification that prevents Wales from receiving a proportional share of funding through the Barnett formula. Not happy over rail funding: Liberal Democrat, David Chadwick MP The issue mirrors the controversy over HS2, which was also designated as benefiting both England and Wales, even though the line does not extend into Welsh territory. Independent estimates suggest Wales could have received over £360 million in consequential funding from East-West Rail if it had been classified as 'England only.' Broader estimates indicate that similar misclassifications over the past decade may have cost Wales more than £4 billion in potential funding. In the House of Commons, Mr Chadwick described the decision as 'shocking,' and renewed calls for the devolution of full rail infrastructure powers to the Senedd. He argued that only through devolution can Wales prevent future misallocations and ensure investment in local lines such as the Heart of Wales Line. Speaking after the exchange, Mr Chadwick said: 'It is simply indefensible that Wales continues to be frozen out of hundreds of millions in rail funding for projects that do not lay a single centimetre of track in our country. We saw this with HS2, with Northern Powerhouse Rail, and now again with East-West Rail. Time after time, Wales is left behind.' He added: 'Wales must be able to invest properly in its own rail network. That includes delivering serious improvements to the Heart of Wales Line, which has been neglected for decades. This line is a lifeline for rural communities, supporting jobs, education and tourism, and it deserves the same level of ambition and investment as rail services elsewhere in the UK.' While critics point to a pattern of funding disparities, the UK Government maintains that major rail projects often bring broader economic benefits across the UK, including Wales — for example, through supply chains or job creation. However, Welsh politicians and transport experts have repeatedly argued that these indirect benefits do not match the level of direct investment seen in other parts of the union. The Welsh Government has long advocated for the devolution of rail infrastructure powers, which are currently reserved to Westminster. It has argued that devolution would enable more targeted investment in Wales's underfunded network — a view backed by a growing number of transport economists. Mr Chadwick and the Welsh Liberal Democrats continue to campaign for East-West Rail to be reclassified as an 'England only' scheme and for a fair funding settlement that reflects actual geographic delivery. They are also pressing for urgent investment in rural rail services, particularly the Heart of Wales Line, which connects Swansea to Shrewsbury via mid Wales.
South Wales Argus
2 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Severn Bridge: Welsh Conservatives concern over 'bottleneck'
National Highways recently announced that from May 27, heavy goods vehicles (HGVs) would only be permitted to use the bridge only if they weigh 7.5 tonnes or less. The weight restriction, expected to remain in place for 12 to 18 months, follows safety inspections revealing deterioration in the bridge's main cables. HGVs exceeding the weight limit will be redirected to the M4 Prince of Wales Bridge. This decision has sparked concern among Welsh Conservatives, who fear a detrimental effect on the economy. They are worried about the economic and logistical consequences for businesses, commuters, and local communities across Wales. Sam Rowlands, Welsh Conservative Shadow Cabinet Secretary for Transport and Infrastructure, said: "The Welsh economy is heavily reliant on the two Severn bridges, and this decision will undoubtedly have a negative impact on the Welsh economy. "Businesses, hauliers, and commuters will all bear the brunt of increased congestion, particularly on the Prince of Wales Bridge, which is already struggling due to ongoing roadworks." Mr Rowlands also criticised the Welsh Labour Government for scrapping the M4 relief road, suggesting that this decision has left motorists and businesses without "a crucial solution to manage growing traffic demands." The weight restrictions and subsequent redirection of traffic are expected to cause significant traffic issues, as drivers are forced to find alternative routes or face queues on the M4. These issues are predicted to cause knock-on effects for Newport's Brynglas pinch point and older roads through villages like Magor and Undy. The restrictions are deemed a major setback for all road users and will raise traffic concerns from Chepstow through to Newport and beyond. Hauliers are expected to use both the Prince of Wales Bridge and long detours around Gloucester, when the M4 at Newport becomes a major problem. However, Cabinet Secretary for Transport and North Wales, Ken Skates, has reassured the public that efforts are being made to reduce the impact of the restrictions. He said: "We will be working closely with National Highways and are determined to minimise travel disruption to the public and businesses whilst the weight limit is in place." The Welsh Conservatives' comments highlight the ongoing struggle to balance infrastructure safety with the need for efficient traffic flow and economic stability. The impact of these restrictions will likely be felt keenly by businesses and commuters in the region over the coming months.
Wales Online
8 hours ago
- Wales Online
Welsh Government's £36m reserves announcement slammed 'You really couldn't make it up'
Welsh Government's £36m reserves announcement slammed 'You really couldn't make it up' Wales Online readers have been discussing the recent announcement by the Welsh Government concerning their plans for £36 million in reserves Wales' finance minister Mr Drakeford was speaking in the Senedd's finance committee (Image: Senedd TV ) Wales Online readers have been voicing their opinions on the recent revelation from the Welsh Government regarding the allocation of £36 million from reserves. The Welsh Government has announced it will utilise £36m from its reserves to address a shortfall resulting from a tax alteration by the UK Government. The change by the UK Labour government has seen an increase in the contribution employers must make towards National Insurance. Previously, businesses were charged a 13.8% rate on employees' earnings over £9,100 annually, but this has risen to 15% on wages above £5,000. Concurrently, the employment allowance – the sum employers can deduct from their NI bill – has gone up from £5,000 to £10,500. While the UK Government anticipates these adjustments will generate £25bn a year, there's been considerable anxiety among charities and businesses about meeting the additional costs. One reader, Alex Peters writes: "If they were really concerned, they wouldn't be wasting millions increasing the size of the Welsh Assembly." Tannerbanc says: "So the public sector is ok to carry on, e.g. expanding the Senedd, no need to review what are the 'essential services' and the private sector can get down to work harder to pay for it, from a man who has only lived in the public sector." Article continues below Morpick comments: "Perhaps the UK Government is getting tired of funding this circus that wastes enormous sums on its madcap ideas." StevenBoyd replies: "Now now, there's nothing 'madcap' about throwing hundreds of millions down the gaping airport hole. It goes to show just how bad Drakeford is at his job. That sum of money could be found by a decent manager tomorrow. Stop funding the Airport, stop any more Welsh language initiatives, like the next round that he himself announced last week, and cancel the WAG expansion." Ykr believes: "He seems to be very calm about all of this, just imagine what he would be like if it was a Tory government in power at Westminster." Middleclasssocialist writes: "As we were promised, the new Labour Government, under Sir Kier, has been far easier to deal with than that Tory Government it replaced and that new "partnership" has helped Wales prosper and thrive. Unlike the Tories, the new Labour Government pick up the phone and listen attentively to what their comrades in Wales think. You can't put a cost on that sort of partnership. £36 million is a drop in the ocean. "As an example, that's only double the cost of what the badly needed, vital, 36 new Senedd Members will cost per year. Also, Caerphilly Council alone, apparently, spent £2.6 million keeping it's libraries open last year. Across Wales, simply closing all of them would cover this £36million easily." Abetterchoice4wales thinks: "When you have built a society dependent upon the state and benefits is it any wonder Wales is the biggest failing economy in Britain." Dyffrynteg says: "With money so hard to come by, possibly the millions wasted on unwanted 20 mph road signs and the millions which will be wasted year after year on an expanded Welsh assembly wasn't such a good idea after all?" Chalky Snr writes: "Quote yet again 'I will provide £36 million' Who the hell does he think he is? The fellow failed NHS Wales cabinet minister who put him there rather than out to pasture is unfortunately for us as much out of her depth as the last two so called first ministers were. Surely Wales deserves better." Lustyboy adds: "You really couldn't make it up. After years of being told that the tories were totally to blame for all of Wales' problems and that Labour in Westminster and Cardiff would provide the platform for a bright future (despite 25 years of devolution administered by labour) What do we find? A Labour government treating with total contempt the Welsh Labour administration. Unbelievable." Grumpygramps says: "Did I miss the point where he also wants the UK tax payer to cough up for the NI increases the Welsh private sector are going to have find? No, thought not." Inreality feels: "Ummm, maybe spending all the UK money on extra senedd expansion was a bad idea!" Styo asks: "Why not look at where we can reduce non-essential 'vanity' expenditure? basically if it isn't curing cancer, emptying bins, building roads, teaching kids or locking crims up, it is being wasted." Article continues below Simoncorkswill believes: "So in fact the Conservatives were obviously giving a great deal of money to Wales, but in an attempt to make them seem as if they were doing the opposite the Labour Welsh government squirrelled away the funds that could have been spent to aid the Welsh people, why is this not a surprise?" Do you think that the Senedd are in the right by helping to pay off some of the funding shortfall? Comment below or HERE to join in the conversation.
