US researchers seek to legitimise AI mental health care
Paris: Researchers at
Dartmouth College
believe artificial intelligence can deliver reliable psychotherapy, distinguishing their work from the unproven and sometimes dubious
mental health apps
flooding today's market.
Their application,
Therabot
, addresses the critical shortage of mental health professionals.
According to Nick Jacobson, an assistant professor of data science and psychiatry at Dartmouth, even multiplying the current number of therapists tenfold would leave too few to meet demand.
"We need something different to meet this large need," Jacobson told AFP.
The Dartmouth team recently published a clinical study demonstrating Therabot's effectiveness in helping people with anxiety, depression and eating disorders.
A new trial is planned to compare Therabot's results with conventional therapies.
The medical establishment appears receptive to such innovation.
Vaile Wright, senior director of health care innovation at the American Psychological Association (APA), described "a future where you will have an AI-generated chatbot rooted in science that is co-created by experts and developed for the purpose of addressing mental health."
Wright noted these applications "have a lot of promise, particularly if they are done responsibly and ethically," though she expressed concerns about potential harm to younger users.
Jacobson's team has so far dedicated close to six years to developing Therabot, with safety and effectiveness as primary goals.
Michael Heinz, psychiatrist and project co-leader, believes rushing for profit would compromise safety.
The Dartmouth team is prioritizing understanding how their
digital therapist
works and establishing trust.
They are also contemplating the creation of a nonprofit entity linked to Therabot to make digital therapy accessible to those who cannot afford conventional in-person help.
Care or cash?
With the cautious approach of its developers, Therabot could potentially be a standout in a marketplace of untested apps that claim to address loneliness, sadness and other issues.
According to Wright, many apps appear designed more to capture attention and generate revenue than improve mental health.
Such models keep people engaged by telling them what they want to hear, but young users often lack the savvy to realize they are being manipulated.
Darlene King, chair of the American Psychiatric Association's committee on mental health technology, acknowledged AI's potential for addressing mental health challenges but emphasizes the need for more information before determining true benefits and risks.
"There are still a lot of questions," King noted.
To minimize unexpected outcomes, the Therabot team went beyond mining therapy transcripts and training videos to fuel its AI app by manually creating simulated patient-caregiver conversations.
While the US Food and Drug Administration theoretically is responsible for regulating online mental health treatment, it does not certify medical devices or AI apps.
Instead, "the FDA may authorize their marketing after reviewing the appropriate pre-market submission," according to an agency spokesperson.
The FDA acknowledged that "digital mental health therapies have the potential to improve patient access to behavioral therapies."
Therapist always in
Herbert Bay, CEO of Earkick, defends his startup's AI therapist Panda as "super safe."
Bay says Earkick is conducting a clinical study of its digital therapist, which detects emotional crisis signs or suicidal ideation and sends help alerts.
"What happened with Character.AI couldn't happen with us," said Bay, referring to a Florida case in which a mother claims a chatbot relationship contributed to her 14-year-old son's death by suicide.
AI, for now, is suited more for day-to-day mental health support than life-shaking breakdowns, according to Bay.
"Calling your therapist at two in the morning is just not possible," but a therapy chatbot remains always available, Bay noted.
One user named Darren, who declined to provide his last name, found ChatGPT helpful in managing his traumatic stress disorder, despite the OpenAI assistant not being designed specifically for mental health.
"I feel like it's working for me," he said.
"I would recommend it to people who suffer from anxiety and are in distress."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
6 hours ago
- Economic Times
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang finally nails it, warns that every job will be affected by AI — and soon
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang warns that AI is already reshaping the job market and every job will be affected immediately. Instead of fearing AI, he urges workers to embrace it, saying those who use AI will keep their jobs. While some tech leaders predict massive job losses, Huang believes AI could bring 30 to 40 million people back to work by boosting productivity. The key to survival is learning and using AI tools. This story highlights the urgent need for workers to adapt or risk being left behind in an AI-driven future. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang warns AI will affect every job immediately. He urges workers to embrace AI or risk unemployment. The debate continues as some predict job loss, while others believe AI will create millions of new jobs worldwide. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads 'Every job will be affected, and immediately. It is unquestionable,' said Huang. 'You're not going to lose your job to an AI, but you're going to lose your job to someone who uses AI.' Is AI replacing workers or helping them get back to work? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Are tech leaders divided over AI and job loss? 'Cancer is cured, the economy grows at 10% a year, the budget is balanced—and 20% of people don't have jobs,' Amodei told Axios. What kind of jobs are being hit first by AI? Are any leaders pushing back on AI doomsday predictions? 'Someone needs to remind the CEO that at one point there were more than 2 million secretaries,' Cuban said. 'There were also separate employees to do in-office dictation.' Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads So what should workers do to stay ahead of AI? Is AI a threat or a tool? 'Don't be that person who ignores this technology.' FAQs: The conversation around AI and jobs just got real. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang didn't sugarcoat things at this year's Milken Institute Global Conference. He says AI is reshaping the job market immediately, not in the distant future—and if you're not using it, you could be left the 62-year-old billionaire at the helm of Nvidia, says we shouldn't just fear AI—we should learn how to use it. According to him, AI could bring 30 to 40 million people back into the workforce, helping to close the talent gap that's been growing argues that AI tools like generative models will boost productivity, fuel global GDP, and open up new roles across industries. In his words, 'I would recommend 100% of everybody take advantage of AI. Don't be that person who ignores this technology and as a result, loses your job.'The bottom line? It's not AI that replaces you—it's a person using AI smarter and faster than and the divide is growing. While Nvidia's Jensen Huang sees opportunity, others aren't so optimistic. Dario Amodei, CEO of AI startup Anthropic, gave a starkly different view this warned that up to 50% of all entry-level white-collar jobs could vanish in the next five years. That could push unemployment to new highs—even if the economy added that not enough people are aware of how fast these changes are coming. And this warning didn't come out of nowhere—Anthropic just released some of the most powerful AI models to date, including what they call 'the world's best coding model.'While AI is reshaping all industries, some are feeling the pressure faster than others. Software engineering is one of them. Many developers are already seeing automated coding tools replace tasks they used to handle interviewed a former software engineer who's applied to 800 jobs without landing a new role. He called it an 'existential crisis' for the tech field—a space once known for job tools can now generate complex code, analyze bugs, and build entire applications. For companies, it means faster development with fewer people. But for workers, it's a major some voices in tech are offering a more balanced view. Billionaire Mark Cuban took to Bluesky to remind everyone that new tech always changes the job compared the current AI wave to past disruptions. Cuban believes AI will create new industries and new roles, just like past innovations did.'New companies with new jobs will come from AI and increase total employment,' he message from leaders like Huang is clear: learn AI, use AI, or risk being left behind. While some jobs may disappear, many others will evolve. Workers who can adapt—especially by mastering AI tools—will be the ones in isn't just about tech jobs. From marketing to finance, healthcare to education, AI is already impacting workflows. Upskilling is the key. Online platforms now offer courses in prompt engineering, data analysis, AI-assisted design, and 40 million jobs are coming back because of AI—as Huang believes—being ready could mean the difference between opportunity and no denying that AI is changing the job market. But how you respond to that change matters more than ever. Whether you're in tech, sales, creative work, or admin support—AI is now part of the work Huang's advice might just be the most practical takeaway from this entire debate:Because the future of work? It's already here. And AI is a big part of it.A1: Yes, Jensen Huang says every job will be affected immediately, but workers who use AI will stay employed.A2: Nvidia's CEO believes AI can create millions of jobs by improving productivity, while some others warn about job losses.
Scroll.in
7 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Aristotle would scoff at Mark Zuckerberg's suggestion that AI can solve the loneliness epidemic
Mark Zuckerberg recently suggested that AI chatbots could combat social isolation by serving as 'friends' for people experiencing loneliness. He cited statistics that the average American has fewer than three friends but yearns for as many as 15. He was close: According to a 2021 report from the Survey Center on American Life, about half of Americans have fewer than four close friends. Zuckerberg then posited that AI could help bridge this gap by providing constant, personalized interactions. 'I would guess that over time we will find the vocabulary as a society to be able to articulate why that is valuable,' he added. Zuckerberg explaining how Meta is creating personalized AI friends to supplement your real ones: 'The average American has 3 friends, but has demand for 15.' — Roman Helmet Guy (@romanhelmetguy) April 30, 2025 Loneliness and social disconnection are serious problems. But can AI really be a solution? Might relying on AI for emotional support create a false sense of connection and possibly exacerbate feelings of isolation? And while AI can simulate certain aspects of companionship, doesn't it lack the depth, empathy and mutual understanding inherent to human friendship? Researchers have started exploring these questions. But as a moral philosopher, I think it's worth turning to a different source: the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle. Though it might seem odd to consult someone who lived over 2,000 years ago on questions of modern technology, Aristotle offers enduring insights about friendships – and which ones are particularly valuable. More important than spouses, kids or money In his philosophical text Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle maintained that true friendship is essential for 'eudaimonia,' a Greek word that is typically translated as 'flourishing' or 'well-being.' For Aristotle, friends are not just nice to have – they're a central component of ethical living and essential for human happiness and fulfillment. 'Without friends, no one would choose to live,' he writes, 'though he had all other goods.' A solitary existence, even one of contemplation and intellectual achievement, is less complete than a life with friends. Friendship contributes to happiness by providing emotional support and solidarity. It is through friendship that individuals can cultivate their virtues, feel a sense of security and share their accomplishments. Empirical evidence seems to support the connection between friendship and eudaimonia. A 2023 Pew Center research report found that 61 per cent of adults in the US say having close friends is essential to living a fulfilling life – a higher proportion than those who cited marriage, children or money. A British study of 6,500 adults found that those who had regular interactions with a wide circle of friends were more likely to have better mental health and be happier. And a meta-analysis of nearly 150 studies found that a lack of close friends can increase the risk of death as much as smoking, drinking or obesity. Different friends for different needs But the benefit of friendship that Aristotle focuses on the most is the role that it plays in the development of virtue. The first tier is what he calls 'friendships of utility,' or a friendship that is based on mutual benefit. Each party is primarily concerned with what they can gain from the other. These might be colleagues at work or neighbours who look after each other's pets when one of them is on vacation. The problem with these friendships is that they are often fleeting and dissolve once one person stops benefiting from the relationship. The second is 'friendships of pleasure,' which are friendships based on shared interests. These friendships can also be transient, depending on how long the shared interests last. Passionate love affairs, people belonging to the same book club and fishing buddies all fall into this category. This type of friendship is important, since you tend to enjoy your passions more when you can share them with another person. But this is still not the highest form of friendship. According to Aristotle, the third and strongest form of friendship is a 'virtuous friendship.' This is based on mutual respect for each other's virtues and character. Two people with this form of friendship value each other for who they truly are and share a deep commitment to the well-being and moral development of one another. These friendships are stable and enduring. In a virtuous friendship, each individual helps the other become better versions of themselves through encouragement, moral guidance and support. As Aristotle writes: 'Perfect friendship is the friendship of men who are good and alike in virtue. … Now those who wish well to their friends for their sake are most truly friends; for they do this by reason of their own nature and not incidentally; therefore their friendship lasts as long as they are good – and goodness is an enduring thing.' In other words, friendships rooted in virtue not only bring happiness and fulfilment but also facilitate personal growth and moral development. And it happens naturally within the context of the relationship. According to Aristotle, a virtuous friend provides a mirror in which one can reflect upon their own actions, thoughts and decisions. When one friend demonstrates honesty, generosity or compassion, the other can learn from these actions and be inspired to cultivate these virtues in themselves. No nourishment for the soul So, what does this mean for AI friends? By Aristotle's standards, AI chatbots – however sophisticated – cannot be true friends. They may be able to provide information that helps you at work, or engage in lighthearted conversation about your various interests. But they fundamentally lack qualities that define a virtuous friendship. AI is incapable of mutual concern or genuine reciprocity. While it can be programmed to simulate empathy or encouragement, it does not truly care about the individual – nor does it ask anything of its human users. Moreover, AI cannot engage in the shared pursuit of the good life. Aristotle's notion of friendship involves a shared journey on the path to eudaimonia, during which each person helps another live wisely and well. This requires the kind of moral development that only human beings, who face real ethical challenges and make real decisions, can undergo. I think it is best to think of AI as a tool. Just like having a good shovel or rake can improve your quality of life, having the rake and the shovel do not mean you no longer need any friends – nor do they replace the friends whose shovels and rakes you used to borrow. While AI may offer companionship in a limited and functional sense, it cannot meet the Aristotelian criteria for virtuous friendship. It may fill a temporary social void, but it cannot nourish the soul. If anything, the rise of AI companions should serve as a reminder of the urgent need to foster real friendships in an increasingly disconnected world.
Time of India
11 hours ago
- Time of India
How social media can 'trigger' eating disorders in young people
Social media can push vulnerable young people towards developing eating disorders by glorifying thinness and promoting fake, dangerous advice about diet and nutrition, experts warn. Young women and girls are much more likely to suffer from illnesses such as anorexia, bulimia and binge eating disorder, though rates among men have been increasing. Research has shown the percentage of people worldwide who have had some kind of eating disorder during their lives rose from 3.5% in 2000 to 7.8% in 2018, a timeframe that captures the rise of social media. For the professionals trying to help teenagers recover from these disorders, misinformation from influencers on platforms such as TikTok and Instagram is a huge problem. "We no longer treat an eating disorder without also addressing social media use," French dietitian and nutritionist Carole Copti told AFP. "It has become a trigger, definitely an accelerator and an obstacle to recovery," she added. The causes of eating disorders are complex, with psychological, genetic, environmental and social factors all having the potential to make someone more susceptible. Social media "is not the cause but the straw that may break the camel's back," said Nathalie Godart, a psychiatrist for children and adolescents at the Student Health Foundation of France. By promoting thinness, strictly controlled diets and relentless exercise, social media weakens already vulnerable people and "amplifies the threat" to their health, she told AFP. 'Vicious cycle' Just one recent example is the #skinnytok trend, a hashtag on TikTok full of dangerous and guilt-inducing advice encouraging people to drastically reduce how much food they eat. For Charlyne Buigues, a French nurse specialising in eating disorders, social media serves as a gateway to these problems, which are "normalised" online. She condemned videos showing young girls with anorexia exposing their malnourished bodies -- or others with bulimia demonstrating their "purges". "Taking laxatives or vomiting are presented as a perfectly legitimate way to lose weight, when actually they increase the risk of cardiac arrest," Buigues said. Eating disorders can damage the heart, cause infertility and other health problems, and have been linked to suicidal behaviour. Anorexia has the highest rate of death of any psychiatric disease, research has found. Eating disorders are also the second leading cause of premature death among 15- to 24-year-olds in France, according to the country's health insurance agency. Social media creates a "vicious cycle," Copti said. "People suffering from eating disorders often have low self-esteem. But by exposing their thinness from having anorexia on social media, they gain followers, views, likes... and this will perpetuate their problems and prolong their denial," she added. This can especially be the case when the content earns money. Buigues spoke of a young woman who regularly records herself throwing up live on TikTok and who had "explained that she was paid by the platform and uses that money to buy groceries". 'Completely indoctrinated' Social media also makes recovering from eating disorders "more difficult, more complicated and take longer", Copti said. This is partly because young people tend to believe the misleading or fake diet advice that proliferates online. Copti said consultations with her patients can feel like she is facing a trial. "I have to constantly justify myself and fight to make them understand that no, it is not possible to have a healthy diet eating only 1,000 calories -- that is half what they need -- or that no, it is not normal to skip meals," she said. "The patients are completely indoctrinated -- and my 45-minute weekly consultation is no match for spending hours every day on TikTok," she added. Godart warned about the rise of people posing as "pseudo-coaches", sharing incorrect, "absurd" and potentially illegal nutrition advice. "These influencers carry far more weight than institutions. We're constantly struggling to get simple messages across about nutrition," she said, pointing out that there are lifelines available for those in need. Buigues takes it upon herself to regularly report problematic content on Instagram, but said it "serves no purpose". "The content remains online and the accounts are rarely suspended -- it's very tiring," she said. The nurse has even advised her patients to delete their social media accounts, particularly TikTok. "It may seem radical but until young people are better informed, the app is too dangerous," she said.
