logo
NYC City Council accused of fear-mongering in bombshell lawsuit against ICE on Rikers Island

NYC City Council accused of fear-mongering in bombshell lawsuit against ICE on Rikers Island

Yahoo26-04-2025

The New York City Council was accused of fear-mongering in their fight to stop ICE on Rikers Island, an attorney for the Mayors' office said in court Friday.
The Adams' administration's attorney, James Catterson, made the argument to Judge Mary Rosado in response to the lawsuit and Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) placed on Adams' office to bar them from working with the Feds on the intended jail office.
'All of this is nothing but speculation,' Catterson said of the council's arguments — which hinged on distrust of the Trump administration's relationship with Mayor Eric Adams.
Rosado voted to extend the restraining order — which prevents Hizzoner's officials from working with ICE on the office in any capacity — until the next preliminary hearing scheduled for May 29.
Attorney for the City Council, Daniel Kornstein, contended that the push for ICE on the embattled prison island was a result of a 'Corrupt bargain' between Adams' officials and the U.S. Attorney's office.
'(The Trump Administration will) twist this process into something that isn't written down,' Kornstein said.
'And we know from the last several months that the (Adams') administration has been lawless in responding to court orders from the highest court in the land,' he asserted.
The City Council filed the restraining order against the administration after the Mayor's office signed an executive order permitting ICE to reopen its office on Rikers earlier this month.
The order was put forth by First Deputy Mayor Randy Mastro — as Mayor Adams recused himself from the legislation in an attempt to avoid conflict — which the council contested, didn't cut it.
'Delegation doesn't cure it because the mayor did not recuse himself,' Kornstein said, 'he did not resign.'
Mastro said Adams' team was 'dissapointed' in the ruling to extend the TRO at a press conference following the hearing.
'It's preventing the city from protecting itself against violent transnational criminal gangs that have been declared terrorist organizations,' The First Deputy Mayor argued.
ICE previously held offices at the prison site until 2014, when then-mayor Bill De Blasio enacted sanctuary city laws that called for the agency's removal.
Mayor Adams began voicing his support for its reopening shortly after Donald Trump's border czar Tom Homan threatened the NYC mayor that he would be 'up his but' if he didn't work with the Trump team on immigration.
Though the order maintains ICE will only get involved in criminal investigations if allowed onto RIkers, the council has pressed on if there will be consequences if the agency acts on civil cases.
Mastro said the administration is working on a template internally that he thinks will address those issues.
Following the Hearing, City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams spoke to supporters of the TRO and members of the media saying:
'This represents an important step by the court to protect public safety in our city and keep all New Yorkers safe. It validates our efforts to defend New York City from being made even more vulnerable to the Trump administration's extreme agenda of unconstitutional activities by blocking the mayor from enabling these attacks on the safety and rights of the people he is supposed to represent,' she told supporters.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk's X Posts About Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein Disappear
Elon Musk's X Posts About Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein Disappear

Newsweek

time21 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Elon Musk's X Posts About Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein Disappear

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Billionaire Elon Musk has seemingly removed posts on X, formerly Twitter, that he wrote in which he claimed that President Donald Trump was named in the much-discussed files of Jeffrey Epstein, a move that significantly escalated a feud between the two former allies. Newsweek reached out to X and the White House for comment by email outside of normal business hours on Saturday. Why It Matters Musk gave over $200 million to Trump's presidential campaign and called himself his "first buddy." Musk and Trump initiated a war of words this week after the tech mogul started attacking the House-approved spending bill, which the president has nicknamed the "One Big Beautiful Bill," that will help him launch a wider effort to implement some of his broader economic and social reforms. Musk, who spent four months rooting around the federal government with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to cut "waste, fraud, and abuse," criticized the bill as a "disgusting abomination" and that it was full of "pork," a reference to abundant discretionary spending in a bill, known as "pork barrel spending." Trump hit back on his own social media platform Truth Social by saying he had asked Musk to leave government because he was "wearing thin," to which Musk responded on X by writing that "Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public," followed later by a post saying, "Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out." While it is known that Trump and Epstein were acquainted and photographed together in the early 2000s, Trump has long denied any involvement in Epstein's criminal conduct. This combination of pictures created on June 5 shows President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House, in Washington, D.C., on May 5 and Elon Musk in the Oval Office of the... This combination of pictures created on June 5 shows President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House, in Washington, D.C., on May 5 and Elon Musk in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., on May 30. More Alex Wroblewski, Allison Robbert/AFP via Getty Images What To Know Musk had posted multiple times on Thursday about Trump being included in the Epstein files, an accusation that was previously leveled against the president and cleared in court along with the likes of former President Bill Clinton. However, as of Saturday morning, those original posts have disappeared from Musk's timeline, although it remains unclear if he deleted them himself or if X removed the posts due to some potential community rules violation. However, two additional reposts about Trump and Epstein remain up on Musk's timeline as of noon on Saturday: One by user @bjornpagen that showed two men locked in a firm grip, one labeled "Elon does ketamine" and the other "Trump on Epstein's list," to which Musk replied with a laughing emoji and a "bullseye" emoji; and another post by user @AGHamilton29 that discussed the "well established" connection between Trump and Epstein, to which Musk replied with an eyebrow-raised emoji. Reposts by Elon Musk on X that are related to his accusation that President Donald Trump is named in the Epstein files. Reposts by Elon Musk on X that are related to his accusation that President Donald Trump is named in the Epstein files. Elon Musk X acocunt Trump on Friday responded to Musk's accusation by posting on Truth Social a message from Epstein's former lawyer David Schoen from X, which claimed his client "had no information to hurt President Trump." "I was hired to lead Jeffrey Epstein's defense as his criminal lawyer 9 days before he died. He sought my advice for months before that. I can say authoritatively, unequivocally, and definitively that he had no information to hurt President Trump. I specifically asked him!" Schoen, who briefly represented Epstein shortly before the financier's death in 2019, wrote. Thousands of pages of records that named people with ties to Epstein, who died while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges in 2019, have been released over the years. However, there is no evidence to suggest Trump is mentioned in any unreleased files related to Epstein. And while the president is mentioned in some of the previously released court documents on Epstein, he has not been accused of any wrongdoing. During his 2024 presidential campaign, Trump had suggested he would release files related to Epstein, with a first batch of those files released in February by U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi. Those files offered no major revelations about the sex trafficking case that has proven so popular among conspiracy theorists. However, FBI Director Kash Patel told Fox News chief political anchor Bret Baier that the agency is "diligently working" on a review of all materials before releasing them to the public. "It takes time to go through years of investigations, years of political maneuvering, and years of coverup to get the American people what they deserve, and that's what I'm gonna give them, on everything," Patel said. What Happened to Epstein? Epstein took his own life at the age of 66 in a jail cell at New York City's Metropolitan Correctional Center in August 2019, before he could stand trial in Manhattan on sex-trafficking charges where he was accused of preying on underage girls as young as 14. Authorities determined he hanged himself. He always denied any wrongdoing. At the time, Epstein was already a convicted sex offender after being found guilty by a Florida state court in 2008 of one count of soliciting prostitution and one count of soliciting prostitution from a minor. What People Are Saying President Donald Trump on Friday wrote on Truth Social: "I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It's a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn't pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that. I didn't create this mess, I'm just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" Far-right political activist Laura Loomer wrote on X on Saturday: "[JD Vance] was on [Theo Von] when [Elon Musk] went nuclear on President Trump. He was asked during the interview what he thought about Elon accusing President Trump of being in the Epstein files. Talk about awkward. Donald Trump is not in the Epstein Files. Do you really think Elon would have allowed his own small child to be around President Trump and travel with him if President Trump was in the Epstein files? Let's all think logically here. President Trump was great to Elon and he was great to Elon's children. President Trump is an amazing man and deep down Elon knows that too." Elon Musk wrote on X in reply to another post by Loomer on Thursday: "Oh and some food for thought as they ponder this question: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years ..." What Happens Next? The aftermath of the very public fight between the two former allies continues to tease further escalations, with Trump threatening to review Musk's government contracts and warning of further consequences if Musk starts to fund Democrats in elections.

Judge: Trump administration can dismantle Institute of Museum and Library Services
Judge: Trump administration can dismantle Institute of Museum and Library Services

Los Angeles Times

time37 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Judge: Trump administration can dismantle Institute of Museum and Library Services

WASHINGTON — A federal judge on Friday denied a request by the American Library Assn. to halt the Trump administration's further dismantling of an agency that funds and promotes libraries across the country, saying that recent court decisions suggested his court lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon had previously agreed to temporarily block the Republican administration, saying that plaintiffs were likely to show that Trump doesn't have the legal authority to unilaterally shutter the Institute of Museum and Library Services, which was created by Congress. But in Friday's ruling, Leon wrote that as much as the 'Court laments the Executive Branch's efforts to cut off this lifeline for libraries and museums,' recent court decisions suggested that the case should be heard in a separate court dedicated to contractual claims. He cited the Supreme Court's decision allowing the administration to cut hundreds of millions of dollars in teacher-training money despite a lower court order barring the cuts, saying that cases seeking reinstatement of federal grants should be heard in the Court of Federal Claims. The American Library Assn. and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees filed a lawsuit to stop the administration from gutting the institute after President Trump signed a March 14 executive order that refers to it and several other federal agencies as 'unnecessary.' The agency's appointed acting director then placed many staff members on administrative leave, sent termination notices to most of them, began canceling grants and contracts and fired all members of the National Museum and Library Services Board. The institute has roughly 75 employees and issued more than $266 million in grants last year. However, a Rhode Island judge's order prohibiting the government from shutting down the institute in a separate case brought by several states remains in place. The administration is appealing that order as well.

Trump says Elon Musk will face ‘very serious consequences' if he funds Dems in future elections
Trump says Elon Musk will face ‘very serious consequences' if he funds Dems in future elections

New York Post

time37 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump says Elon Musk will face ‘very serious consequences' if he funds Dems in future elections

WASHINGTON — President Trump warned Saturday that his former ally Elon Musk will face 'very serious consequences' if he starts bankrolling Democratic candidates for office after their nasty public split over a Republican spending bill working its way through Congress. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Trump told NBC News' Kristin Welker in an interview. 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that,' the president added. Advertisement 3 Musk and Trump have been feuding after the Tesla CEO spoke out on the president's 'big beautiful' bill. AP 'Is there anything else you just want people to know about the status,' Welker asked. 'No, not at all. We're doing great,' Trump replied. 'The bill is great. It looks like we're going to get it passed. Looks strongly like we're going to get it passed.' Advertisement 3 Musk was part of cabinet meetings during the first few months of Trump's second term. Molly Riley/White House / SWNS Musk knocked Trump during a multi-day X tirade over the debt increases contained in the 'big beautiful bill' earlier this week and said without his hundreds of millions of dollars in contributions, the president would never have been re-elected in 2024. Here is the latest on Donald Trump and Elon Musk's feud He also claimed credit for delivering the GOP a 53-47 majority in the Senate — and holding onto its majority in the House. Advertisement 3 Trump has hit back at Musk's comments in the ongoing feud. The Tesla and SpaceX billionaire contributed more than a quarter of a billion dollars to Republican candidates in the 2024 cycle, federal campaign filings show.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store