Ukraine's 'Spider's Web' drone strike burns over 40 Russian warplanes, Moscow calls it 'terrorist attack'
The brazen Ukrainian blitz of Russian warplanes Sunday was 18 months in the making and the Pentagon was kept in the dark until it was over, sources told Fox News.
"Operation Spider's Web," a series of coordinated drone strikes penetrating deep into Russian territory, is believed to have taken out dozens of Russia's most powerful bomber jets and surveillance planes as they sat idle on five military airfields.
The stunning operation was personally overseen by President Volodymyr Zelensky, Ukraine's security service (SBU) said.
Ukraine used small FPV drones hidden inside wooden cabins mounted on trucks. When the trucks reached their targets, the roofs opened by remote control, and the drones launched.
Videos on social media showed drones lifting off from parked trucks and striking large aircraft on the runways.
Ukraine Destroys Dozens Of Russian Warplanes With Drone Attack Deep Inside Russia
Read On The Fox News App
In a statement on X, Zelenskyy called the operation "an absolutely brilliant result" and said it was "achieved solely by Ukraine."
He said the mission took "one year, six months, and nine days from the start of planning to effective execution" and described it as "our most long-range operation." He added that "our people involved in preparing the operation were withdrawn from Russian territory in time" and thanked General Vasyl Maliuk, head of the SBU, for the success. Zelensky said some details could not be disclosed yet but declared: "These are Ukrainian actions that will undoubtedly be in history books… Ukraine is defending itself, and rightly so."
Russia's defense ministry confirmed that airfields in five regions were attacked: Murmansk, Irkutsk, Ivanovo, Ryazan and Amur.
Russia called the strike a "terrorist act" but said its forces repelled the attack. Still, the ministry admitted several aircraft caught fire. Russian officials said some suspects had been arrested.
Ukraine said 117 drones were used.The SBU claimed 34% of Russia's strategic bombers were hit and estimated the damage at $7 billion. BBC Monitoring reported that other Ukrainian experts gave a lower estimate of $2 billion. These numbers have not been confirmed.
The attack happened just before planned peace talks between Ukraine and Russia were set to begin Monday in Istanbul, which are backed by President Donald Trump, the BBC reported.Russia Launches Largest Aerial Attack Of Ukraine War, Killing At Least 12
Ukraine says it will push for a full ceasefire, the return of captured prisoners, and the return of children taken to Russia. Those terms have not been agreed to by Russia.
The White House confirmed to Fox News that the Trump administration was not informed about the attack in advance. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, who did not speak to Ukrainian officials immediately after the operation, was ultimately given a full briefing and subsequent updates, according to a senior defense official.The officials said the blitz was highly sophisticated, and that the Pentagon is unsure whether the quadcopter drones, which were prepositioned in Russia in cabins and then offloaded into trucks, were piloted or autonomous.U.S. officials were skeptical of reports that up to 50 Russian bombers were hit, and believed the number was likely between 11 and 15, the official said, who added it may have involved as many as five Russian airfields.
Military experts say the raid damaged Russia's ability to launch long-range missile attacks. The bombers hit included TU-95 and TU-22M3 aircraft, which have been used in past strikes on Ukraine.
Ukraine also claimed it damaged a Russian A-50 radar aircraft, used to direct Russian air power.Original article source: Ukraine's 'Spider's Web' drone strike burns over 40 Russian warplanes, Moscow calls it 'terrorist attack'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chinese-owned US farmland raises concerns of foreign drone attacks
(NewsNation) — Chinese-owned farmland located near key U.S. military installations may be making the country more vulnerable to a Ukraine-style drone attack, officials warn. There are currently nearly 370,000 acres of farmland the Chinese own. Several of those sites have been linked to the mysterious drone sightings that took place across the United States last fall. After Ukraine destroyed 40 Russian targets with 177 drones over the weekend, the attack has reopened questions about how vulnerable the United States is to such an attack given the farmland's proximity to military bases that could be targeted if the U.S. was to ever undergo a similar strike to what took place in Russia over the weekend. Russia severely limited after attack: Ex-Ukraine ambassador Those military installations stretch across the U.S. and include Grand Forks Air Force Base in North Dakota, where a Chinese company, Fufeng, purchased farmland close to the base and announced plans to open a corn mill. The U.S. Air Force called the sale a threat to national security, and the sale was shut down, NewsNation previously reported. However, NewsNation has learned that the company still owns the land, which extends over more than 300 acres, again raising concerns that the military base and others could be prone to a drone attack. Several states have laws in place that prevent the Chinese from purchasing land. However, the challenge of monitoring potential sales is that the Chinese often use shell companies to purchase the land or use American residents to shield officials from learning who owns the land. Over the last five years, Chinese ownership of U.S. land has increased by 55%. Almost three-quarters of that land is located in the southern United States. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Zelensky launched a string of daring raids against Russia. He's proving to Trump that Ukraine has the cards after all
First came dozens of armed drones launched from trucks traveling deep inside Russia, swarming over military airfields across the country and raining down nuclear-capable long-range bombers. Then, two days later, a massive underwater bomb targeted a key bridge linking occupied Crimea to the Russian mainland. The two daring raids by Ukrainian special forces have stunned the Kremlin, bolstered Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and sent shockwaves through defense departments around the world. But there has been an uncharacteristic silence from the White House, and its usually verbose inhabitants. Donald Trump, who during an infamous Oval Office showdown in February told Zelensky that he didn't 'have the cards' to keep up the fight against Russia, and JD Vance, who in the same meeting asked the Ukrainian president if he had 'said thank you, once' for Washington's support, have not said a word about one of the most significant setbacks to Russia's military in decades. John Bolton, Trump's former national security advisor, told The Independent he was 'surprised that there has been no public Trump comment, given his propensity to comment on almost anything.' When The Independent asked the White House if Zelensky might have had some cards up his sleeve that the president hadn't known about, press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that Trump 'remains positive at the progress" the two sides have made in U.S.-brokered peace talks that just ended in Istanbul, Turkey. 'But he also is a realist, and he realizes these are two countries that are at war and have been for a long time because of his predecessor's weakness and incompetence,' she added. Despite the U.S. role in brokering those talks, Ukraine did not inform the White House of the attacks in advance. The strikes took out many of the Russian bombers that have been firing barrages of missiles on Ukrainian cities over the past few weeks, but they also destroyed a number of its nuclear-capable strike force that might have threatened the United States. That led many to ask on social media, with just a hint of irony, if JD Vance had said thank you to the Ukrainian president. In any case, there was plenty for Vance and Trump to comment on. So why the silence? The operation, which has been dubbed 'Russia's Pearl Harbor,' may have brought home some uncomfortable truths for the president. Trump has repeatedly insisted that Ukraine is on an inevitable path to destruction, or at risk of starting World War III, if it does not agree to a U.S.-brokered surrender that would see Ukraine give up most of the land that Russia currently occupies. Ukraine's victories over the past few days have decisively undermined that notion, dealing a strategic and symbolic blow to Russia's military strength and striking deep into the country's interior. Trump has also spent an enormous amount of political capital trying to bring the war to an end, specifically by attempting to enforce terms on Ukraine that it couldn't possibly accept. Those peace talks have been accompanied by a heavy Russian bombing campaign against Ukrainian cities. Ukraine's willingness to fight on stands in the way of that aim, which has angered Trump and Vance. Michael Weiss, a Ukraine expert and editor of Insider, an investigative media outlet focused on Russia, said there really wasn't much Trump could say after the last few days. 'Yesterday, a Ukrainian intel officer messaged me asking the same question. Why is Trump so quiet? I told him, well — what's he going to say? The Ukrainians are starting World War III and making sure Russia won't be able to fight it half as well?' he told The Independent. 'More seriously, I suspect he knows his peace gambit is DOA. Now, even Mike Johnson is pro-sanctions. Pressure is building to penalise Moscow. If he walks away from it all, Ukraine has just shown it won't be helpless or incapacitated,' he added. The attack coming as a surprise to the White House is significant. It's clear Zelensky does not trust the U.S. with sensitive information on account of the abrupt pro-Russia spin Trump has put on American policy towards Kyiv since returning to power in January. Some members of the Trump administration are vehemently anti-Ukraine in part because they see Russia as a sympathetic nationalist-run power exerting itself in the face of NATO expansion and American-led hegemony. Many MAGA influencers were quick to attack Ukraine for the raids, fearing a Deep State plot to drag the U.S. deeper into the war. This anti-Ukraine view reaches as high as the office of the Vice President, who intervened to blow up an Oval Office meeting between Trump and Zelensky in February by casting the Ukrainian leader as ungrateful and disrespectful to his American patrons. While Democrats and some anti-Trump Republicans have long claimed there's a similar patron-client relationship between Trump and Putin dating back to Russia's efforts to interfere in the 2016 U.S. election on Trump's behalf, people close to Trump have suggested the matter is far less complex. The president, The Independent understands, sees Russia as a strong country and Putin as a strong leader — a 'winner,' in his own parlance. But the audacity and ingenuity of this weekend's Ukrainian attacks may have — for now — positively influenced his opinion of Zelensky. Put simply, it's because Ukraine's success makes Moscow look less like a winner and more like the thing Trump hates above all else: a loser. Indeed, Zelensky indicated that the strikes were intended as such. '[W]hen we do show our strength, we do it justly, striking military targets. We show it not only to the Russian aggressors, but also to those of our allies who were once strong supporters but have started to waver, Zelensky wrote on X on Monday. Weiss believes that the last few days might have demonstrated to Trump that Ukraine is not done fighting yet. 'So long as the U.S. sells arms directly or allows third-party transfers from the Europeans, Kyiv will be in okay shape,' he said. 'Air defense is critical, and this is why knocking out 20 per cent of Russia's cruise missile-firing aircraft was such a master stroke. Why hit arrows when you can kill the archer?'
New York Times
31 minutes ago
- New York Times
Wednesday Briefing: Staggering Casualties in Ukraine
Troop casualties in Ukraine near 1.4 million, a study found Nearly 1 million Russian troops have been killed or wounded in the war in Ukraine, according to a study released yesterday. Roughly 400,000 Ukrainian troops were also estimated to have been killed or wounded, bringing the total casualties of the three-year conflict to a staggering 1.4 million. The Center for Strategic and International Studies, a U.S.-based think tank that compiled the study, cautioned that casualty figures were difficult to estimate. But the tally still presents an accounting of the grinding conflict. Russia's territorial gains have been slower than even the bogged-down and costly Somme advance of British and French troops in World War I, the study said. Since January 2024, Russia has seized less than 1 percent of Ukrainian territory. On the battlefield: Kyiv said its troops struck the Crimean bridge yesterday for the third time. Over the weekend, remotely operated Ukrainian drones emerged from hiding inside Russia and began attacking airfields. These videos show what happened. The U.S. proposed new terms in nuclear talks with Iran President Trump's envoy to the Middle East crafted a potential nuclear arrangement with Iran that was handed over to Tehran last weekend. Under the terms of the proposal, Iran would continue to enrich uranium at low levels, suitable for nuclear power plants but not for bombs, while the U.S. and other countries work out a more detailed plan to eventually block Iran's path to a nuclear weapon. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
