
Care at risk in ‘swathes of Scotland', warns sector chief
Dr Macaskill's warning comes after the Prime Minister set out new immigration rules designed to drive down net migration — which stood at 728,000 in the year to mid-2024 — and overhaul the current visa system. The new ban on care visas was announced as part of new UK Government immigration curbs
As well as a ban on low-paid care worker recruitment from overseas, the new White Paper includes tougher English language requirements, a ten-year minimum stay for settlement, and higher qualification standards for skilled worker visas.
Sir Keir said the new system would end what he described as 'a squalid chapter' in British politics and the economy, while promising to 'take back control of our borders'.
'In a diverse nation like ours — and I celebrate that — these rules become even more important,' he said. 'Without them, we risk becoming an island of strangers, not a nation that walks forward together.'
He added: ''Take back control.' Everyone knows that slogan, and everyone knows what it meant on immigration — or at least that is what people thought.
'Because what followed from the previous government, starting with the people who used that slogan, was the complete opposite.
'Between 2019 and 2023, even as they were going round our country, telling people with a straight face that they would get immigration down, net migration quadrupled, until in 2023 it reached nearly one million.
'That is about the population of Birmingham, our second-largest city. That is not control. It is chaos.'
READ MORE
The Prime Minister said some of the millions of inactive adults in the UK would be supported back into work to help cover the staffing shortfalls.
'The current system does the opposite, and so we will support them into work with a £1 billion package, the right to try and measures like that — and that if you can work, you should work. And I do think that this White Paper should be seen in conjunction with what we are doing on welfare.'
Dr Macaskill said the sector had tried and failed repeatedly to hire local workers.
'When the United Kingdom Government, without consultation and engagement with the care sector — the organisations who employ tens of thousands of people who care — unilaterally decided we can no longer recruit from abroad, they did so with little appreciation of just how damaging their actions could be,' he said.
'There are parts of Scotland where the composition of the social care workforce is significantly made up of international colleagues,' he continued. 'Without the ability to attract and to retain international colleagues, it is no exaggeration to say that care would not be able to be delivered in whole swathes of our nation.'
'If that were to occur, this would mean that people would end up being supported miles from home or, worse still, having to be admitted to hospital because they could not be cared for by social care services.'
Dr Donald Macaskill called for a Scottish visaDr Macaskill said the changes showed that Scotland needed its own distinct approach to immigration.
'What any sensible and rational immigration policy requires is an assessment of need based upon specific sectors and geographies. That is why a visa arrangement that specifically addresses the needs of Scotland and its demographics, together with the national shortage of social care workers, is urgently needed.'
'If federal immigration models can work in Canada and Australia, then a devolved approach to migration can work for Scotland,' he added.
Responding to the Prime Minister's statement, First Minister John Swinney accused the Labour leader of being 'terrified' of Nigel Farage's Reform UK, following their success at English local elections.
He said: 'There will be a huge impact on employment in the National Health Service and on social care.
'We struggle in Scotland to have a large enough working-age population.
'The announcements today from the UK Government are going to make that even more difficult and there are going to be some significant opportunities lost for the Scottish economy by the implications of these announcements.'
READ MORE
Scottish Labour MP Joani Reid supported the new UK-wide policy, arguing that it would reduce exploitation and improve standards.
'Inward migration is a big part of our national story and will continue to be so in the future,' she said. 'Net migration numbers are going to fall, and that is good, but Britain will always offer a home to the brightest and best of people who want to come here.'
'The Immigration White Paper means we will have tougher rules, more rigorously enforced, on immigration,' she added. 'Importing low-paid, low-skilled workers, often with poor command of English, will be closed off to exploitative employers.'
Scottish Greens MSP Maggie Chapman accused the Government of 'scapegoating' migrant communities.
'It is a cynical, cruel and authoritarian response to Reform,' she said. 'It will only serve to damage public services while throwing migrant workers under the bus with racist, restrictive and totally self-defeating policies.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
MPs could vote to force government to build 150,000 social homes a year
A proposed change to the Planning and Infrastructure bill would demand a 150,000 target for building social homes this Parliament LIb Dem MPs will push for a vote to force the government to set a target on social homes. A proposed change to the Planning and Infrastructure bill would demand a 150,000 target for building social homes this Parliament. It comes amid reports Deputy PM Angela Rayner is locked in a struggle with the Treasury over the Housing budget ahead of this weeks spending review. Agreement has yet to be reached on funding for the Housing department, which is responsible for delivering Labour 's target of 1.5 million new homes - including a promised social housing 'revolution' - by the end of the Parliament. The Lib Dems amendment would also make it mandatory for new car parks to have solar panels on them. And it would create a pubic register of donations made to the Housing Secretary from developers whose projects they have commissioned, dating back ten years. Liberal Democrat Housing and Planning Spokesperson Gideon Amos MP said: "For too long, planning and infrastructure regulations have been in the slow lane, preventing economic growth that would help put money back into British families' pockets. 'If the Government is serious about kickstarting the economy, they need to be far more ambitious. This starts with finally setting a social housing target, and pushing ahead with the healthcare, GPs, transport and energy infrastructure that communities want to see come first where new housing is proposed.' The Party is also pushing for stricter protections for local wildlife and habitats, with requirements on ministers and Natural England to take steps to prevent and reduce adverse effects on the environment. One of their amendments would also ensure development corporations provide green spaces in all new developments.

The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Gaza Freedom Flotilla urges UK Government to 'protect' ship
Members of the humanitarian coalition are currently en route to Gaza on the Madleen ship, which is expected to arrive within the next 24 hours. The vessel flies a UK flag, meaning that it falls under the jurisdiction of the UK Government. There are 12 volunteers on the ship, including Swedish climate campaigner Greta Thunberg, as well as other volunteers from France, Turkey, the Netherlands, Spain, Brazil and Germany. READ MORE: UK won't recognise Palestine at UN conference despite 'discussions', reports say The ship set off from Sicily on June 1 and its live tracker shows that it has almost reached Gaza. In a statement shared in the early hours of Saturday, the group said: "The 'Madleen', a UK-flagged civilian ship en route to Gaza, is protected under international maritime law. "As a vessel flying the British flag, it falls under the jurisdiction and responsibility of the UK government, which has a legal duty to defend 'Madleen' and the civilians on board, and to prevent unlawful interference - including any threat or use of force - by foreign powers such as Israel." The coalition called on the UK Government to issue a public warning to Israel that any action against the Madleen is "unacceptable and unlawful" and to act to protect the rights and safety of those onboard the vessel. The group also urged the UK Government to "comply with its legal duties" to "prevent genocide" and to "[reject] the legitimacy of Israel's blockade and actively supporting efforts to deliver humanitarian aid and uphold international law". It comes after crew on the Madleen issued an alert after a drone was spotted flying over the vessel on June 3 as it was more than 1000km from Greek waters. The drone was later identified as a Helenic Coast Guard Heron surveillance drone, which the coalition said is used as part of a wider military and intelligence partnership between Greece, Cyprus and Israel. READ MORE: 'Joy, celebration and warmth' of Palestinian art to be showcased at Edinburgh Fringe Israeli news outlets are reporting that Israel is preparing to block the vessel from entering Gaza. According to the Times of Israel, the Israeli navy is monitoring the boat's route and plans to intercept the vessel if it continues to Gaza. The newspaper adds that the UK Government is monitoring the situation and that it has reportedly asked Israel to vouch for the safety of the Madleen and those on board. The Foreign Office has been contacted for comment.


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Government stalling in efforts to cut foreign aid spent on asylum seekers
The government is struggling to cut the amount of money from the foreign aid budget it spends on asylum seekers in the UK, new figures show. Home Office figures show the department expects to spend £2.2bn of overseas development assistance (ODA) this financial year, of which £2.1bn is expected to be spent on asylum support. The predictions for this year are only slightly less than the £2.4bn spent in 2024/25. Official development assistance (ODA) – which was slashed earlier this year to 0.3 per cent of GDP to pay for a boost to defence spending - is used to promote the economic development and welfare in developing countries around the world. A portion of this money is handed to the home office to support asylum seekers after they arrive in the UK, most of which goes towards their accommodation. But the government's failure to cut back on this spending has led aid organisations to accuse ministers of 'robbing Peter to pay Paul', claiming they are in danger of a 'reckless repeat of decisions taken by the previous Conservative government.' Figures published in March revealed that the number of asylum seekers housed in costly hotels has increased by more than 8,000 since the general election, with 38,079 migrants being housed in hotels at the end of December. It comes despite Sir Keir Starmer previously saying a Labour government wouldn't use the foreign aid budget to pay for asylum seekers' hotel costs – but admitted that the government would not be able to stop doing so immediately. 'I'm not going to pretend to you we can do that in the first 24 hours', he said in May 2024. Meanwhile, Labour's election manifesto vowed to 'end asylum hotels, saving the taxpayer billions of pounds'. Gideon Rabinowitz, director of policy at the Bond network of development organisations, warned that 'cutting the UK aid budget while using it to prop up Home Office costs is a reckless repeat of decisions taken by the previous Conservative government.' "Diverting £2.2bn of UK aid to cover asylum accommodation in the UK is unsustainable, poor value for money, and comes at the expense of vital development and humanitarian programmes tackling the root causes of poverty, conflict and displacement. "It is essential that we support refugees and asylum seekers in the UK, but the government should not be robbing Peter to pay Paul', he told the BBC. Meanwhile, Sarah Champion, chair of the International Development Committee, said: "Aid is meant to help the poorest and most vulnerable across the world: to alleviate poverty, improve life chances and reduce the risk of conflict. "Allowing the Home Office to spend it in the UK makes this task even harder." "The government must get a grip on spending aid in the UK. The Spending Review needs to finally draw a line under this perverse use of taxpayer money designed to keep everyone safe and prosperous in their own homes, not funding inappropriate, expensive accommodation here." The Home Office told the BBC it is committed to ending asylum hotels and is speeding up asylum decisions to save taxpayers' money. The department also said it had reduced overall asylum support costs by half a billion pounds in the last financial year, saving £200m in ODA which had been passed back to the Treasury. In April, The Independent revealed that the government had awarded a contract which allows for hotels and barges to house asylum seekers up until September 2027, despite Labour vowing to end the practice. The contract, advertised ahead of the election, was awarded by the Cabinet Office in October 2024 – just months after Labour won a historic landslide election victory - and runs up until September 2027. In June, the home secretary admitted she was "concerned about the level of money" being spent on asylum seekers' accommodation, adding: "We need to end asylum hotels altogether."