Susie Wiles catfish texted contacts asking for cash and pardons
A catfish posing as Susie Wiles, Donald Trump's chief of staff, texted and called her contacts asking for cash and presidential pardons, it has been reported.
Ms Wiles, who is considered the most powerful woman in the White House, has privately told colleagues her personal cell phone was hacked and mined for executive contacts.
The FBI has launched an investigation following the breach.
The impostor is said to have sent a series of text messages and phone calls to Republican lawmakers using Artificial Intelligence to mimic her voice, according to the Wall Street Journal.
In one case, the impersonator is said to have asked for a cash transfer and in another, asked a lawmaker to put together a list of people who could be pardoned by Donald Trump.
'The White House takes the cybersecurity of all staff very seriously, and this matter continues to be investigated,' a White House spokeswoman said.
'The FBI takes all threats against the president, his staff, and our cybersecurity with the utmost seriousness,' Kash Patel, the FBI director, said in a statement.
'Safeguarding our administration officials' ability to securely communicate to accomplish the president's mission is a top priority.'
Earlier this month, the FBI warned of 'an ongoing malicious text and voice messaging campaign' where actors have impersonated senior US officials to target individuals.
'The malicious actors have sent text messages and AI-generated voice messages — techniques known as smishing and vishing, respectively — that claim to come from a senior US official in an effort to establish rapport before gaining access to personal accounts,' a warning by the bureau read in May.
The White House has struggled with information security. A hacker who breached the communications service used by Mike Waltz, the former national security adviser, earlier this month intercepted messages from a broad swathe of American officials.
And late last year, a White House official said the US believed that an alleged sweeping Chinese cyber espionage campaign known as Salt Typhoon targeted and recorded telephone calls of 'very senior' American political figures.
Ms Wiles has reportedly been targeted by hackers at least once before, in the final months of Mr Trump's 2024 presidential campaign.
At the time, hackers alleged by US authorities to be acting on behalf of Iran approached journalists and a political operative with a variety of messages sent to and from Ms Wiles, some of which were eventually published.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
24 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
South Korea's Exports Drop on Tariff Threats and Political Risks
South Korea's exports contracted in May, underscoring growing challenges for the trade-reliant economy as global demand weakens and uncertainties deepen over Donald Trump's sweeping tariff push. The values of exports fell 1.3% from a year earlier, according to data released Sunday by the customs office. That compared with a decline of 2.4% estimated by economists in a Bloomberg survey.


Forbes
28 minutes ago
- Forbes
Raising Capital, Raising Defenses: Turning Endowments Into Legal Lifelines
TOPSHOT - People hold up signs during the Harvard Students for Freedom rally in support of ... More international students at the Harvard University campus in Boston, Massachusetts, on May 27, 2025. Harvard students protested Tuesday after the US government said it intends to cancel all remaining financial contracts with the university, President Donald Trump's latest attempt to force the prestigious institution to submit to unprecedented oversight. (Photo by Rick Friedman / AFP) (Photo by RICK FRIEDMAN/AFP via Getty Images) Capital campaigns have long been used by universities to fund new buildings, research centers and endowed faculty positions. But as campuses become frequent targets of political and legal challenges, institutions may need to expand the purpose of these campaigns. Increasingly, capital campaigns are being used not only to build infrastructure, but also to defend it in court. Universities are navigating policy battles that stretch from federal funding threats to litigation over diversity programs, student protest rights and academic freedom. As legal costs grow and federal support becomes less predictable, capital campaigns offer an alternative stream of funding for long-term legal resilience. Capital Campaigns Are Evolving The traditional capital campaign is a multi-year fundraising effort aimed at major institutional investments. Notable examples include the University of Chicago, which raised $5.43 billion during its 'Inquiry and Impact' campaign, and Harvard University, whose record-setting campaign brought in $9.6 billion, The Harvard Crimson reported. While most campaigns historically focused on physical infrastructure, many now include less visible priorities: legal clinics, policy centers, and public interest litigation units. At the University of Virginia School of Law, a recent capital campaign met its $400 million goal early, highlighting growing donor support for initiatives that blend legal education with public impact work. Similarly, Villanova University's $1.25 billion campaign supports not only new facilities but also mission-driven academic programming. Legal Landscape Legal challenges faced by universities have threatened protections for undocumented students and investigated race-conscious admissions, including a high-profile case involving Harvard College's admissions policies, Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. (SFFA) v. President & Fellows of Harvard College (Harvard) and SFFA v. University of North Carolina (UNC), Nos. 20-1199 & 21-707. The U.S. Supreme Court held that Harvard and UNC's admissions programs, which account for race at various stages in the process, violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, striking down affirmative action in higher education. In another legal battle, a coalition of universities challenged efforts to terminate the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. That case, Dep't of Homeland Sec. v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 591 U.S. ___ (2020),which reached the Supreme Court in 2020, resulted in a ruling that preserved the program for hundreds of thousands of lawsuits may represent a broader pattern of legal exposure for universities on issues ranging from state restrictions on curricula to challenges against student protest rights. Building internal capacity to respond to these challenges may further emerge as a core strategic priority. Funding Litigation Through Philanthropy Legal advocacy is expensive. A single federal lawsuit can require years of staff time, expert witnesses, and appellate litigation. When public funding is reduced or tied to ideological compliance, private fundraising becomes essential. Donors already support legal centers focused on civil rights, government accountability and higher education access. At the University of Chicago, a $100 million anonymous donation in 2024 funded the Forum for Free Inquiry and Expression to protect open discourse on campus. Northwestern University's Community Justice and Civil Rights Clinic supports students working on over-policing and mass incarceration cases. Morgan State University received a $3 million gift from Kirkland & Ellis for its Robert M. Bell Center to fund racial justice fellowships and civil rights education. Universities may be further compelled to frame legal capacity-building as part of their capital campaign messaging, reflecting a broader concern for institutional autonomy. Foundations and individuals that once focused solely on infrastructure or scholarship are now looking to sustain the principles that make education possible: academic freedom, equal access, and legal independence. Looking Ahead Legal pressure on higher education institutions continues to escalate under the Trump administration's aggressive posture. Harvard University, in particular, has become a national focal point. The Department of Homeland Security recently revoked Harvard's certification to enroll international students, citing the school's refusal to turn over protest-related records. That move affects approximately 7,000 students. The university has filed suit, and a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order allowing continued enrollment during litigation, Reuters reported. In parallel, the Trump administration has reportedly frozen more than $2 billion in research grants to elite universities, including Harvard, citing alleged violations of federal directives related to antisemitism and national security, NPR reported. The federal government is also testing new visa protocols. Under a pilot program, the State Department is now reviewing the social media history of student visa applicants affiliated with certain universities to assess for 'antisemitic or extremist content,' the Associated Press reported. This evolving climate presents operational, reputational, and financial risks for higher education. In response, some universities are starting to build legal infrastructure into their capital campaigns, not just to fund scholarships and faculty chairs, but to support general counsel offices, legal centers, and rapid-response litigation teams that can defend academic freedom and student rights. These legal investments may prove just as essential as endowment growth in this era of political volatility. Universities that build legal infrastructure into capital campaigns can ensure they have both the resources and the strategic clarity to defend their operations, values, and students. As litigation becomes a persistent cost of operating in politically divided environments, legal capacity must be part of the fundraising conversation. Universities that succeed in the coming years will be those that recognize a building is only as secure as the law that protects it—and that constitutional integrity is a capital asset worth funding.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US women cruise past China in friendly win
Catarina Macario celebrates her opening goal for the USA in a 3-0 win over China on Saturday (Kerem YUCEL) The United States romped to a 3-0 win over China in a women's international football friendly on Saturday, as the former world champions' renaissance under coach Emma Hayes continued. Goals from Catarina Macario, Sam Coffey and Lindsey Heaps delivered a convincing win for the American women, who dominated a fragile Chinese side at Saint Paul, Minnesota. Advertisement It was the 17th win in 21 games for the USA's English head coach Hayes, who was tasked with restoring the Americans to the summit of the women's game following their early 2023 World Cup exit. Hayes, who led the USA to a gold medal at last year's Olympics, is preparing her squad for this year's qualifiers for the 2027 World Cup in Brazil. The former Chelsea manager would have liked what she saw in a fluid first half performance that saw China's risky tactical decision to play with a high line punished ruthlessly. Macario opened the scoring after 28 minutes, bundling home a close-range finish after good work from Alyssa Thompson. Advertisement The USA doubled their tally seven minutes later with a brilliantly worked goal, which began when the gifted 17-year-old midfielder Lily Yohannes released Thompson down the right who crossed for Macario. Macario played a short pass into Coffey, who swept home with aplomb. Macario and Heaps both threatened to add to the USA tally with long-range shots that were just off target before half-time. Heaps though bagged the USA's third in the 54th minute, nodding in past China goalkeeper Pan Hongyan to effectively seal the win. The USA face Jamaica in a friendly in on Tuesday. rcw/bb