Anti-domestic violence groups are suing over the Trump administration's grant requirements
Seventeen statewide anti-domestic and sexual violence coalitions are suing President Donald Trump's administration over requirements in grant applications that they don't promote gender ideology or run diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, or prioritize people in the country illegally.
The groups say the requirements, which Trump ushered in with executive orders, put them in an impossible position. If they don't apply for federal money allocated under the Violence Against Women Act of 1994, they might not be able to provide rape crisis centers, battered women's shelters, and other programs to support victims of domestic violence and sexual assault. But if the groups do apply, they said in the lawsuit, they would have to make statements they called antithetical to their core values–and take on legal risk.
In the lawsuit, filed in US District Court in Rhode Island on Monday, the coalitions said that agreeing to the terms of grants could open them to federal investigations and enforcement actions, as well as lawsuits from private parties.
The groups suing include some from Democratic-controlled states, such as the California Partnership to End Domestic Violence, and in GOP-dominated ones, including the Idaho Coalition against Sexual and Domestic Violence. The groups say the requirements are at odds with federal laws that require them not to discriminate on the basis of gender identity, to aid underserved racial and ethnic groups and to emphasize immigrants with some programs, and not to discriminate based on legal status.
The US Department of Justice, which is named as a defendant in the lawsuit, did not respond to a request for comment. The suit is one of more than 200 filed since January to challenge President Donald Trump's executive orders. There were similar claims in a suit over anti-DEI requirements in grants for groups that serve LGBTQ+ communities. A judge last week blocked the administration from enforcing those orders in context of those programs for now.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
40 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
After a calm night, LA mayor shortens downtown curfew hours imposed after violent protests
After a calm night in downtown Los Angeles, Mayor Karen Bass on Monday slightly trimmed the hours of a curfew imposed last week after days of violent protests and looting that followed President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. Bass' announcement that the nightly curfew would be narrowed – it will start at 10 p.m. Monday rather than at 8 p.m. and extend until 6 a.m. Tuesday – followed the disclosure that there were no arrests by police in the area on Sunday. The mayor's office said the slightly trimmed curfew time 'reflects a marked reduction in violence, vandalism and looting in downtown that followed the protests.' When the curfew was imposed on June 10, officials said it was necessary to stop vandalism and theft by agitators looking to cause trouble. At the time, Bass said the city 'reached a tipping point' after 23 businesses were looted. In a statement Monday, Bass said the curfew, coupled with ongoing crime prevention efforts, 'have been largely successful in protecting stores, restaurants, businesses and residential communities from bad actors who do not care about the immigrant community.' Bass has given no indication when the curfew will end. The curfew covers a relatively tiny slice of the sprawling city – a 1-square-mile (2.5 square kilometer) section of downtown that includes the area where protests have occurred. Last week, Trump ordered the deployment of roughly 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to the second-largest US city following protests over his stepped-up enforcement of immigration laws. On Sunday, Trump directed federal immigration officials to prioritize deportations from Democratic-run cities, a move that comes after large protests erupted in Los Angeles and other major cities against his administration's immigration policies.
Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Senate Republicans Seek Tougher Medicaid Cuts and Lower SALT Deduction in Trump's Big Bill
Senate Republicans proposed deeper Medicaid cuts, including new work requirements for parents of teenagers, to offset the costs of making President Donald Trump's tax breaks permanent in their draft legislation. The proposal maintains the current $10,000 deduction of state and local taxes (SALT), drawing criticism from GOP lawmakers from high-tax states who advocated for a $40,000 cap in the House-passed bill. Senators insisted negotiations would continue. The Senate draft also increases Trump's proposed tax break for seniors with a larger $6,000 deduction for low- to moderate-income senior households earning no more than $75,000 a year for singles and $150,000 for couples. The text unveiled by the Senate Finance Committee Republicans offers the most comprehensive look at changes senators want to make to the 1,000-page package approved by House Republicans last month. GOP leaders aim to fast-track the bill for a vote by Trump's Fourth of July deadline. Senator Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), the chairman, stated the proposal would prevent a tax hike and achieve significant savings by cutting green energy funds and targeting 'waste, fraud, and abuse.' This comes as Americans broadly support funding levels for safety net programs, with many viewing Medicaid and food assistance programs as underfunded, according to a poll from The Associated Press–NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Trump's 'big bill' combines GOP priorities into what he calls the 'beautiful bill.' Republicans are attempting to pass it quickly despite unified Democratic opposition. Fundamental to the package is extending some $4.5 trillion in tax breaks approved in 2017, set to expire this year. New additions include no taxes on tips, a $500 increase to the child tax credit, and over $1 trillion in program cuts. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated the House version would add $2.4 trillion to the national deficit over a decade and leave 10.9 percent fewer people insured due to new work requirements and other changes. The CBO reported the wealthiest households would receive the largest tax breaks (around $12,000 annually), while the poor would see a tax hike of roughly $1,600, and middle-income households would receive tax breaks of $500 to $1,000 a year. Both House and Senate packages include a $350 billion increase for Homeland Security and Pentagon funds, with $175 billion for Trump's deportation efforts, such as hiring 10,000 more Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers. Protests over deportations have occurred nationwide, including the handcuffing of Senator Alex Padilla in Los Angeles. Deficit hawks like Senator Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) question the Homeland Security spending. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer warned that the Senate GOP's proposed Medicaid cuts are deeper than the House bill. As the package moves to the Senate, changes to Medicaid, SALT, and green energy programs are tradeoffs GOP leaders are making to achieve passage with their slim majorities. Criticism arose quickly after House Speaker Mike Johnson warned senators against substantial changes. Representatives Young Kim (R-California) and Andrew Garbarino (R-New York), co-chairs of the House SALT caucus, insisted the negotiated SALT deal must remain. Representative Nicole Malliotakis (R-New York) called the $10,000 cap 'insulting.' Large cost savings come from imposing new work requirements on able-bodied single adults aged 18 to 64 without dependents receiving Medicaid. The Senate version expands the requirement to parents of children older than 14. Republicans also proposed expanding work requirements in the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) to include older Americans up to age 64 and parents of children older than 10. People would need to work 80 hours monthly or participate in community service. Senator Josh Hawley (R-Missouri) joined others pushing to mitigate Medicaid cuts, including to the provider tax levied on hospitals. The Senate plan proposes phasing down the provider tax from six percent to 3.5 percent by 2031, with exceptions. A new $35 co-pay for some Medicaid patients earning above the poverty line, with exceptions, remains. Senate Republicans seek a slower phase-out of some Biden-era green energy tax breaks for wind and solar projects, while electric vehicle tax breaks would be eliminated immediately. Conservative Republicans oppose raising the national debt limit by $5 trillion.
Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Jury Finds MyPillow Founder Defamed Former Employee for a Leading Voting Equipment Company
A federal jury in Colorado on Monday found that one of the nation's most prominent election conspiracy theorists, MyPillow founder Mike Lindell, defamed a former employee for a leading voting equipment company after the 2020 presidential election. The employee, Eric Coomer, sued after Lindell called him a 'traitor' and accusations about him stealing the election were streamed on Lindell's online media platform. Coomer was the security and product strategy director at Denver-based Dominion Voting Systems, whose voting machines became the target of elaborate conspiracy theories among allies of President Donald Trump, who continues to falsely claim that his loss to Democrat Joe Biden in 2020 was due to widespread fraud. Dominion won a $787 million settlement in a defamation lawsuit it filed against Fox News over its airing of false claims against the company and has another lawsuit against the conservative network Newsmax. Newsmax apologized to Coomer in 2021 for airing false allegations against him. Coomer said during the two-week Lindell trial that his career and life were destroyed by the statements. His lawyers said Lindell either knew the statements were lies or conveyed them recklessly without knowing if they were true. Lindell's lawyers denied the claims and said his online platform, formerly known as Frankspeech, is not liable for statements made by others. Lindell said he went to trial to draw attention to the need to get rid of electronic voting machines that have been targeted in a web of conspiracy theories. He said he used to be worth about $60 million before he started speaking out about the 2020 election and is now $10 million in debt. Reviews, recounts, and audits in the battleground states where Trump contested his loss in 2020 all affirmed Democrat Joe Biden's victory. Trump's attorney general at the time said there was no evidence of widespread fraud, and Trump and his allies lost dozens of court cases seeking to overturn the result. Lindell stuck by his false claims that the 2020 presidential election was stolen during the trial but did not call any experts to present evidence of his claims. Lindell said his beliefs that the 2020 election was tainted by fraud were influenced by watching the 2020 HBO documentary 'Kill Chain' and by the views of Trump's former national security adviser Michael Flynn. In an interview for a documentary Lindell made in 2021, Flynn said foreign interference was going to happen in US elections, and Lindell said he had no reason to doubt the claim since Flynn had worked for both political parties in intelligence. Lindell distanced himself from an account by a Colorado podcaster who claimed to have heard a conference call from the extremist group Antifa before the 2020 election. The podcast claimed that on the call someone named 'Eric' from Dominion said he would make sure that Trump would not win – a story that was recounted on Frankspeech during a 2021 event. Lindell said he only learned about that during the trial. Lindell said he never accused Coomer of rigging the election, but he did say he was upset because he said Newsmax blocked him from being able to go on air to talk about voting machines after it apologized to Coomer. Coomer denied there was any such deal to block Lindell under his agreement with the network. Coomer's lawyers tried to show how their client's life was devastated by the conspiracy theories spreading about him. Lindell was comparatively late to seize on Coomer, not mentioning him until February 2021, well after his name had been circulated by other Trump partisans. Coomer said the conspiracy theories cost him his job, his mental health, and the life he'd built and said Lindell's statements were the most distressing of all. He specifically pointed to a statement on May 9, 2021, when Lindell described what he believed Coomer had done as 'treason.' Lindell's attorneys argued that Coomer's reputation was already in tatters by the time Lindell mentioned him. They said that was partly because of Coomer's own Facebook posts disparaging Trump, which the former Dominion employee acknowledged were hyperbolic and had been a mistake.
