logo
Colleges face challenges as states attack tenure

Colleges face challenges as states attack tenure

Boston Globe5 hours ago

At least 11 states, including seven since the start of this year, have imposed new levels of review for tenured faculty, made it easier to fire them or proposed banning tenure altogether. Almost all have Republican-controlled legislatures or have seen lawmakers question what is being taught on campuses.
This comes at the same time as, but has gotten less attention than, the Trump administration's higher education funding cuts and investigations into colleges and universities.
Advertisement
'It's the flip side of the same assault,' said Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, or AFT, which
Unlike nontenured faculty, who can be dismissed or not reappointed, tenured faculty have more protections — including from being demoted or fired for what they think or say.
Advertisement
Without tenure, 'If you pursue the truth in ways that are uncomfortable for donors, for students, for trustees, for the state legislature, then you'll lose your job,' said Mark Criley, senior program officer for academic freedom, tenure and governance at the faculty union the American Association of University Professors, or AAUP.
Even before the second Trump administration and this wave of tenure challenges, 45 percent of faculty members said they
Most backers of curtailing tenure say they're not doing it for ideological reasons. They say they're trying to lower costs for taxpayers and consumers by removing faculty whose productivity is low.
The goal is 'getting rid of professors who are not pulling their weight,' said Nebraska state Sen. Loren Lippincott, a Republican and sponsor of a proposal to
He hears stories 'of professors that have tenure bragging about how little they work, how little they put in or how few hours they show up to teach classes,' Lippincott said at
In other states, however, curbs on tenure have been linked directly or indirectly to faculty political views.
Advertisement
An Ohio bill passed in late March will
Over the governor's veto, the Republican-dominated Kentucky General Assembly in March passed a bill
Sponsors said the measure will uphold performance standards, but Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, a Democrat, contended in his veto message that it
After faculty at the University of Texas at Austin signed
A legislative proposal in Texas the following year failed to eliminate tenure, but broadened
Advertisement
In Indiana, a measure added to
This follows a law passed last year in Indiana requiring reviews of tenured faculty and
Arkansas legislators passed a law in March allowing university administrators to call for
There have been earlier attempts
Advertisement
Tenure
The move was largely a response to firings around that time of university and college faculty for teaching the theory of evolution, said Reuben, the Harvard historian.
'Faculty had to be able to have the freedom to ask questions, and they could not be tied down to any sort of intellectual test imposed by church dogma or political parties,' Reuben said.
Momentum for removing this protection comes against a backdrop of falling trust in colleges and universities and of the people who work at them.
Only about a third of Americans have 'a great deal' or 'a lot' of
Only a little more than a third of Republicans believe university professors
Advertisement
'This level of attack couldn't gain the kind of momentum it has without the declining public support for higher education,' Reuben said. 'It couldn't have happened to this magnitude before, because there was a general sense that higher education was good for society.'
In Hawai'i, it was a fiscally conservative Democrat, state Sen. Donna Mercado Kim, who pushed, beginning in 2022, for tenure to be banned for University of Hawai'i faculty who do research and other jobs besides teaching, such as providing student support. Although she did not respond to repeated requests for comment, Kim has written that the effort was a way to make sure taxpayer and student tuition money given to the university
After hundreds of faculty protested, she agreed to a compromise under which the university has set up a task force to study its tenure procedures.
'To me, it's about the Senate wanting control over the university,' said Christian Fern, executive director of the University of Hawaii Professional Assembly, or UHPA, the faculty union.
'Being able to teach without political retribution — which rings really loudly right now — do you want to have a faculty member able to teach what they learned in their research, even if it's politically incorrect?' Fern asked. 'I think yes.'
Karla Hayashi, president of the board of the UHPA and a former lecturer and English composition professor who now runs a tutoring center at the University of Hawai'i at Hilo, said she expects more attempts to weaken tenure. Hayashi sees them as an extension of political pressure that starts at the federal level.
'If I take away your tenure, then you're dependent on doing what I want you to do to earn your living,' she said.
Contrary to arguments from critics, tenure 'is not a job for life,' Criley, of the AAUP, said. 'It's a guarantee that you'll only be dismissed for cause when a case can be made that you're not fit for your professional duties — that you're negligent, incompetent or guilty of some sort of misconduct that violates professional ethics.'
Not all faculty agree that tenure is fine the way it is.
'If your main goal is job security, I don't think you're going to be that adventuresome of a professor,' said Jim Wetherbe, a professor in the business department at Texas Tech University and a longtime
Academic freedom at public universities is already protected by the First Amendment, Wetherbe has argued.
But Weingarten, the AFT head, said the immediate worry is that what faculty can say or teach will be narrowed.
'The right wing keeps talking about free speech, free speech, free speech, and an attack on tenure is an attack on free speech,' she said. 'It's basically an attempt to create compliance.'
This story about
was produced by
, a nonprofit, independent news organization focused on inequality and innovation in education. Sign up for our
. Listen to our
.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NYC incumbent Mayor Adams launches re-election bid
NYC incumbent Mayor Adams launches re-election bid

UPI

time22 minutes ago

  • UPI

NYC incumbent Mayor Adams launches re-election bid

1 of 9 | New York City Mayor Eric Adams speaks at his re-election campaign launch event on the steps of City Hall in New York City on Thursday. Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo June 26 (UPI) -- New York City Mayor Eric Adams kick-started his re-election bid as an independent candidate on Thursday. Adams was joined by about 100 supporters on the steps of the New York City Hall as he announced his candidacy and laid out a case for another four years as the city's mayor. "It's a choice between a candidate with a blue collar and one with a silver spoon," Adams said of his background versus that of Democratic Party candidate and self-avowed socialist Zohran Mamdani. Mamdani, 33, surprised many in the political establishment by winning Tuesday's Democratic Party primary over former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who conceded the loss and announced he would continue running as an independent. Adams, likewise, was elected to the mayoral office as a Democrat in 2021 but since has left the party to become an independent. "This is a city not of socialism," Adams told supporters on Thursday. "There's no dignity in someone giving you everything for free," he said. "There's dignity in giving you a job, so you can provide for your family and the opportunities that you deserve." Adams said New York is "not a city of handouts" but instead helps people improve themselves and their lives. Adams has challenged the prior Biden administration's immigration policies and supports the Trump administration's efforts to oppose illegal immigration. The Biden administration filed federal charges accusing Adams of bribery, wire fraud and conspiracy, which the Trump administration dropped earlier this year. Adams said the charges against him were politically motivated due to his opposition to the Biden administration's immigration and border policies. "Despite our pleas, when the federal government did nothing as its broken immigration policies overloaded our shelter system with no relief, I put the people of New York before party and politics," Adams told media after he was indicted on Sept. 27. "I always knew that if I stood my ground for all of you, that I would be a target," he said. "And a target I became." Mamdani has proposed government control of grocery stores, free public transportation, free childcare, freezing rents and eliminating tuition at city universities, among other proposals. Mamdani is a New York state representative who was born and raised in Uganda in 1991 and became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 2018. He has a bachelor's in Africana Studies from Bowdoin College and, if elected, said he would use his power as mayor to "reject Donald Trump's fascism, to stop [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] agents from deporting our neighbors and to govern our city as a model for the Democratic Party." His mother, Mira Nair, is an Indian-American filmmaker who is known best for "Mississippi Masala." Mamdani's father, Mahmood Mamdani, is a Ugandan and former professor of colonialism in India, African history and political violence at Columbia University and other institutions. He is the director of the Makerere Institute of Social Research in Uganda.

Tampa Bay's new People's Pride rejects corporate, police ties
Tampa Bay's new People's Pride rejects corporate, police ties

Axios

time25 minutes ago

  • Axios

Tampa Bay's new People's Pride rejects corporate, police ties

Concerned that St. Pete Pride has grown too corporate, a group of activist organizations say they want to return the celebration to its roots. Why it matters: The People's Pride Coalition will hold its inaugural Pride Night on Friday at a time of increasing skepticism of corporate-backed Pride events and marketing campaigns. The big picture: That's especially true this year, as major companies retreat from Pride sponsorships and participation amid President Trump's attacks on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. "They're outing themselves as not truly supporting queer people," coalition member V Garcia told Axios. The wishy-washy approach also shows that relying on corporate support isn't sustainable, added coalition member Gabby Aguilera. Zoom in: The coalition — made up of local grassroots organizations including Tampa Democratic Socialists of America and the Justice Advocacy Network — formed in the wake of the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas terrorist attacks and the ensuing war that has so far killed more than 50,000 Palestinians. Organizers were troubled by the big-business sponsors underpinning St. Pete Pride, such as defense contractor GE Aerospace and phosphate mining firm Mosaic, which has a troubling environmental history in Tampa Bay. They've also taken issue with the festival's police presence, a wariness that's only grown as more law enforcement agencies, including St. Pete police, sign partnerships with federal immigration authorities. What they're saying:"It just goes directly against the roots and history of Pride," which began as an uprising, Aguilera said. The other side: St. Pete Pride leaders have heard the coalition's concerns "and recognize that the origins of Pride are rooted in protest and the ongoing fight for liberation and equity for all," president Byron Green-Calisch said in a statement to Axios. Police officers are there to "ensure the safety of the more than half a million attendees expected at our Pride events." "This is a necessity, not an endorsement," he said, adding that leaders "understand that it raises valid concerns for some." Between the lines: Coalition organizers recognize the need for security and that police are typically involved with closing off city streets for parades and similar events. Cutting ties is "not going to be a quick fix," Aguilera said. The nonprofit St. Pete Pride is also working on broadening its individual donor base, new executive director Bior Guigni told Axios in a previous interview. When it comes to corporate partnerships, her goal is to ensure that "it's not just a monetary exchange, but it's also a mission alignment," she said. The latest: While GE Aerospace and Mosaic are not listed among this year's sponsors, coalition members plan to continue putting pressure on the organization to meet their demands. And while they'll march in Saturday's Pride parade, coalition members organized Pride Night for folks who identify with their mission. If you go: The event is 6-10pm Friday at Allendale United Methodist Church in St. Pete. The lineup includes live music, drag performances, crafts, free food and a free store. A $5-15 donation is suggested but not required.

EU Briefs Divided Leaders on Trump's Counterproposal on Tariffs
EU Briefs Divided Leaders on Trump's Counterproposal on Tariffs

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

EU Briefs Divided Leaders on Trump's Counterproposal on Tariffs

(Bloomberg) -- European Union leaders are discussing their response to President Donald Trump's latest proposal on trade after a briefing from Ursula von der Leyen. US Renters Face Storm of Rising Costs Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares Mapping the Architectural History of New York's Chinatown Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined US State Budget Wounds Intensify From Trump, DOGE Policy Shifts The European Commission president told EU leaders at summit talks in Brussels on Thursday evening that she had received the latest US tariff offer, according to officials briefed on the discussion who declined to give any more detail. The question dogging the leaders and the commission, which handles trade matters for the bloc, is whether to accept an asymmetrical trade deal with the US or risk escalation by striking back, provoking Trump's ire. Several member states argued against retaliation, with most suggesting that reaching a quick deal with the US is better than holding out for a perfect one, even if many of Trump's tariffs remain in place, according to two people briefed on the discussions. But there's still division, with Paris categorically rejecting any deal skewed in favor of the US and pushing for a complete removal of tariffs, another official said. The EU needs to reach an agreement with Trump by July 9, when tariffs on nearly all of the bloc's exports to the US increase to 50%. The US president says the EU takes advantage of US with its goods surplus and perceived barriers to American trade. 'We hope that the discussions with the US continue in an energetic mood in the coming days — the July deadline is coming soon,' Luxembourg Prime Minister Luc Frieden told reporters on his way into the summit. 'I wish the commission good luck.' Detailed discussions with the US are taking place on both tariffs and non-tariff barriers, as well as on key sectors, strategic purchases and regulatory matters the EU is hoping to address through its simplification agenda, said the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. The US is asking the EU to make what the bloc's officials see as unbalanced and unilateral concessions, Bloomberg reported earlier. Discussions on critical sectors — such as steel and aluminum, automobiles, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and civilian aircraft — have been particularly difficult. Officials believe the best-case scenario remains an agreement on principles that would allow the negotiations to continue beyond an early July deadline. Alongside a 10% universal levy on most goods — which is currently facing a US court challenge — Trump has introduced 25% tariffs on cars and double that on steel and aluminum based on a different executive authority. He's also working to expand tariffs on other sectors, including pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and commercial aircraft. Many of those duties are expected to stay, regardless of an agreement with the Trump administration, according to the people. The EU, which has been seeking a mutually beneficial deal, will assess any end-result and at that stage decide what level of asymmetry — if any — it's willing to accept. The EU's industry chief, Stephane Sejourne, told Bloomberg this week that the EU would need to respond to any tariffs — including a baseline 10% levy — with countermeasures. But some EU leaders, including Italy's Giorgia Meloni have indicated that they could live with some levies if it allows for a rapid deal that avoids an escalation in the conflict. 'When we discussed 10% with companies, it isn't particularly impactful for us,' Meloni told reporters in The Hague Wednesday after the NATO summit. 'I think a decision at 10% would enable us, as far as we're concerned, to keep working on things that we care about.' --With assistance from Charlie Duxbury, Olivia Fletcher, Michal Kubala, Lyubov Pronina, Maxim Edwards, Suzanne Lynch, Andrea Palasciano, Samy Adghirni, Donato Paolo Mancini, Jan Bratanic, Katharina Rosskopf and Sanne Wass. How to Steal a House Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried Apple Test-Drives Big-Screen Movie Strategy With F1 Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store