US and allies accuse North Korea and Russia of violating UN sanctions
The United States and 10 allies on Thursday said the military cooperation between Russia and North Korea flagrantly violates UN sanctions and has helped Moscow increase its missile strikes on Ukrainian cities.
They made the accusations in their first report since joining forces to monitor sanctions against North Korea after Russia vetoed a resolution in March 2024 to continue the monitoring by a UN Security Council panel of experts.
It had been issuing reports of Pyongyang's sanctions violations since 2010.
The 29-page report produced by the Multilateral Sanctions Monitoring Team — comprised of the US, Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, South Korea and the United Kingdom — said the evidence it gathered demonstrates that North Korea and Russia have engaged in 'myriad unlawful activities' explicitly prohibited by UN sanctions resolutions.
Russian President Vladimir Putin (Alexander Kazakov, Sputnik, Kremlin via AP)
It said North Korea has transferred arms and related materiel by sea, air and rail, including artillery, ballistic missiles and combat vehicles, for Russia's use in the war in Ukraine.
Russia has transferred air defence systems to North Korea, and its forces trained the North's troops deployed to support Russia's war, the team said.
And Moscow also has supplied refined petroleum products to Pyongyang in far excess of the yearly cap under UN sanctions, and has maintained corresponding banking relations with the North in violation of sanctions.
The 11 countries said this unlawful cooperation has 'contributed to Moscow's ability to increase its missile attacks against Ukrainian cities, including targeted strikes against critical civilian infrastructure.'
The cooperation has also provided resources for North Korea to fund its military and banned ballistic missile programmes, and it has allowed the more than 11,000 troops Pyongyang has deployed to Russia since October 2024 to gain first-hand military experience, the team said.
There was no immediate response from the Russian Mission to the United Nations to a request for comment on the report.
The report covers the period between January 1, 2024, and April 30, 2025, and points to evidence that Russia and North Korea intend to further deepen their military cooperation for at least the foreseeable future.
It cites an unnamed country in the team reporting that Russian-flagged cargo vessels delivered as many as 9 million rounds of ammunition for artillery and multiple rocket launchers from North Korea to Russia in 2024.
The report includes images of containers, which the team says were from North Korean and Russian ports and an ammunition dump in Russia.
Citing an unnamed team member, the report says North Korea last year transferred at least 100 ballistic missiles to Russia, which were launched into Ukraine 'to destroy civilian infrastructure and terrorise populated areas such as Kyiv and Zaporizhzhia.'
North Korean Public Security Minister Pang Tu Sop, right, meets with Russian Vice Interior Minister Vitaly Shulika at the Mansudae Assembly Hall in Pyongyang (AP/Jon Chol Jin)
It also transferred 'elements of three brigade sets of heavy artillery,' the report said.
It includes images of a North Korean 170mm self-propelled gun that it said was being transported through Russia, and North Korean multiple rocket launcher ammunition and an anti-tank missile, which it said were found in Ukraine.
The team said in a joint statement that it will continue to monitor implementation of UN resolutions 'and raise awareness of ongoing attempts to violate and evade UN sanctions'.
It urged North Korea 'to engage in meaningful diplomacy'.
The Security Council imposed sanctions after North Korea's first nuclear test explosion in 2006 and tightened them over the years in a total of 10 resolutions seeking, so far unsuccessfully, to cut funds and curb its nuclear and ballistic missile programmes
The last sanctions resolution was adopted by the council in December 2017.
China and Russia vetoed a US-sponsored resolution in May 2022 that would have imposed new sanctions over a spate of intercontinental ballistic missile launches, and have blocked all other UN action against North Korea.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
5 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Ukraine seeks Western help as latest Russian attacks kill 24 and injure over 200
©Associated Press Today at 00:30 Russian drones, missiles and artillery killed at least 24 civilians and injured more than 200 others in Ukraine, officials said yesterday. It comes as Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky sought guarantees at a Nato summit of further Western help for his country's efforts to repel Russia's invasion.
Irish Independent
5 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Sleeper agent plot to assassinate Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky revealed by reports
©UK Independent Today at 00:30 A plot to assassinate Volodymyr Zelensky at an airport in Poland last year involved a Polish pensioner who had been a Russian sleeper agent for decades, new reports have revealed. It is among what is believed to be dozens of attempts on the Ukrainian president's life since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022.
Irish Independent
5 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Luke McGee: ‘Axis of Autocracies' may prove stronger than traditional alliances as Trump's gamble in Iran plays out
Russia has relied heavily on Tehran for cheap weapons against Ukraine, but Putin may now need to pivot more towards North Korea ©UK Independent When Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi arrived in Moscow to co-ordinate Tehran's response to the massive US strikes on nuclear facilities, he met not with his opposite number Sergey Lavrov, but with Vladimir Putin. That, in itself, speaks volumes about how wide-ranging the repercussions of Donald Trump's military intervention might be. The dramatic escalation and direct involvement of the US in Iran, coupled with the conflict between Iran and Israel, and Trump talking openly of regime change, put the Russian leader in a difficult position. He was compelled to condemn the US bombing raid while his own ordnance was falling on civilian targets in Ukraine. Whatever requests Araghchi makes of Moscow, it will have multiple competing interests and moves to consider before committing to anything beyond rhetoric. Tehran and Moscow have what might be best described as an asymmetrical relationship. Ever since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Iran has been a friend. Much of Putin's early success in the three-year conflict was down to Iran providing Russia with cheap weapons. Sources in Kyiv are cautiously optimistic that Iran may cease sending weapons to Russia as they may be needed in its fight against Israel. It could mean North Korea is leaned on to supply even more manpower and missiles, strengthening Putin's dependence on Pyongyang. While Putin has publicly condemned the US and Israeli strikes on Iran, he knows better than almost any other world leader that talk is cheap. Without hard power to back up the words, Putin has been free to carry on with his assault on a sovereign nation. It is probably fair to assume that the Kremlin is currently in something of a holding pattern while it watches how things develop between the US and Iran. Naturally, there are multiple ways the coming days could play out, ranging from full-throated US support for immediate regime change to a sudden, shock diplomatic breakthrough that ends fighting and brings an agreement on Iran's nuclear programme. More likely, it will fall somewhere in the middle, where fighting continues and Trump's levels of interest become the determining factor in how long this drags out. That's where things get complicated. Much has been made of the new Axis of Autocracies: Iran, Russia, China and North Korea. Diplomats and intelligence officials have repeatedly described this as a marriage of convenience, rather than a traditional alliance. While it's true there is no single unifying ideology between these four other than a hatred of the US-led world order, that has been enough for them to aid one another in their geopolitical disputes. It might be that we live in an age when traditional alliances of shared values and ideologies – especially ones led by a disruptor like Trump – are less stable than a collection of self-interested autocrats who simply have a common enemy. China and Russia will almost certainly want the situation in Iran to stabilise as soon as possible. Their sense of self-preservation and aversion to public discussions of regime change will take precedence over any desire to help a friend in need. This might be why the US has called on China, which imports more oil from Iran than any other nation, to press Iran to keep open the Strait of Hormuz, a critical shipping route, to avoid a global economic crisis. The US probably assumes that, for the time being, stability and the ability to leverage power matters more to China than supporting Iran. But the muddier it all becomes, that calculation might change. If Trump doesn't have the diplomatic nous to capitalise on his airstrikes, there is every chance his MAGA instincts will see him withdraw and leave others to clear up after him. It could be that Iran, Russia, China and North Korea are more than happy to mop up the mess and twist world events to their own advantage.
