logo
Mahrang Baloch Writes From Prison: ‘Speaking Up for Justice Is Not a Crime'

Mahrang Baloch Writes From Prison: ‘Speaking Up for Justice Is Not a Crime'

It has been more than two and a half months since I was thrown into prison —Hudda Prison, in Quetta, Pakistan, the same place father was caged nearly two decades ago, also for promoting the rights of the people of Balochistan.
Since my arrest, Pakistan's state secuity agencies have deployed every tactic to break me. I have been offered a deal: stay silent, avoid political activity, and you can be home. I refused. The state has failed to produce a single piece of evidence linking me to any act of violence or criminality. The only "proof" they cite is a press conference I gave a few days before my March 22 arrest.
I spoke to reporters after armed militants had hijacked a train and held 300 passengers hostage for hours. The attack occurred in the Balochistan, the largest province in Pakistan, and was carried out by Baloch separatists who have been fighting with the state for decades. At the press conference, I spoke not to defend the hijackers—our movement, the Baloch Yakjehti [Unity] Committee, has always renounced violence. Indeed, my intention was to draw a distinction between those who confront the state with arms and those who confront it with words.
It's a crucial distinction, one the state prefers to blur. In Pakistan, 'terrorist' is a label pinned on anyone who advocates for Baloch rights. Those who speak up run the risk of arrest by military and intelligence agencies. After their arrest, they might never be seen again. If they are, it is often as a body, produced after a violent incident like the train attack.
This was why I asked reporters: Who were the more than two dozen 'unidentified' bodies brought to Quetta's Civil Hospital after the hijacking? And why were 13 of them buried overnight without being named? The attackers, the Baloch Liberation Party, had released pictures and details of the 12 militants it said were killed. The identities of the rest were a mystery, but we had our suspicions. In Balochistan it is common practice, after violent episodes, for the forcibly disappeared persons to be put to death, and their bodies produced as those of militants.
I demanded DNA testing of those who had been buried in the dead of night. Families of the disappeared feared, with good reason, that their loved ones were among them.
Read more: Pakistan Jails Baloch Human Rights Activist
So I am in jail for insisting on the distinction between peaceful activism and violence.
My work had already drawn unwelcome international attention. In May 2024, Pakistani officials were outraged after I visited Norway at the invitation of PEN Norway, the Norwegian branch of PEN International and the World Expression Forum. I was even harassed on Norwegian soil by individuals linked to Pakistan's embassy in Oslo, whose intervention was ended by the Norwegian domestic security agency, PST. When I returned to Pakistan, I was immediately charged with sedition, and treated as if I had returned from an ISIS camp in Syria or Iraq rather than one of the most peace-loving countries in the world.
In October, the government's smear campaigns amplified with my inclusion on the TIME100 Next Emerging Leaders. I was called 'Malala 2' and a Western puppet. Surveillance around me intensified, and I was placed on the Fourth Schedule, an anti-terror watch list typically reserved for hardened militants, and which restricts the movement and activities of the listed. I was barred from travelling abroad.
I am learning the price of peaceful activism.
For decades, Pakistan has kept the rest of the country, and the world, in the dark about Balochistan. It remains an information black hole. Among those the military and intelligence agencies have forcibly disappeared, killed, or forced into exile are journalists who dare to write about these atrocities. According to the Balochistan Union of Journalists, more than 40 have been killed since 2000. Foreign media are denied access to the region.
From this darkness, a woman leading a grassroots movement for Baloch rights was unacceptable. The hostility of the state intensified with the BBC's 100 Women list, and a nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize. But if international pressure has prevented my being killed, I face psychological warfare, threats, and the constant spectre of danger.
I write this the day my sister told me that the Islamic State of Khorasan (ISIS-K) released a 100-page Urdu-language booklet accusing me of being a Western agent. Their "evidence"? The TIME honor and Norway trip. Other BYC leaders are in jail with me: Sabghat Ullah Shah Jee, Beebarg Zehri (a disabled man), Gulzadi, and Beebow. I tell them: We are not the first to be imprisoned for demanding peace, justice, and rights. From Nelson Mandela to Narges Mohammadi, we walk the same path. We draw strength from their courage, intellect, and defiance.
Our movement is rooted in peace. We speak against enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings, forced displacement, and the systematic denial of basic rights to the Baloch. We are the rightful owners of the Saindak Copper-Gold Project (worth billions of dollars, but the profits are not shared with the local population), the Reko Diq mine (estimated to hold copper and gold reserves worth over $60 billion, but the benefits are not reaching the Baloch people), and Gwadar — the gateway to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. Yet, 70% of Balochistan's population lives below the poverty line.
Read more: Pakistan Bars Activist From Traveling to TIME Event Honoring Her
The state is offended and brands us terrorists and violent. But we are not violent. The state is armed, powerful, and ruthless. It uses violence to silence those who ask for justice. The practices once reserved for the Baloch, considered lesser citizens, are now expanding to other parts of Pakistan. Former Prime Minister Imran Khan and his party are now under the military's wrath. He is jailed. Is Imran Khan also a terrorist? Are members of his PTI party now "agents of hostile agencies"?
If the Pakistan Army and its intelligence agencies are as competent as they claim to be, why have they failed to present a single piece of credible proof? Why have they not held a fair, transparent trial?
Because this isn't about the law; it's about fear, their fear of our truth.
This prison is more than bricks and bars. It carries the memory of my father. As a child, I visited him here. I didn't grow up playing with toys. I grew up holding posters of my father, who was detained and then disappeared. When I turned eighteen, I received his lifeless, tortured, bullet-riddled body. This is not just my story. It's the story of every child in Balochistan. Childhood here is shaped by grief, fear, and posters of the disappeared.
When our generation came of age, those of us raised in the shadows of state violence, we vowed: No child after us should suffer the same fate. We are fully aware of the power imbalance between us and a nuclear-armed state. It controls the media. It runs smear campaigns. It weaponizes the judiciary. It deploys overwhelming force. It controls the parliament. It operates proxy groups and armed militias.
Our confinement is part of a war of narratives.
Speaking up for justice is not a crime.
Raising our voices against state violence is not treason.
Demanding rights is not terrorism.
It is humanity.
And one day, we believe, this struggle will succeed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrats look for reinvention and a new playbook against Trump in key committee race
Democrats look for reinvention and a new playbook against Trump in key committee race

Washington Post

time23 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Democrats look for reinvention and a new playbook against Trump in key committee race

WASHINGTON — House Democrats are quietly engaged in a behind-the-scenes race for a key committee position, the second time in as many months that the party has had to fill one of the most prized positions in Congress. Four Democrats are running to be the ranking member on the House Oversight Committee, an investigative panel with public clout, subpoena power and an expansive portfolio. The position is open due to the death last month of Rep. Gerry Connolly of Virginia.

Ex-Pakistan foreign minister warns full-scale war with India closer than ever after recent skirmishes
Ex-Pakistan foreign minister warns full-scale war with India closer than ever after recent skirmishes

New York Post

time11 hours ago

  • New York Post

Ex-Pakistan foreign minister warns full-scale war with India closer than ever after recent skirmishes

WASHINGTON — Pakistan's former foreign minister warned US lawmakers and diplomats last week that the 'threshold' for war between his nation and India is lower than ever following clashes in the disputed region of Kashmir last month. 'We're incredibly grateful for the role that the US government — President Trump, Secretary [of State] Marco Rubio — created throughout this crisis in helping us all achieve this cease-fire,' Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, the current chairman of the Pakistan People's Party, told The Post in a recent interview. 'But our message has been that the cease-fire is a start, but it is only a start, and what we seek is assistance in our pursuit of peace through dialogue and diplomacy.' 4 Ex-foreign minister of Pakistan Bilawal Bhutto Zardari warned US lawmakers and diplomats last week that the 'threshold' of war between his nation and India is closer than ever following skirmishes in the disputed region of Kashmir last month. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement 'We're all a lot less safe as a result of this conflict than we were before,' added Zardari, the son of the late Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. 'The threshold of full-out military conflict between India and Pakistan has been drastically lowered — the lowest it has ever been in our history, as a result of this conflict.' The US-brokered truce between the nuclear-armed nations took effect May 10 after weeks of fighting. India accused Pakistan of sparking the conflict by supporting an April 22 terror attack that left 26 civilians dead in the segment of Kashmir under New Delhi's control. Advertisement 4 India accused Pakistan of sparking the conflict by backing an April 22 terror attack that left 26 civilians dead in the segment of Kashmir under New Delhi's control. AP Most of those killed were Hindus, and Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri pointed the finger at the Kashmir-based terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba for the carnage in the resort town of Pahalgam. The Pakistani delegation that came to Washington expressed a desire to coordinate with India on counter-terrorism — but rejected that Islamabad was involved in any way with the attack. 'The Prime Minister of Pakistan offered an impartial international inquiry because we were confident that Pakistan is not involved in this terrorist incident,' Zardari said. 'The international intelligence community endorses this view.' Advertisement 4 The Pakistani delegation that came to Washington expressed a desire to discuss coordinating with India on counter-terrorism — but rejected that Pakistan was involved in any way with the attack. AP 'As things stand now, if there's a terrorist attack anywhere in India,' he went on, 'it immediately means war, and the law of reciprocation means, therefore, if there's a terrorist attack in Pakistan, we are to also treat it as an act of war.' Zardari also said that India's threat to cut off Pakistan's water was 'an existential matter' that would be considered 'an act of war.' 'If we are to engage in a new dialogue with India, make new promises with one another that could potentially lead to new treaties, then it's very important that they abide by the old treaties like the Indus Water Treaty,' he said. Advertisement 4 'I'm optimistic that the president is passionate about peace and that he will be successful in pushing that message here in the United States,' Zardari said of Trump. 'Pakistan is obviously ready.' AP The delegation from Islamabad met with officials in the State Department and Congress and is headed this week to meet with UK and European diplomats in hopes of brokering a more lasting peace. 'We had a military upper hand when we agreed to the cease-fire. We did so on the stipulation that the cease-fire would be the first step,' Zardari said. 'I'm optimistic that the president is passionate about peace and that he will be successful in pushing that message here in the United States. Pakistan is obviously ready.' Reps for the Indian embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Feds Condemn LA Riots — But Still Won't Arrest the NGO Funders Behind Them
Feds Condemn LA Riots — But Still Won't Arrest the NGO Funders Behind Them

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Feds Condemn LA Riots — But Still Won't Arrest the NGO Funders Behind Them

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) condemned the violent riots that erupted in Los Angeles over the weekend, where mobs torched vehicles, hurled projectiles at federal officers, and attacked ICE agents. While DHS released shocking footage and denounced media and political efforts to whitewash the violence as 'peaceful,' members of Congress are asking a deeper question: Why are the NGOs that helped fuel the border crisis and now the riots — many funded with taxpayer dollars — not being held accountable for the lawlessness? In a statement released Tuesday, DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said: 'The violent targeting of law enforcement in Los Angeles by lawless rioters is despicable and Democrat politicians must call for it to end.' She added: 'Sanctuary politicians and the media have falsely claimed these are 'peaceful' riots. The American people can see with their own eyes the truth.' The unrest came in response to recent ICE enforcement operations targeting criminal illegal immigrants in California. Rioters descended on federal buildings, vandalized property, and violently clashed with law enforcement. DHS highlighted footage showing masked agitators throwing rocks and Molotov cocktails, setting police vehicles on fire, and launching projectiles at Customs and Border Protection officers. Congress: Follow the Money Now, lawmakers on the House Homeland Security Committee are ramping up an investigation into the role of nonprofit organizations — many of which receive federal funding — that may be complicit in enabling or encouraging this kind of unrest. In a letter sent by Chairman Mark Green (R-TN) and Oversight Subcommittee Chairman Clay Higgins (R-LA), the committee wrote: 'The Committee remains deeply concerned that NGOs that receive U.S. taxpayer dollars benefitted from the border crisis created by the Biden Administration, and stand ready to do so under future Democrat administrations.' They cited a 'near-total lack of accountability' for how these taxpayer funds are being spent. The committee is also probing whether these nonprofits may have incentivized or supported illegal activity. 'The Committee is concerned that these NGOs used U.S. taxpayer money to enable the Biden border crisis by incentivizing and facilitating illegal immigration, placing our homeland security at risk and encouraging unprecedented levels of human trafficking and smuggling,' the lawmakers wrote. 'Finally, the Committee is concerned that certain NGOs are now actively advising illegal aliens on how to avoid and impede law enforcement officials, which can only be seen as an attempt to undermine the work [of the] federal government.' CHIRLA Denies Involvement — But Questions Linger One group, the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles (CHIRLA), publicly denied involvement in the riots. In a statement to the New York Post, a CHIRLA spokesman said: 'We have not participated, coordinated, or been part of the riots being registered in Los Angeles other than the press conference and rally cited above.' That denial comes as critics point to the coordinated nature of the violence — including the presence of legal observers, bail fund organizers, and professional signage — all hallmarks of NGO-backed protest infrastructure. The New York Post also reported that several groups involved in immigrant advocacy have received millions in federal funding in recent years — prompting lawmakers to question whether taxpayer money is inadvertently fueling illegal activity and civil unrest. Though DHS has been forceful in its rhetoric, critics argue that public statements are not enough. So far, no legal or enforcement action has been taken against the nonprofit groups suspected of helping coordinate or support the riots. The New York Post confirmed that the House Homeland Security Committee has launched an investigation into several of these NGOs — particularly those that received federal funding while allegedly facilitating illegal immigration and obstructing law enforcement. Lawmakers say the situation raises serious questions about how taxpayer dollars are being used and whether any groups crossed legal lines. But for many, oversight alone isn't enough. Critics argue the federal government must move beyond investigations and toward real accountability — including freezing funds, issuing subpoenas, and pursuing criminal charges if warranted. Until that happens, they warn, the groups fueling chaos at the border and on the streets of American cities will continue to operate unchecked.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store