logo
Vaccines don't cause autism. What does?

Vaccines don't cause autism. What does?

NBC News22-11-2024

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s false claims linking autism to childhood vaccinations are receiving new scrutiny now that President-elect Donald Trump has selected him to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, a sprawling agency with a budget of $1.7 trillion that oversees research into both autism and vaccines.
The myth that autism is caused by childhood vaccines — proposed in 1998 by a British doctor who was later banned from practicing medicine in the United Kingdom — has been thoroughly debunked. Hundreds of studies have found vaccines to be safe. The World Health Organization estimates that over the past 50 years, immunizations have saved 154 million lives around the world.
Kennedy, who espouses a number of health-related conspiracy theories, has pointed to vaccines to explain the substantial rise in autism diagnoses in recent decades, which have ballooned from an estimated 1 in 150 children in 2000 to 1 in 36 today. Research suggests that much of that increase is due to increasing awareness and screening for the condition; changing definitions of autism to include milder conditions on the spectrum that weren't recognized in previous years; as well as advances in diagnostic technology.
'For a very long time, the anti-vaccine movement has been exploiting families of autistic people, promoting a market for pseudo-scientific treatments that don't provide the answers they're looking for and that can expose autistic people to real harm,' said Ari Ne'eman, co-founder of the nonprofit Autistic Self Advocacy Network and an assistant professor of health policy and management at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. 'More discredited conspiracy theories linking autism and vaccines are not the answer.'
Timothy Caulfield, research director at the University of Alberta's Health Law Institute in Canada, who studies health misinformation, said that people often are more willing to believe conspiracy theories about conditions such as autism, whose causes are complex and not fully understood, than diseases with clear causes.
People seem less inclined to speculate, for example, about alternative explanations for Down syndrome, which causes intellectual disabilities and has long been known to be caused by an extra copy of chromosome 21.
'It's really a shame because there are vulnerable families [of people with autism] who need our support,' said Judith Miller, a clinical psychologist and senior scientist and training director at the Center for Autism Research at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. 'Every dollar and hour spent trying to debunk a conspiracy theory is a dollar and an hour lost that could have been spent trying to understand how to help families.'
A complex condition
Finding the causes of autism is complicated, because it's not a single disorder, said Manish Arora, a professor of environmental medical and climate science at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York.
'Autism is a spectrum, not a single narrow disease,' Arora said. 'It's many, many things under one umbrella.'
Although people diagnosed with autism often have similar strengths and challenges, 'there are many paths to autism and many presentations of autism,' Miller said.
Scientists have found a variety of risk factors for autism — most of which exist before birth — but there is no single cause for a neurological and developmental condition that affects how people interact with others, communicate, learn and behave.
A number of the traits sometimes seen in people with autism — such as being sensitive to loud noises, for example, or finding it difficult to interpret social cues — are also found in people who have not been diagnosed with autism. Doctors diagnose autism based on a person's behavior, noting that there is no simple test for the condition, as there is for Covid or diabetes, said Arora, founder and CEO of a start-up company that researches biomarkers for autism and other neurological conditions.
Finding the cause of an infectious disease — such as influenza, which is caused by the flu virus — is much more straightforward.
While researchers continue to study the factors that influence the development of autistic traits, 'the one thing we know doesn't cause autism is vaccines,' said Catherine Lord, a psychologist and researcher at the Center for Autism Research and Treatment at the UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine.
Genetic vulnerability
Doctors have long known that genes play a large role in autism, simply by noting that autism can run in families. For example, in identical twins — who share all of their DNA — if one twin has autism, the other usually does, as well. In the case of fraternal twins — who share about half their DNA — if one fraternal twin has autism, the chance that the other will have autism ranges from 53% to 67%, according to an analysis of research studies.
Scientists have identified more than 100 genes related to autism, Miller said, and genes are believed to play a role in 60% to 80% of cases.
'The genetics of autism have never been better understood,' said Dr. Gregory Cejas, medical director of the Autism Clinical Center and Fragile X Clinic at the Washington University School of Medicine. 'We're making leaps and bounds about known genetic causes of autism.'
Yet genes clearly don't explain every case of autism.
Autism is very different from conditions like sickle cell anemia or cystic fibrosis, which are caused by a single gene. Scientists believe that people develop autistic traits due to a combination of genetic vulnerability and environmental exposures, Lord said.
'People have found many, many different genetic patterns associated with autism, but none of them are only associated with autism and none of them are always associated with autism,' Lord said.
For example, fragile X syndrome — caused by a mutated gene on the X chromosome — is the most common known cause of autism. But only a fraction of children with the genetic mutation actually develop autism, Miller said. It's possible that this mutation leaves some people more vulnerable to developing autistic characteristics, while others with the same mutations don't develop autistic traits, because they are shielded by protective factors that have not yet been identified.
Some people blamed the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine with autism because symptoms of the condition often occur at around 12 to 15 months of age, the same time toddlers get that immunization. But Miller notes that 'most of the genetic conditions that affect our life and health aren't apparent at birth. Symptoms or characteristics won't show up until later, but the genetic code will have been with us the whole time.'
Prenatal vulnerability
Many of the known risk factors for autistic characteristics occur before birth or at the time of delivery, Arora said. Babies who experience complications at birth, such as their umbilical cord becoming wrapped around their neck, have a higher risk of autism.
So do babies born prematurely, perhaps because of something that happened in the womb.
Children are more likely to be diagnosed with autism if they have older fathers and possibly if they have older mothers, Miller said. It's not clear if something in the biology of older parents causes a child to have a higher risk of autism, or if socioeconomic issues could play a role. It's possible that older parents have better access to health care, making it more likely for their child to receive an autism diagnosis.
A mother's health influences her child's autism risk in several ways, according to multiple studies: Children have a greater chance of being diagnosed with autism if their mothers were exposed to high levels of air pollution or developed a serious infection, such as the flu or pneumonia, while pregnant.
While Ne'eman, of the Autistic Self Advocacy Network, said he's not opposed to basic biological research on autism or its causes, he said those studies do little to help people with autism overcome the barriers they face in their everyday lives.
He notes that only 8.4% of the $419 million spent on autism research in the United States is devoted to support and services for people with autism.
'We need an autism research agenda,' he said, 'that reflects the true priorities of autistic people and our families: supports across the lifespan and inclusion in the community.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's EPA announces major rollbacks to power plant pollution limits
Trump's EPA announces major rollbacks to power plant pollution limits

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Trump's EPA announces major rollbacks to power plant pollution limits

US power plants will be allowed to pollute nearby communities and the wider world with more unhealthy air toxins and an unlimited amount of planet-heating gases under new regulatory rollbacks proposed by Donald Trump's administration, experts warned. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) unveiled a plan on Wednesday that would repeal a landmark climate rule that aims to mostly eliminate greenhouse gases from power plants by the 2030s and would, separately, weaken another regulation that restricts power plants' release of hazardous air pollutants such as mercury. 'We choose to both protect the environment and grow the economy,' said Lee Zeldin, administrator of the EPA, at an event to announce the plans. He said the rollbacks will save households money while also defying what he called 'the climate change cult'. The climate rule has 'saddled our critical power sector with expensive, unreasonable and burdensome regulations', Zeldin said. 'American energy suffered and Americans who rely on reliable, affordable energy suffered. The good news is those days are over.' The EPA's proposals will go out for public comment and are likely to face legal challenges. They target a rule crafted last year by the Biden administration to phase out emissions from electricity-producing fossil fuel plants, which are responsible for around a quarter of US greenhouse gases, and a regulation called the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, which Biden toughened in 2023 to slash harmful pollution suffered by communities. These rollbacks come despite overwhelming scientific evidence of the dire consequences of the worsening climate crisis and the harm caused by pollutants such as mercury, which can seep into water, soils and the air and has been linked to neurological damage in young children as well as heart, lung and immune system ailments in adults. Coal-fired power plants cause nearly half of all mercury emissions in the US, according to the EPA. More than 200 health experts wrote to the EPA on Wednesday warning the moves 'would lead to the biggest pollution increases in decades and is a blatant give-away to polluters'. The experts added the reversals are 'a direct contradiction to the Environmental Protection Agency's mission of protecting public health and the environment'. Trump, however, has vowed to boost fossil fuel production at all costs, having reaped record donations from the oil and gas industry during his election campaign. At Wednesday's EPA event, Zeldin was joined by eight lawmakers, all Republicans – Kevin Cramer, Troy Balderson, Brett Guthrie, Carol Miller, Dan Meuser, Rob Bresnahan, Michael Rulli and Riley Moore – who have collectively received more than $3m from fossil fuel donors in their own election campaigns, a Guardian analysis of the OpenSecrets database shows. Bresnahan, a Pennsylvania representative, holds personal financial interests in more than 20 fossil fuel companies. In justifying the deletion of the Biden climate plan, which the EPA previously estimated would deliver $370bn in net benefits, Zeldin has claimed that US power plants only produce a small and declining fraction of the world's emissions. This is despite the fact that if these power plants were a country, it would be the sixth-largest emitter on the planet. Gina McCarthy, who was EPA administrator under Barack Obama, said that Zeldin's 'dismantling of our nation's protections from power plant pollution is absolutely illogical and indefensible. It's a purely political play that goes against decades of science and policy review.' 'By giving a green light to more pollution, his legacy will forever be someone who does the bidding of the fossil fuel industry at the expense of our health,' she added. 'Everyone will be affected by his actions, but the most vulnerable among us, our kids and grandkids, will suffer the most.' The EPA has embarked upon a wide-ranging blitz upon environmental regulations since Trump became president, setting about removing or loosening clean air and water rules that, collectively, were on track to save 200,000 American lives in the decades ahead. Trump, who has adopted the mantra of 'drill, baby, drill', has claimed unhindered fossil fuel production will bring down energy costs, although he has sought to hobble clean energy such as solar and wind, which are typically the cheapest sources of new electricity generation. The rollbacks follow the second-hottest May on record globally, and a record-hot 2024 that unleashed a stunning number of climate-driven disasters and six weeks of extra-dangerously hot days. Experts have warned that sea level rise is on track to cause 'catastrophic inland migration', including to millions of Americans, with climate shocks set to wipe 50% from global GDP by the end of this century. 'It's completely reprehensible that Donald Trump would seek to roll back these lifesaving standards and do more harm to the American people and our planet just to earn some brownie points with the fossil fuel industry,' said Patrick Drupp, climate policy director at the Sierra Club. 'This administration is transparently trading American lives for campaign dollars and the support of fossil fuel companies, and Americans ought to be disgusted and outraged that their government has launched an assault on our health and our future.'

Welsh tourist vanishes on holiday and found on life support in hospital
Welsh tourist vanishes on holiday and found on life support in hospital

Wales Online

time7 hours ago

  • Wales Online

Welsh tourist vanishes on holiday and found on life support in hospital

Welsh tourist vanishes on holiday and found on life support in hospital It's thought 29-year-old Ashton Jones, from Cwmbran, was violently attacked after he became separated from his friends Ashton Jones is gravely ill in a Thai hospital (Image: Wales News Service ) A British tourist who mysteriously vanished on a night out in Thailand was found on life support in hospital – and his family fear he won't survive unless he is brought back home. Ashton Jones, 29, went on a last-minute trip to Bangkok but was separated from his friends on a night out. ‌ His family have no idea what happened before he was found in a hospital having emergency brain surgery – and is now fighting for his life nearly 6,000 miles away from home. ‌ And to make it worse Ashton didn't take out holiday insurance before jetting off 6,000 miles to Bangkok. Read the biggest stories in Wales first by signing up to our daily newsletter here. His worried grandmother Beverley Walker, of Cwmbran is desperately trying to raise money to pay for his medical care and bring him back home to Wales. She said Ashton had travelled to Thailand with a lifelong friend on May 30 and on arrival met up with another friend. Article continues below Ashton Jones with his grandmother Beverley Walker (Image: Wales News Service ) But five days into his trip the family received the worst news that he had gone missing after a night out partying. His friends spent hours searching for Ashton after he went missing from the nightclub they were in. ‌ He was found in hospital in Thailand and medics believe Ashton, who has epilepsy, was violently attacked. Beverley said: 'I am deeply concerned that without immediate financial or diplomatic assistance my grandson may not survive. 'The emotional toll on our family is immense. We are heartbroken and fearful, watching from afar while Ashton suffers without the care he urgently requires.' ‌ Beverley said on Monday, nearly a week after Ashton went into hospital on June 3, workers at Chonburi Hospital tried to wake him up. She added: 'It was a success but he still has a long way to go. He's bedbound and suffering with fits, cannot talk, eat, or drink and isn't aware. 'We all as a family are worried sick with fear for Ashton and how we can bring him home.' ‌ Ashton's trip was only booked at the last minute and he didn't have any travel insurance (Image: Wales News Service ) But Ashton's treatment and funding to bring him to the UK will cost the family thousands, which is way more than they can afford to pay. As he went out to Thailand at short notice Beverley said he 'did the unthinkable' and travelled without taking out any insurance. ‌ The family have set up a GoFundMe page in a bid to raise £50,000 to help cover medical expenses and to bring him home. So far more than £3,000 has been raised by more than 100 donors since the fundraiser was launched. Beverley said: 'The hospital in Thailand is asking for the cost of his treatment on going that is far beyond what our family can afford. ‌ 'In the meantime Ashton's condition continues to deteriorate and it feels as though we are being left helpless as time runs out. 'We have already put together life savings for medical bills, flights, travel, accommodation to be with him but would never be able to afford to get him home to better health care and his family. 'We all as a family are worried sick with fear for Ashton and how we can bring him home. ‌ 'So please any donations made towards getting Ashton home is appreciated beyond words can describe. 'From the bottom of our hearts thank you.' You can donate to the fundraiser here. Article continues below A Foreign Office spokesman said: 'We are supporting a British man who has been hospitalised in Thailand and are in contact with the local authorities.' Get daily breaking news updates on your phone by joining our WhatsApp community here. We occasionally treat members to special offers, promotions and ads from us and our partners. See our Privacy Notice.

'Karen Millen's breastfeeding comments are infuriating example of mum-shaming'
'Karen Millen's breastfeeding comments are infuriating example of mum-shaming'

Daily Mirror

time7 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

'Karen Millen's breastfeeding comments are infuriating example of mum-shaming'

Like a lot of mums I know, Karen Millen's been mentioned all over my social media feed since she appeared on Jeremy, Storm & Vanessa On 5 this week. Vanessa Feltz highlighted the story of a mum in the USA who has gone viral for breastfeeding her three-year-old, and been trolled since posting her video. Karen Millen, a fashion designer, said that she found the whole thing "selfish". Despite not being a health expert, she then proceeded to declare "there's no benefit is there for a child to be breastfed beyond six months" - the World Health Organization disagrees. Karen, who designs clothes but is not a renowned child psychologist, then throws in "that's not good emotionally for that child", and that she thinks it's "not normal" and "weird". As for her claims that it becomes an addiction - where are the stats or science to back that up? Because I personally have yet to meet an adult who's calling up their mum for a breastfeed because they are so used to the boob. I am just weeks out of my breastfeeding journey, and those comments really hit a nerve, leaving me infuriated. I wasn't alone - other mums around me, some of whom can't see a light at the end of the breastfeeding tunnel just yet, were also livid. These comments are just another example of society shaming mums. If you don't breastfeed, that's bad. If you do breastfeed, that's bad. You just can't win. Any mum who has breastfed will know how much of a rollercoaster the experience can be. There are some truly wonderful highs; the bonding with your baby, the cuddles, the fact that it's super convenient because you don't need to remember bottles. But there are also plenty of lows; the long nights where the baby cluster feeds and there's only so much your partner can do to help, the pressure to always be near your baby because they can't feed without you, the physical and mental toll it takes on your body. I know some mums who are more than ready to be done with it, but their babies aren't, so they are pushing through. 'Selfish' is absolutely not a word I would use to describe any of those women. Then there's the societal pressure. From the moment my baby was born, I had health professionals, family members, friends and random people I didn't even know telling me that breastfeeding was the best course of action (I actually disagree with this sentiment too - mums have enough to deal with, however you choose to feed your baby is best). All the mums around me - no matter how they choose to feed their babies - have been navigating the world of parenting, and there are so many opinions out there, it can be so overwhelming. I can't help but think if I'd seen those comments when I was having a particularly rough night or difficult day, it would have absolutely left me feeling deflated and useless. Mums - and dads too - deserve to get all of the support they can, and unless they're doing something that genuinely could harm or put a child in danger, who are we to judge to another parent's decision? The World Health Organization's official recommendation is: "WHO and UNICEF recommend that children initiate breastfeeding within the first hour of birth and be exclusively breastfed for the first 6 months of life – meaning no other foods or liquids are provided, including water. "Infants should be breastfed on demand – that is as often as the child wants, day and night. No bottles, teats or pacifiers should be used. "From the age of 6 months, children should begin eating safe and adequate complementary foods while continuing to breastfeed for up to two years of age or beyond." See that last bit? OR BEYOND. So no, I don't think it's "selfish" or "weird". I think if a child is happy and healthy and loved, who cares if they're being breastfed or not?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store