Hainault sword attacker Marcus Monzo found guilty of murdering boy, 14, and three attempted murders
A man has been found guilty of murdering a 14-year-old boy with a samurai sword as he walked to school in east London.
Marcus Arduini Monzo, 37, nearly decapitated Daniel Anjorin and attacked five others during a 20-minute rampage in Hainault on 30 April last year.
Prosecutors said he skinned and deboned his pet cat Wizard before trying "to kill as many people as he could" while under the influence of cannabis.
Monzo, a Spanish-Brazilian national from Newham in east London, admitted two charges of possessing an offensive weapon relating to two swords, which he said he bought for display purposes.
He claimed he had no memory of carrying out the attacks denied Daniel's murder along with four charges of attempted murder, wounding with intent, aggravated burglary and possession of a bladed article.
He was cleared of one count of attempted murder - instead found guilty of intending grievous harm - and found guilty of all other charges following a trial at the Old Bailey.
The court heard Monzo was a "talented martial artist" and the jury was shown footage of him unboxing a samurai sword on 4 April last year.
In the four-minute video clip, he calls the weapon "freaking sexy" as he lunges towards the camera and makes different moves.
1:27
The court was also shown CCTV footage from the morning of 30 April, with audible screams in one clip as Monzo drove his grey Ford Transit van at speed into pedestrian Donato Iwule.
Mr Iwule told jurors: "I thought I was dying" and "I saw blood coming out of my neck", after he was struck with a sword before running away.
Witnesses described how Monzo was running around "like a maniac" and "looked a bit mad, like there was nothing there".
Daniel, who had left home at around 7am wearing headphones and school sports clothes, suffered "a near-decapitation" when Monzo attacked him with the weapon from behind, prosecutor Tom Little KC told the jury.
PC Yasmin Mechem-Whitfield chased the armed attacker through alleyways before Monzo struck her three times with the 60cm blade using "extreme force", the court heard.
He then entered a nearby house through the back door and walked upstairs before attacking sleeping couple Sindy Arias and Henry De Los Rios Polania, who he asked: "Do you believe in God?"
Mr Little said their lives were only spared because their four-year-old daughter, who was sleeping nearby, woke up and started to cry.
Monzo, who had been cornered by police, also struck Inspector Moloy Campbell once with the sword before he was finally disarmed and arrested after trying to climb onto a garage to escape.
Doorbell footage shows the moment officers shout: "Don't move, don't f****** move", after he was brought to the ground by three separate taser discharges.
Monzo told police he had "many personalities", including a "professional assassin", and compared the events to The Hunger Games film franchise.
He wept while giving evidence as he said he did not intend to harm anybody and told jurors he had no memory of what happened.
He told how he had previously used psychedelic drugs and smoked cannabis "three or four times a week" before the attack, but denied doing so on the day.
Prosecutors said he likely suffered from a psychotic disorder with "schizophrenic-like symptoms", including "delusional beliefs" that both he and his family were in "mortal danger".
But Mr Little said his psychotic state was self-induced and did not meet the threshold for diminished responsibility.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘Iran-linked' group backs Palestine Action
An Iran-linked group has backed Palestine Action's violent protest campaign against Israeli targets despite the group's proscription as a terrorist organisation. The Islamic Human Rights Commission (IHRC) has been described as an 'Islamist group ideologically aligned with the Iranian regime' that has a history of 'extremist links and terrorist sympathies' in a Government review of the counter-terror Prevent programme. In social media posts and at events over the past 10 months, the IHRC in north London has campaigned in support of 10 Palestine Action activists charged with criminal damage, violent disorder and aggravated burglary after a protest at a factory belonging to Israeli arms company Elbit Systems in Bristol last August. The so-called 'Filton 10' were initially arrested under the Terrorism Act, which meant they could be held for 14 days without charge. None were charged with terrorism offences but the Crown Prosecution Service said there was a 'terrorism connection'. The break-in was cited by Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, on Monday as she announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation after the group damaged two military plans at RAF Brize Norton at a potential cost of millions of pounds. However, in its response to the proscription, the IHRC said it stood by Palestine Action, saying: 'We are all part of the resistance! We are all Palestine Action!' If posted after the official designation as a terror group, the statements could be a criminal offence. The ban has meant that any members of Palestine Action or anyone who supports it could face up to 14 years in prison. The order banning the group will be laid in Parliament on Monday and is expected to become law on July 4. The IHRC, which is funded by a registered charity, said that if Ms Cooper proscribed Palestine Action, 'it will not only be the latest outcome of unchecked political and legal Islamophobia in the UK but another nail in the coffin of the British legal system'. There is no suggestion of any wrongdoing by the IHRC, which has said it has consistently supported the right to protest and civil resistance, particularly by holding governments and companies accountable for 'their roles in enabling human rights abuses, such as the genocide taking place in Gaza.' It said it has 'no institutional or financial link' with the Iranian government, and that allegations suggesting otherwise were 'baseless.' However, Lord Walney, the former Government adviser on political violence, said: 'It is outrageous that a body with a registered charitable arm is proclaiming itself 'part of the resistance' in support of a group about to be proscribed under terrorism law. 'The IHRC has spoken up for Palestine Action time and again while claiming to be a legitimate charity. 'Ministers must wake up to the links between supporters of the Iranian regime and Palestine Action's long campaign of criminal damage inflicted on the UK defence industry.' Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said he condemned the IHRC for supporting Palestine Action, which has used 'violence, intimidation and criminal damage' to try to achieve its political aims. 'The IHRC and the MPs who support [Palestine Action's] violent methods are advocating mob rule and should hang their heads in shame,' he said. 'Just because you disagree with someone doesn't give you the right to smash up their property. Mob rule has no place in a civilised country. 'The IHRC Trust is, in essence, the same organisation as the IHRC and has charitable status. I call on the Charity Commission to urgently revoke their charitable status – no close affiliate of a registered charity should be allowed to support mob violence and attacks on police officers.' The IHRC has described itself as a campaign, research and advocacy non-profit that 'struggles for justice for all peoples'. It was created in 1997 and has special consultative status with the economic and social council of the United Nations. In a letter to Jonathan Hall KC, the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, in January, the IHRC accused the police and Government of misusing anti-terror legislation against the Filton 10. In a letter to the UN, it called for charges to be dropped against Palestinian activists. 'The rights of free expression and protest are too important in a democracy to allow individuals to be investigated for potential terrorism merely because they may have been involved in protests or hold critical opinions,' the IHRC said. Senior figures in Palestine Action have spoken at Quds Day rallies organised by IHRC, a tradition which began in Iran in 1979 shortly after the Iranian revolution. Responding to The Telegraph, the IHRC said Palestine Action was 'not a terrorist organisation'. 'The move to proscribe it illustrates how politicised and malleable the term 'terrorism' has become – now so broad as to border on the meaningless,' it said in a statement. It said the assertion that the IHRC was 'ideologically aligned' with Iran was 'not evidence – it is opinion, and a deeply prejudiced one at that.'
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Prisoner who stabbed child killer Roy Whiting told nurses he did it to get taken off the wing, court hears
A prisoner who stabbed child killer Roy Whiting in his jail cell told nurses he had 'no option other than attack a sex offender in order to get taken off the wing', a court heard. Andrew Light, 45, complained he 'disliked being among nonces' on D-Wing of HMP Wakefield. He was also taking the illicit drug Spice whilst inside shortly before stabbing Whiting, 66, with a six-inch wooden shank, a jury at Leeds Crown Court was told. Whiting - who is serving a life sentence for the abduction and murder of eight-year-old Sarah Payne in July 2000 - was stabbed by Light with the improvised weapon on February 11, 2024. Psychiatrist Dr Purvesh Madhani assessed Light after his attack on Whiting. The doctor told the attempted murder trial Light suffered from schizoaffective disorder and an emotionally unstable personality disorder, but he 'had the requisite capacity to form intent' at the time he tried to kill Whiting. His condition had been managed for decades by taking the anti-psychotic medicine Olanzapine - which stopped him hallucinating - and he was transferred to HMP Wakefield in August 2023 after spending 20 years in a psychiatric facility. Dr Madhani told the court Light had suicidal thoughts and self harmed when he failed to properly take his medication, but at the time of his attack on Whiting he had 'agency', was 'goal orientated' and 'aware of his actions'. The psychiatrist said Light's medical record showed he had been taking the novel psychoactive substance Spice in the period leading up to the stabbing, which could have effected his mental condition. Light told prison nurses in October 2023 that he was 'unhappy' in HMP Wakefield and 'disliked being among nonces'. They recorded in his medical notes that 'being among nonces is making him feel unwell'. He felt 'angry and frustrated'. After failing a mandatory drugs test Light said he 'did not give a s**t about medication'. The medical record read: 'Andrew stated he now feels he has no option other than attack a sex offender in order to get taken off the wing.' Prosecutor Michael Smith asked Dr Madhani what did Light telling Whiting 'that was for Sarah Payne' after stabbing him indicate about his awareness and capacity. Dr Madhani said Light targeted Whiting. 'If that indeed was said, it indicates to me that he is capable of thinking in a coherent way about the alleged victim and his antecedence,' replied the doctor. The jury has been told that Light has admitted possessing a bladed article in the prison and also pleaded guilty to unlawfully wounding Whiting. He also changed his plea to guilty on a change of wounding with intent today. However, Light still denies attempted murder. The trial continues.
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Three men 'who raped teenager in Rotherham' told her "this is what white girls are for", court hears
A teenage girl who was 'raped by three men in Rotherham' and abused for three years was told 'this is what white girls are for', a court has heard. Sageer Hussain allegedly carried out the attack on the 14-year-old, when he was around the same age as her, alongside two other men. Prosecutor Andrew Bailey told Sheffield Crown Court today the girl, now in her late 30s, was raped by Hussain, Kessur Ajaib and Mohammed Makhmood between 1999 and 2002. Describing one of the times the teenager was allegedly raped by Hussain, Mr Bailey told the court she later said: 'He said it was my own fault, I'd led him on. 'I shouldn't have walked around in what I was dressed in. 'I deserved it and that is what white girls were for.' Mr Bailey then told the jury of eight women and four men: 'He continued to call her things like "white sl**" when he saw her.' The prosecutor opened the trial of the three men by telling the jury: 'The three defendants are all charged with serious sexual offending of a historical nature. 'The offending all took place in the Rotherham area.' He said all three men are accused of raping one of the complainants. Hussain is also charged with raping a second teenager. Mr Bailey said the first teenager was an 'immature and vulnerable young girl' when she began hanging around a Rotherham youth club. He said this club was also frequented by young Asian men, some around her age but others who were little older and would ask the girls if they wanted drink and give them cigarettes. The prosecutor said the girl met Ajaib at the youth club and he began to sexually assault her after word got around that she had had consensual sex with a boy of her own age, even though she was 14. Mr Bailey said Ajaib saw this as a 'green light' and the defendant said that 'now she needed to come to try somebody real'. He told the jury how Ajaib, who was about 18 at the time, raped her in an alleyway. He said: 'She told him she didn't want to do it' and added: 'He was a lot bigger than her and she felt overpowered. She realised she had no choice.' Mr Bailey said this girl was made to have sexual intercourse on 'about five or six occasions'. He said: 'She felt like a prostitute. She was in fear of being hurt if she didn't do it.' The prosecutor said Makhmood, who was about 18 or 19 at the time, raped the same girl in an old graveyard in Rotherham as she fought against him. He said that he called her a 'sl**' and a 'dirty b****' before spitting at her and laughing. Mr Bailey said the girl's parents had split up and her mother was working four jobs, so she had to deal with it on her own. He said she 'did not dare tell anyone'. The prosecutor said the girl described Hussain as a 'horrible person' who walked around with a swagger. Mr Bailey told the jury how Hussain allegedly raped the second complainant in an alley in Rotherham town centre with two other people present, one female and one male. He said she described how she cried throughout the ordeal as the the other girl blocked her exit. 'She did what she had to do to get out,' the prosecutor said. He said the girl described herself as 'looking like a 14-year-old boy, not feminine at all, and looking young for her age'. Ajaib, 43, of Walter Street, Rotherham denies two counts of rape and one of indecent assault, all relating to the first complainant. Makhmood, 43, of Falding Street, Rotherham, denies one count of raping the first complainant. Hussain, 39, formerly of Rotherham, denies two counts of raping the first complainant and one of raping the second complainant. Mr Bailey told the jury that Makhmood told police in interview that it was a case of 'mistaken identity' and police had 'got the wrong man'. Hussain told officers the 'allegations were vindictive' and Ajaib made no comment when he was interviewed. The trial was adjourned and will continue tomorrow.
