Europe-US power struggle in Asia-Pacific
The annual Shangri-La Dialogue that Singapore hosts is a gathering of security and defence experts of south, south-east and east-Asia, along with the United States, European Union countries and China. It is a meeting point where new worldviews are enunciated if not new spheres of influence are carved out.
At this year's Shangri-La, China stepped back as it were. There can only be speculation why it did so. India and Pakistan delegations represented by highest military personnel were present, avoiding running into each other in the corridors of the hotel.
It was the Americans and the Europeans who seemed to have crossed swords at the conference. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has spelt the American position with regard to European powers. He said, 'We would much prefer that the overwhelming balance of European investment be on that continent...so that as we partner there, which we will continue to do, we're able to use our comparative advantage as an Indo-Pacific nation to support our partners here.'
In plain language, Hegseth is saying that Europe has no place in the Indo-Pacific, even if it had in the earlier period colonialism in the 19h and early 20th centuries. Americans believe that they are victors in the Second World War in the Asian region, and therefore they have the right to assert Asia-Pacific to be its sphere of influence. It is blunt language indeed, characteristic of the Trump Administration.
Surprisingly, Hegseth says that the American commitment in Europe will continue, and the Americans will continue to support the European countries. This is in contrast to the rhetoric of President Donald Trump that Europe must take care of itself, and America is not interested in leading NATO.
Trump has been flip-flopping quite a lot, about tariffs and about security commitments. Unable to persuade Russian President Vladimir Putin to agree to a ceasefire with Ukraine, Trump feels that America has no option but to oppose Russia in Europe.
The European counter to Hegseth formulation was ready. Kaja Kallas, the Estonian politician and European Union's High Representative for foreign affairs and security policy and Vice-President of the European Commission, said, 'It is a good thing we are doing more (in Europe), but what I want to stress is that the security of Europe and the security of the Pacific is very much interlinked.' She went on to say, 'If you are worried about China, you should be worried about Russia.'
French President Emmanuel Macron emphasized that France remains an Indo-Pacific power. He referred to the French presence in New Caledonia and French Polynesia, and the 8,000 French soldiers in the region.
Macron gave a political twist to the China factor, by countering the American approach of gathering all anti-China forces of the Indo-Pacific region. He said, 'We are neither China nor the US., we don't want to depend on either of them. We want to cooperate with both as far as we can, and we can cooperate for growth and prosperity and stability for our people and the world order, and I think this is exactly the same view of a lot of countries and a lot of people of this region.' It is not surprising that the Americans are not comfortable with the European presence in the Indo-Pacific region. But the Europeans see both economic and defence opportunities in Asia.
An International Institute of Strategic Studies (ISS) of London in its report noted, 'European companies including Airbus, Damen, Naval Group and Thales have a long-standing presence in Southeast Asia, and other European actors have established themselves in the market in the last decade, including Italy's Fincantieri and Sweden's Saab.' There is competition now between Europe and America. China can watch the contest with amusement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Etihad
33 minutes ago
- Al Etihad
German city evacuates 20,000 after unexploded World War II bombs are found
4 June 2025 21:10 BERLIN (AGENCIES)Some 20,500 people were being evacuated from the city of Cologne in western Germany as explosives experts prepared to defuse three unexploded World War II bombs found during construction work this evacuation, which comes after the discovery Monday of three American-made bombs, is the largest in Cologne since the end of World War II, the city administration said.A crucial industrial, cultural and logistical hub for Nazi Germany, Cologne was a primary target of Allied bombers during World War authorities cordoned off a 3,280-foot radius around Deutz, a busy district next to the Rhine river, across from the Old discoveries of unexploded World War II ordnance - 80 years on from the end of the conflict - are not uncommon across Germany and parts of Europe, the proximity of the bombs to downtown Cologne and other densely populated areas was large bomb was fitted with an impact fuse, meaning the bomb is less likely to go off on its own over time, but it is still dangerous if disturbed."In that respect, they are dangerous, yes. But it's definitely not the case that we need to panic,' Kai Kulschewski told local radio station WDR 5 on is the head of neighboring city Dusseldorf's explosive ordnance disposal department, which is overseeing the evacuation and businesses, government buildings, 58 hotels and nine schools are within the evacuation zone, the city said. The area also includes the busy MesseDeutz train station and a major hospital, whose intensive-care patients were moved to nearby hospitals by disposal experts plan to defuse the devices later Wednesday, once the entire zone is cleared. City authorities began the evacuations at 8am, conducting door-to-door checks and warning that people who refused to evacuate could be escorted by force and face steep on Wednesday afternoon showed that streets usually teeming with people and traffic were empty. Public transport was severely disrupted, with roads closed and train services halted. Flights at Cologne Bonn Airport continued operating, but access to the airport was landmarks, including the Cologne Philharmonie and museums, were forced to close for the day. More than a dozen couples scheduled to wed at Cologne's city hall had to relocate their ceremonies, WDR Wednesday afternoon, WDR reported that few people had arrived at the shelters for displaced residents; people had instead taken advantage of the good continued to sail on the Rhine, although authorities warned that they would clear a stretch of the river once the defusing told WDR that around 1,500 to 2,000 unexploded bombs from World War II are found every year across North Rhine-Westphalia, the state in which Cologne is located. In 2010, three workers died trying to defuse a bomb in the city of Göttingen when it exploded. Also that decade, in the city of Euskirchen, a construction worker was killed when he detonated an explosive from the war while digging.
Al Etihad
4 hours ago
- Al Etihad
China's rare earth export curbs hit Europe's auto industry
4 June 2025 17:42 BERLIN/FRANKFURT (REUTERS)Some European auto parts plants have suspended output and Mercedes-Benz is considering ways to protect against shortages of rare earths, as concerns about the damage from China's restrictions on critical mineral exports decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of rare earths and related magnets has upended the supply chains central to automakers, aerospace manufacturers, semiconductor companies and military contractors around the move underscores China's dominance of the critical mineral industry, key to the green energy transition, and is seen as leverage by China in its trade war with US President Donald Trump. China produces around 90% of the world's rare trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic said on Wednesday that he and his Chinese counterpart had agreed to clarify the rare earth situation as quickly as possible."We must reduce our dependencies on all countries, particularly on a number of countries like China, on which we are more than 100% dependent," said EU Commissioner for Industrial Strategy Stephane Sejourne."The export (curbs) increase our will to diversify," he said as Brussels identified 13 new projects outside the bloc aimed at increasing supplies of metals and minerals on Wednesday, Mercedes-Benz production chief Joerg Burzer said he was talking to the carmaker's top suppliers about building "buffers" such as rare earth stockpiles to protect against potential threats to supply. Mercedes was currently not affected by the said that part of its supplier network was affected by the shortage but that its own plants were running as auto supplier association CLEPA said several production lines have been shut down after running out of supplies, the latest to warn about the growing threat to manufacturing due to the China's announcement in April coincided with a broader package of retaliation against Washington's tariffs, the measures apply globally and are causing worry among business executives around the and US automakers have complained that the restrictions imposed by China threaten production, following a similar grievance from an Indian EV maker last week. Reliance on China Automakers from General Motors to BMW and major suppliers like ZF and BorgWarner are researching or have developed motors with low- to zero rare earth content in a bid to cut their reliance on China, but few have managed to scale production to bring down has deployed a magnet-free electric motor for its latest generation of electric cars, but still requires rare earths for smaller motors powering components like windshield wipers or car window carmaker Volkswagen said it is not seeing any shortages at the slow pace of easing its critical mineral export controls has become a focus of Trump's criticism of Beijing, which he says has violated the truce reached last month to roll back tariffs and trade has sought to redefine the US' trading relationship with its biggest economic rival by imposing steep tariffs on billions of dollars of imported goods in hopes of narrowing a trade deficit and bringing back lost imposed tariffs as high as 145% against China only to scale them back after a selloff in stock, bond and currency markets over the sweeping nature of the levies. China has responded with its own tariffs and is leveraging its dominance in key supply chains to persuade Trump to back down. Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping are expected to talk this week to try to iron out their differences and the export curbs are expected to be high on the agenda.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
South Korea's Lee Jae-myung is the right man to deal with Donald Trump
South Koreans went to the polls to choose a new president on Tuesday, and they handed Lee Jae-myung of the Democratic Party a clear victory with 49.4 per cent of the vote. But even before Mr Lee was sworn in at the country's Parliament the following morning, he appeared to be surrounded by a whirlwind of questions, accusations and warnings. 'The first task facing South Korea's next leader: Handling Trump' was one headline, referring not just to the 25 per cent tariffs Seoul may have to deal with from Washington, but also Mr Lee's willingness to improve relations with China and North Korea, a shift from the very pro-US and Japan outlook of former president Yoon Suk-yeol, who had plunged the country into chaos by briefly declaring martial law last December. It may indeed be quite the challenge if Mr Trump listens to one self-appointed adviser, the hardcore Maga activist Laura Loomer, who posted on X: 'RIP South Korea. The communists have taken over and won the presidential election today. This is terrible.' Mr Lee faces a country with deep political divides, and the two other candidates, both on the right, won a combined total of just over 50 per cent. So even though the election was widely seen as being driven by anger at Mr Yoon's self-implosion – for which he was impeached, arrested and driven from office – which hindered the candidacy of Kim Moon-soo, who is from the same People Power Party as Mr Yoon, 'the conservative tally outweighed Lee's support even after the debacle of Yoon's martial law decree', as one analyst put it. Not enough young people support Mr Lee, say some. He faces legal charges – which he says are politically motivated – although they may be suspended until after his five-year term as President ends. Others accuse him of being a showy populist who has used fiery and – they would say – irresponsible rhetoric about US troops stationed in the country. How will he cope with an economy that is 'sputtering'? Oh, and to top it all, he apparently doesn't even have a proper place to work, since Mr Yoon moved the presidential office out of the Blue House, the official residence, to a military compound that none of the candidates said they liked. There are other ways to look at Mr Lee's victory, of course. The 6 per cent margin of his win over Mr Kim was more than emphatic enough in a three-way race, and with his Democratic Alliance partners holding 173 out of the 300 parliamentary seats, there should be none of the logjam between the executive and the legislature that led Mr Yoon to make such a rash (and career-ending) move. Mr Lee has called for 'national unity' and said on election night that he wanted South Korea to be a country 'where we live together with mutual recognition and co-operation rather than hatred and loathing'. All of this should reassure investors, while the new President has a $25 billion stimulus package up his sleeve, plans for labour and corporate governance reforms, and wants to go all-out on stimulating domestic demand. As for Mr Trump, despite Ms Loomer's wild characterisation of Mr Lee as a 'communist' – the adjectives 'liberal' and 'centrist' are more commonly preferred – the two leaders may be more likely to hit it off than some have suggested. They are both populists: Mr Lee made a point of being filmed when he climbed over barriers to enter the National Assembly to vote against Mr Yoon's imposition of martial law last December, and he has been referred to as 'Korea's Bernie Sanders', but also as 'Korea's Trump', for his candid speech and ability to connect with the grassroots. On North Korea, if Mr Trump enters negotiations with Pyongyang again, as he did during his first term, the two could be very in tune. In fact, this February Mr Lee's party sent a letter to the Nobel Committee urging them to nominate Mr Trump for this year's peace prize in the hope that he 'continue his peace-building efforts during his second term', as a party official put it. That was a canny move that will surely have been brought to Mr Trump's attention. Both men have survived assassination attempts. Mr Lee was stabbed in the neck in January 2024 and was airlifted to hospital. Just like Mr Trump, Mr Lee drew inspiration from his survival, saying: 'Since my life was saved by our people, I will dedicate the rest of it solely to serving them.' And when it comes to trade discussions with the US, not only has Mr Lee said it is 'the most important issue' for him, after 'overcoming people's hardships and recovering from the current turmoil', but he seems prepared both to stand his ground and to show the US President whatever deference is required. 'Diplomacy between independent countries can be mutually beneficial,' Mr Lee said on Korean radio last Monday. 'We have plenty of cards to play. There's room to give and take, and that's what we must do well.' Asked how he would react to tough words from Mr Trump, Mr Lee was ready. 'That's just the way powerful countries operate,' he said. 'Any humiliation or pressure is not about me personally – it's about the entire nation. If it's necessary, I'll crawl under his legs. What's the big deal?' So for sure, Mr Lee faces challenges. But with a clear mandate, allies dominating Parliament, and being seen as the person bringing back stability after the tumult of the past six months, he has a lot going for him too. Navigating better relations with China while maintaining the treaty alliance with the US won't perhaps be easy, but he won't be the only leader having to thread that needle. Above all, his pragmatism may end up being his greatest strength. Take his concluding words about his possible approach to Mr Trump: 'An hour of the president's time is worth 52 million hours of the Korean people's time,' he said. 'If the president has to bend briefly so that 52 million people can stand tall, then that's what must be done.'
