logo
Jefferson Awards: Potts helps provide food for veterans

Jefferson Awards: Potts helps provide food for veterans

Yahoo18-03-2025

Mar. 18—LIMA — Her title may be director of the the Veterans Food Pantry of Northwest Ohio.
To watch Elizabeth "Betsy" Potts in action on a recent morning, she mostly directs herself as a devoted volunteer for the organization, which offers two to three days' worth of food for area veterans, free of charge.
She helped the volunteers who grabbed boxes of food items off a truck by carrying boxes of cans and putting them into storage. She pulled a cart of cans of vegetables and started placing them on shelves, in preparation for the veterans who'd visit later that day.
"So many of our veterans had a hard time when they were in the service," said Potts, who served in the Marine Corps writing orders stateside and working in the mailroom during the Vietnam War. "... They're just so grateful for having someplace to go. We find some of our veterans will come in here because they're in a group of veterans who understand: 'Oh, where were you? What unit were you in?' All that. That's a little side thing that is gratifying sometimes."
Potts is one of eight local winners of the Jefferson Awards for Public Service and will get a $300 donation to the charity of her choice on her behalf. All the winners will be recognized at an event Tuesday, March 25, with one winner receiving an additional $700 donation for a non-profit.
Potts started volunteering at the food pantry 15 years ago, when it was in the basement of Memorial Hall, after moving back to Lima with her husband, an Air Force veteran from the Vietnam era, after working at post offices in Charlotte and Columbus. She served as a co-director after five years and became its sole director, a volunteer position, five years ago.
The pantry moved to 810 W. North St. in February 2015 and serves 275 families every month during its pickups on Wednesday and Friday afternoons. It's a choice food pantry, meaning veterans pick what they want while they're there.
It's completely funded by donations and is financially stable right now, Potts said. It benefits from other veterans and civilian organizations raising money on its behalf and some savvy buying of non-perishable goods by Potts. Sometimes it gets fresh fruits and vegetables or even eggs donated to help veterans.
"Volunteerism is at the heart of Ms. Potts' daily activities," Denis Glenn wrote in his nomination letter for the Jefferson Awards. "She encourages others to volunteer by not only her words but by her actions. She crosses many diverse paths and treats all with respect, something she learned from her days as a U.S. Marine."
Potts also serves as the paymaster at the Marine Corps League, treasurer with the Vietnam Veterans of America Chapter 089, treasurer with the Daughters of the American Revolution and as a member of the Friends of the Library.
She also enjoys genealogical research, where she found she had a second-great-grandfather, George Washington Lowery, who served in the Civil War and other ancestors who served in the Revolutionary War.
She said she was surprised when she learned she was a local winner of the Jefferson Awards, showing her humility along the way.
"You read the stories of everybody else that has been here or dominating anything," she said. "You know, all I do is run a pantry. It takes maybe 20 to 30 hours a week that I'm doing something for the pantry. It just completely shocked me. I just couldn't believe it."
JEFFERSON AWARDS
The 2025 Jefferson Awards for Public Service committee has selected nine winners from throughout the region, including eight adult winners and one youth winner. They will be honored at a banquet March 25 at Veterans Memorial Civic Center in downtown Lima.
Read past Jefferson Awards profiles at LimaOhio.com/jeffersonawards.
Reach David Trinko at 567-242-0467 or on Twitter/X @Lima_Trinko.
Featured Local Savings

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How a Springfield agency's mission evolved since its founding after the Civil War
How a Springfield agency's mission evolved since its founding after the Civil War

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

How a Springfield agency's mission evolved since its founding after the Civil War

SPRINGFIELD – As a young child, Mary Jo McDonald spent years in foster care and was on the list to be adopted by a new family. That all changed when her troubled mother found the strength to change. McDonald credits her reunification with her mother when she was 7 to help provided years ago by a social service agency, Helix Human Resources. The agency cared for her and gave her mother support to overcome traumas — and become a good parent. Helix, formed just after the Civil War, is marking 160 years of helping countless families as the city's oldest nonprofit agency and one of the oldest social service organizations statewide. McDonald, now 50 and a successful real estate agent, said her mother is a lovely woman who turned to alcohol after facing trauma after immigrating to the United States from Ireland at the age of 18. New to the country, her mother was raped, got pregnant and gave up that child for adoption. Then a son, McDonald's younger brother, died of crib death. Her mother tried to forget the hurt by drinking and could not care for her only remaining child. McDonald was placed in foster care through Helix. It was McDonald's foster mother who started the process that changed her family. She alerted McDonald's mother that her child was on track to be adopted, knowing that was not what she wanted. While McDonald's mom had tried rehab before, this time, with help from Helix, it was a success. She went to rehab, got counseling and was given job training to become a certified nursing assistant. The agency helped her find a job and an apartment. Mother and daughter were able to reunite. 'My mom has not drunk since I was 7,' said McDonald, who continues to volunteer with Helix. 'I found out if you are willing to accept the help, the help is there.' In 160 years, Helix has changed names twice and added and subtracted services over the decades but it's mission has never changed, said Mark Paglia, chief executive officer. 'We provide a variety of services for children and family who have experienced some level of trauma in their lives,' said Paglia who had headed up the agency for about 18 months. The Springfield agency now offers at least 14 programs, with the largest number of clients, more than 1,000, served through outpatient programs such as the Holyoke Family Wellness Center. It provides mental health treatment at its clinic on Lower Westfield Road to anyone who asks. 'We have shifted a lot over the years,' Paglia said. 'In the 50s, 60s, 70s, there were a lot of institutional type services but that has changed over the last 20 years to programs in less-restrictive environments.' Today, the agency only has 15 people living in a residential setting. It offers help to families who call with a need. It also connects to clients though referrals from agencies and schools, Paglia said. The Holyoke Wellness Center serves some of the largest number of people and is designed to be accessible for anyone in need of help, he said. 'One call or email to our clinic through our admission coordinator will connect people with assessment and clinicians,' Paglia said. One of its biggest programs is a family assessment and mentoring service. That is an individualized program that helps members succeed in the community and at home to improve their lives, Paglia said. It also works with school departments, which refer children with social-emotional problems, behavioral challenges or learning disabilities that they cannot educate in a regular classroom to one of several schools the program runs. Helix staff also partner with the state Department of Children and Families, offering programs similar to the one McDonald went through decades ago to help children in foster care and families in crisis turn their lives around so they can reunite, Paglia said. That program also follows parents after their children return home to ensure the family remains stable and gets any additional help needed, he said. When Helix employees realized they were coming up on the 160th anniversary, staff started doing research and realized the agency was started to help Civil War widows, many of whom came to Springfield to settle with their children, Paglia said. 'It was a difficult time, nationally over 600,000 people were killed and many were husbands and fathers,' Paglia said. 'Women from different churches came together and said, 'How can we help?'' he said. The Springfield Home for Friendless Women and Children was formed. Its first president was Rachel Capem Merriam, of Merriam-Webster dictionary fame, he said. The agency evolved and people started calling it the Children's Study Home. It officially changed its name to that in 2001. That stuck until 2021, when staff, the board of trustees and the community came together and decided to change it to Helix Human Services. 'They liked the idea that the name represents resilience,' he said. When clients are in crisis, they lack hope. But Helix counselors work to assure them it is just a moment in their lives and they can go forward, Paglia said. 'We feel the trauma the children experience does not define who they are,' he said. 'We believe children can lead happy, healthy lives.' A lot of children the agency helps have faced abuse, including sexual abuse and neglect. Some have moved from foster care placement to placement. Others suffer from mental health illnesses, he said. Helix's primary campus is located on Sherman Street in Springfield, where it runs residential programs for boys aged 5 and 11. Its SHARP program specializes in assisting students who are in the LGBTQ+ community. It also operates the Mill Pond schools in Springfield and Richmond. The schools are designed for students from kindergarten through age 22 who have behavioral or social-emotional problems or learning disabilities that make it difficult for them to achieve in a regular public school setting. It offers additional programs in the Cape Cod area, Paglia said. The SHARP program operates to help youth in the LGBTQ+ community who have faced trauma live healthy, happy and independent lives as they move into adulthood. 'We work to provide counseling for our kids to build self-acceptance in the face of a community where they are typically not accepted,' he said. The program is mainly for older teenagers and includes staff who are part of the LGBTQ+ community. They run support groups, provide counseling and teach clients skills to live independently. 'In many ways we lead from behind,' Paglia said. 'We try to empower them and help them identify who they want to be.' Paglia calls himself 'the new guy,' having led the agency for less than two years. But he said he is proud of the work the 148-person staff does and is grateful to a strong board of directors and business supporters. One of the biggest concerns today is the threat federal funding cuts. Paglia said those cuts impact the program directly as well as indirectly, through state and school reduction in the funding that helps pay for children's tuition and therapy. But Paglia said Helix has survived many crises and changes over its 160 years. He feels it will weather current turmoil. 'I think our strength is in our board, who have, over the past 10 to 15 years, led Helix through some challenging times,' he said. Read the original article on MassLive.

The one change that worked: I started sketching
The one change that worked: I started sketching

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The one change that worked: I started sketching

I've always battled with phone use. I resent how much my sense of being alive in the world – feeling it, doing things, making stuff happen – is affected by my screen time. So a few years ago, I decided to do a sketch every day. I had always wanted to draw, but I was embarrassed about starting out because I was so bad at it. Then I bought a few black notebooks: a small one for my jacket pocket, and larger ones for my bedside and for the kitchen table. As no one would ever see my drawings, I decided I didn't need to care about what anyone thought. One day I grabbed one of the notebooks and a pencil and went out to the Cornish cliffs. I spent 10 minutes hastily drawing some cows and wild ponies. Standing on a cliff, pencil in hand, I felt like an idiot and an impostor, but I had started. It was a happy moment. I had never drawn a pony before but, to my delight, one quick, simple sketch seemed not bad for a beginner. Next, I drew our cat snoozing. Then our dog, Foxy, staking out a mouse in our kitchen. Beside each sketch, I wrote the date and little notes. Having the pencils and sketchbooks within easy reach – in my car or lying around the house – meant these small moments built up. Within weeks what might otherwise have been buried in photos on my mobile phone became a tender profile of my life unfolding on pages. My favourite drawings are often of people. Our daughter, Elizabeth, is usually furious when she realises I'm surreptitiously drawing her. Drawing strangers at airports, in cafes or on the tube is fun. I enjoy the element of danger. Will I get caught? Can I finish the drawing before that person moves on? It helps to pass the time on long journeys instead of spending it on screen. Lots of my sketches are dreadful, but the quickest ones – of people or animals – can have good results because drawing at speed makes my self-consciousness fall away. One unexpected benefit of doing a sketch a day is I spend less time doomscrolling on my phone. Like most people, I am anxious about the state of the world, but drawing slows things down, makes me pay attention to the moment. I lose myself in the act of drawing, and I'm using my hands, which is soothing in itself. Drawing also brings me back to the analogue world. It makes me happier and more patient. Art is known for being therapeutic and transformative, and I've definitely felt the benefits. In two years our daughter will be leaving home. In the future I'll be able to look at those drawing diaries and think, yes, we were together when I did those.

Why I Don't Always Thank Veterans For Their Service
Why I Don't Always Thank Veterans For Their Service

Buzz Feed

time18 hours ago

  • Buzz Feed

Why I Don't Always Thank Veterans For Their Service

James shifts nervously from one foot to the other, sweat glistening on his forehead and his muscles tense. A smiling intern approaches with a flag pin intent on thanking him for his military service whether he likes it or not. That's when he bolts for the door. I take off after him; there's no way I'm letting him tear onto the highway with his nervous system flashing red. Visions of a high-speed collision flash in my mind as I jog through the parking lot trying to catch him. Earlier that morning, I noticed James standing apart from the milling crowd gathered for a workshop on terminally ill veterans who have 'combat-related psychological challenges' like post-traumatic stress disorder, moral injury and complicated bereavement. With his straight back and hair cut in the style of a Marine, James was a stark contrast to the business card-exchanging group of social workers and psychologists with whom I'd been chatting. I had gone over and struck up a conversation. He'd told me he worked for a 'street program' focused on helping veterans struggling with drugs, homelessness and issues like depression, suicidal thoughts and PTSD. He'd recently applied to graduate schools with a vision of becoming a psychologist. 'I want to be there for my Iraq War brothers and sisters,' he'd said. 'We were all betrayed, every one of us. Moral injury and PTSD, that's just the tip of the iceberg.' 'Betrayed by who?' I'd asked. 'Politicians, military brass, the majority of people in this country who don't give a shit what really happened to me and my buddies and who don't want to hear about it.' He'd stared into my eyes as though expecting me to be uncomfortable with his candor. 'I've heard that from lots of vets,' I'd said, nodding. 'Not just the ones who fought in Iraq; going way back.' 'That's the dirty little secret about war,' he'd said, extending his hand. 'It's always an act of betrayal.' Later, we'd grabbed seats together at a table with three others. The trainer started with moral injury ― what it is, what it looks like, why it matters. He played poignant excerpts from recorded interviews of veterans talking about the psychologically and spiritually painful impact of witnessing or committing actions that violated their sense of morality or that had shattered their trust in those they'd relied on to act in their best interest. The trouble had started after lunch when the trainer asked attendees who were veterans to raise their hands. A half-dozen or so complied, but James hesitated. I'd given him a nod and whispered, 'You don't have to do this if you don't want to.' He gave a forced smile and raised his hand. Then the trainer asked the veterans to stand and announced that an intern would be making rounds with a box of flag pins. James had quickly sized up the well-intentioned ritual coming his way. The trainer would speak directly to each veteran, asking them what branch they'd been in and where they had been stationed. Then he would thank each of them for their 'service' while the intern pinned a flag to their shirt and the audience clapped. Sweating profusely, James had scanned the room looking for the nearest exit and anything or anyone that might get in his way. That's when he'd bolted. 'James,' I call out as he unlocks a beat-up Ford Mustang. He doesn't respond as he flings the door open and fumbles with the seatbelt, his hands shaking. I step between the open door and the car's frame. I know it's tricky, maybe even dangerous, getting in his space when he's feeling threatened, but I'm determined to help him settle before he revs the engine. 'Five minutes,' I say holding up five fingers. 'Just give me five, James. After that you can forget you ever met me.' His respirations are rapid. I take a deep breath, trying to cue him to do the same. He taps the steering wheel rapidly with one of his fists as though thinking, then motions to the passenger seat. 'Clock's ticking,' he says. I sit in the passenger seat, leaving the door open. We stare ahead avoiding eye contact. I wait for him to speak. 'Service,' he finally says. 'They have no idea.' He lowers his head. 'They call what happened over there service? Do they think we were serving fucking French fries? What I saw, what I did. What my buddies did. What we had done to us. It wasn't any kind of service. It was pure hell and I'm still living it. Now they want to pat me on the head and jab me with a cheap flag pin?' 'You're right,' I respond. 'They have no idea.' 'They don't want to know,' he shoots back. 'They want us all to shut the hell up and go along so they don't have to take any responsibility themselves. Didn't I tell you we were all betrayed? It never stops.' He gives me a sad look. 'I watched friends get their guts blown out. You ever seen bodies of women and kids splattered across the ground knowing you and your buddies are the ones who did it?' I shake my head silently. He grips his steering wheel so tightly the sinews in his forearms look like tightened cables. 'Service,' he says with acid sarcasm. His face softens and tears well in his eyes. 'How can they start in with the flag pins without even asking me what my experience was? It's like they're trying to push a lie down my throat.' 'What lie?' I ask. He looks up as though searching for words. 'That whatever we do is some kind of service to humanity. That we never commit atrocities and cover them up; that we're always helping the weak and protecting democracy. I found out fast we were killing and getting killed for money and power.' 'What's it like having people thanking you for your service everywhere you go, James?' He shakes his head as though I wouldn't understand. I remain silent, giving him time to either respond or switch the subject. 'You know what it's like?' he finally says. 'You might think this is an exaggeration but you asked. It's an act of violence.' 'Help me understand that one,' I say. 'Imagine you're hurting like hell and all you want to do is tell your friends and family what happened, hoping they'll understand, hoping maybe they'll tell you they're sorry about what you had to go through and reassure you that you're not some kind of monster. But all they do is pretend what you did was great and parrot a bunch of lame horse shit about being a hero. It's like you're being choked to death from the inside and you look to others for help and they just smile and look away.' 'Psychological and emotional violence,' I say. He nods. I look at the clock and mention that it's been five minutes. 'You kept your part of the deal, James. I've got time if you want to talk more but I want to keep my end. It's your call.' His hands are steady now and his breathing is normal. 'Thanks for coming after me. I'm good now.' He reaches out his hand. He squeezes mine tight and says, 'Thanks for not thanking me for my service when we met.' I nod. As he drives off I think about the hundreds of terminally ill combat veterans I've worked with as their hospice social worker. Most were, as combat veteran Tim O'Brien puts it, 'carrying stuff.' Stuff many ― maybe most ― civilians wouldn't understand. That's probably why so many of these veterans had locked it up inside and hidden it from view. Long days in a hospital bed, though, have ways of dredging stuff up. It's normal for patients approaching death to look back on their lives and take stock. When you're looking back on a life that includes the cataclysmic violence and horrific loss and grief of war, this life review process can be psychologically and spiritually complex ― even painful. Many of the combat veterans I've known had spent decades trying not to think or talk (at least not with civilians) about what they'd seen and done. Many suppressed undigested grief for friends who'd been killed or struggled silently with survival guilt, anger or feeling unsafe in the world. Some struggled with explosive tempers, anxiety or depression related to the scars of war; others with emotional numbness, alcohol and/or drug addictions, or feeling disconnected from others. Some had polished up a handful of well-rehearsed war stories sanitized of blood, gore or moral ambiguity, which they'd offered family and friends so as not to upset them. Others simply kept quiet. But as death approaches, it can claw up stories and memories that have been suppressed. These memories can be fragmented and poignant with details of war's horror ― the smell of burning bodies, the eyes of a dead buddy gazing up at the sky, the numb immersion day after day after day in violence, killing and death. Sometimes they are laced with moral pain and shame ― the killing of civilians, lifeless bodies of 'the enemy' being desecrated in the rage of a battle's aftermath. As I walk back to the training, I think about a B-17 pilot who participated in bombing raids during World War II intended to incinerate German cities. The point had been to kill every man, woman and child ― every dog and flea unlucky enough to be on the ground. He'd done his duty and returned from war assured that he'd helped save the world from fascism. But humans, despite misguided notions about war being part of the 'human condition,' are not wired to kill each other however just the cause may seem. As an old man, he was haunted by the belief that he was a mass murderer. He was convinced he was going to go to hell after he died and there he'd feel the kind of fiery torture he believed he'd inflicted on others. Like James, he had winced at reflexive expressions of thanks for his 'service.' The message he heard was: W e believe that you were performing a service, standing up for freedom, protecting the weak, saving democracy. You're a hero. That's our story and we don't want to hear your story if it makes us uncomfortable or challenges us in any way. He didn't want someone else's story shoved down his throat; he wanted someone with whom it was safe to tell his own without being judged or rejected. He wanted to unpack some of what he'd been carrying and find compassion for the 20-year-old young man he'd been when thrust into the bloody savagery of war. He wanted to begin to heal before he died. As someone who works with dying veterans, I've learned to never automatically thank them for their service. I realize many are justifiably proud of their time in the military, of friendships forged, courage shown and service given. I know that most appreciate expressions of thanks and that these expressions are often genuine and heartfelt on the part of those offering them. But I would rather disappoint those who expect me to join the chorus of thanks than close the door on a single veteran like James who needs someone who won't flinch or look away if they choose to share what they have been carrying. Refusing to lead with the culturally sanctioned chant 'Thank you for your service' sends the message to veterans like James that I'm not pushing a story that denies their experience. It's safe to talk. I can be trusted to listen without judging. Those veterans who have noticed and asked about my lack of obedience to the social custom of using the euphemism 'service' have generally understood and appreciated my reasons once we discussed them. Several shared things with me during those conversations they would not otherwise have shared. Things they, too, had been carrying. But there's another reason I never give automatic thanks or use the word service. It's an easy out for the rest of us. It lets civilians like me off the hook when it comes to taking any responsibility for what we have allowed political and military leaders to do in our name. It allows us to wash our hands of any culpability for how they, and we, have used our troops. That's part of what I think James meant when he said all wars are acts of betrayal. Calling the sum of actions taken in war 'service' is a convenient way for the rest of us to deny what our warriors have been asked to do. It makes it easy for us to turn away from or to deny the burning anguish, grief and regret many carry. Insidiously, it also allows us to avoid asking awkward questions: Were we really justified in using violence to kill so many other human beings? Why are we so desperate to idealize those who have done the bloody, heartbreaking work of war? Who profits ― politically or financially ― from all this division and violence? What are we so damned afraid of? The 'service' euphemism has become so prevalent that it is now part of a cultural trance state that shuts down honest conversations about these and other questions. Automatically thanking a veteran for his or her service can inadvertently telegraph to those whose experiences fly in the face of our well-rehearsed storyline that we don't want to hear what really happened ― that we don't care about what they might be carrying. This not only reinforces our collective conceit that our own hands are clean, it ensures that we will not have to carry anything ourselves. Euphemism piles upon euphemism. Hiding the slaughter of war behind the innocuous word 'service' allows us to call the children James saw killed 'collateral damage.' Calling bombs 'smart bombs' and calling it 'precision bombing' when we unleash them on others allows us to conceal those children from our awareness as well as the pangs of grief in those left behind. It even allows some of us to vilify those Americans who dare dissent or protest the dropping of bombs as 'unpatriotic' or 'un-American.' When American troops are killed, we are protected, as though we are children, from any images of their charred and mangled corpses. Once more we are slathered in reassuring euphemisms. Our 'fallen heroes' and their 'brave sacrifice' are lauded by a ratings-obsessed media and politicians vowing revenge on an enemy also in thrall to the delusion that they are providing a service by killing young American men and women. If we really want to 'honor the ultimate sacrifice' our soldiers have made, if we really want to ensure that they have 'not died in vain,' we need to stop lying about war by hiding behind socially enforced rituals, platitudes and euphemisms. If we really want to help those who have survived and carry the wounds of war, we need to stop hiding from and denying war's cruel brutality. We must make sure it is safe for veterans who have been in the military during a time of war ― regardless of whether they were directly exposed to combat ― to speak for themselves and to speak the truth. And we need to listen to all of them, not just the ones whose stories make us feel good about ourselves. Note: Names and some details have been slightly altered to protect the privacy of the individuals discussed in this essay. This essay originally ran in January 2022 and is being rerun now as part of HuffPost Personal's 'Best Of' Series. Scott Janssen is a hospice social worker and writer. He has written extensively about providing trauma-informed care for patients who are terminally ill and has spoken nationally about ways to better support veterans who are nearing the end of their lives. His work has appeared in dozens of publications, including Social Work Today, Psychotherapy Networker, American Journal of Nursing, Reader's Digest, and The Washington Post. His novel Light Keepers is a visionary adventure about the transformational power of kindness and love when the world appears lost in anger, conflict, and fear.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store