Thompson School District plans public forum with 3 superintendent candidates
Thompson School District has announced three candidates to become its next superintendent and is hosting a public forum with the candidates at 6 p.m. April 29 at Thompson Valley High School in Loveland.
The three candidates are Brett Heller, superintendent of the School Town of Munster district in Indiana; Kym LeBlanc-Esparza, deputy superintendent of Colorado's Jefferson School District; and Douglas Van Zyl, an educational consultant and former superintendent of the Lakeville Area School District in Minnesota and St. Joseph School District in Missouri.
All three candidates will have on-site visits and interviews with Thompson School District officials from April 29-May 1, spokesman Michael Hausmann wrote in a news release April 17. Additional biographical information on each candidate will be posted soon on the district's website.
Marc Schaffer, Thompson School District's superintendent for the past seven years, is leaving at the end of June to become superintendent of a school district near his hometown in suburban Chicago.
The facilitated public forum, followed by a meet-and-greet session, with the candidates will be at 6 p.m. April 29 in the auditorium at Thompson Valley High School, 1669 Eagle Drive, Loveland.
More: Dozens of speakers at Thompson school board meeting divided on transgender students' rights
The three candidates were identified as the most qualified with assistance from a national search firm, McPherson & Jacobson LLC, the news release said.
'The consultants reviewed, screened and conducted extensive background checks' on 26 applicants, Hausmann wrote.
Thompson School District oversees 30 schools in southern Larimer County, including two elementary schools in Fort Collins, with total enrollment this year of 14,751, according to the Colorado Department of Education's annual count.
Reporter Kelly Lyell covers education, breaking news, some sports and other topics of interest for the Coloradoan. Contact him at kellylyell@coloradoan.com, x.com/KellyLyell, threads.net/KellyLyell and facebook.com/KellyLyell.news.
This article originally appeared on Fort Collins Coloradoan: Thompson School District offers forum with 3 superintendent candidates
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Retired Rear Admiral Who Served Under Trump Warns of Plans to Politicize Military Justice System
A top retired Navy legal official is sounding the alarm over what he sees as a growing and dangerous politicization of the military legal system and the lawyers who run it. In a public talk last week and in an interview with on Thursday, retired Rear Adm. Jim McPherson warned that the Trump administration and leaders in the Pentagon have politicized the selection process for the top lawyers in all three military branches by going around the traditional selection process and requiring nominees to answer screening questions about specific policies favored by the administration. The warning comes just months after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth fired the top lawyers for the Army and Air Force without explanation. The Navy's top lawyer had resigned shortly after the election in late 2024. McPherson's remarks seem to confirm the fears that legal experts had shortly after the firings. Read Next: Army Faces Backlash over Plan to Divert Barracks Funds to Border Mission In a lunchtime address to a group of lawyers at an American Bar Association function, McPherson, whose long career included several top civilian posts in the Pentagon during the first Trump administration, noted Hegseth's remarks to Fox News in the days after the firings. "Ultimately, we want lawyers who give sound constitutional advice and don't exist to attempt to be roadblocks to anything," Hegseth said on the cable news channel in February. Hegseth then went on to note that "traditionally" those top lawyers -- sometimes known by the abbreviation TJAG for "The Judge Advocate General" -- have "been elected by each other or chosen by each other ... small groups of insulated officers who perpetuate the status quo." "Well, guess what? That status quo hasn't worked very well at the Pentagon. It's time for fresh blood," said Hegseth, a former Fox News host. During his time serving the Pentagon in the first Trump term, McPherson held the posts of under secretary of the Army, general counsel of the Army, and the acting secretary of the Navy. In his address, McPherson pushed back on Hegseth's argument, calling it "misinformed." McPherson, who served as the Navy's judge advocate general in the early 2000s, said that military lawyers are there to "ensure the rule of law and operational environments." "Adherence to the rule of law is essential as a disciplined force for the effective and efficient application of forces and force enabler -- they're not roadblocks," he added. However, Hegseth has a long track record of disdain for lawyers and the military justice system. In his last book, the then-Fox News host and commentator wrote that "our adversaries should receive bullets, not lawyers." "If we refuse to do what is necessary, that is precisely why wars become endless," he wrote. In the same book, he also wrote that the Geneva Conventions -- international treaties governing the humane treatment of prisoners of war and civilians -- force the U.S. to fight "with one hand tied behind our back." "If our warriors are forced to follow rules arbitrarily and asked to sacrifice more lives so that international tribunals feel better about themselves, are we just better off winning our wars according to our own rules?" he mused in the book. As a Fox News host, Hegseth also took personal interest in and advocated for the release of two Army officers who were charged with war crimes -- 1st Lt. Clint Lorance and Maj. Mathew Golsteyn -- during the first Trump administration. Lorance was found guilty in a 2013 court-martial of second-degree murder, making false statements and other charges after he ordered his platoon to fire on three Afghan men on a motorcycle. Golsteyn was charged with murder after killing a suspected, unarmed Taliban bombmaker, later burning his body. Both men received presidential pardons from Trump. Hegseth also played a role in helping lessen the punishment of Navy SEAL Eddie Gallagher, who was charged with war crimes for stabbing a wounded ISIS prisoner but ultimately convicted of posing for a photograph with the corpse. "Our current secretary, as a Fox commentator, blamed the JAGs that were involved in those cases for railroading those individuals who were simply doing their job," McPherson said. Now, it appears that the selection process for the new TJAGs is being modified to give Hegseth ultimate say over who heads the lawyers for each service, and candidates are being asked political questions during their interviews. "My understanding is each of those three services has already held a board, but the guidance to that board was very different than previous boards," McPherson said, adding that "the guidance to the boards was rank order your recommendations." "In other words, don't come forward with a single name recommendation" as was done in the past, he said. From there, those groups of candidates would be interviewed by the top civilian for each service and Hegseth would interview each finalist before passing their names to the White House, McPherson said. "This departs markedly from the statutory requirement that the boards that select the TJAGs be in conformance with all other boards," said McPherson, noting that the requirement says that should be done "as far as practicable." "I'm sure that's the exception that they will use," he added. Since McPherson was relaying the information about the process through his own connections and sources, reached out to Hegseth's office for comment. They declined to comment and instead referred questions to the services. According to McPherson, Navy Secretary John Phelan has interviewed at least three finalists as part of the Trump administration vetting of the military lawyers. Amid those interviews, Phelan asked the candidates whether they agreed "with a policy regarding the mandatory inoculation for COVID and how that policy was executed" and "do you agree with the former policy regarding eligibility for transgender people to enter and remain in the service and how that policy was executed," McPherson said. McPherson called these "two highly political questions" and policies with "which the TJAG would have never been involved in." The former Navy JAG said that they were "totally inappropriate questions to ask." also reached out to Phelan's office with questions about the selection process and the vetting questions. Capt. Adam Clampitt, a spokesman for the secretary, declined to comment on the selection process and said the service wanted "to maintain the integrity of the convening board process." Clampitt flatly denied that Phelan asked the vetting questions. "That is categorically false and did not happen," he said. He did not answer follow-up questions on whether he was calling McPherson, a man who retired as a rear admiral and went on to serve as Army under secretary in the first Trump administration, a liar. For his part, McPherson was undeterred by the denial. When reached out, he said that he was standing by his remarks and the source who relayed the information to him. In an interview Thursday, McPherson also noted that what struck him about the questions was how politically charged they were even compared to his own experience in the first Trump term. "I went through a vetting process at the White House with the personnel office, and sat through an interview with three other attorneys who worked on the staff there and then the head of that office, and I was surprised that they didn't ask me political-style questions," he said. "I didn't get hot-button policy questions as a senior political appointee," McPherson said of the experience. While McPherson shares the belief of many other military legal experts that the JAGs will not be able to act as a legal bulwark, he noted that they are still a powerful voice of conscience and ethics for decision-makers in times when they may be asked to confront challenging orders. Amid the Black Lives Matter riots that gripped much of the country in the summer of 2020, Trump famously pushed for the use of National Guard troops, including employing deadly force, against protesters and made a controversial appearance at Lafayette Square outside the White House alongside then-Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Mark Milley and former Defense Secretary Mark Esper. The move was criticized by many who saw Milley's presence there as the military's endorsement of Trump's goal to use the country's troops against its own citizens. "My presence in that moment and in that environment created a perception of the military involved in domestic politics," Milley later said as part of an apology. McPherson said that there was a discussion within Army senior leadership at that time about what they would do if Trump invoked the Insurrection Act -- a law that would allow him to use troops to put down protests. "What are we prepared to do? What are we prepared to say? No, we can't do that. We actually had that conversation," McPherson said, noting that this conversation also involved Milley and Esper. "I felt confident at the time that we would do the right thing," he said. "We no longer have an Esper or Milley in charge, and that's the fear I have, quite frankly." Related: 'People Are Very Scared': Trump Administration Purge of JAG Officers Raises Legal, Ethical Fears


Associated Press
2 days ago
- Associated Press
Georgia school district considers property tax hike to pay for school officers after shooting
WINDER, Ga. (AP) — Officials in the Georgia school district where four people were killed in a September shooting at Apalachee High School are considering a property tax increase to pay for school-based police officers. Barrow County Superintendent Dallas LeDuff told school board members Tuesday that the tax increase would be necessary because county government has informed the school district that it will no longer pay for sheriff's deputies, local news outlets reported. The school district and Barrow County Commission have been splitting the price of deputies assigned as school resource officers since 2017. That number was originally 12, rose to 16 in 2024, and then to 24 after the shooting. That would place at least two officers in the district's high schools and at least one officer in every other school, although officials haven't yet been able to hire 24 deputies. County commissioners sent a letter to LeDuff last month saying county government will for now pay half only 12 salaries, and eventually stop paying any of the costs. 'What they would like to see happen is that we as a school system be responsible for funding 100% of all direct and indirect costs for all 24 officers that we are staffing now, along with future officers we might add,' LeDuff said. The superintendent said the district will cover whatever the officers cost, calling it 'nonnegotiable.' The district has been under intense local pressure since the shooting to improve security, agreeing to install weapons detectors at its high schools and middle schools this year after months of community outcry. 'Especially in light of Sept. 4, I am deeply concerned with the Board of Commissioners' underlying notion that 2,000-plus Barrow County school system employees and over 15,000 Barrow County students are no longer included in their definition of public safety,' Barrow County school board member Kayla Hendrix said. 'Perhaps we need to ask the county commissioners who qualifies under their definition of public safety.' Officials have said the believe a quick response by officers at Apalachee prevented more victims. The Sept. 4 shooting killed teachers Richard 'Ricky' Aspinwall, 39, and Cristina Irimie, 53, and students Mason Schermerhorn and Christian Angulo, both 14. Another teacher and eight more students were wounded, seven of them hit by gunfire. Colt Gray, then a 14-year-old freshman, has been indicted as an adult for murder and other crimes. Barrow County commissioners wrote in their letter that voters had approved a plan to exempt some senior citizens from paying school property taxes and that the county therefore believes it is inappropriate to use property taxes collected for county government to subsidize school expenses. 'It is imperative that Barrow County government ensure that no county general fund dollars — for which there is no senior exemption — are dedicated to areas that would otherwise be funded by school taxes and the associated millage rate,' county spokesperson Brian Stewart said. Paying the expenses for next year would cost the school district more than $1 million. The district's proposed property tax increase would cost the owner of a $100,000 property about $20 a year. The issue could come up at a county commission meeting next week. William Philip said he plans to go to that meeting to protest the decision. 'This is a serious issue. This has to do with our kids' safety,' Philip said. 'Bad politics. Horrible politics. A lot of parents can't wait to go to the commissioners meeting and see.'
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
PCA teacher running for seat on Poudre School District Board of Education
Mike Thomas, a teacher at Poudre Community Academy and former member of the Colorado Education Association's Board of Directors, is running for seat on the Poudre School District Board of Education in the November 2025 election. Thomas, 41, is running for the District D seat, representing northwest Fort Collins. Jim Brokish, who currently holds that seat, does not plan to run for reelection. Tom Griggs, who spent most of his professional career teaching teachers, and Coronda Ziegler, a student success manager at Colorado State University, have also announced their candidacy for the District D seat. Board of Education members must reside within the district they represent but are elected by all voters within the school district's boundaries. Thomas taught for 13 years at schools in Boulder, Denver and Fort Collins after getting started on his career in education in a Head Start program in the Seattle area, Thomas told the Coloradoan on May 30. His experience ranges from preschool through high school, primarily in science, mathematics, construction and welding. Thomas took a break from teaching for several years to be a stay-at-home father — he and his wife, Kristen Rasmussen, have two children — and renovate their Fort Collins home before accepting a job two years ago at Poudre Community Academy, one of two alternative high schools in Poudre School District. Concerns over the poor condition of the building that houses PCA prompted him to run for the school board, he said. Thomas waited until the school year was over to announce his candidacy, fully aware of a PSD Board of Education policy that automatically puts district employees running for seats on the school board on an unpaid extended leave of absence until the election. Were he to win the District D seat, that policy reads, Thomas would deem him 'automatically and voluntarily resigned as a District employee' upon taking the oath of office. 'I really love PCA; I don't want to leave it,' Thomas said. 'I made the decision to think about running in January, when we had to walk across the street with all of our students to use the bathroom, because our bathrooms had stopped working for the third time this year.' More: Poudre School District raising pay for teachers, classified employees One of Thomas' primary concerns, he told the Coloradoan, is ensuring the district uses money from the 2024 debt-free schools mill levy to properly maintain, repair and improve its school buildings and other facilities. He would like to help the school district explore the use of solar and geothermal energy in its facilities. Thomas would also like to see the district speed up the implementation of its new elementary school literacy curriculum through professional development opportunities for teachers and expand its use into middle and high schools. 'I'm really happy with what the district is doing at the elementary school level, which is a big change,' Thomas said. 'It has not been implemented as fully as it needs to be; professional development has not been provided as extensively as it needs to be. We need to make it happen a lot faster than what's going on right now.' In addition to serving on the Colorado Education Association's Board of Directors, Thomas said he worked on multiple political-action campaigns and helped two candidates with their races for seats on the Boulder Valley School District Board of Education while living there while his wife, now a climate scientist at CSU, completed post-doctoral work at the National Center for Atmospheric Research. Two candidates in other districts have also announced their candidacy for Board of Education seats in the November 2025 election — Sabrina Herrick in District C (northeast Fort Collins) and Andrew Spain in District E (northern and western Larimer County, including Wellington, Red Feather Lakes and Poudre Canyon). Reporter Kelly Lyell covers education, breaking news, some sports and other topics of interest for the Coloradoan. Contact him at kellylyell@ and This article originally appeared on Fort Collins Coloradoan: Mike Thomas running for seat on PSD Board of Education