An Archaeologist Found a 1 Million-Year-Old Face
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links."
Fragments of human facial bones that surfaced in northern Spain have been found to be 1.1 to 1.4 million years old, meaning that they are parts of the oldest human face in Western Europe.
The individual, now called 'Pink,' is thought to be more primitive than Homo antecessor—a hominin which lived in the area 800,000 to 900,000 years ago—and closer to Homo erectus.
Similarities between Pink and Homo erectus prompted scientists to give this new individual the name Homo 'affinis' erectus, though further research needs to be done to determine more about this face's morphology.
When a fragment of a skull emerged from a cave in northern Spain, archaeologist Rosa Huguet was almost certain it came from a human ancestor. What she didn't know at the time of the excavation was that she was coming face to face (pun intended) with the most ancient human visage in Western Europe. Huguet nicknamed the hominin 'Pink.'
The oldest faces on the European continent—which are also the most ancient outside of Africa—were unearthed in Dmanisi, Georgia, and belong to five 1.8 million-year-old skulls from a hominin group known as Homo georgicus, which is thought to be closely related to Homo erectus. When early humans arrived in the western part of Europe was less certain, until now. The cheek and upper jawbone fragments that Huguet and her team found in 2022 (and have been investigating since then) are between 1.1 and 1.4 million years old, making them the oldest human fossils in Western Europe.
'This finding enables us to not only learn about the facial morphology of early Europeans, but also increase our knowledge of the evolutionary history of our ancestors in Europe,' she said in a study recently published in Nature.
Before this discovery, the Iberian Peninsula was still the only region with any evidence of early human migration to Western Europe. The only other artifacts this ancient were a 1.1 miillion-year-old hominin jawbone (found at the same site in 2007), a slightly older tooth and finger bone from nearby, and several stone tools. But these had little to tell about human settlement and activity during the Early Pleistocene.
The next oldest human fossils are Homo antecessor bones (about 800,000 to 900,000 years old). These were also excavated from the site at which Pink was uncovered—known as Sima del Elefante—and Huguet observed that their facial morphology is much closer to that of modern humans than Pink's was. Homo antecessor shows an obvious difference in the section of bone just below the eye socket, which 'slopes down and backwards just like Homo sapiens,' as Huguet said in the study. The same part of Pink's face slopes forward, which is considered to be more primitive.
Something else that stood out about Pink was the side of the face, which was less arched than that of Homo antecessor. The upper jaw of Homo antecessor showed a bend that Pink's upper jawbone did not have. Pink also had a flatter nose and was missing a hollow area below the eye, and all these differences led Huguet to conclude that she was looking at a hominin further removed from modern humans than Homo antecessor.How did this face compare to Homo erectus and the Georgian skulls? Both of these hominins had pronounced differences from Pink on the sides of the face, with cheekbones that protruded outward more. Pink also had a narrower face than Homo erectus fossils from Africa and Asia. Despite this, it is still thought that Pink is closer to these faces than Homo antecessor, and is possibly a new hominin species that is now being called Homo 'affinis' erectus—a hominin close to Homo Erectus.
There are, literally and otherwise, many pieces missing from Pink's history. The researchers think that the hominin may fall somewhere in between Homo georgicus and Homo antecessor. It is also possible that Homo affinis erectus and Homo antecessor coexisted for a while, or that Pink's species vanished entirely before Homo antecessor appeared. Huguet plans on continuing with her research.
Either way, Pink is giving prehistoric Western Europe a new face.
You Might Also Like
The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape
The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere
Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Penguin population decline may be worse than "worst-case projections"
Emperor penguin populations in Antartica may be declining faster than the most pessimistic predictions, scientists said after analyzing satellite images of a key part of the continent. The images, spanning from 2009 to 2024, suggest a decline of 22% in the Antarctic Peninsula, Weddell Sea and Bellingshausen Sea, according to researchers from the British Antarctic Survey and University of Southampton, who published their study in Nature on Tuesday. The 16 emperor penguin colonies in that part of Antartica represent a third of the global population. The estimated decline compares to an earlier estimate of a 9.5% reduction across Antarctica as a whole between 2009 and 2018. The researchers now have to see if their assessment in that region of Antartica is true for the rest of the continent. "There's quite a bit of uncertainty in this type of work and what we've seen in this new count isn't necessarily symbolic of the rest of the continent," Dr. Peter Fretwell, the lead author of the study, said in a statement. "But if it is — that's worrying because the decline is worse than the worst-case projections we have for emperors this century." While further analysis is needed, Fretwell told Agence France-Presse the colonies studied were considered representative. Researchers know that climate change is driving the losses, but the speed of the declines is a particular cause for alarm. Warming is thinning and destabilizing the ice under the penguins' feet in their breeding grounds. In recent years some colonies have lost all their chicks because the ice has given way beneath them, plunging hatchlings into the sea before they were old enough to cope with the freezing ocean. Fretwell said the new research suggests penguin numbers have been declining since the monitoring began in 2009. That is even before global warming was having a major impact on the sea ice, which forms over open water adjacent to land in the region. But he said the culprit is still likely to be climate change, with warming driving other challenges for the penguins, such as higher rainfall or increasing encroachment from predators. "Emperor penguins are probably the most clear-cut example of where climate change is really showing its effect," Fretwell said. "There's no fishing. There's no habitat destruction. There's no pollution which is causing their populations to decline. It's just the temperatures in the ice on which they breed and live, and that's really climate change." Emperor penguins number about a quarter of a million breeding pairs, all in Antarctica, according to a 2020 study. A baby emperor penguin emerges from an egg kept warm in winter by a male, while the female in a breeding pair embarks on a two-month fishing expedition. When she returns to the colony, she feeds the hatchling by regurgitating and then both parents take turns to forage. To survive on their own, chicks must develop waterproof feathers, a process that typically starts in mid-December. The new research uses high resolution satellite imagery during the months of October and November, before the region is plunged into winter darkness. Fretwell said future research could use other types of satellite monitoring, like radar or thermal imaging, to capture populations in the darker months, as well as expand to the other colonies. He said there is hope that the penguins may go further south to colder regions in the future but added that it is not clear "how long they're going to last out there." Computer models have projected that the species will be near extinction by the end of the century if humans do not slash their planet-heating emissions. The latest study suggests the picture could be even worse. "We may have to rethink those models now with this new data," said Fretwell. But he stressed there was still time to reduce the threat to the penguins. "We've got this really depressing picture of climate change and falling populations even faster than we thought but it's not too late," he said. "We're probably going to lose a lot of emperor penguins along the way, but if people do change, and if we do reduce or turn around our climate emissions, then then we will save the emperor penguin." Australian reporter covering Los Angeles protests shot with rubber bullet by police officer LAPD chief speaks out about deployment of military forces to anti-ICE protests Can Trump deploy National Guard without governor's approval?
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
When is the next full moon? June's Strawberry Moon rises Tuesday night
Ready to see a cosmic phenomenon in the night sky? There's a full moon rising tonight, and it won't be regular. June's Strawberry Moon will be different celestial event that won't be seen again until 2043. According to it will be the lowest laying full moon seen north of the equator, as well as one of the farthest from the sun. Because the moon is near its farthest point from Earth, it'll appear slightly smaller and dimmer. The Strawberry Moon is the final full moon of the spring in the Northern Hemisphere that signals the coming of the summer solstice. Each full moon name derives from natural event occuring such as seasonal changes used by Native American, Colonial American and European sources. According to the Old Farmer's Almanac, The Strawberry Moon name comes not from its color, but from the Algonquin tribes in North America, who saw this full Moon as the signal that wild strawberries were ready for harvest. The moon will reach its peak and become full visible at 3:45 a.m. EDT on Wednesday, June 11, but the best time so see it will be as it rises on June 10, according to The moon rising occurs at different times depending on locations. Moonset in Monmouth and Ocean counties for June 10, 2025, is at 8:25 pm. All times are Eastern Daylight Time. This article originally appeared on Asbury Park Press: June 2025 full moon: How to see Strawberry Moon in New Jersey
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
For 9 Days, Earth Was Sending Out Mysterious Signals. Now We Know What They Were.
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: Strange signals coming from the Arctic in 2023 were assumed to be a seiche (trapped water with waves sloshing back and forth), but this was never confirmed. Previous instruments used to measure seismic weather phenomena were not able to pick up enough information, but NASA's SWOT satellite eventually found that the signal actually was from a seiche caused by a landslide. Reconstructions of what the weather was like during the days SWOT picked up the signal also show that it couldn't have been anything but a seiche. As fascinating as bizarre signals from other planets can be—teaching us about earthquakes on Mars or auroras in the skies of Jupiter—sometimes even weirder signals come from weather extremes happening right here on Earth. For nine days in 2023, an unknown seismic pulse was generated by the Earth every 90 seconds. It first appeared that September, vanished, and then returned in October. The signals began after a landslide triggered by a megatsunami in Dickson Fjord, Greenland, and was thought to have been produced by a seiche, or standing wave. This wave had probably been stirred up by the tsunami and then trapped by ice in the fjord—but there was no way to prove it. Satellite observations were able to document avalanches and the tsunamis they caused, and scientists collected further data in a research station. There was just one problem—the hypothesized seiche was eluding detection. It remained a mystery, even though studies at the time found seismic data that seemed to align with the sloshing motions of standing waves. So, researcher Thomas Monahan of Oxford University decided to take a closer look. Using data from the KaRIn (Ka-band Radar Interferometer) instrument on board NASA's Surface Water Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite—an international collaboration capable of high-resolution measurements that extended into Dickson fjord—Monahan and his team finally found evidence for a seiche whose waves were slowly losing intensity. 'Based on the seismic attribution, and systematic ruling out of other dynamic phenomena, we conclude that the observed variability in the SWOT data is consistent with that of a slowly decaying seiche,' the team wrote in a study recently published in Nature Communications. Seiches can occur in lakes and other enclosed (or partially enclosed) bodies of water. The tsunami unleashed in Dickson Fjord had enough strength to leave powerful winds and sudden atmospheric pressure shifts in its wake, pushing water from one end of the enclosure to the other. The water then sloshed back and forth, oscillating for anywhere from hours to days after winds ceased. Tsunamis are often seismic phenomena, and the very long period (VLP) seismic signal that came from the fjord was the aftermath of a tsunamigenic landslide. Previous attempts at recording evidence for this particular seiche had been thwarted by the limitations of satellite altimeters, which did not pick up data during extended gaps between observations. They were also not able to record the differences in the height of waves beyond the area directly under the satellite. They were, however, able to get an especially accurate read on the water below. The landslides in Dickson Fjord happened right when SWOT was transitioning to its Science phase, during which it would orbit and survey most of the planet's surface from an altitude of 890 km (553 miles) for 21 days. This orbit was purposely out of sync with the Sun to lower the chances of misidentifying signal frequencies. The researchers went through the data from every pass the satellite made over the region for the weeks in September and October and used this data to create maps of the fjord, modeling it how would have behaved during different times after the landslide and the height differences between waves (which reached up to two meters, or about 6.5 feet). Reconstructions of weather conditions ruled out all other possible causes behind the signal, and convinced scientists that it could only have been caused by a seiche. 'This study shows how we can leverage the next generation of satellite earth observation technologies to study these processes,' Monahan said in a recent press release. 'SWOT is a game changer for studying oceanic processes in regions such as fjords which previous satellites struggled to see into.' You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
