logo
B.C.'s ridings look different this federal election. Here's how that shakes things up

B.C.'s ridings look different this federal election. Here's how that shakes things up

CBC31-03-2025

As part of the once-a-decade riding redistribution process, B.C. has gained a riding for the 2025 federal election and seen many political boundaries reshaped.
The new political map is likely to change the political calculations for federal parties, with the additional riding located in the B.C. Interior, an area historically popular with the Conservatives.
And a University of B.C. political scientist says the redrawing of political boundaries in Metro Vancouver could add to the challenges faced by the federal NDP and its leader Jagmeet Singh, who has to contest in a significantly redrawn riding.
Stewart Prest says riding boundaries matter a lot in Canada's first-past-the-post electoral system, where each geographically-defined electoral district elects an MP that residents can identify.
"When you create a new riding, it creates a new seat," he said. "When you move a boundary several blocks, it can make a difference in a close riding between victory and defeat."
The riding redistribution is part of a process that is based on Canada's population growth, with riding boundaries redrawn to ensure each seat has roughly the same amount of voters across the country. Voters can search for their electoral district by postal code on the Elections Canada website.
"Take a moment to find out what riding you're in," Prest urged. "It may not be the one you're used to, but it is worth the time and to see who is running to represent you. And this is an election that matters."
Here are some of the ways that the redrawn ridings could influence the upcoming federal election.
Questions for NDP in Burnaby
The federal NDP, which is flagging in the polls, has all of its Metro Vancouver seats located in the Burnaby and Tri-Cities area — a region that has seen some significant changes with the redrawing of political boundaries.
Of particular significance is NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh, who won the last two elections from Burnaby South, but is now contesting from the Burnaby Central seat.
Burnaby South has been broken up, with the southern portion of it in Vancouver Fraserview-South Burnaby and Burnaby Central taking portions of what was the Burnaby North-Seymour riding.
Prest says the NDP faces an uphill battle to even hold onto historical safe seats like Vancouver East in the current political climate, and the redrawing adds new wrinkles.
"Mr. Singh, well, he has built some political machine in Burnaby," he said. "He is having to somewhat shift that focus given ... Burnaby South has been redistricted as a central Burnaby riding.
"That means Mr. Singh has an additional local challenge in addition to his national challenge."
Redrawn Vancouver ridings
In Metro Vancouver, the Liberals have a high-profile candidate running in former Vancouver mayor Gregor Robertson.
Robertson will contest the newly redrawn riding of Vancouver Fraserview—South Burnaby, which features much of the old riding of Vancouver South and also includes an adjoining area in Burnaby.
Prest says Robertson will not have deep linkages to the Burnaby portion of the riding, which means he'll have to convince voters there that he's the right choice.
"I think it suggests an area where he's going to have to work in a different way to build up the same kind of rapport that he enjoys with Vancouverites," he said.
New riding could benefit Tories
In the Interior, where a new seat for Vernon—Lake Country—Monashee has been added and numerous district boundaries have been reshaped in response to population growth, Prest says the Tories are most likely to benefit.
"It is part of the province where Conservatives, both provincial and federal, do very well," the political scientist said.
"I would say on its face, it does give the Conservatives a chance to pick up the new seat, and perhaps even to pick up a couple of other seats."
Prest notes, however, that while the Tories may benefit in the Interior, the redrawn ridings in the Lower Mainland will be a different kind of battle — as parties try to present a form of change that also incorporates high levels of Canadian patriotism.
"Those other districts that are in the Lower Mainland, where the ridings are more marked by a kind of urban demographic and an urban sensibility, there is going to be, I think, a harder test for [the Conservatives]," he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Justice Department's early moves on voting and elections signal a shift from its traditional role
Justice Department's early moves on voting and elections signal a shift from its traditional role

Toronto Star

time7 hours ago

  • Toronto Star

Justice Department's early moves on voting and elections signal a shift from its traditional role

ATLANTA (AP) — In North Carolina, it was a lawsuit over the state's voter registration records. In Arizona and Wisconsin, it was a letter to state election officials warning of potential administrative violations. And in Colorado, it was a demand for election records going back to 2020. Those actions in recent weeks by the U.S. Department of Justice's voting section may seem focused on the technical machinery of how elections are run but signal deeper changes when combined with the departures of career attorneys and decisions to drop various voting rights cases. They represent a shift away from the division's traditional role of protecting access to the ballot box. Instead, the actions address concerns that have been raised by a host of conservative activists following years of false claims surrounding elections in the U.S. Some voting rights and election experts also note that by targeting certain states — presidential battlegrounds or those controlled by Democrats — the moves could be foreshadowing an expanded role for the department in future elections. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW David Becker, a former department attorney who worked on voting rights cases and now leads the Center for Election Innovation & Research, said the Justice Department's moves represent a departure from focusing on major violations of federal law. 'This would be like the police department prioritizing jaywalking over murder investigations,' he said. A Justice Department spokesperson responded with 'no comment' to an emailed request for more information about the actions, including whether similar ones had been taken in any other states. Actions come amid major changes at the DOJ Conservatives for years have called for an overhaul at the Justice Department in both personnel and priorities. President Donald Trump also has criticized how elections are run, falsely blaming his 2020 loss on widespread fraud. Earlier this year, he signed an executive order seeking a sweeping overhaul of election operations — an authority the Constitution grants to the states and Congress. After his win last November, Trump installed key allies at the Justice Department, including Attorney General Pam Bondi, who has made similar claims about the 2020 election. Multiple reviews in the presidential battleground states affirmed Democrat Joe Biden's win in 2020, Trump and his allies lost dozens of lawsuits, and even Trump's attorney general at the time said there was no evidence of widespread fraud. Justin Levitt, a former deputy assistant attorney general in the department's civil rights division, said most of the DOJ's actions appeared reasonable and focused on issues that had already been raised by conservative activists in those states. They also are the type that would be expected from a conservative administration, he said, with the exception of the Colorado request. He called that 'well out of bounds.' ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW 'This administration has prioritized grievance, even perceived grievance when there is no basis in fact,' said Levitt, who also served as a senior policy adviser in the Biden administration. 'And it's dismaying, but not surprising, that the civil rights division would do the same.' Department wants records related to the 2020 election The department's request to Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, a Democrat, asked for all records relating to last year's presidential election. Federal law requires those to be kept for 22 months. In the request, the department stated it had received a complaint alleging that Griswold's office was not in compliance with federal law relating to voter registration. The request also directs Griswold to preserve any records of the 2020 election that might still be in the state's possession. Griswold, in an interview, called the request a 'fishing expedition' and said her office responded by providing state voting files. 'I'm not even sure they know what they are looking for,' Griswold said. 'They can request all the data they want, and it's not going to prove anything.' North Carolina elections have been a particular target for Republicans In North Carolina, where Republican lawmakers recently wrested control of the state election board from the Democratic governor, Justice Department lawyers filed a lawsuit accusing state election officials of failing to ensure that all voter records include identifying information, such as a driver's license. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon, who oversees the civil rights division, said in a statement announcing the lawsuit that accurate voter rolls are critical to ensuring elections are conducted 'fairly, accurately, and without fraud.' The previous board had acknowledged the issue and updated the state's voter registration form. The new board leadership has vowed to address it. Skeptical of the motives In Wisconsin, which Trump won in 2016 and 2024 but lost in 2020, department lawyers recently sent a letter to the state election commission accusing it of not providing a complaint process for those raising concerns. This comes as Republican state lawmakers are pushing legislation to expand the ability to appeal decisions made by the six-member commission, which is equally divided between Republicans and Democrats. Republican lawmakers have long complained about commission decisions they perceive as benefiting Democrats. The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, a law firm that frequently defends Republicans on election issues, supports both efforts, said Lucas Vebber, the firm's deputy counsel. 'It's ensuring that Wisconsinites are entitled to have their complaints heard and adjudicated,' he said. 'As something as important as our elections, it's vital to ensure that process is transparent and available to everyone.' ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Rep. Lee Snodgrass, a Democrat on the Wisconsin Legislature's elections committee, said state law needs some tightening around how election complaints are handled, but she's dubious about the motives of the Trump administration and conservative activists in the state. They are looking for ways 'to cast doubt on election integrity, so if they don't get the results they want they can cry foul,' Snodgrass said. Concerns about future actions In Arizona, DOJ lawyers said the state was not clearly telling voter registration applicants to provide a driver's license if they have one and asked the state to conduct a review to identify any noncitizens. Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, a Democrat, responded by saying Arizona requires those registering to vote in state and local elections to provide proof of citizenship and conducts checks using the state's motor vehicle records. In Oregon, Justice Department lawyers weighed in on an ongoing lawsuit filed by the conservative group Judicial Watch. It alleges the state has failed to comply with federal laws on maintaining voter lists and making these records available for public inspection. John Powers, a former Justice Department attorney who now serves as legal director for the Advancement Project, said he was concerned about the moves coupled with the Justice Department's staff departures and its withdrawal from voting rights cases. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Powers said he hoped, with midterm elections next year, that the department would not pursue minor technical issues in a way that could undermine public confidence in elections. 'I would be lying if I said I wasn't concerned about what the future might hold,' he said. ___ Bauer reported from Madison, Wisconsin.

Justice Department's early moves on voting and elections signal a shift from its traditional role
Justice Department's early moves on voting and elections signal a shift from its traditional role

Winnipeg Free Press

time8 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Justice Department's early moves on voting and elections signal a shift from its traditional role

ATLANTA (AP) — In North Carolina, it was a lawsuit over the state's voter registration records. In Arizona and Wisconsin, it was a letter to state election officials warning of potential administrative violations. And in Colorado, it was a demand for election records going back to 2020. Those actions in recent weeks by the U.S. Department of Justice's voting section may seem focused on the technical machinery of how elections are run but signal deeper changes when combined with the departures of career attorneys and decisions to drop various voting rights cases. They represent a shift away from the division's traditional role of protecting access to the ballot box. Instead, the actions address concerns that have been raised by a host of conservative activists following years of false claims surrounding elections in the U.S. Some voting rights and election experts also note that by targeting certain states — presidential battlegrounds or those controlled by Democrats — the moves could be foreshadowing an expanded role for the department in future elections. David Becker, a former department attorney who worked on voting rights cases and now leads the Center for Election Innovation & Research, said the Justice Department's moves represent a departure from focusing on major violations of federal law. 'This would be like the police department prioritizing jaywalking over murder investigations,' he said. A Justice Department spokesperson responded with 'no comment' to an emailed request for more information about the actions, including whether similar ones had been taken in any other states. Actions come amid major changes at the DOJ Conservatives for years have called for an overhaul at the Justice Department in both personnel and priorities. President Donald Trump also has criticized how elections are run, falsely blaming his 2020 loss on widespread fraud. Earlier this year, he signed an executive order seeking a sweeping overhaul of election operations — an authority the Constitution grants to the states and Congress. After his win last November, Trump installed key allies at the Justice Department, including Attorney General Pam Bondi, who has made similar claims about the 2020 election. Multiple reviews in the presidential battleground states affirmed Democrat Joe Biden's win in 2020, Trump and his allies lost dozens of lawsuits, and even Trump's attorney general at the time said there was no evidence of widespread fraud. Justin Levitt, a former deputy assistant attorney general in the department's civil rights division, said most of the DOJ's actions appeared reasonable and focused on issues that had already been raised by conservative activists in those states. They also are the type that would be expected from a conservative administration, he said, with the exception of the Colorado request. He called that 'well out of bounds.' 'This administration has prioritized grievance, even perceived grievance when there is no basis in fact,' said Levitt, who also served as a senior policy adviser in the Biden administration. 'And it's dismaying, but not surprising, that the civil rights division would do the same.' Department wants records related to the 2020 election The department's request to Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, a Democrat, asked for all records relating to last year's presidential election. Federal law requires those to be kept for 22 months. In the request, the department stated it had received a complaint alleging that Griswold's office was not in compliance with federal law relating to voter registration. The request also directs Griswold to preserve any records of the 2020 election that might still be in the state's possession. Griswold, in an interview, called the request a 'fishing expedition' and said her office responded by providing state voting files. 'I'm not even sure they know what they are looking for,' Griswold said. 'They can request all the data they want, and it's not going to prove anything.' North Carolina elections have been a particular target for Republicans In North Carolina, where Republican lawmakers recently wrested control of the state election board from the Democratic governor, Justice Department lawyers filed a lawsuit accusing state election officials of failing to ensure that all voter records include identifying information, such as a driver's license. Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon, who oversees the civil rights division, said in a statement announcing the lawsuit that accurate voter rolls are critical to ensuring elections are conducted 'fairly, accurately, and without fraud.' The previous board had acknowledged the issue and updated the state's voter registration form. The new board leadership has vowed to address it. Skeptical of the motives In Wisconsin, which Trump won in 2016 and 2024 but lost in 2020, department lawyers recently sent a letter to the state election commission accusing it of not providing a complaint process for those raising concerns. This comes as Republican state lawmakers are pushing legislation to expand the ability to appeal decisions made by the six-member commission, which is equally divided between Republicans and Democrats. Republican lawmakers have long complained about commission decisions they perceive as benefiting Democrats. The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, a law firm that frequently defends Republicans on election issues, supports both efforts, said Lucas Vebber, the firm's deputy counsel. 'It's ensuring that Wisconsinites are entitled to have their complaints heard and adjudicated,' he said. 'As something as important as our elections, it's vital to ensure that process is transparent and available to everyone.' Rep. Lee Snodgrass, a Democrat on the Wisconsin Legislature's elections committee, said state law needs some tightening around how election complaints are handled, but she's dubious about the motives of the Trump administration and conservative activists in the state. They are looking for ways 'to cast doubt on election integrity, so if they don't get the results they want they can cry foul,' Snodgrass said. Concerns about future actions In Arizona, DOJ lawyers said the state was not clearly telling voter registration applicants to provide a driver's license if they have one and asked the state to conduct a review to identify any noncitizens. Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, a Democrat, responded by saying Arizona requires those registering to vote in state and local elections to provide proof of citizenship and conducts checks using the state's motor vehicle records. In Oregon, Justice Department lawyers weighed in on an ongoing lawsuit filed by the conservative group Judicial Watch. It alleges the state has failed to comply with federal laws on maintaining voter lists and making these records available for public inspection. John Powers, a former Justice Department attorney who now serves as legal director for the Advancement Project, said he was concerned about the moves coupled with the Justice Department's staff departures and its withdrawal from voting rights cases. Powers said he hoped, with midterm elections next year, that the department would not pursue minor technical issues in a way that could undermine public confidence in elections. 'I would be lying if I said I wasn't concerned about what the future might hold,' he said. ___ Bauer reported from Madison, Wisconsin.

Tony Abbott: How Anglosphere conservatives can thrive in the age of Trump
Tony Abbott: How Anglosphere conservatives can thrive in the age of Trump

National Post

time10 hours ago

  • National Post

Tony Abbott: How Anglosphere conservatives can thrive in the age of Trump

Article content As a consequence of the Trump tariff wars, Canada's conservative opposition leader went from being 20 points ahead in the polls to a narrow loss in April's election. And Australia's conservative opposition leader went from being competitive in the polls to a massive defeat last month. Despite Pierre Poilievre's fierce repudiation of the insults against Canada, and despite Peter Dutton's insistence that he would prevent U.S. tariffs against Australia, voters saw both as guilty by association. Donald Trump was a right-winger, many voters' reasoning ran; Poilievre and Dutton were right-wingers, therefore both were somehow 'mini-Trumps' who might be just as erratic should they gain office. Naturally, the Liberals in Canada, and Labor in Australia, revelled in attacking their 'Trump-like' opponents. Article content Conservative leaders' best response to the president's 'America first,' verging on 'everyone else last,' foreign policy is to declare that their first duty, likewise, is to their own country. After all, seeing one's own country as a 'shining city on a hill' and even as 'the last best hope of mankind,' to use Ronald Reagan's rhetoric, is the hallmark of conservative leaders. A deep patriotism is at the heart of all conservative thinking. Article content Article content A key difference between this president and his predecessors is that his love of America does not so readily extend to an embrace of America's like-minded allies; or to using American soft and hard power to extend American values throughout the world. Loyalty, sentiment, high-mindedness, and a 'love that pays the price' count for little with a transactional administration, even though it's America's readiness, up till now, to keep the world safe for democracy that's made it so widely admired. Article content A smart move by conservatives would be to push for much deeper cooperation between the other members of the Anglosphere. After all, Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand (the CANZUK countries) are all members of the Five Eyes security partnership and are all now members of the Trans-Pacific Partnership free trade deal. If America's security guarantees are weakening, there's a strong argument for Britain, supported by Canada and Australia, to step up; especially if the wider world is to continue to reflect the long Anglo-American ascendancy rather than a new Chinese one. And there's every reason to think that the current centre-left British, Canadian and Australian governments would be amenable to working more closely together on global issues if Trump's America is starting to go missing. Article content Article content It was always a mistake to see Reagan-Thatcher conservatism as exclusively, or even mainly, economic. Those two conservative titans respected freer markets as the best means of securing individual prosperity and national strength, not as ends in themselves. They supported smaller government and greater freedom because it's strong citizens rather than a nanny state that creates the best society. They saw love of country, a commitment to excellence, and personal responsibility as the key to a strong social fabric; much more so than 'equalizing' taxes and over-generous, incentive-sapping social welfare. Their record was freer trade with like-minded democracies, rather than with geo-political rivals; and of boosting local industry via robust competition and domestic deregulation rather than government subsidy. Article content Whether it's Trump Derangement Syndrome or the almost equally prevalent Trump Fascination Syndrome, the U.S. president's out-sized political personality is denying oxygen to everyone and everything that's not referencing him. Because America matters, and because the president has so much sway over what America does, the wild ride will continue. But what counts, in the end, is less what someone else does, that's up to him; and more what we do, that's up to us. Conservatives should respectfully dissent from any rogue actions by the current administration, while remembering that there will be a new one within four years. Donald Trump is just one manifestation of American conservatism, not the embodiment of it. And in the meantime, conservative leaders should get on with devising a credible policy agenda for their own countries and relentlessly making the case for change with their own voters. Article content

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store