Senate advances its version of grain indemnity updates
Grain bins on a farm near Prairie City, Iowa. (Photo by Kathie Obradovich/Iowa Capital Dispatch)
Iowa senators voted Monday to increase the floor and ceiling of the fund that pays Iowa farmers in the event that their grain buyer goes broke.
Sen. Mike Zimmer, D-DeWitt, called the bill a 'much needed improvement' to the current grain indemnity policy.
'What makes me most anxious about it is that with every day tariffs coming on, every day our markets are being closed for our farmers and their commodities,' Zimmer said. 'The ability for our grain elevators to store this grain while they continue to look for other markets is very, very important.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Senate File 608 would increase the minimum of the grain indemnity fund to $5 million and the maximum to $12 million. This is an increase from the current parameters, which are set at $3 million and $8 million, though it is not as great an increase as a bill proposed in the Iowa House of Representatives. The House bill would increase the fund's range to $8 million and $16 million.
SF 608 would also include 'grain purchased under credit-sale contract' under the definition of 'purchased grain' meaning grain purchased on a credit sale would be eligible for the same indemnity protections.
The House version of the bill would also include credit-sale contracts, but would reimburse those contracts at a rate of 70% of the grain purchased.
Sen. Kerry Gruenhagen, R-Walcott, added a minor clarifying amendment to the bill, which passed.
The bill advances after a vote of 39-8.
House File 508 has yet to be debated on the House floor.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
Jeffries says Trump ‘intentionally' inflaming unrest in Los Angeles
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) is hammering President Trump over the clashes in Los Angeles, saying the president is purposefully escalating tensions to distract the country from a volatile economy. Speaking to reporters in the Capitol, Jeffries railed against Trump's aggressive deportation policies and defended the rights of Americans to protest such government actions — if it's done peacefully. He accused Trump of 'fanning flames and inciting things on the ground' to distract from a domestic policy agenda that Jeffries has dubbed 'a failure.' 'Donald Trump is clearly trying to distract from the fact that he has a failed administration,' Jeffries said. The Democratic leader also dismissed Trump's argument that, by intervening in the L.A. immigration protests, he's simply bringing law and order to a city where local officials have failed to do so. Jeffries noted that Trump, for hours, had declined to intervene on Jan. 6, 2021, when a mob of his supporters attacked law enforcers at the U.S. Capitol in an effort to block the certification of Trump's election defeat a few months earlier. In January, Trump pardoned roughly 1,500 of the rioters — a move that, according to Jeffries, gives Trump and his supporters 'zero credibility' to claim the mantle of law and order. 'Donald Trump wasn't a leader on Jan. 6. He didn't send the National Guard to stop the violent mob that was brutally beating police officers in plain view for every single American to see,' Jeffries said. 'And this guy, who likely withheld the National Guard — he certainly didn't send them forward — is lecturing the country about law and order?' 'Give me a break. We're not feeling you — particularly as it relates to this issue,' he continued. 'Donald Trump and all of these minions who support him — the sycophants, the extremists — have zero credibility on this issue. Republicans have become the party of lawlessness and disorder.' Amid the unrest in L.A., Trump over the weekend activated members of the National Guard, drawing criticisms from California officials — notably Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) — who said local law enforcement agencies are sufficiently equipped to handle the situation without the involvement of federal troops. Newsom announced Monday that he is suing the administration over the federal intervention. 'This is a manufactured crisis,' Newsom posted on X. 'He is creating fear and terror to take over a state militia and violate the U.S. constitution.' Jeffries is standing squarely behind Newsom and L.A. Mayor Karen Bass (D), a former member of the House, who have both argued that local and state law enforcers in California have the faculties and manpower to protect both First Amendment rights and public safety. 'The LAPD, the L.A. Sheriff's Department, other local law enforcement, and the California Highway Patrol, seem to have the capacity to make sure that the situation is addressed — that peaceful protests are allowed to occur, and that law-breakers are held accountable,' Jeffries said.
E&E News
12 minutes ago
- E&E News
Trump admin advances power plant pollution rollbacks
The Trump administration is poised to release the first two rules in a high-stakes series of proposed Clean Air Act rollbacks that aim to dismantle Biden-era controls on power sector pollution. The proposed rules would loosen restrictions on the fossil fuel-fired power sector with 'repeals' of stricter hazardous air pollutant limits and climate standards that required fossil fuel plants to invest in carbon capture. A government tracking website showed the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs completed a review Friday. Groups that had scheduled meetings on the climate rule for this week reported having them canceled. Advertisement Both drafts could now be issued within days for public comment. On a related front, a House subcommittee has a Wednesday hearing scheduled to scrutinize Clean Air Act regulations.
Bloomberg
13 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Johnson Urges Senate to Minimize Changes to $40,000 SALT Deal
House Speaker Mike Johnson said he's pressuring Senate Republicans to refrain from changing a deal to increase the state and local tax deduction cap to $40,000, pushing back on President Donald Trump's willingness to scale back the write-off. 'I've asked them to modify it as little as possible because I've got a very delicate balance there,' Johnson told reporters at the White House on Monday.
