‘The difference is incredible' rave fans of new Protein Works £50 greens powder slashed to £34.99
YOU can boost your wellness routine with Protein Works' newest greens powder and save some money in the process.
For a limited time, Protein Works has slashed £15 off the All In A.I. Greens powder in the brand's sale.
"All In" A.I. Greens, £34.99 (was £49.99)
A 30-day All In A.I. Greens supply normally costs £49.99 but is currently slashed to £34.99, and you won't need a discount code to redeem the savings.
The All In A.I. Greens formula is designed to give you all the daily essential nutrients you need while on the go and includes 172 health benefits in a single serving.
The plant-based A.I. Greens is available in two flavours: original and summer berries, and is perfect for those with busy, active lifestyles who want to stay healthy without the fuss.
The blend of 27 greens, botanicals, and seven adaptogens works hard to keep you healthy from the inside out, while the probiotics help boost your gut health and overall wellness.
Protein Works customers have praised the new supplement online, with one person sharing, "This gives you so much energy; it's incredible!
"I've been trying loads of supplements for years now to help my energy levels.
"I've been taking this product for about a week, and I can honestly say the difference is incredible.
"My skin is already starting to clear up, my gut is far less problematic, and my energy levels are off the charts!"
My skin is already starting to clear up, my gut is far less problematic, and my energy levels are off the charts
Protein Works customer
Another shared: "It's early days, but so far, I'm really pleased with this product.
"The taste takes a bit of getting used to, but I've definitely noticed I have more energy and seem to find it easier to get stuff done."
A third person said: "I've been taking this for about a week now, and I can really start to feel the difference. I feel so much more focused and alert all day.
newsletter and join the WhatsApp group.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
15 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The world's gone topsy turvy as the GREENS become voice of reason (!) on super - as a rift festers between two of Australia's most powerful men: PVO
Who would have thought that the Greens could become the voice of reason in the current superannuation tax debate? But with negotiations between the Labor government and the opposition breaking down before they even started - courtesy of the intransigence of Treasurer Jim Chalmers - it is the Greens who have indicted a willingness to try and compromise to find common ground. Labor's starting position is that it hopes to tax super holdings above $3m at a 30 per cent rate, including unrealised gains. So earnings on balances over that sum will get taxed, as will the super assets themselves if they rise in value - even if you don't sell them. That is the taxing of paper profits - the clear worst design feature in what Labor is proposing to do. The Greens want the threshold lowered to $2m instead of $3m. But unlike Labor they are open to both indexing the rate at which the tax will be applied and discussing at least a partial removal of taxing unrealised gains. The Greens have expressed concerns at illiquid assets (think property) being taxed, because people aren't able to sell down their holdings to pay such a tax. If the Greens come to realise that you can't differentiate between liquid (think cash, shares) and illiquid assets when it comes to apply an unrealised gains tax, then we are in business. A reasonable compromise might be possible. That leaves the Greens still at the negotiating table but, at this stage at least, not the Labor party. Why? Because the Treasurer just doesn't get it. Chalmers simply can't get his non-economist head around the deficiencies of the policy as it currently stands. Even though the Greens can. What does that say about this Labor government? While some people won't like the idea that a 30 per cent tax on super earning can start to apply from a $2m threshold rather than a $3m one, that's hardly unreasonable in the world of most Australians. Especially if it is indexed, as Greens have expressed a willingness to embrace. Given the tax rates working-age income earners pay, 30 per cent on earnings on super assets above $2m isn't exactly a socialism panacea of a policy. With an ageing population it's part of the tough medicine the budget needs, especially if governments keep spending money they don't have rather than embarking on root and branch budget repairs. The opposition appears to be fundamentally opposed to lowering the threshold from $3m to $2m, but it's hard not to think that's an example of them being in the pocket of wealthy Australians who have for too long used their super balances as a means of legal tax avoidance. If Labor was more reasonable it would see opportunity in the Greens coming to the negotiation table. It might have little choice - despite Chalmers' refusal to accept a compromise - because without the support of the Greens or the opposition there is next to no chance of the super tax hikes passing the senate. Even after Albo's embrace of defecting Greens senator Dorinda Cox, who has been welcomed into the Labor fold despite the PM previously chastising Senator Fatima Payman for walking away from Labor after she was elected at the 2022 election. In Albo's myopic world view it's wrong for an elected Labor senator to do that - she should have resigned her seat according to the PM - but it's absolutely fine for a Green senator to do the same if it benefits the Labor Party. Yes it's contradictory and hypocritical, but don't let such inconsistencies prevent you from accepting Albo's explanation that it's reasonable and fine. The weird thing is Labor get little value from the defection. It doesn't chance the fact that the Greens control the senate balance of power. It doesn't make the passage of the super laws, without compromise, any easier. And there are a host of other downsides to accepting Cox into Labor's ranks, including her past anti-Labor rhetoric and accusations of bullying the PM says have been resolved but others aren't so certain about. With the Greens breaking from tradition and extending the hand of compromise to Labor, Albo now has a choice: stand by his stubborn treasurer who doesn't want to compromise the existing poor drafting of the super bills. Or overrule his subordinate and come to the table to negotiate an outcome that delivers more revenue without the design flaws currently being picked apart by experts. It could be a pivotal moment in the relationship between the PM and his Treasurer. It seems likely the opposition will use the new super taxes as a wedge political issue come the next election. If Labor sticks to its guns and somehow gets the laws past in their current format anyway, by using its election mandate to force others to acquiesce, the Opposition will have significant ammunition. If a genuine compromise with the Greens does happen, we've already seem senior opposition frontbenchers in the media attacking the 'Labor Greens Coalition', in the hope that doing so takes some shine off of the new government. This recent development has energised the PM to return to the negotiation table with the Coalition, defying the hopes and dreams of his treasurer. We now know Chalmers doesn't at all see eye-to-eye with Albo when it comes to compromising with the Coalition. Animosity between the pair will only rise if a deal gets done, brokered by a PM without the support of his minister responsible for super and tax. There is always tension between treasurers and prime ministers. It happened between Bob Hawke and Paul Keating, as well as between John Howard and Peter Costello. But when a PM and Treasurer put stakes in the ground the way Albo and Chalmers have, which way the ensuing discussions go will certainly leave one of the pair diminished. Let's wait to see who that is.
The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
AFL's Tasmania expansion on a knife edge amid state political uncertainty
The AFL's expansion into Tasmania is on a knife edge as the state's politicians consider a move to oust premier Jeremy Rockliff, which would trigger a shake up and potentially torpedo the Devils' plans to join the league. The Devils on Wednesday said the political uncertainty was cause for 'great concern' and presented 'a serious risk … for the future of Tasmania Football Club'. The club, which has already attracted 210,000 members, is due to enter the competition in 2028 under an agreement with the AFL, and move into the newly complete venue on the Hobart waterfront the following year. One of the conditions set by the AFL for a new team in Tasmania was a roofed stadium, but the expensive project – set to cost around $1bn – faces opposition from some in Tasmania, who instead have called for the money to be spent elsewhere. The Greens have declared they support a motion of no-confidence in the premier put forward by Labor's opposition leader Dean Winter. In Parliament on Wednesday morning, Greens leader Dr Rosalie Woodruff called for the motion to explicitly mention the government's handling of the stadium. But Winter responded by saying he would not support the amendment, and the no-confidence motion was focused on the state of the budget. In a dramatic day in Hobart, Devils' head of corporate affairs Kath McCann was emotional at a press conference as she described there is no 'plan B' to renegotiate the deal with the AFL. 'It'd be fair to say that the level of uncertainty would be significantly heightened, and in fact, some of those scenarios don't beg thinking about for the club here today,' McCann said, via the ABC. 'The optics nationally and internationally are really negative for Tasmania, what this looks like is uncertainly, a risk to invest and a state that isn't unified.' The Devils had earlier taken the unusual step of offering a public statement amidst the political uncertainty. 'We ask that our political leaders understand the implications of their actions and decisions on the future of our state for all Tasmanians, a future which we know Tasmania Football Club can play a significant part,' it said. On Tuesday in Melbourne, AFL chief executive Andrew Dillon said the competition had already been planning for the weekly bye for one team that would come with entry of the Devils as 19th team, and anticipated the stadium's enabling legislation would be discussed in the lower house later this month and the upper house early in July. 'The Tasmanian government and [Devils CEO] Brendon Gale and the Tassie Devils have done a power of work and we're really confident in 2028,' he said.
The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
Labor's no-confidence motion to oust Tasmanian premier Jeremy Rockliff set to succeed
A no-confidence motion in the Tasmanian premier appears likely to succeed on Wednesday. Jeremy Rockliff has been under increasing pressure over his handling of the state's budget, Bass Strait ferry delays, a plan to sell assets and a new stadium. The Labor opposition on Wednesday moved a no-confidence motion in the Liberal premier, after a day earlier threatening to if it could find the numbers. The motion will be debated on Wednesday. The independents Craig Garland and Kristie Johnston and Jacqui Lambie Network MP Andrew Jenner have indicated they will support the motion. The Greens, who have five MPs, voiced their support for the no-confidence motion on Wednesday morning, meaning it has the numbers to pass. 'The deals the premier struck for minority government after the last election have collapsed,' the Labor leader, Dean Winter, told parliament. 'Three independent members of the crossbench have lost confidence in the premier. '(This is) due to his financial mismanagement, his appalling handling of the Spirit of Tasmania project, and his plan to privatise Tasmania's most precious assets.' If a no-confidence motion against Rockliff is successful, convention dictates he resign. In a social media post, Rockliff said a successful no-confidence motion would force Tasmania back to the polls. 'An election just over 12 months since the last one,' he said. 'That's the last thing Tasmania needs. That's the last thing Tasmanians want.' The Liberals, who have been in power since 2014, are governing in minority with just 14 of 35 seats in the lower house. Last week's 2025-26 budget predicted debt would more than double to $10.8bn in four years' time, with deficits each year. The Greens leader, Rosalie Woodruff, said the premier had brought the no-confidence motion on himself. 'Poll after poll have made it abundantly clear that Tasmanians do not, will not, support a new stadium at Macquarie Point in Hobart,' she said. The stadium, which is supported by Labor, is a condition of the Tasmania Devils entering the AFL in 2028.
