Why some animals become fossils while others vanish without a trace
For centuries, we have marveled at the prints left by animals who existed thousands of years ago. But one enduring mystery remains: why do some animals leave behind beautifully preserved remains, while others vanish without a trace?
Scientists at the
University of Lausanne
(UNIL) have taken on this question head-on.
Their groundbreaking research offers new insights into why certain creatures become fossils, and others simply disappear.
Unlocking the secrets of
fossilization
At the outset, the scientists explain that the fossils are not limited to bones. In some extraordinary cases, they can even preserve muscles, skin, and even traces of internal organs. But this process is not guaranteed, and the event is rather quite selective.
Farid Saleh, a Swiss National Science Foundation Ambizione Fellow at UNIL, and his team discovered that the internal chemistry of a carcass plays a pivotal role in whether it fossilizes. During
decomposition
, the remains of some animals can cause sharp drops in oxygen levels in the surrounding sediment.
'This means that, in nature, two animals buried side by side could have vastly different fates as fossils, simply because of differences in size or body chemistry,' explained lead researcher Nora Corthésy.
Chemistry of decay
The research team observed that proteins tend to break down faster than lipids, which in turn accelerates oxygen consumption near the decaying body. This local depletion of oxygen can limit further breakdown and encourage the growth of bacteria that don't rely on oxygen.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
35 & Earning? Protect Your Family with ₹1 Cr Life Cover
ICICI Pru Life Insurance Plan
Get Quote
Undo
This shift sets up the perfect conditions for fossilization. As these bacteria work, the chemical environment around the body changes, allowing durable minerals, like pyrite or calcium phosphate, to replace soft tissues in fine detail.
'A large, protein-rich animal can slip into this state more easily, leading to a better chance of fossilization,' the scientists noted.
In contrast, smaller animals or those with less protein may not trigger such changes in the surrounding environment and are more likely to decay completely.
The bias of the
fossil record
This helps explain why many fossil beds feature certain animals, like arthropods, while others, such as soft-bodied worms, are absent. The absence may not reflect extinction or rarity, but simply a failure to fossilize.
Implications for
paleontology
'Understanding how size and body chemistry influence fossilization changes how paleontologists interpret ancient ecosystems,' said Corthésy. 'It helps separate the absence of fossils due to true extinction from those missing due to poor preservation.'
The creatures we'll never know
The sobering reality is that many animals may have lived and died without leaving any physical trace. Their bodies decomposed so quickly, or failed to create the chemical conditions needed for preservation, that they were wiped clean from the geological record.
In this sense, the fossil record is less of a comprehensive archive and more of a highly selective snapshot. 'Animals with soft bodies and low protein content, such as some early worms, may have existed in abundance, but we'll likely never find their remains,' the researchers explained.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
What is China really doing in space? Mysterious satellite maneuver stuns experts
China's activities in space have recently taken a quiet but significant turn, which might be a sign of a major evolution in how we think about satellite operations. In today's world, technology, sustainability, and national security are intertwined with one another. Such missions seem to explore the possibilities far above Earth. Recent movements by China in geostationary orbit are being closely watched by the space community, which has posted the observations on its official X handle. On January 6, 2025, a Long March 3B rocket launched from Xichang carried Shijian‑25 into geostationary transfer orbit. Built by Shanghai Academy of Spaceflight Technology (SAST), it's officially tasked with 'satellite fuel replenishment and life extension service technology verification,' reported Shijian-21 was launched in October 2021 on a Long March 3B rocket. Its mission was to dock with an old, no longer working satellite called Beidou-2 G2 and move it to a safe, out-of-the-way orbit above the regular geostationary satellites. This 'graveyard orbit' helps keep space clear and prevents collisions with active satellites. Both these Chinese satellites made a close approach in June Ground‑based tracking by S2A Systems detected Shijian‑21 and ‑25 converging in GEO during mid‑June. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 4BHK+Family Lounge+Utility room at 4.49Cr (All Incl)* ATS Triumph, Gurgaon Book Now Undo On June 14, they were 'virtually unresolvable from the other,' indicating a close rendezvous, which is likely expected to be a docking test, as reported by Observations also noted earlier manoeuvres on June 13 and 14, and an expected rendezvous around June 11 based on their orbital trajectories. How can this test be useful? Refuelling and servicing satellites in GEO could drastically extend their service life, reduce space debris, and lower launch demands. Shijian‑25 was intended to rendezvous with Shijian‑21 because they are in a phased orbit, which means sharing orbital elements but staggered in longitude, which can result in lowering the fuel needed for proximity operations. Although this mission is described as a civilian technology test, the close movements of the satellites have raised some concerns. According to COMSPOC OPS on social media, two US satellites, called USA 270 and USA 271, are nearby, probably keeping an eye on the Chinese satellites. COMSPOC explained, 'USA 270 and 271 now flank SJ-21 and SJ-25 from the east and west—potentially enabling favorable sun angles depending on the timing of closest approach. ' According to COMSPOC, the ongoing activity between China's Shijian-21 and Shijian-25 satellites is unfolding in a particularly busy and sensitive area of geostationary orbit (GEO). COMSPOC also stated clearly, 'While these U.S. assets aren't directly involved, their proximity adds complexity to the local SSA picture — and raises strategic awareness concerns.' In other words, even if there's no direct interaction, just being close in such a critical orbital region makes the dynamics more complicated and potentially riskier.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Are we living inside a black hole? NASA's James Webb findings stun scientists
A latest discovery by NASA 's James Webb Space Telescope has reignited one of the most astonishing theories in modern physics: the possibility that our entire universe exists inside a giant black hole. After closely analysing hundreds of ancient galaxies, researchers observed something deeply puzzling. A majority of them appear to spin in the same direction, which contradicts long-standing beliefs about the universe's early formation. This unusual finding is forcing scientists to question the very structure and origin of the cosmos. It could reshape our understanding of space, time, and reality itself. While more evidence is needed, the idea that our universe could exist inside a black hole is no longer confined to science fiction. James Webb Telescope observes rotating galaxies hinting black hole theories Using its incredibly sensitive instruments, the James Webb Space Telescope studied 263 ancient galaxies, some dating back to just 300 million years after the Big Bang . These galaxies are among the oldest and farthest we have ever observed. Surprisingly, about 60% of them appear to rotate in the same direction, mostly clockwise. This finding contradicts the previously accepted belief that galaxy spin directions should be random, especially across such vast stretches of space. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Das entspannendste Farmspiel. Keine Installation Taonga Jetzt spielen Undo Galaxy spin pattern challenges chaos theory, hints at hidden order In the standard model of the universe, galaxies are thought to have formed from chaotic matter distributed randomly after the Big Bang. So their spin directions, clockwise or counter-clockwise, should also be random. But the James Webb findings suggest otherwise. If a large number of galaxies are rotating in a coordinated way, it hints at some sort of underlying order or force that influenced them early in the universe's history. This unexpected uniformity has led scientists to revisit some radical ideas, including one that proposes we might be living inside a black hole. What does it mean to live inside a black hole This idea might sound like science fiction, but it is based on real physics. A black hole is a region of space where gravity is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape. At its core is a point called a singularity, surrounded by a boundary called the event horizon. Some physicists propose that if a massive star collapsed in a certain way, it could create a black hole that forms an entirely new, enclosed space, possibly a whole universe. In this theory, our own universe could be what is inside the event horizon of a much larger black hole that exists in another "parent" universe. Why are scientists taking this seriously now The synchronised spinning of galaxies seen by James Webb hints at large-scale patterns or forces that are hard to explain with current models. If the early universe was influenced by the properties of a black hole, such as its rotation or shape, it might explain why so many galaxies today still spin the same way. The idea of a universe inside a black hole also helps solve other puzzles, like why the universe appears so uniform and why space-time seems to behave the way it does. What are the limitations of this theory Of course, not everyone is convinced. Some experts suggest that what we are seeing could be due to observational bias. In other words, how we interpret distant light might be skewed by effects like the Doppler shift or the limits of our telescopes. The researchers themselves admit that more data and deeper analysis are needed before drawing firm conclusions. But even if the "black hole universe" idea turns out to be wrong, this discovery still opens exciting new doors in our understanding of space. What can be happen next Scientists will continue to observe more galaxies across various regions of the sky to see if the pattern holds. If similar spin alignments are found elsewhere, it could point to a universal force or condition that existed in the very earliest moments after the Big Bang. Theorists are revisiting their models, trying to fit this new piece into the cosmic puzzle. At first glance, these kinds of discoveries might seem abstract, far removed from everyday life. But they get to the heart of a deeper question: What is the universe, really? And how did we get here? By exploring ideas like a "black hole universe," we are not just studying space. We are learning about our own cosmic origins, our place in the grand scheme of things, and perhaps even what lies beyond.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Does creatine cause hair loss? Let's separate myths from science
So, you're taking creatine, or thinking about it, and somewhere along the way, someone casually drops, 'Dude, it'll make your hair fall out.' Cue the panic. You imagined gains in the gym—not shedding your hairline at 25. But does creatine actually cause hair loss, or is this just another fitness myth that refuses to die? Let's break it down—no jargon, no fear mongering, just what science actually says. Before we tackle the hair situation, let's recap what creatine even is. It's a natural compound found in your muscles, made from three amino acids: arginine, glycine, and methionine. Your body makes it on its own, and you also get small amounts from foods like red meat and fish. When you take it as a supplement (usually creatine monohydrate), it helps your muscles produce more energy during high-intensity workouts. That means better performance, more reps, faster recovery—and eventually, more muscle. It's one of the most studied and trusted sports supplements out there. But now, onto the million-dollar question… Where did the hair loss rumor start? The whole 'creatine causes hair loss' debate traces back to one small study from 2009. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trade Bitcoin & Ethereum – No Wallet Needed! IC Markets Start Now Undo In this study, 20 college-aged rugby players took creatine daily for three weeks. Researchers noticed that their DHT levels increased—DHT being short for dihydrotestosterone, a hormone derived from testosterone. And here's the twist: DHT is often blamed for male pattern baldness. Sounds like an open-and-shut case, right? Not quite. The study did not measure hair loss at all. They didn't count hair strands, examine hairlines, or ask participants if their shampoo routine had changed. They just measured hormone levels in the blood. What's DHT, and why do people freak out about it? Let's talk about DHT for a second, because it's at the center of this whole mess. DHT is a powerful androgen, meaning it plays a role in things like sex drive, muscle growth… and unfortunately, hair follicle shrinkage in genetically susceptible people. That's the key phrase: genetically susceptible. So, even if DHT levels rise slightly, not everyone is going to experience hair loss. In fact, tons of guys with high DHT keep thick heads of hair well into old age. It's not just about the hormone—it's also about how sensitive your hair follicles are to it. What has science said since 2009? Since that 2009 study, there's been a lot of discussion—but not a lot of new hard evidence. Most follow-up research on creatine focuses on athletic performance, brain health, and even post-injury recovery. Very few have looked into hair loss specifically. Here's what's important: no major study has ever proven that creatine directly causes hair loss. That 2009 study showed a potential link—not cause and effect. And many experts believe the rise in DHT might not be strong or sustained enough to cause actual follicle damage, especially in people not genetically prone to hair loss. In fact, many people take creatine for years without seeing a single hair fall out unnaturally. On Reddit, in gyms, and in real life, the hair loss horror stories are largely anecdotal. For every guy saying, 'creatine wrecked my hair,' there's another who says, 'I've been on it for years, and my hair's fine.' If you're still worried, what can you do? Okay, let's say you're still anxious. You want those gym gains but not at the cost of your luscious locks. Fair. First, assess your genetics. If baldness runs strong in your family and you're already noticing a receding hairline, DHT might be worth monitoring—whether you're taking creatine or not. Second, you can try using creatine in cycles instead of daily long-term use. Some people do this to give their body a break (though this isn't strictly necessary for performance). Third, consider talking to a dermatologist. If hair loss is a concern, they can check hormone levels, scalp health, and even suggest treatments like minoxidil (Rogaine) or finasteride, which actually blocks DHT. And finally, keep in mind the type of creatine matters too. Stick to creatine monohydrate—it's the most researched, safest, and cheapest form. Avoid sketchy blends or unregulated 'testosterone boosters' that might have more hormonal side effects than creatine ever will. At the end of the day, fitness and health are about choices. If a tiny risk of hair loss freaks you out more than skipping creatine's muscle-building magic, that's your call. But if you're chasing gains and doing everything right—hydration, sleep, recovery—creatine can absolutely be part of your journey. The content in this article is intended for informational and educational purposes only and should not be considered a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult your physician or a qualified healthcare provider before starting any diet, supplement, fitness, or health program. One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change
