Misinformation being ‘whipped up' over immigration cases
Misinformation is being 'whipped up' over asylum and immigration cases in relation to international human rights law, the Government's top legal adviser has said.
Lord Richard Hermer KC warned there is a 'real job on misinformation' around Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), the right to private and family life, in how it is applied to immigration cases in the UK.
Giving evidence to Parliament's Joint Committee on Human Rights on Wednesday, the Attorney General said: 'There is clearly a lot of information, misinformation, that is being whipped up in the context of asylum and immigration in particular, Article 8.
'Many of you will have heard banded around the idea that the courts have allowed a foreign national offender to stay here because his child will miss chicken McNuggets.
'That is doing the rounds.
'What is not doing the rounds is that that case went to the Upper Tribunal, who categorically rejected that as an Article 8 argument.
'They rejected the claim.'
He added: 'Courts are always going to make mistakes.
'That's why we have appeal courts, and that's what's happened here.'
The senior lawyer however said it was 'entirely right' for the Home Secretary to conduct a review on the use of Article 8 in migration cases in the UK.
Yvette Cooper confirmed on Monday the review will be particularly focusing on cases where ministers have disagreed with the conclusions reached in the courts.
Several deportation attempts have been halted by how the ECHR clause has been interpreted in UK law.
Lord Hermer said there has been a 'rise' in the number of decisions reported at First Tier immigration tribunals on the basis of Article 8 that are 'capable of suggesting that it is not being applied properly or appropriately'.
He told the committee: 'I want to make clear in all my comments about decisions of any court that I am categorically not criticising judges.
'I think there is real merit in checking that Article 8 is being properly understood and applied, because, as I've said, you can have a very, very robust but fair process in asylum and immigration context that is entirely compatible with Article 8.'
He added there needs to be checks on the 'right calibration' of casework decisions and also that the Government is being robust in appealing against decisions.
'Completely understand that people are concerned, so are we,' he said.
'We are determined to ensure that the immigration asylum system is as robust, efficient and fair as it can be, and you can do an awful lot that is compatible.
'All of this I should stress will be within Article 8.'
Elsewhere, the Attorney General was quizzed by MPs and peers on how he ensures the Government receives impartial advice on questions of human rights law after a 'long career at the bar'.
It comes after Lord Hermer faced questions about how his previous work, including representing former Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams, could result in possible conflicts of interest in his Government work.
But he replied: 'Well, I think the short answer is that's by doing the best I can.'
'It's absolutely essential that governments of whatever colour receive objective, legal advice.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
41 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Carney to Fast-Track ‘Nation-Building' Projects Through Bill
Prime Minister Mark Carney announced legislation on Friday to fast-track 'nation-building' projects in Canada and remove internal barriers to trade in an effort to shore up the country's economy from the US tariff barrage. The bill that aims to build 'one Canadian economy' targets projects that may include ports, railways, highways, critical-mineral mines, oil pipelines and electricity transmission systems. The government's overall goal is to speed up approvals to two years.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Britain's biggest steelmaker warns it faces Trump tariffs hit
The Indian owner of the Port Talbot steelworks has warned that a carve-out from Donald Trump's tariffs is 'critical' to its business. Tata Steel's UK operations are at risk of falling foul of American import tariffs even if a pending agreement between London and Washington is formalised, because of a reliance on steel made in India and elsewhere. This is because of American demands that UK steel products can only be exempt from tariffs if they used metal that was 'melted and poured' domestically. Ministers are trying to secure an exemption for Tata, which is Britain's largest steel producer, but the business otherwise faces being hit by Mr Trump's 50pc tariffs on foreign steel. The company closed the last blast furnaces at Port Talbot, south Wales, last year and is currently in the process of building an electric arc furnace at the site, which will recycle domestically-sourced scrap metal. In the meantime, Tata has resorted to importing steel melted in India and Europe for processing into products that are then shipped onwards to America. The temporary measures mean the company risks running afoul of Mr Trump's 50pc tariffs on foreign steel, which are currently scheduled to be imposed on the UK from July 9. British steel products already face tariffs of 25pc, like those from much of the rest of the world, but the trade deal in principle struck by Mr Trump and Sir Keir Starmer would see the tax rate fall to zero. However, despite four weeks of talks, the deal has yet to be implemented. When Mr Trump imposed 50pc steel tariffs on the rest of the world, he gave Britain a reprieve until July 9 – and negotiators are now racing to conclude something before then. Even this poses a problem for Tata, as the deal's framework stipulates that steel products sent from the UK to the US must use steel that was 'melted and poured' domestically to qualify for tariff relief. The Government is seeking to obtain a temporary carve-out for Tata and has reportedly said it is confident of success, but the warning from Tata signalled nervousness within the company on Friday. It is understood that being hit by 50pc tariffs would force Tata to either try to pass some costs on to customers or absorb them itself. If it could not absorb them, production cuts may have to be considered. Rajesh Nair, the chief executive of Tata Steel UK, said: 'Tata Steel UK will need to import steel substrate until Electric Arc Furnace steelmaking is operational in Port Talbot from late 2027 onwards. 'It is therefore critical for our business that melted and poured in the UK is not a requirement to access the steel quotas in any future trade deal. 'Even though we are not currently melting steel in the UK, we remain the largest steel producer in the country and our mills continue to transform imported steel coil and slab into high-value, specialist products which are not available from US producers and are therefore essential to our US customers. 'We urge the Government to secure a deal as soon as possible, and we would be happy to provide the US government with any needed assurances on the provenance and processing of the steel we supply.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Britain ‘faces up to £30bn of tax rises' to hit Nato defence target
Britain faces tax rises of up to £30bn in the autumn Budget to fund greater defence spending, economists have warned. Analysts said higher taxes looked inevitable as without them Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, would struggle to meet promises to increase defence spending while still meeting her self-imposed fiscal rules. Sir Keir has pledged that the UK will spend 3pc of GDP on defence by the next parliament and Nato is expected to demand even higher commitments later this year. Michael Saunders, of consultancy Oxford Economics, said the Prime Minister was likely to ramp up spending gradually over this parliament to make the 3pc and above target easier to meet in future. Mr Saunders said: 'To establish a more credible path to defence spending 'considerably north of 3pc' next decade, the Government may decide in the autumn Budget that it needs to add some extra spending within the five-year OBR forecast horizon. It's not hard to see pressures for extra fiscal tightening of £15bn to £30bn.' Nato is expected to require members to lift defence spending to 3.5 pc of GDP in the coming years. The military alliance is likely to set a new increased target at its June summit, piling additional costs on to the Chancellor. Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary general, recently said: 'We know that the 2pc pledge – agreed way back in 2014 – just doesn't cut it any more. So in 2025, we are finalising a plan to dramatically increase defence spending across the Alliance.' The demand for additional defence spending comes as Ms Reeves is already under pressure as a result of the recent about-turn on winter fuel payments for pensions and adverse moves in financial markets. Labour pledged not to increase income tax, National Insurance or VAT in its election manifesto last year. However, Mr Saunders and other economists warned that the Chancellor might have to break one or more of these promises as spending commitments mounted. Mr Saunders said: 'The need to raise revenues may require the Government to revisit its manifesto commitments, which seemed to rule out increases in most major taxes.' Earlier this week, the Chancellor repeatedly refused to rule out further tax rises. 'I'm not going to say that I'm not going to take any tax measures in the next four years,' she told an audience of business leaders at the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) annual dinner. It follows record increases of £40bn in last year's autumn Budget. Ms Reeves has promised not to repeat a raid on this scale. The Chancellor left herself a margin of £9.9bn to meet her fiscal rules, a wafer-thin buffer that forced her to rip up spending plans in the spring to repair her budget. Ms Reeves also has to grapple with mounting costs from the Government's pledge to restore winter fuel payments and review the two-child benefit cap. There are also concerns that a downgrade to the UK's economic growth by the OBR and increased government borrowing costs caused by rising gilt yields could wipe out Ms Reeves's narrow fiscal headroom. The Treasury was contacted for comment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
